Jump to content

Niddah: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
lower case
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 15: Line 15:
In the [[Book of Leviticus]], the [[Torah]] prohibits sexual intercourse with a ''niddah''.<ref>Leviticus 15:19-30, 18:19, 20:18</ref> The prohibition has been maintained in traditional Jewish law and by the [[Samaritans]]. It has largely been rejected by adherents of [[Reform Judaism]] and other liberal branches.<ref name="JWA">{{Cite web|url=https://jwa.org/encyclopedia/article/female-purity-niddah|title=Female Purity (Niddah) {{!}} Jewish Women's Archive|website=jwa.org|access-date=2020-02-19}}</ref><ref name=":1">{{Cite web|url=https://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/the-laws-of-niddah-taharat-hamishpaha/|title=Why Some Jewish Women Go to the Mikveh Each Month|website=My Jewish Learning|language=en-US|access-date=2020-02-19}}</ref>
In the [[Book of Leviticus]], the [[Torah]] prohibits sexual intercourse with a ''niddah''.<ref>Leviticus 15:19-30, 18:19, 20:18</ref> The prohibition has been maintained in traditional Jewish law and by the [[Samaritans]]. It has largely been rejected by adherents of [[Reform Judaism]] and other liberal branches.<ref name="JWA">{{Cite web|url=https://jwa.org/encyclopedia/article/female-purity-niddah|title=Female Purity (Niddah) {{!}} Jewish Women's Archive|website=jwa.org|access-date=2020-02-19}}</ref><ref name=":1">{{Cite web|url=https://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/the-laws-of-niddah-taharat-hamishpaha/|title=Why Some Jewish Women Go to the Mikveh Each Month|website=My Jewish Learning|language=en-US|access-date=2020-02-19}}</ref>


In [[rabbinic Judaism]], additional stringencies and prohibitions have accumulated over time, increasing the scope of various aspects of niddah, including: duration (12 day minimum); expanding to prohibition against sex to include: sleeping in adjoining beds, any physical contact, and even passing objects to any male, including ones spouse; and requiring a detailed [[ritual purification]] process.<ref name="JWA"/><ref name="Werczberger2020">
In [[rabbinic Judaism]], additional stringencies and prohibitions have accumulated over time, increasing the scope of various aspects of niddah, including: duration (12-day minimum); expanding to prohibition against sex to include: sleeping in adjoining beds, any physical contact, and even passing objects to any male, including ones spouse; and requiring a detailed [[ritual purification]] process.<ref name="JWA"/><ref name="Werczberger2020">
{{cite book |last1=Werczberger |first1=R. |last2=Guzmen-Carmeli |first2=S. |editor1-last=Yaden |editor1-first=David Bryce |editor2-last=Newberg |editor2-first=Andrew B. |editor3-last=Zhao |editor3-first=Yukun |editor4-last=Peng |editor4-first=Kaiping |title=Rituals and Practices in World Religions: Cross-cultural Scholarship to Inform Research and Clinical Contexts |date=2020 |publisher=Springer |isbn=9783030279530 |url=https://www.google.com/books?id=r0fODwAAQBAJ&pg=PA123 |chapter=Judaim |quote=women and menstruation. Later on, the rabbis increased the period of sexual separation between a menstruating wife and her husband from 7 to 12 days, and decreed that following that period, the woman would immerse herself in the miqveh... According to the halacha, the immersion in the miqveh must take place after dark. It also requires that the woman undress completely and clean herself before entering. The immersion must be witnessed by a Jewish woman (balanit) whose role is to ensure that all body parts, including the hair, are submerged in the water. Some attendants offer to check the hands, feet, and back for possible barriers (chatzitzot) between the body and the water, such as nail polish. Upon immersing, the woman recites the designated blessing...}}
{{cite book |last1=Werczberger |first1=R. |last2=Guzmen-Carmeli |first2=S. |editor1-last=Yaden |editor1-first=David Bryce |editor2-last=Newberg |editor2-first=Andrew B. |editor3-last=Zhao |editor3-first=Yukun |editor4-last=Peng |editor4-first=Kaiping |title=Rituals and Practices in World Religions: Cross-cultural Scholarship to Inform Research and Clinical Contexts |date=2020 |publisher=Springer |isbn=9783030279530 |url=https://www.google.com/books?id=r0fODwAAQBAJ&pg=PA123 |chapter=Judaim |quote=women and menstruation. Later on, the rabbis increased the period of sexual separation between a menstruating wife and her husband from 7 to 12 days, and decreed that following that period, the woman would immerse herself in the miqveh... According to the halacha, the immersion in the miqveh must take place after dark. It also requires that the woman undress completely and clean herself before entering. The immersion must be witnessed by a Jewish woman (balanit) whose role is to ensure that all body parts, including the hair, are submerged in the water. Some attendants offer to check the hands, feet, and back for possible barriers (chatzitzot) between the body and the water, such as nail polish. Upon immersing, the woman recites the designated blessing...}}
</ref><ref name="Liss2015">
</ref><ref name="Liss2015">
Line 21: Line 21:
</ref>
</ref>


