Talk:Otto Heinrich Warburg: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
JohnDoe0007 (talk | contribs) reply to Alterrabe, thanks to contributors |
Agathoclea (talk | contribs) m Tagged for WP:BIOGRAPHY. |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject Biography|living=yes|class=Start|importance=}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Germany|class=Start|importance=Mid}} |
|||
This article is pretty POV. I'm gonna remove POV comments pending citation. [[User:Turlington|Turly-burly]] 09:48, 9 July 2006 (UTC) |
This article is pretty POV. I'm gonna remove POV comments pending citation. [[User:Turlington|Turly-burly]] 09:48, 9 July 2006 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 13:56, 14 February 2007
Biography Start‑class | |||||||
|
Germany Start‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||
|
This article is pretty POV. I'm gonna remove POV comments pending citation. Turly-burly 09:48, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
Otto Heinrich Warburg was an extremely interesting scientist, whose work, I am convinced, is not yet properly appreciated. As I have been able to, I've been adding to this article.
Eventually, I see his page as consisting of the following sections, or some variant thereof:
- 1 His origins
- 2 His education & service in the First World War
- 3 His scientific endeavors (with subsections)
- in cell physiology
- in cancer research
- scientists he mentored
- scientists with whom he collaborated
- scientists who enlarged on his discoveries
- 4 Warburg as a person
- 5 The honors he received.
- 6 An overall evaluation of his work
- 7 Works by Warburg and their import
- 8 Works about Warburg and perhaps critiques of them.
How long this will take, I do not know; other wikipedians are most welcome to add their input.$ --Alterrabe 16:21, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- I'm with you there...I've been slowly adding to this page (mostly anonymously before I created an account) since it was in infancy. I was so surprised/disappointed upon checking this article for a bit more info after reading about Warburg...it was so small...If I remember correctly, the first time I checked there wasn't even an article. Glad to see it's gotten to where it is and I hope (and will do what I can to make sure) it gets to the complexity you're talking about. Warburg really has done some great work that everyone should be aware of. Thanks to everyone who's contributed. --JohnDoe0007 09:02, 14 February 2007 (UTC)