Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Vaush (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions
→Why though?: new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Why? [[Special:Contributions/2601:3C3:400:21C0:D878:F030:E593:8854|2601:3C3:400:21C0:D878:F030:E593:8854]] ([[User talk:2601:3C3:400:21C0:D878:F030:E593:8854|talk]]) 09:09, 28 March 2022 (UTC) |
Why? [[Special:Contributions/2601:3C3:400:21C0:D878:F030:E593:8854|2601:3C3:400:21C0:D878:F030:E593:8854]] ([[User talk:2601:3C3:400:21C0:D878:F030:E593:8854|talk]]) 09:09, 28 March 2022 (UTC) |
||
This article was nominated for deletion based on the issue of notability; this is a perfectly understandable claim, as the person in question could still be considered by many to be an 'up and coming YouTubers'; however, just as Wikipedia has articles on people you've never heard of (possibly even other YouTubers/streamers!) that have merits to stay on Wikipedia, so too does Wikipedia have an article on Vaush. [[User:sqwyd|sqwyd]] ([[User talk:sqwyd|talk]]) 10:45, 9 April 2022 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 10:45, 9 April 2022
Why is this page being considered for deletion?
Seem like people against Vaush due to recent drama are just trying to since there is no stated reason. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trynil (talk • contribs) 22:53, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Why
[edit]Why 148.72.164.124 (talk) 21:25, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Why though?
[edit]Why? 2601:3C3:400:21C0:D878:F030:E593:8854 (talk) 09:09, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
This article was nominated for deletion based on the issue of notability; this is a perfectly understandable claim, as the person in question could still be considered by many to be an 'up and coming YouTubers'; however, just as Wikipedia has articles on people you've never heard of (possibly even other YouTubers/streamers!) that have merits to stay on Wikipedia, so too does Wikipedia have an article on Vaush. sqwyd (talk) 10:45, 9 April 2022 (UTC)