Since the late 19th century, with the influence of German Modern Orthodoxy, the laws concerning ''niddah'' are also referred to as ''taharat hamishpacha'' ({{Script/Hebrew|טהרת המשפחה}}, Hebrew for ''family purity''), an [[Apologetics|apologetic]] euphemism coined to deemphasize the impurity of the woman (a concept criticized by the Reform movement) and to exhort the masses by warning that niddah can have consequences on the purity of offspring.<ref name="JWA"/><ref name="Marmon2017">
Since the late 19th century, with the influence of German Modern Orthodoxy, the laws concerning ''niddah'' are also referred to as ''Taharat haMishpacha'' ({{Script/Hebrew|טהרת המשפחה}}, Hebrew for ''family purity''), an [[Apologetics|apologetic]] euphemism coined to de-emphasize the "impurity" of the woman (a concept criticized by the Reform movement) and to exhort the masses by warning that niddah can have consequences on the purity of offspring.<ref name="JWA"/><ref name="Marmon2017">
{{cite book |last1=Marmon-Grumet |first1=Naomi |editor1-last=Gross |editor1-first=Martine |editor2-last=Nizard |editor2-first=Sophie |editor3-last=Scioldo-Zurcher |editor3-first=Yann |title=Gender, Families and Transmission in the Contemporary Jewish Context |date=2017 |publisher=Cambridge Scholars Publishing |isbn=978-1-4438-9232-2 |page=40 |url=https://www.google.com/books?id=UmbXDgAAQBAJ&pg=PA40 |chapter=The Transmission of Sexual Mores, Norms of Procreation and Gender Expectations through Pre-Marital Counselling (Hadrakhat Hatanim/Kallot) |quote=According to Marienberg (2003), the term 'taharat hamishpaha,' was most likely coined to hide the association of impurity and encourage thinking about the Talmudic notion that niddah can have consequences on the purity of offspring.}}
{{cite book |last1=Marmon-Grumet |first1=Naomi |editor1-last=Gross |editor1-first=Martine |editor2-last=Nizard |editor2-first=Sophie |editor3-last=Scioldo-Zurcher |editor3-first=Yann |title=Gender, Families and Transmission in the Contemporary Jewish Context |date=2017 |publisher=Cambridge Scholars Publishing |isbn=978-1-4438-9232-2 |page=40 |url=https://www.google.com/books?id=UmbXDgAAQBAJ&pg=PA40 |chapter=The Transmission of Sexual Mores, Norms of Procreation, and Gender Expectations through Pre-Marital Counselling (Hadrakhat Hatanim/Kallot) |quote=According to Marienberg (2003), the term "taharat hamishpaha", was most likely coined to hide the association of impurity and encourage thinking about the Talmudic notion that niddah can have consequences on the purity of offspring.}}
</ref><ref name="Wasserfall2015">
</ref><ref name="Wasserfall2015">
{{cite book |last1=Wasserfall |first1=Rahel |title=Women and Water: Menstruation in Jewish Life and Law |date=2015 |publisher=Brandeis University Press |isbn=978-1-61168-870-2 |pages=32–33 |url=https://www.google.com/books?id=QyczCwAAQBAJ&pg=PA32 |quote=probably generated by the Neo-Orthodox movement as a response to the Reform rejection of some of the normative menstrual laws, particularly use of the miqveh. The Reform movement claimed that the law was instituted at a time when public bathing facilities were the norm but was no longer valid with the advent of home bathtubs and greater concern for personal hygiene... The term family purity is euphemistic and somewhat misleading, since the topic is, in fact, ritual impurity.}}
{{cite book |last1=Wasserfall |first1=Rahel |title=Women and Water: Menstruation in Jewish Life and Law |date=2015 |publisher=Brandeis University Press |isbn=978-1-61168-870-2 |pages=32–33 |url=https://www.google.com/books?id=QyczCwAAQBAJ&pg=PA32 |quote=probably generated by the Neo-Orthodox movement as a response to the Reform rejection of some of the normative menstrual laws, particularly use of the miqveh. The Reform movement claimed that the law was instituted at a time when public bathing facilities were the norm, but was no longer valid with the advent of home bathtubs and greater concern for personal hygiene... The term family purity is euphemistic and somewhat misleading, since the topic is, in fact, ritual impurity.}}
</ref><ref name="Biale2008">
</ref><ref name="Biale2008">
{{cite book|author1-link=David Biale |last1=Biale |first1=David |title=Blood and Belief: The Circulation of a Symbol Between Jews and Christians |date=2008 |publisher=University of California Press |isbn=978-0-520-25798-6 |page=175 |url=https://www.google.com/books?id=07IwDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA175 |quote=for the modern Orthodox Jews of Germany, the phrase "family purity" (Reinheit des Familienslebens) came to designate the laws of menstruation. Whereas in Talmudic law a menstruating woman conveyed a kind of technical impurity, in this new, bourgeois conception, the family as a whole was purified by avoidance of menstrual blood.}}
