User talk:Jazzmk2000/sandbox

Article Evaluation Article reviewing Lamprey Everything in the article seemed relevant to a reader who does not know anything about lamprey. I do not think any viewpoints are overrepresented. Some of the facts do not include citations, and the citations do not work properly sometimes. Sometimes the source does not match what the fact is supposed to represent. I did not see any plagiarism when checking my specific links. On the talk page it looks as though someone took out their anger on Lampreys and wrote false information on them and someone fixed it. It's a part of the Wiki Education Foundation. the WikiProject Food and Drink (this is weird) and WikiPoject Fishes. It talks about them as a food dish which is different in class. Maybe that is overly talked about. Jazzmk2000 (talk) 23:55, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

Hi Jasmine, It looks like you have some great ideas! Just make sure to add your sources for option one. It also wasn't clear to me what edit you had done for option three, as there were no italics. I would also stick strictly with referencing peer-reviewed scientific literature.Scientist06 (talk) 19:55, 5 April 2022 (UTC)