Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samizdata: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
*'''Keep'''. Very noteworthy blog. --[[User:Daniel11|Daniel11]] 01:47, 20 November 2005 (UTC) |
*'''Keep'''. Very noteworthy blog. --[[User:Daniel11|Daniel11]] 01:47, 20 November 2005 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' per CapitalistRoadster. These blog nomiations seem to suggest a need for some sort of blog policy guidelines. [[User:Jacqui M|<font color="#663366">Jacqui</font>]][[User_talk:Jacqui M|<sup>★</sup>]] 19:20, 20 November 2005 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' per CapitalistRoadster. These blog nomiations seem to suggest a need for some sort of blog policy guidelines. [[User:Jacqui M|<font color="#663366">Jacqui</font>]][[User_talk:Jacqui M|<sup>★</sup>]] 19:20, 20 November 2005 (UTC) |
||
*'''Merge''' to [[Samizdat]]. Failing consensus to do that, '''delete'''. Mentioned in the gaurdian, which has had some good coverage of blogs. However, in general blogs fail [[WP:V]] and [[WP:CITE]], this looks to be no excpetion. Doesn't need to have it's own article. - [[User:Aaron Brenneman|< |
*'''Merge''' to [[Samizdat]]. Failing consensus to do that, '''delete'''. Mentioned in the gaurdian, which has had some good coverage of blogs. However, in general blogs fail [[WP:V]] and [[WP:CITE]], this looks to be no excpetion. Doesn't need to have it's own article. - [[User:Aaron Brenneman|<span style="color:#2f4f4f;">brenneman</span>]][[User Talk:Aaron Brenneman|<sup style="color:#2f4f4f;">(t)</sup>]][[Special:Contributions/Aaron Brenneman|<sup style="color:#2f4f4f;">(c)</sup>]] 02:44, 23 November 2005 (UTC) |
||
*'''Comment''' I'm aware that this is probably useless, based upon the string of pure "votes" above, but oh well... '''''This is not a vote.''''' Unless you have some evidence of something's notability, please don't simply say "keep, notable". Provide some links, citations in major media, references in popular culture, arguments as to why you think it's notable, anything. Even if it is just "like foo said above". Otherwise what your simply saying is "keep because I've heard of it." A closer with a tiny bit of [[chutzpa]] would have a good argument for discounting any such opinion. [[User:Aaron Brenneman|< |
*'''Comment''' I'm aware that this is probably useless, based upon the string of pure "votes" above, but oh well... '''''This is not a vote.''''' Unless you have some evidence of something's notability, please don't simply say "keep, notable". Provide some links, citations in major media, references in popular culture, arguments as to why you think it's notable, anything. Even if it is just "like foo said above". Otherwise what your simply saying is "keep because I've heard of it." A closer with a tiny bit of [[chutzpa]] would have a good argument for discounting any such opinion. [[User:Aaron Brenneman|<span style="color:#2f4f4f;">brenneman</span>]][[User Talk:Aaron Brenneman|<sup style="color:#2f4f4f;">(t)</sup>]][[Special:Contributions/Aaron Brenneman|<sup style="color:#2f4f4f;">(c)</sup>]] 02:44, 23 November 2005 (UTC) |
||
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''</div> |
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''</div> |