{{cite book|author1-link=David Biale |last1=Biale |first1=David |title=Blood and Belief: The Circulation of a Symbol Between Jews and Christians |date=2008 |publisher=University of California Press |isbn=978-0-520-25798-6 |page=175 |url=https://www.google.com/books?id=07IwDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA175 |quote=for the modern Orthodox Jews of Germany, the phrase "family purity" (Reinheit des Familienlebens) came to designate the laws of menstruation. Whereas in Talmudic law, a menstruating woman conveyed a kind of technical impurity, in this new, bourgeois conception, the family as a whole was purified by avoidance of menstrual blood.}}
</ref><ref name="Stollman2006">
</ref><ref name="Stollman2006">
{{cite journal |last1=Stollman |first1=Aviad |title=A Lifetime Companion to the Laws of Jewish Family Life, and: Man and Woman: Guidance for Newlyweds (review) |journal=Nashim: A Journal of Jewish Women&#39;s Studies &amp; Gender Issues |date=2006 |volume=12 |issue=1 |pages=309–329 |url=https://www.academia.edu/8841371/A_Lifetime_Companion_to_the_Laws_of_Jewish_Family_Life_Review_Essay_of_Dr_D_Zimmermans_book |issn=1565-5288 |quote=According to Evyatar Marienberg, the term ‘tahorat ha-mishpahah, itself is of German-Jewish origin, late in the nineteenth century, probably a translation of the expression “Reinheit des Familienslebens. The original expression was most likely coined as an attempt to suppress the obvious halakhic fact that a woman who menstruates is impure. Instead of discussing the impurity of the niddah, one is encouraged to think of the purity of the family. It is also probable that the term came into use to emphasize the talmudic notion that not keeping the laws of niddah can have consequences on the purity of the offspring.}}
{{cite journal |last1=Stollman |first1=Aviad |title=A Lifetime Companion to the Laws of Jewish Family Life, and: Man and Woman: Guidance for Newlyweds (review) |journal=Nashim: A Journal of Jewish Women&#39;s Studies &amp; Gender Issues |date=2006 |volume=12 |issue=1 |pages=309–329 |url=https://www.academia.edu/8841371/A_Lifetime_Companion_to_the_Laws_of_Jewish_Family_Life_Review_Essay_of_Dr_D_Zimmermans_book |issn=1565-5288 |quote=According to Evyatar Marienberg, the term "Tahorat haMishpahah", itself is of German-Jewish origin, late in the nineteenth century, probably a translation of the expression "Reinheit des Familienlebens". The original expression was most likely coined as an attempt to suppress the obvious halakhic fact that a woman who menstruates is impure. Instead of discussing the impurity of the niddah, one is encouraged to think of the purity of the family. It is also probable that the term came into use to emphasize the talmudic notion that not keeping the laws of niddah can have consequences on the purity of the offspring.}}
</ref><ref name="Encyclopedia2005">
</ref><ref name="Encyclopedia2005">
{{cite encyclopedia |title=Purification: Purification in Judaism |encyclopedia=Encyclopedia of Religion |edition=2nd |year=2005 |last=Fonrobert |first=Charlotte Elisheva |editor-last=Jones |editor-first=Lindsay |publisher=Macmillan Reference USA |volume=11 |url=https://www.encyclopedia.com/environment/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/purification-purification-judaism |quote=This term is technically a misnomer... It entered Jewish legal discourse in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century before it was popularized in the market of handbooks for married couples. One of its main functions is rooted in its polemical force, vis a vis liberal, non-observant Jews}}</ref>
{{cite encyclopedia |title=Purification: Purification in Judaism |encyclopedia=Encyclopedia of Religion |edition=2nd |year=2005 |last=Fonrobert |first=Charlotte Elisheva |editor-last=Jones |editor-first=Lindsay |publisher=Macmillan Reference USA |volume=11 |url=https://www.encyclopedia.com/environment/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/purification-purification-judaism |quote=This term is technically a misnomer... It entered Jewish legal discourse in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century, before it was popularized in the market of handbooks for married couples. One of its main functions is rooted in its polemical force, vis a vis liberal, non-observant Jews}}</ref>


