User talk:APK/Archive 31

Archive 25

←

Archive 29

Archive 30

Archive 31

Archive 32

Emma Young

You stalkin' me? Because it's wo-o-o-orking, to quote David Malki.

Did you ever get here in your local ramblings? It was on the news last night - seems it's been designated a minor basilica. No skin off my nose, except that it was once the only church in a three-block radius that was open during an afternoon rainstorm, so I ducked inside to dry off. I've always had a fondness for it as a result. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 17:13, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

I'm always lurking... If it's not on the NRHP then I probably never photographed or visited the church. APK whisper in my ear 19:25, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

It might be - I suspect it is, as a part of the Alexandria Historic District. Long years ago I found a list of sites for that, but let it slip through my fingers, and have no idea where to find it again.

Been battling the wilds of Metro today, for pleasure, not work - we had ourselves another derailment on the Red Line this morning. No major injuries, but it's screwed tomorrow's commute to hell for a bunch of people. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 02:44, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Yeah I saw that on the news. #Back2Good APK whisper in my ear 03:22, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

I'm so glad I work out in the suburbs now. You have no idea. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 05:15, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Reverted edits on largest school districts

I definitely understand your reasoning for reverting my edits but that's a really long list of school to update at the same time. How about creating a list that includes a "year" column instead of the"students in 2010" or "change from 2008". It seems a lot better than what was put up there before.--SeminoleNation (talk) 15:27, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

That might work. The reason I reverted is because when I first came across that page, it was a mess. The numbers were constantly changed despite the year staying the same, so I've been waiting for new data to update the entire page. I might have found some updated stats. (I guess 2014 is better than nothing) I'm finding it difficult to find what I'm looking for from this page full of random info, but I think that's the most updated year available. I'll look again when I get home. APK whisper in my ear 19:27, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

2014 seems okay! I looked at that same NCES page. It looks like I found more updated information by going to their specific websites and pulling up their annual reports. I'm sure 2014 would be a good starting point for that page because it really is a mess. Let me know if you need any help.--SeminoleNation (talk) 00:38, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Stewart's Castle

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Stewart's Castle you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of KJP1 -- KJP1 (talk) 21:01, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

Hi, unfortunately, I'm hitting a problem with the online sources. I obviously don't have access to the books but I thought the clippings would enable me to do enough through the online sources. However, ever time I try, I get this,

"Server Too Busy - The Chronicling America server is currently too busy to serve your request. Please try your request again shortly."

That, combined with the fact that the Washington Post is subscription, is making any sort of source check impossible. Any ideas? KJP1 (talk) 21:00, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Stewart's Castle

The article Stewart's Castle you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Stewart's Castle for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of KJP1 -- KJP1 (talk) 08:41, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Edit

Why did you change my edit? I just added some photos of embassies and removed some that weren't up to date. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aaaaanass (talk • contribs) 11:15, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

You removed photos of embassies without explanation. APK whisper in my ear 21:05, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Two years ago ...

local history
... you were recipient no. 835 of Precious, a prize of QAI!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:21, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Three years now! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:13, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

... and four ... --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:26, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

... and five! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:17, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

... now six --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:44, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Julian Scott 1897 painting, In The Court Of Larrick's Tavern.

My name is Jason and I am looking for source material on the Julian Scott painting. Specifically, where did you obtain the information that it existed and where might I be able to find the original or at least a copy. You reference it on the page you created for The Historic Larrick's Tavern. If you do not know where it is located can you at least let me know where you got the information. Thank you.

