Talk:KGF: Chapter 2: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 09:07, 17 April 2022

This page was nominated at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion on 13 August 2019. The result of the discussion was speedy keep.

Film: Indian C‑class

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.

India: Cinema C‑class Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

BoX office of 500cr world wide

Semi-protected edit request on 20 May 2020

This edit request to K.G.F: Chapter 2 has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

^[1] Movieflickz.com 00:31, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. RandomCanadian (talk | contribs) 00:51, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ "KGF: Chapter 2 Satellite Rights Sold Out For A Massive Amount worth Rs. 120cr. - Movieflickz.com". Movieflickz.com.

Semi-protected edit request on 21 July 2021

This edit request to K.G.F: Chapter 2 has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

117.207.41.14 (talk) 10:27, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deepoka padukon actress remove

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 11:08, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 19 November 2021

This edit request to K.G.F: Chapter 2 has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Add Music Composer names Coolblack4 (talk) 07:56, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ◢ Ganbaruby!  (talk) 10:05, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Production Session Edit

Hi, I want to remove in production selection one of the producer name called Karthik Gowda. can you please grant permission to edit that session. Poojasrireddy (talk) 10:13, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: this is not the right page to request additional user rights. You may reopen this request with the specific changes to be made and someone will add them for you, or if you have an account, you can wait until you are autoconfirmed and edit the page yourself. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 17:13, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indiscriminate info in track listing

@MNWiki845 You've added a bunch of information in track listing: adding [almost] all the singers of a song. While I appreciate your efforts, please read thru WP:INDISCRIMINATE. Wikipedia is not a collection of database. Please remove the listing and make the it compact. — DaxServer (t · m · c) 10:06, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Add Cast : Ebadat Akram Dunia

Ebadat Akram Dunia as Villain Thebranddunia (talk) 16:02, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 14 April 2022

It is requested that an edit be made to the semi-protected redirect at K.G.F: Chapter 2. (edit · history · last · links · protection log)

This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y".

The edit may be made by any autoconfirmed user. Remember to change the |answered=no parameter to "yes" when the request has been accepted, rejected or on hold awaiting user input. This is so that inactive or completed requests don't needlessly fill up the edit requests category. You may also wish to use the {{ESp}} template in the response. To request that a page be protected or unprotected, make a protection request.

It received mixed reviews from critics to It received positive reviews from critics Change "KGF: Chapter 2 received mixed reviews from critics" to "KGF: Chapter 2 received positive reviews from critics. The movie exceeded the pre-release hype."

KGF 2 Review: 'K.G.F: Chapter 2' is brutal tale of raw machismo and there is a hint at a third chapter | KGF 2 Movie Review (indiatimes.com) Yash's KGF Chapter 2 Gets Higher Rating Than RRR, Pushpa on IMDB (sakshi.com) - "he film has gathered positive reviews from critics, fans and public alike. "- "https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/kannada/movie-reviews/k-g-f-chapter-2/movie-review/90832069.cms" Even the citation given for the mixed reviews in the reception section says that the movie is good. The citation is itself wrong. Kindly change Kalbhag (talk) 05:07, 15 April 2022 (UTC) - https://menglish.sakshi.com/amp/news/tollywood/yashs-kgf-2-imdb-rating-153527"

Semi-protected edit request on 14 April 2022 (2)

This edit request to K.G.F: Chapter 2 has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Change "mixed reviews" to "positive reviews". The reviews are positive majorly. Change "KGF: Chapter 2 received mixed reviews from critics" to "KGF: Chapter 2 received positive reviews from critics. The movie exceeded the pre-release hype."

