Template talk:WikiProject Visual arts: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 15:05, 5 May 2022

Visual arts Template‑class

	Visual arts portal This template is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts
Template	This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

missing C-class category

{{editprotected}} The template is not evaluating "c" as a category. As per discussion on the project page this should be corrected. The missing code appears to be

 |c|C=[[Category:C-Class visual arts articles|{{PAGENAME}}]]

Thanks Enki H. (talk) 13:41, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --- RockMFR 02:58, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Importance parameter

Should this not have a field for "importance", as in Template:WikiProject Pornography, and maybe "listas" (not sure if that's necessary or not)? Ty 13:11, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Perhaps we should try to agree a quick "sample" list of articles with ratings to help assessors. Don't know about "listas". Johnbod (talk) 13:41, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There is a very useful model for guidance here: Wikipedia:WikiProject Pornography/Assessment, which could be adapted. Ty 13:53, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It would need adapting; it's a very different world! "Under no circumstances should any individual person be assigned top importance" would not work for us I think. Johnbod (talk) 15:08, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please replace image

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

The current image (File:WPVisualArts.png) should be replaced with its SVG version, File:WPVisualArts.svg. Vector images scale better, and the replacement image provides a more crisp image at 80px. --Gyrobo (talk) 23:55, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Okay — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 12:30, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please add portal

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please add {{Portal|Arts}} to this template, below the main portal link for Visual arts. — Cirt (talk) 07:40, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: please be more specific about what needs to be changed. Use the sandbox. Anomie ⚔ 01:12, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Importance ratings

I've removed this parameter, I hope correctly, as the project has decided more than once that we don't do these. It was added 10 days or so ago. Please don't re-add without discussing at the main project talk page, not here. Johnbod (talk) 13:15, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Concur with Johnbod on this. I don't see the point of importance ratings as they are ambiguous and poorly assigned. VA articles have never had them and have not suffered because of this.freshacconci talktalk 16:05, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Missing importance category

A category of importance is missing. Please add one on.

Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 04:01, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The project decided long ago not to have one, for good reasons - please go away. Johnbod (talk) 11:20, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No its not missing. Christian75 (talk) 07:10, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It is again now. Thanks. I've added a note that this should be discussed at the project before re-adding. Johnbod (talk) 14:42, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
 ==Importance parameter==
-Should this not have a field for "importance", as in [[Template:WikiProject Pornography]], and maybe "listas" (not sure if that's necessary or not)? '''''[[User:Tyrenius|<font color="#880088">Ty</font>]]''''' 13:11, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
+Should this not have a field for "importance", as in [[Template:WikiProject Pornography]], and maybe "listas" (not sure if that's necessary or not)? '''''[[User:Tyrenius|<span style="color:#880088;">Ty</span>]]''''' 13:11, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
 :Yes. Perhaps we should try to agree a quick "sample" list of articles with ratings to help assessors. Don't know about "listas". [[User:Johnbod|Johnbod]] ([[User talk:Johnbod|talk]]) 13:41, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
-::There is a very useful model for guidance here: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Pornography/Assessment]], which could be adapted. '''''[[User:Tyrenius|<font color="#880088">Ty</font>]]''''' 13:53, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
+::There is a very useful model for guidance here: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Pornography/Assessment]], which could be adapted. '''''[[User:Tyrenius|<span style="color:#880088;">Ty</span>]]''''' 13:53, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
 :::It would need adapting; it's a very different world! "Under no circumstances should any individual person be assigned top importance" would not work for us I think. [[User:Johnbod|Johnbod]] ([[User talk:Johnbod|talk]]) 15:08, 30 March 2010 (UTC)