Proposed deletion of File:William Jarvis Picture th.jpg

The file File:William Jarvis Picture th.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

2019 US Banknote Contest

	US Banknote Contest
	November-December 2019
There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties of United States banknotes, yet only a fraction of these are represented on Wikimedia Commons in the form of 2D scans. Additionally, Colonial America, the Confederate States, the Republic of Texas, multiple states and territories, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons. In the months of November and December, WikiProject Numismatics will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the 2019 US Banknote Contest. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on all Wikimedia projects. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive awards. Whether you want to claim the Gold Wiki or you just want to have fun, all are invited to participate. If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions here

Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk)

Proposed deletion of File:Salem Street c 1910.gif

The file File:Salem Street c 1910.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Feedback on Washington D.C. related article

I've written an article about The Wharf and I tried to keep the article similar to articles about other attractions around the country, such as Navy Pier, Fisherman's Wharf, etc. Since I've declaired COI as a paid editor, I wanted to seek your feedback on the draft and it's tone. Any feedback or support you could provide will be appreciated. You can find the draft at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:The_Wharf_(Washington,_D.C.). Thanks for the help. SBCornelius (talk) 15:14, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

I'll try to take a look at it when I'm doing with my current project, thanks. APK whisper in my ear 20:01, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

@SBCornelius: I copy edited the intro. Please take a look at how I formatted the references and try to do that for the remainder of the article. You'll probably be reusing some of the references cited in the lede. If so, just add for example <ref name=wtop1/> if that's the case. (minus the nowiki markup I've added here) Check out WP:CITE for additional info. APK whisper in my ear 20:06, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Old Korean Legation Museum

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Old Korean Legation Museum you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MSG17 -- MSG17 (talk) 02:02, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

No rush, thank you. APK whisper in my ear 03:38, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

Washington, Virginia, edits by NYTTEND on 8 March 2020

Dear APK. Thank you for notifying me that NYTTEND has not been active for a few months. If you read my message to him, you can understand how disturbed I am that NYTTEND deleted an article I wrote about Washington, Virginia. I suppose I should wait for NYTTEND to respond to me. But if he/she doesn't, what do you suggest I do? The present version of the Wikipedia page on Washington, Virginia, is unreferenced, inaccurate, and incomplete.Harriswoodville (talk) 20:31, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

Nyttend is a good, long-term Wikipedian and nothing he does is out of malice. I'm not sure why the changes were made other than Nyttend saying it read as promotional. If there is promotional language, then it seems to be minor. I've reverted to your version. I need to go through and look at any helpful edits that were made in the last few months. I'm busy today so give me some time. APK whisper in my ear 20:42, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

@Harriswoodville: I noticed you removed the demographics section. It was using 2000 Census info so yes, that's very outdated, but articles on US populated places should include some type of stats on its residents. See if you can find the info from the 2010 census. APK whisper in my ear 20:46, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

I added links to Wikipedia articles in the intro. Please go through the article and do the same for the first mention of these topics, like I did here. APK whisper in my ear 20:51, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

I am so very grateful to you for restoring my original article. I am a new creator of Wikipedia pages, and it took me HOURS to create the Washington, Virginia, article that NYTTEND deleted. With regard to population statistics, the town has a population of only about 125 people, which is shown in the boxed information on the right of the first page (2010 data and 2018 estimates). A statistician has told me that it would be statistically inappropriate to break this small number into subcategories, particularly since the population is only an estimate to begin with. As you suggest, I will go though the article and add links to Wikipedia articles. Again, many thanks.Harriswoodville (talk) 20:32, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Old Korean Legation Museum

The article Old Korean Legation Museum you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Old Korean Legation Museum for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MSG17 -- MSG17 (talk) 03:02, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

Thank you very much MSG17. APK whisper in my ear 03:16, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Metropolitan Community Church of Washington, D.C.

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Metropolitan Community Church of Washington, D.C. you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Whiteguru -- Whiteguru (talk) 06:22, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Metropolitan Community Church of Washington, D.C.

The article Metropolitan Community Church of Washington, D.C. you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Metropolitan Community Church of Washington, D.C. for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Whiteguru -- Whiteguru (talk) 00:21, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

@Whiteguru: thanks so much for doing this. I'll look over your notes tomorrow and get started on the suggestions. APK whisper in my ear 02:57, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Metropolitan Community Church of Washington, D.C.

