Jump to content

Talk:Neville Chamberlain (police officer)/GA1: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 14: Line 14:
**No problem. Done Best Wishes, '''[[User:Lee Vilenski|<span style="color:green">Lee Vilenski</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:Lee Vilenski|talk]] • [[Special:Contribs/Lee Vilenski|contribs]])</sup>''' 15:45, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
**No problem. Done Best Wishes, '''[[User:Lee Vilenski|<span style="color:green">Lee Vilenski</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:Lee Vilenski|talk]] • [[Special:Contribs/Lee Vilenski|contribs]])</sup>''' 15:45, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
*{{tq|(despatch dated 31 March 1900)}} – Is that meant to be a citation? Doesn't really appear encyclopedic just in the prose like that. I don't know. [[User:Steelkamp|Steelkamp]] ([[User talk:Steelkamp|talk]]) 16:03, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
*{{tq|(despatch dated 31 March 1900)}} – Is that meant to be a citation? Doesn't really appear encyclopedic just in the prose like that. I don't know. [[User:Steelkamp|Steelkamp]] ([[User talk:Steelkamp|talk]]) 16:03, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
**Removed, integrated. Best Wishes, '''[[User:Lee Vilenski|<span style="color:green">Lee Vilenski</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:Lee Vilenski|talk]] • [[Special:Contribs/Lee Vilenski|contribs]])</sup>''' 10:07, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
*Should ''[[Sinn Féin]]'' be linked? [[User:Steelkamp|Steelkamp]] ([[User talk:Steelkamp|talk]]) 23:11, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
*Should ''[[Sinn Féin]]'' be linked? [[User:Steelkamp|Steelkamp]] ([[User talk:Steelkamp|talk]]) 23:11, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
**Sure. Best Wishes, '''[[User:Lee Vilenski|<span style="color:green">Lee Vilenski</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:Lee Vilenski|talk]] • [[Special:Contribs/Lee Vilenski|contribs]])</sup>''' 10:07, 21 April 2022 (UTC)


===={{GAList/check}} Verifiable with no original research====
===={{GAList/check}} Verifiable with no original research====

Revision as of 10:07, 21 April 2022

GA Review

GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Steelkamp (talk · contribs) 14:16, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Hello. I will be doing a good article review of this article. I aim to get the review done within the next few days. If you would like to return the favour, I have several good article nominations active right now. Good luck. Steelkamp (talk) 14:16, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good article criteria

Well written

Verifiable with no original research

Broad in its coverage

Neutral

Stable

Illustrated, if possible

General

Alright, I have placed this on hold awaiting improvements from you. Steelkamp (talk) 23:13, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]