Jump to content

Talk:Islamic schools and branches: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
m Reverted edits by 103.52.135.193 (talk) to last version by Bookku
Line 6: Line 6:
{{WikiProject Islam|class=C|importance=high}}
{{WikiProject Islam|class=C|importance=high}}
{{Archives}}
{{Archives}}

Fake propaganda or news of science verses islam.


== Ahmadiyya is not Muslim or sunni cast or branch . Need correction and plz remove it . ==
== Ahmadiyya is not Muslim or sunni cast or branch . Need correction and plz remove it . ==

Revision as of 06:33, 8 April 2022

Template:Vital article

WikiProject iconIslam C‑class High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.


Ahmadiyya is not Muslim or sunni cast or branch . Need correction and plz remove it .

Its is declared by government of Pakistan and school of thoughts and beliefs that Ahmadiyya is not a branch or sect of Islam or any sunni sect. Here is a helpful link that you can trace deobandi school of thoughts India and much more material.

Government of Pakistan - Law for Ahmadis Imran8here (talk) 21:39, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A government, a court, or another branch of a religion has no right to tell a group of people what they are or are not. Wikipedia doesn't take sides in such disputes. Doug Weller talk 14:27, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:08, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Druze do not belong in this article or in that image/chart

As someone has well documented in the article and cited the unique distinction of Druze as it’s own belief system separate from any other religious group while at the same time borrowing from most of the major religions in the world-from their holy texts to their prophets-It takes from Christianity, Islam, Judaism, Greek philosophy and even Teachings from the Far East...

Long story short...Druze are not Muslims and do not identify as such. The image/chart at the top of the article needs to be replaced or modified so that there is no need to include the section on Druze, which disrupts the article and contradicts (rightfully) what most readers will first see... Ramahamalincoln (talk) 07:57, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting inputs

Greetings,

Adequate and nuanced overview for even non– Muslim audience is expected out of the articles Muslims and Muslim world. Whether the articles are achieving that purpose adequately? Requesting and expecting proactive participation in providing inputs from non–Muslim audience too along with Muslim users.

Since the article Muslim world is tagged various improvements it can not be submitted to formal review process still I feel the article deserves more inputs for content improvement.

Requesting your visit to the articles

and provide your inputs @

Thanks

Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 06:49, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]