Talk:Good News Bible: Difference between revisions
m →Declaration of Interest: reply |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
:Hey, thanks for the declaration of interst! But be biased! Why not, this is a talk page? I can be as biased as I like on a talk page! For example, I have a strong POV that the Bible is the inspired word of God, and I'm wholly '''for''' the work of ABS and other Bible Societies and organisations! And I don't mind (on the talk pages) saying it. ''However'', whenever I write anything in a Wikipedia article, I do work to try NOT to put any POV stuff, unless it's clearly stated as such "Christians believe that...", etc. [[User:Brusselsshrek|Brusselsshrek]] 12:56, 7 April 2006 (UTC) |
:Hey, thanks for the declaration of interst! But be biased! Why not, this is a talk page? I can be as biased as I like on a talk page! For example, I have a strong POV that the Bible is the inspired word of God, and I'm wholly '''for''' the work of ABS and other Bible Societies and organisations! And I don't mind (on the talk pages) saying it. ''However'', whenever I write anything in a Wikipedia article, I do work to try NOT to put any POV stuff, unless it's clearly stated as such "Christians believe that...", etc. [[User:Brusselsshrek|Brusselsshrek]] 12:56, 7 April 2006 (UTC) |
||
::My Declaration is only for the article space, and not talk pages. I'm for the ABS and the basic tentets of the faith. The Declaration doesn't affect that. - Thanks, ''[[User:Hoshie|Hos]]'''''[[User_talk:Hoshie|hie]]''' | |
::My Declaration is only for the article space, and not talk pages. I'm for the ABS and the basic tentets of the faith. The Declaration doesn't affect that. - Thanks, ''[[User:Hoshie|Hos]]'''''[[User_talk:Hoshie|hie]]''' | 00:34, 9 June 2006 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 23:47, 16 February 2007
Re: My article concerns
I have concerns about two sentences in this artcle:
The GNT has been adopted as the standard for many Protestant churches.
I don't think I've heard anyone refer to the TEV as "A Standard" or "The Standard" Protestant Bible. There are people who hate the TEV with a purple passion. Just ask David Cloud.
Bottom line: The RSV was a standard. The NIV is a standard. The TEV is not.
...and the text lacks the extensive footnotes found in many other translations.
False. I have the 1976 edition of the TEV, and there are footnotes on almost every page.
- hoshie
Footnotes were correct
The line on footnotes was correct. I compared the 1976 GNT and the NRSV and there was a difference.
hoshie 09:46, 15 Nov 2003 (UTC)
Declaration of Interest
In the past, I have donated to the American Bible Society (ABS). My donation in no way reflects any bias for or against the ABS or it's activities.
iHoshie 11:35, 1 Dec 2003 (UTC)
- Hey, thanks for the declaration of interst! But be biased! Why not, this is a talk page? I can be as biased as I like on a talk page! For example, I have a strong POV that the Bible is the inspired word of God, and I'm wholly for the work of ABS and other Bible Societies and organisations! And I don't mind (on the talk pages) saying it. However, whenever I write anything in a Wikipedia article, I do work to try NOT to put any POV stuff, unless it's clearly stated as such "Christians believe that...", etc. Brusselsshrek 12:56, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
- My Declaration is only for the article space, and not talk pages. I'm for the ABS and the basic tentets of the faith. The Declaration doesn't affect that. - Thanks, Hoshie | 00:34, 9 June 2006 (UTC)