The article Metropolitan Community Church of Washington, D.C. you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Metropolitan Community Church of Washington, D.C. for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Whiteguru -- Whiteguru (talk) 23:21, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

Thank you very much. APK whisper in my ear 03:57, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

Some overdue thanks

		The Original Barnstar
		I just saw your additions to Grant Road Historic District. Very nice job. I just moved out of the neighborhood and have thought for a while that that article deserves better. Going back a while, I referenced a number of the articles you expanded, particularly Dupont Circle Fountain, when writing my first GA, Peter Muhlenberg Memorial. Currently working on some articles about 20th century Maine newspaper publishers, but one of these days, I'm gonna get Tenley Campus up to GA status! Cheers! Rockhead126 (talk) 21:27, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

@Rockhead126: Thank you and I'm glad someone appreciates the article. I finally remembered to head up to Tenleytown the other weekend and take some photos. It really is a beautiful historic district. Nice work on Peter Muhlenberg Memorial. :-) APK whisper in my ear 03:24, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Treaty Oak (Washington, D.C.)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Treaty Oak (Washington, D.C.) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 04:21, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for reviewing it. APK whisper in my ear 04:22, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Treaty Oak (Washington, D.C.)

The article Treaty Oak (Washington, D.C.) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Treaty Oak (Washington, D.C.) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 19:41, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Treaty Oak (Washington, D.C.)

The article Treaty Oak (Washington, D.C.) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Treaty Oak (Washington, D.C.) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 21:01, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Thanks so much. I nominated it last night and that was definitely the fastest GA process I've experienced. APK whisper in my ear 23:53, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sixteenth Street Historic District

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sixteenth Street Historic District you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gerald Waldo Luis -- Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 11:01, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

@Gerald Waldo Luis: Thanks for reviewing. APK whisper in my ear 04:50, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sixteenth Street Historic District

The article Sixteenth Street Historic District you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Sixteenth Street Historic District for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gerald Waldo Luis -- Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 13:21, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:39, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Oak Lawn (Washington, D.C.)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Oak Lawn (Washington, D.C.) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of REDMAN 2019 -- REDMAN 2019 (talk) 13:21, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Oak Lawn (Washington, D.C.)

The article Oak Lawn (Washington, D.C.) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Oak Lawn (Washington, D.C.) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of REDMAN 2019 -- REDMAN 2019 (talk) 12:41, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Oak Lawn (Washington, D.C.)

The article Oak Lawn (Washington, D.C.) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Oak Lawn (Washington, D.C.) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of REDMAN 2019 -- REDMAN 2019 (talk) 12:21, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago

Awesome

Ten years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:42, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

Thanks. APK whisper in my ear 18:02, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

Fixed your talk page archiving

Hi! I took the liberty of fixing the auto-archiving settings at the top of this page. --rchard2scout (talk) 09:10, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Thank you very much. APK whisper in my ear 04:25, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Demonet Building

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Demonet Building you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Epicgenius -- Epicgenius (talk) 17:22, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Codman Carriage House and Stable

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Codman Carriage House and Stable you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kieran207 -- Kieran207 (talk) 23:01, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Codman Carriage House and Stable

The article Codman Carriage House and Stable you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Codman Carriage House and Stable for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kieran207 -- Kieran207 (talk) 00:01, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Crystal Heights

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Crystal Heights you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 13:21, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Demonet Building

The article Demonet Building you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Demonet Building for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Epicgenius -- Epicgenius (talk) 19:41, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Crystal Heights

The article Crystal Heights you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Crystal Heights for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 20:21, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Demonet Building

The article Demonet Building you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Demonet Building for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Epicgenius -- Epicgenius (talk) 18:01, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Crystal Heights

The article Crystal Heights you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Crystal Heights for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 15:02, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Embassy of Albania, Washington, D.C. for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Embassy of Albania, Washington, D.C. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Embassy of Albania, Washington, D.C. until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Dan arndt (talk) 01:47, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mount Vernon Triangle Historic District

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mount Vernon Triangle Historic District you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of JackFromReedsburg -- JackFromReedsburg (talk) 00:41, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mount Vernon Triangle Historic District

The article Mount Vernon Triangle Historic District you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Mount Vernon Triangle Historic District for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of JackFromReedsburg -- JackFromReedsburg (talk) 02:01, 31 March 2021 (UTC)