Appeal to tradition: Difference between revisions
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit Android app edit |
Mentioned that this argument is a genetic fallacy, since this page is in Category:Genetic fallacies. |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Logical fallacy in which a thesis is deemed correct on the basis of tradition}} |
{{Short description|Logical fallacy in which a thesis is deemed correct on the basis of tradition}} |
||
'''Appeal to tradition''' (also known as '''''argumentum ad antiquitatem''''' or '''''argumentum ad antiquitam''''',<ref>{{cite web | title=Logical Fallacies and the Art of Debate | url=http://www.csun.edu/~dgw61315/fallacies.html|work=www.csun.edu | access-date=29 January 2014 |ref=refLogicalFal}}</ref> '''appeal to antiquity''', or '''appeal to common practice''') is |
'''Appeal to tradition''' (also known as '''''argumentum ad antiquitatem''''' or '''''argumentum ad antiquitam''''',<ref>{{cite web | title=Logical Fallacies and the Art of Debate | url=http://www.csun.edu/~dgw61315/fallacies.html|work=www.csun.edu | access-date=29 January 2014 |ref=refLogicalFal}}</ref> '''appeal to antiquity''', or '''appeal to common practice''') is a [[genetic fallacy]] in which a thesis is deemed correct on the basis of correlation with past or present [[tradition]]. The appeal takes the form of "this is right because we've always done it this way."<ref>[{{cite book | title = Argumentation and Debating | first = William | last = Trufant | publisher = Houghton Mifflin company | year = 1917 |ref=refTrufant1917}}]</ref>{{Better source needed|reason=This is an source that is over a century old. It may be outdated. Also, there is no ISBN # or page #'s that this may be referring to.|date=February 2022}} |
||
An appeal to tradition essentially makes two assumptions that are not [[logical truth|''necessarily'' true]]: |
An appeal to tradition essentially makes two assumptions that are not [[logical truth|''necessarily'' true]]: |
Revision as of 05:18, 28 April 2022
Appeal to tradition (also known as argumentum ad antiquitatem or argumentum ad antiquitam,[1] appeal to antiquity, or appeal to common practice) is a genetic fallacy in which a thesis is deemed correct on the basis of correlation with past or present tradition. The appeal takes the form of "this is right because we've always done it this way."[2][better source needed]
An appeal to tradition essentially makes two assumptions that are not necessarily true:
- The old way of thinking was proven correct when introduced, i.e. since the old way of thinking was prevalent, it was necessarily correct.
- In reality, this may be false—the tradition might be entirely based on incorrect grounds.
- The past justifications for the tradition are still valid.
- In reality, the circumstances may have changed; this assumption may also therefore have become untrue.[citation needed]
An appeal to tradition is only fallacious in itself if the argument is not developed further, such as pointing out that the widespread acceptance of a practice or dependency on it means that abandoning it would incur significant implications/disruption/cost. For example, arguing that the QWERTY keyboard layout should be retained "because it is traditional" would be fallacious without also arguing that most keyboard users would need retraining to adapt to a new keyboard layout.[citation needed]
See also
Notes
- ^ "Logical Fallacies and the Art of Debate". www.csun.edu. Retrieved 29 January 2014.
- ^ [Trufant, William (1917). Argumentation and Debating. Houghton Mifflin company.]