KGF 2 Review: 'K.G.F: Chapter 2' is brutal tale of raw machismo and there is a hint at a third chapter | KGF 2 Movie Review (indiatimes.com) Yash's KGF Chapter 2 Gets Higher Rating Than RRR, Pushpa on IMDB (sakshi.com) - "he film has gathered positive reviews from critics, fans and public alike. "- "https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/kannada/movie-reviews/k-g-f-chapter-2/movie-review/90832069.cms" Even the citation given for the mixed reviews in the reception section says that the movie is good. The citation is itself wrong. Kindly change Kalbhag (talk) 05:07, 15 April 2022 (UTC) - https://menglish.sakshi.com/amp/news/tollywood/yashs-kgf-2-imdb-rating-153527" Kalbhag (talk) 13:24, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 15:54, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

first day collections

there is no proper source for 1st day collections. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.204.132.73 (talk) 13:31, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 14 April 2022 (3)

This edit request to K.G.F: Chapter 2 has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Update info after release Correction of addition of KGF Chapter 3 contrary to earlier claims. KGF2Tommorow (talk) 16:39, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 16:43, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Change "KGF: Chapter 2 received mixed reviews from critics" to "KGF: Chapter 2 received positive reviews from critics. The movie exceeded the pre-release hype."

KGF 2 Review: 'K.G.F: Chapter 2' is brutal tale of raw machismo and there is a hint at a third chapter | KGF 2 Movie Review (indiatimes.com)

Yash's KGF Chapter 2 Gets Higher Rating Than RRR, Pushpa on IMDB (sakshi.com) - "he film has gathered positive reviews from critics, fans and public alike. "- "https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/kannada/movie-reviews/k-g-f-chapter-2/movie-review/90832069.cms"

Even the citation given for the mixed reviews in the reception section says that the movie is good. The citation is itself wrong. Kindly change Kalbhag (talk) 05:07, 15 April 2022 (UTC) - https://menglish.sakshi.com/amp/news/tollywood/yashs-kgf-2-imdb-rating-153527" Kalbhag (talk) 09:04, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 14 April 2022 (4)

It is requested that an edit be made to the semi-protected redirect at K.G.F: Chapter 2. (edit · history · last · links · protection log)

This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y".

The edit may be made by any autoconfirmed user. Remember to change the |answered=no parameter to "yes" when the request has been accepted, rejected or on hold awaiting user input. This is so that inactive or completed requests don't needlessly fill up the edit requests category. You may also wish to use the {{ESp}} template in the response. To request that a page be protected or unprotected, make a protection request.

"The movie received mixed reviews from critics" to "The movie received positive reviews from critics" Citation - ^[1] and "The film has gathered positive reviews from critics, fans and public alike" - ^[2]

The given citation is also from the same website with says the movie got positive reviews, and the cited text is misleading... Kindly check all reviews before posting.. kindly make the changes as requested Kalbhag (talk) 16:58, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

References

Semi-protected edit request on 14 April 2022 (5)

It is requested that an edit be made to the semi-protected redirect at K.G.F: Chapter 2. (edit · history · last · links · protection log)

This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y".

The edit may be made by any autoconfirmed user. Remember to change the |answered=no parameter to "yes" when the request has been accepted, rejected or on hold awaiting user input. This is so that inactive or completed requests don't needlessly fill up the edit requests category. You may also wish to use the {{ESp}} template in the response. To request that a page be protected or unprotected, make a protection request.

Change "KGF: Chapter 2 received mixed reviews from critics" to "KGF: Chapter 2 received positive reviews from critics. The movie exceeded the pre-release hype."

KGF 2 Review: 'K.G.F: Chapter 2' is brutal tale of raw machismo and there is a hint at a third chapter | KGF 2 Movie Review (indiatimes.com) Yash's KGF Chapter 2 Gets Higher Rating Than RRR, Pushpa on IMDB (sakshi.com) - "he film has gathered positive reviews from critics, fans and public alike. "- "https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/kannada/movie-reviews/k-g-f-chapter-2/movie-review/90832069.cms" Even the citation given for the mixed reviews in the reception section says that the movie is good. The citation is itself wrong. Kindly change Kalbhag (talk) 05:07, 15 April 2022 (UTC) - https://menglish.sakshi.com/amp/news/tollywood/yashs-kgf-2-imdb-rating-153527"