== Etymology and usage ==
== Etymology and usage ==

Revision as of 16:24, 13 May 2022

Niddah
Halakhic texts relating to this article
Torah:Leviticus 15:19–30 18:19 20:18
Babylonian Talmud:Niddah
Mishneh Torah:Kedushah (Holiness): Issurei Biah (forbidden sexual relations): 4–11
Shulchan Aruch:Yoreh De'ah 183–202

Niddah (or nidah; Template:Lang-he), in traditional Judaism, describes a woman who has experienced a uterine discharge of blood (most commonly during menstruation), or a woman who has menstruated and not yet completed the associated requirement of immersion in a mikveh (ritual bath).

In the Book of Leviticus, the Torah prohibits sexual intercourse with a niddah.[1] The prohibition has been maintained in traditional Jewish law and by the Samaritans. It has largely been rejected by adherents of Reform Judaism and other liberal branches.[2][3]

In rabbinic Judaism, additional stringencies and prohibitions have accumulated over time, increasing the scope of various aspects of niddah, including: duration (12-day minimum); expanding to prohibition against sex to include: sleeping in adjoining beds, any physical contact, and even passing objects to any male, including ones spouse; and requiring a detailed ritual purification process.[2][4][5]

Since the late 19th century, with the influence of German Modern Orthodoxy, the laws concerning niddah are also referred to as Taharat haMishpacha (טהרת המשפחה‎, Hebrew for family purity), an apologetic euphemism coined to de-emphasize the "impurity" of the woman (a concept criticized by the Reform movement) and to exhort the masses by warning that niddah can have consequences on the purity of offspring.[2][6][7][8][9][10]

Etymology and usage

Niddah has the general meaning of “expulsion” and “elimination”,[11] coming from the root ndd, "to make distant" (the Aramaic Bible translations use use the root rhq, "to be distant"), reflecting the physical separation of women during their menstrual periods,[12] who were “discharged” and “excluded” from society by being banished to and quarantined in separate quarters.[11] Later in the biblical corpus, this meaning was extended to include concepts of sin and impurity,[2][11][12] which may be related to ancient attitudes towards menstruation.[2]

Literally, the feminine noun niddah means moved (i.e. separated), and generally refers to separation due to ritual impurity.[13] Medieval Biblical commentator Abraham ibn Ezra writes that the word niddah is related to the term menadechem (מנדיכם‎), meaning those that cast you out.[13]

Hebrew Bible

The noun niddah occurs 25 times in the Masoretic Text of the Hebrew Bible. The majority of these uses refer to forms of uncleanliness in Leviticus. For example, in Leviticus, if a man take his brother's wife, then that is "uncleanness", niddah. The five uses in Numbers all concern the red heifer ceremony (Numbers 19:1) and use the phrase mei niddah, "waters of separation".[14] 2 Chronicles 29:5 includes a single exhortation of Hezekiah to the Levites, to carry forth the niddah (translated: "filthiness"), possibly idols of his father Ahaz, out of the temple in Jerusalem.[15] Usage in Ezekiel follows that of Leviticus. Finally, the Book of Zechariah concludes with an eschatological reference to washing Jerusalem:[16] "In that day there shall be a fountain opened to the house of David and to the inhabitants of Jerusalem for sin (ḥaṭ’at) and for uncleanness (niddah)" (Zechariah 13:1).

