Ukraine v. Russian Federation (2017): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary Tag: Reverted |
|||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
== Judgment == |
== Judgment == |
||
Yáll stupid, hearings began on Ukraine's application for preventive measures, which lasted until March 9.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/03/06/ukraine-sues-russia-international-court-justiceforfinancing/|title=Ukraine sues Russia in International Court of Justice for 'financing terrorism'|last=Oliphant|first=Roland|date=2017-03-06|work=The Telegraph|access-date=2019-11-08|language=en-GB|issn=0307-1235|archive-date=2019-11-08|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191108172304/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/03/06/ukraine-sues-russia-international-court-justiceforfinancing/|url-status=live}}</ref> Preventive measures will allow the Court to prevent the deterioration of the situation and to protect the civilian population for the length of time necessary to hear the case. Consideration of the merits of the claim will continue regardless of the Court's ruling on the request for the application of preventive measures. |
|||
On April 19, 2017, a precautionary decision was announced. The International Court of Justice in The Hague ruled that Russia should refrain from imposing restrictions on the [[Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People]] and allow it to resume its activities.<ref>{{Cite news |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-russia-ukraine-world-court-idUSKCN1T41PJ |title=Russia rebuffs Ukraine's case over rebel support at U.N. court |first=Stephanie |last=van den Berg |date=3 June 2019 |work=[[Reuters]] |access-date=2019-11-08 |language=en |archive-date=2019-11-08 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191108170758/https://www.reuters.com/article/us-russia-ukraine-world-court-idUSKCN1T41PJ |url-status=live}}</ref><ref>[https://www.icj-cij.org/files/case-related/166/19410.pdf Request for the indication of provisional measures] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180516194642/http://www.icj-cij.org/files/case-related/166/19410.pdf |date=2018-05-16 }} ICJ Summary</ref> The ICJ denied Ukraine approval of provisional measures against Russia on prohibition of terrorist financing.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.rferl.org/a/icj-to-issue-ruling-on-ukraine-case-against-russia/28438420.html|title=ICJ Says It Won't Impose Measures Against Russia In Case Brought By Kyiv|website=RadioFreeEurope/RadioLiberty|language=en|access-date=2019-11-08|archive-date=2019-11-08|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191108170759/https://www.rferl.org/a/icj-to-issue-ruling-on-ukraine-case-against-russia/28438420.html|url-status=live}}</ref> |
On April 19, 2017, a precautionary decision was announced. The International Court of Justice in The Hague ruled that Russia should refrain from imposing restrictions on the [[Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People]] and allow it to resume its activities.<ref>{{Cite news |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-russia-ukraine-world-court-idUSKCN1T41PJ |title=Russia rebuffs Ukraine's case over rebel support at U.N. court |first=Stephanie |last=van den Berg |date=3 June 2019 |work=[[Reuters]] |access-date=2019-11-08 |language=en |archive-date=2019-11-08 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191108170758/https://www.reuters.com/article/us-russia-ukraine-world-court-idUSKCN1T41PJ |url-status=live}}</ref><ref>[https://www.icj-cij.org/files/case-related/166/19410.pdf Request for the indication of provisional measures] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180516194642/http://www.icj-cij.org/files/case-related/166/19410.pdf |date=2018-05-16 }} ICJ Summary</ref> The ICJ denied Ukraine approval of provisional measures against Russia on prohibition of terrorist financing.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.rferl.org/a/icj-to-issue-ruling-on-ukraine-case-against-russia/28438420.html|title=ICJ Says It Won't Impose Measures Against Russia In Case Brought By Kyiv|website=RadioFreeEurope/RadioLiberty|language=en|access-date=2019-11-08|archive-date=2019-11-08|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191108170759/https://www.rferl.org/a/icj-to-issue-ruling-on-ukraine-case-against-russia/28438420.html|url-status=live}}</ref> |
||
Revision as of 13:43, 4 April 2022
| Application of the International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism and of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (Ukraine v. Russian Federation) | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Court | International Court of Justice |
| Citation | General List No. 166 |
| Court membership | |
| Judges sitting | Abdulqawi Yusuf (President) Xue Hanqin (Vice-President) Ronny Abraham Mohamed Bennouna Antônio Augusto Cançado Trindade Joan Donoghue Giorgio Gaja Julia Sebutinde Dalveer Bhandari Patrick Lipton Robinson James Crawford Nawaf Salam Yuji Iwasawa Peter Tomka Fausto Pocar (ad hoc) Leonid Skotnikov (ad hoc) |
The case Application of the International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism and of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (Ukraine v. Russian Federation) is a case in the International Court of Justice (ICJ). On January 16, 2017, a representative of Ukraine filed a lawsuit at the International Court of Justice to hold the Russian Federation liable for committing acts of terrorism and discrimination against Ukraine.[1] The lawsuit alleges violations of the Terrorist Financing Convention and International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination.
Judgment
Yáll stupid, hearings began on Ukraine's application for preventive measures, which lasted until March 9.[2] Preventive measures will allow the Court to prevent the deterioration of the situation and to protect the civilian population for the length of time necessary to hear the case. Consideration of the merits of the claim will continue regardless of the Court's ruling on the request for the application of preventive measures.
On April 19, 2017, a precautionary decision was announced. The International Court of Justice in The Hague ruled that Russia should refrain from imposing restrictions on the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People and allow it to resume its activities.[3][4] The ICJ denied Ukraine approval of provisional measures against Russia on prohibition of terrorist financing.[5]
On November 8, 2019, the court found that it has jurisdiction to hear the case on the basis of anti-terrorism and anti-discrimination treaties over Russia's alleged support for separatists in Crimea and Eastern Ukraine. Also the ICJ rejected Moscow’s call on preliminary objections.[6][7]
External links
References
- ^ "EJIL: Talk! – Ukraine Takes Russia to the International Court of Justice: Will It Work?". 26 January 2017. Archived from the original on 2019-11-08. Retrieved 2019-11-08.
- ^ Oliphant, Roland (2017-03-06). "Ukraine sues Russia in International Court of Justice for 'financing terrorism'". The Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235. Archived from the original on 2019-11-08. Retrieved 2019-11-08.
- ^ van den Berg, Stephanie (3 June 2019). "Russia rebuffs Ukraine's case over rebel support at U.N. court". Reuters. Archived from the original on 2019-11-08. Retrieved 2019-11-08.
- ^ Request for the indication of provisional measures Archived 2018-05-16 at the Wayback Machine ICJ Summary
- ^ "ICJ Says It Won't Impose Measures Against Russia In Case Brought By Kyiv". RadioFreeEurope/RadioLiberty. Archived from the original on 2019-11-08. Retrieved 2019-11-08.
- ^ "U.N. top court rejects Moscow's call to block Ukraine vs Russia case". Reuters. 2019-11-08. Archived from the original on 2019-11-08. Retrieved 2019-11-08.
- ^ "UN International Court of Justice recognizes Ukraine's suit against Russia as one under its jurisdiction". Interfax-Ukraine. Archived from the original on 2019-11-08. Retrieved 2019-11-08.