The "Critical Acclaim" claim in introduction

The critical acclaim in 'Introduction' section contradicts the mixed reviews from critics in 'Reception' section. It would also be helpful if there is a citation for the audience claim in 'Introduction' section since no other film page has something like that. Ddehhiorrty (talk) 03:42, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly check these source

KGF 2 Review: 'K.G.F: Chapter 2' is brutal tale of raw machismo and there is a hint at a third chapter | KGF 2 Movie Review (indiatimes.com)

Yash's KGF Chapter 2 Gets Higher Rating Than RRR, Pushpa on IMDB (sakshi.com) - "he film has gathered positive reviews from critics, fans and public alike. "

Even the citation given for the mixed reviews in the reception section says that the movie is good. The citation is itself wrong. Kindly change Kalbhag (talk) 05:07, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The film met with positive reviews from both audience and critics Thailandbilla (talk) 06:20, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The film met with highly positive reviews Thailandbilla (talk) 08:00, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ddehhiorrty most of the critic reviews were positive. almost 90% of them and yet it's mentioned mixed reviews in the reception section. Srihariths (talk) 15:55, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Srihariths Wikipedia mostly uses the critic consensus found on rotten tomatoes to state how the movie is received critically. As of this reply, the critics score at rotten tomatoes stands at 44%. Ddehhiorrty (talk) 08:57, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 15 April 2022

This edit request to K.G.F: Chapter 2 has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please do write that this film received highly positive reviews from audience as is in the previous chapter the review of audience was given in the Wikipedia page. 2001:8F8:1471:A9FE:D141:13B1:69DE:6F30 (talk) 10:39, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Ab207 (talk) 13:45, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 15 April 2022 (2)

This edit request to K.G.F: Chapter 2 has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

"1978

fter killing Garuda, Rocky takes charge as the kingpin of the Kolar Gold Fields (KGF), much to the chagrin of Guru Pandian." Please add 'A' to it. After is the word. Debashish206 (talk) 11:04, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already done Ab207 (talk) 13:45, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 17 April 2022

It is requested that an edit be made to the semi-protected redirect at K.G.F: Chapter 2. (edit · history · last · links · protection log)

This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y".

The edit may be made by any autoconfirmed user. Remember to change the |answered=no parameter to "yes" when the request has been accepted, rejected or on hold awaiting user input. This is so that inactive or completed requests don't needlessly fill up the edit requests category. You may also wish to use the {{ESp}} template in the response. To request that a page be protected or unprotected, make a protection request.

Kishan Yadav Azamgarh (talk) 08:13, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please edit box office collection with Rs 332 Crore Source:Pinkvilla

[Movieflickz.com-1] "KGF: Chapter 2 Satellite Rights Sold Out For A Massive Amount worth Rs. 120cr. - Movieflickz.com". Movieflickz.com.

[2] ttps://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/kannada/movie-reviews/k-g-f-chapter-2/movie-review/90832069.cms.

[3] "https://menglish.sakshi.com/amp/news/tollywood/yashs-kgf-2-imdb-rating-153527"

[1]

[1]

[2]

@@ Line 103: / Line 103: @@
 :[[User:Ddehhiorrty|@Ddehhiorrty]] most of the critic reviews were positive. almost 90% of them and yet it's mentioned mixed reviews in the reception section. [[User:Srihariths|Srihariths]] ([[User talk:Srihariths|talk]]) 15:55, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
-::[[User:Srihariths|@Srihariths]] Wikipedia mostly uses the critic consensus found on rotten tomatoes to state how the movie is recieved critically. As of this reply, the critics score at rotten tomatoes stands at 44%. [[User:Ddehhiorrty|Ddehhiorrty]] ([[User talk:Ddehhiorrty|talk]]) 08:57, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
+::[[User:Srihariths|@Srihariths]] Wikipedia mostly uses the critic consensus found on rotten tomatoes to state how the movie is received critically. As of this reply, the critics score at rotten tomatoes stands at 44%. [[User:Ddehhiorrty|Ddehhiorrty]] ([[User talk:Ddehhiorrty|talk]]) 08:57, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
 == Semi-protected edit request on 15 April 2022 ==