Rabbinic injunctions

The copious laws of niddah contained in the Jewish rabbinic writings are almost entirely made-up of "fences" (Template:Lang-he), or safeguards, built around the Torah. The general rule which applies is that a woman is clean from the standpoint of the Torah until she feels uterine blood discharge from its source within her body. However, the rabbis have declared a woman to be unclean although she has not felt any discharge of blood, but has merely seen either a red or black blood stain on her body,[17] or on her white garment or sheet, and which blood stain is larger in diameter than a fava bean (about 20 mm), in which case she must separate herself from her husband until she can complete seven clean days and can be purified in a ritual bath (mikveh).[18] A blood stain that is a dark brown color leaning towards the color of coffee and the color of chestnuts defiles a woman and renders her niddah, on the condition that she feels its discharge. However, if she saw the same color while checking herself with an inspection cloth, but had not felt any discharge of blood, she is clean.[19][20] Conversely, a vaginal discharge that is white in color, or either light yellow, green or blueish in color, do not render the woman niddah.[19] There are, yet, many other conditions that need to be met, by rabbinic ordinances, in order to render uncleanness to a blood stain.[18]

The daughters of Israel have behaved stringently with themselves, insofar that even if they should see a drop of blood as a mustard grain, they would wait over it seven days of cleanness[21][22]

Although the Written Law (Leviticus 15:25–28) explicitly enjoins women to count seven days of cleanness (see infra) when they have seen irregular blood sightings (the irregularity occurring only from the eighth day of the start of her regular period and ending with the conclusion of the eighteenth day[23]), the Sages of Israel have required all women who have experienced even their regular and natural purgation to count seven days of cleanness before they can be purified.[24]

Application of the Torah

The Leviticus description of niddah is essentially composed of two parts: the ritual purity (tumah and taharah) aspect and the prohibition of sexual intercourse aspect.[25]

Ritual purity aspect

The Biblical regulations of Leviticus specify that a menstruating woman must "separate" for seven days (Leviticus 15:19). Any object she sits on or lies upon during this period is becomes a "carrier of tumah" (midras uncleanness). One who comes into contact with her midras, or her, during this period becomes ritually impure (Leviticus 15:19–23) In addition, a man who has sexual relations with her is rendered ritually impure for seven days—as opposed to one day of impurity for coming into contact with her or her midras (Leviticus 15:24).

While the purity laws still exist in theory, in modern times there is generally no practical consequence to becoming impure (as, e.g., the Temple in Jerusalem cannot be visited), so the laws have no practical expression.

Some later rabbinic authorities encouraged (but did not require) avoiding the midras of the niddah, as a remembrance for diasporic Jews so as to not forget the purity laws.[26] This encouragement was only for the biblically prescribed seven-day period, not for the latter days that were added as part of certain rabbinical stringencies. The Lubavitcher rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson discouraged abstaining from the midras of a niddah in modern times.[27]

Sexual relations

Leviticus further prohibits sexual intercourse with a woman who is in her niddah state. "And to a woman in her (state of) niddah impurity you should not come close (with intent to) reveal her nudity" (Leviticus 18:19).

The Torah concludes by imposing the punishment of kareth on both individuals (man and woman) if the prohibition is violated (Leviticus 20:18) This issur (prohibition) component of physical relations with the niddah is considered in full effect and mandatory for all children of Israel.

Practical laws

Terms and definitions

  • Niddah, a woman who had become impure as a result of menstruation.
  • Zavah, a woman who had become impure by a bloody uterine emission, deemed abnormal, in the sense that the emission had occured during the timeframe of the 8th - 18th day, counting from the start of her last menstruation
  • Mikveh, a ritual bath for immersion after the niddah period has ended.
  • Vestot, days during which the woman is likely to see her menstrual flow
    • Onah Benonit, the 30th day after the beginning of previous menstruation
    • Veset HaChodesh, the same day of the Jewish month on which began the previous menstruation
    • Veset HaFlagah, the days (or half-days, per Chabad minhag) between menstruation
  • Bedikah, cloth with which to check whether menstrual blood has finished
  • Ben niddah (male) or bat niddah (female), a person conceived when their mother was niddah

Start of menstruation

According to rabbinical law, a woman becomes a niddah when she is aware that blood has come from her womb, whether it is due to menstruation, childbirth, sexually transmitted disease, or other reasons.[28] If menstruation began before she sees evidence of it, the rabbinic regulations regard her as not being niddah until she notices. Until this point, the regulations do not come into force.

