Jump to content

Talk:Roanoke Colony: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 11: Line 11:
{{afd-merged-from|Lost Colony DNA Project|Lost Colony DNA Project|11:30, 5 February 2014 (UTC)}}
{{afd-merged-from|Lost Colony DNA Project|Lost Colony DNA Project|11:30, 5 February 2014 (UTC)}}
{{archives|banner=yes}}
{{archives|banner=yes}}

== Dawson book ==
Scott Dawson has a new book <s>coming out</s>, claiming that the colony was never lost: its members simply assimiliated with the Croatoan tribe and lived happily ever after.[https://www.pilotonline.com/news/vp-nw-not-lost-20200817-qgmblubzt5dyjm3jrcop25ssoq-story.html] I'm posting the info here in case someone wants to use it: I'm unlikely to try to do so myself. Added: I see this is same book mentioned in previous talk entry. The book does sound like it has some new data. [[Special:Contributions/2602:24A:DE47:BB20:50DE:F402:42A6:A17D|2602:24A:DE47:BB20:50DE:F402:42A6:A17D]] ([[User talk:2602:24A:DE47:BB20:50DE:F402:42A6:A17D|talk]]) 04:15, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

The statement, "The Roanoke settlers were massacred" is a bit troubling. What if we instead stated, "The Roanoke invaders were defended against and repelled." ? <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/66.41.236.23|66.41.236.23]] ([[User talk:66.41.236.23#top|talk]]) 17:13, 26 October 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


== Confusing wording ==
== Confusing wording ==

Revision as of 05:46, 1 April 2022

Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 11, 2019Peer reviewNot reviewed
On this day...Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on August 18, 2004, August 18, 2007, August 18, 2008, August 18, 2011, August 18, 2015, August 18, 2017, and August 18, 2020.

Template:Vital article

Confusing wording

Casual reader here. I read through the 'voyage' section under 'Lane colony' but I can't quite figure out who was at Puerto Rico, who was at the Outer Banks, and when. Maybe it is obvious to someone more familiar with the subject than I, but I think it could use a tidy up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SDavies (talkcontribs) 10:06, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Citation style

I propose switching the citation style to Sfn notes, which allow for citing different pages of the same work in separate citations, eliminating the need for the 'rp' template. I think the rp template, especially combined with the AMA style, makes the article hard to read, with unusual small parenthetical numbers between the regular footnotes and prose. UpdateNerd (talk) 11:41, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]