Treatment Guidelines from The Medical Letter: Difference between revisions
Tcsouthpaw (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Tcsouthpaw (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
== External Links == |
== External Links == |
||
[http://www.medicalletter.org |
[http://www.medicalletter.org Treatment Guidelines website] |
||
[http://medlet-best.securesites.com/html/ed.htm The Medical Letter Editorial and Advisory Board] |
[http://medlet-best.securesites.com/html/ed.htm The Medical Letter Editorial and Advisory Board] |
||
Revision as of 18:53, 15 February 2007
 | Treat Guidel Med Lett doesn't exist. |
| Discipline | peer-reviewed newsletter |
|---|---|
| Language | English |
| Publication details | |
| History | first published 2001 |
| Publisher | |
| Standard abbreviations | |
| ISO 4 | Treat Guidel Med Lett |
| Indexing | |
| ISSN | 1541-2792 |
| Links | |
Treatment Guidelines from The Medical Letter is published monthly (12 issues/year) by The Medical Letter, Inc., which also publishes The Medical Letter on Drugs and Therapeutics. The newsletter provides independent, unbiased reviews of drug classes for treatment of some common disorders. A typical issue Treatment Guidelines contains recommendations for first choice and alternative drugs with assessments of the drugs’ effectiveness, safety and cost.
Editorial Process
An expert consultant or one of the editors prepares the preliminary report using both published and available unpublished studies that are carefully examined, paying special attention to the results of controlled clinical trials.
The preliminary draft is edited and sent to every member of the Advisory Board, to 10-20 other investigators who have clinical and experimental experience with the drug or type of drug or disease under review, to the FDA and CDC, to the first authors of all the articles cited in the text, to appropriate representatives of the pharmaceutical companies making the drugs under review, and often to companies that make competitor drugs as well.
Many critical observations, suggestions and questions are received from the reviewers and are incorporated into the article during the revision process, and the article is checked and edited to make sure the final appraisal is not only accurate, but also easy to read.
flowchart of the editorial process