It is not necessary for the woman to witness the flow of blood itself; it is sufficient for her to notice a stain that has indications of having originated in her womb; bloodstains alone are inadequate without such evidence, for example, if she finds a stain just after cutting her finger, she does not become a niddah, as the blood is not obviously uterine. If she notices a bloodstain of uncertain origin, for example on her underclothing, there are a series of complicated criteria used by rabbinical law to determine whether she is niddah or not; the woman herself is not expected to know these criteria, and must seek the assistance of a rabbi.[29]

Duration of niddah status

According to the Torah, the niddah period is 7 days; however, in Ashkenazi communities, the Rabbis added a stringency increasing the minimum duration period to 12 days.[4][5][30][31] (See section "Seven days of cleanness" for differences in custom).

The Biblical definition of niddah is any blood emission occurring within seven days from the beginning of the menstrual period. After this seven-day period, the woman may immerse in the mikveh immediately (if she has stopped menstruating). Any blood found after these seven days is considered abnormal (zavah) blood and is subject to more stringent requirements, depending on the duration of said abnormal blood flow.

In the days of the Amoraim, because of possible confusion in determining when menstruation began and ended and hence whether blood was normal menstrual (niddah) or abnormal (zavah) blood, it became the accepted practice and practical halacha, that all women treat any emission as a continued abnormal flow (zavah gedolah—זבה גדולה), which requires counting seven abnormal-discharge-free days from the end of menstruation. This lengthening of the niddah period is known as Rabbi Zeira's stringency.[32] All Orthodox and some Conservative authorities rule that these "seven clean days" must be observed.[33][34]

Practices during niddah

In the Orthodox Jewish community, women may test whether menstruation has ceased; this ritual is known as the hefsek taharah. The woman takes a bath or shower near sunset, wraps a special cloth around her finger, and swipes the vaginal circumference. If the cloth shows only discharges that are white, yellow, or clear, then menstruation is considered to have ceased. If discharge is red or pink, it indicates that menstruation continues. If it is any other color, like brown, it is subject to further inquiry, often involving consultation with a rabbi. The ritual requires that the cloth used to perform this test is first checked carefully to ensure that it is clean of any marks, colored threads, or specks; the cloth itself can be any clean white cloth, although there are small cloths designed for this ritual, known as bedikah cloths (meaning checking).

In the Orthodox Jewish community, further rituals are practiced toward assurance regarding the cessation of the menstrual flow. After the hefsek taharah, some women insert a cloth (or, in modern times, a tampon), consequently known as a moch dachuk, for between 18 minutes and an hour, to ensure that there is absolutely no blood; this must be done carefully, as it could otherwise irritate the mucous membrane, causing bleeding unrelated to menstruation. If there is any fear of irritation causing bleeding, a rabbi may waive this practice. The "bedikah" is repeated each morning and evening of the seven days after the end of menstruation. Another tradition is the wearing of white underwear and use of white bedding during this period; conversely, the rest of the time, when not counting the "seven clean days", some women who suffer from spotting deliberately use coloured underwear and colored toilet paper, since it is only when blood is seen on white material that it has any legal status in Jewish law. When not during their seven "clean" days, all women are advised to wear colored undergarments, for this reason. It is furthermore strongly recommended that women make an effort to refrain from looking at the toilet paper after wiping to avoid possible resultant questions.

Physical contact during niddah

A niddah hut (Mergem Gogo) at the Jewish village of Ambober in northern Ethiopia, 1976.

As with most forbidden relationships in Judaism, all physical contact in an affectionate or lustful manner is rabbinically forbidden when a woman is in her niddah status.[35][36] Such contact is forbidden whether or not the man and woman are husband and wife.[37]

In the case of husband and wife, however, the sages added on extra restrictions, including touch that is not in an affectionate or lustful manner,[38] passing of objects even without touching, and sleeping in the same bed; these restrictions are to avoid the risk of leading to sexual contact.[39] These laws are termed harchakot, meaning "the laws of separation," and imply the prohibitive rules regulating the passing of objects from hand to hand, as well as to taking distinctive measures used to remind them of their separation, such as placing some object at the dinner table which is not ordinarily placed there.[40] The laws of separation (harchakot) are derived from a biblical command: "You shall not approach a woman to uncover her nakedness so long as she is separated for her [menstrual] uncleanness" (Leviticus 18:19).[40] Some have suggested that by physically distancing oneself from his spouse there is an enhanced need for relationships to develop in non-physical ways, such as emotional and spiritual connections.

Some Conservative poseks are considerably more lenient in reference to the harchakot than Medieval or contemporary Orthodox authorities. In a responsum written in the Committee on Jewish Law and Standards of the Rabbinical Assembly, Miriam Berkowitz ruled that the "harchakot are to be observed as much as possible, but left up to the discretion of each couple".[33]: 36  In another responsum for the committee, Susan Grossman stated that touching that would be appropriate between siblings is permissible.[41]

Seven days of cleanness

When blood from a menstruant (niddah) has ceased altogether, shortly before sunset she performs on herself a "cessation of uncleanness", known by its Hebrew euphemism hefseq be-ṭaharah (הפסק בטהרה‎ = lit. "cessation of purification"), during which time she checks herself to verify that all uterine bleeding has indeed stopped. This is done by bathing,[42] and, afterwards, inserting a clean piece of white cotton or linen cloth within her vagina and examining it after swiping the area inside, followed by leaving in that place a snugly fitting cotton wad for the duration of about 20 minutes (preferably during the evening twilight).[43] When there are no signs of blood, the woman begins counting seven days of cleanness on the following day,[44] during which seven days she is still prohibited to have any physical contact with her husband.[45][46] During each of the seven days, the woman checks herself once in the morning and once in the evening, by using a soft and white, absorbent cotton cloth.[47][48]

In Sephardic Jewish tradition, a woman who has had no physical contact with her husband within the 72 hr. period (3 days) prior to the start of her menstruation, she is permitted to immediately conduct the hefseq be-ṭaharah (see supra) after all uterine bleeding has stopped, and, on the following day, she begins to count seven days of cleanness, which culminate in an immersion. Differences in custom, however, exist between the Ashkenazim and the Sephardic Jewish communities as to when to begin the counting of seven days of cleanness if she cohabited with her husband within those 72 hours (three days) prior to her seeing blood.

  • Ashkenazim: According to the halachic ruling of Moses Isserles, in all cases, whether a woman cohabited with her husband within the past 72 hours or did not cohabit with her husband, whether the woman saw blood for only 2 or 3 days, or merely a blood stain, she does not begin to count seven days of cleanness until 5 days have passed from the time that she ceased seeing blood, and only then does she proceed to count seven days of cleanness.[49] For example, if she ceased to see blood on a Sunday, she can begin her hefseq be-ṭaharah (see supra) on a Thursday, and then on a Friday to start her first day of seven days of cleanness.[50] These days are not to be interrupted by any blood sighting in-between, and after concluding these seven clean days, she immerses herself in a ritual bath (mikveh) on that coming night.[51] At this time she is no longer a menstruant, but is deemed clean, and she is permitted unto her husband.
  • Sephardic Jews: For Jews that largely hail from North Africa, Spain, Turkey, and the Middle East (including Iran), they will usually follow the practice of the Shulhan Arukh, which is to wait 4 days from the time the couple last cohabited together (i.e. last time in which they engaged in sexual intercourse) before she begins to count seven days of cleanness. This will allow for the discharge of semen from her body that is suspected of having been mixed with the blood of her menstruation.[52] For example, if the couple last cohabited on a Saturday, and she then saw blood on a Sunday, she can begin her hefseq be-ṭaharah (see supra) on a Tuesday (on the condition that all blood has stopped), and then on a Wednesday to start her first day of seven days of cleanness.[51][53] These days are not to be interrupted by any blood sighting in-between, and after concluding these seven clean days, she immerses herself in a ritual bath (mikveh) on that coming night. At this time she is no longer a menstruant, but is deemed clean, and she is permitted unto her husband.

For the Sephardic Jewish community, waiting four days before beginning to count seven days of cleanness only refers to when there were conjugal affairs between a man and his wife, leading up to her menstrual period. If, however, there was no sexual intercourse between the couple in the days leading up to her menstrual cycle, and, subsequently, there was no fear of her body discharging of her husband's copulative seed that had been mixed with her menstrual blood, there is no need for her to wait four days, but she may presently begin her hefseq be-ṭaharah (see supra), followed by counting seven days of cleanness.[54] Another factor used to determine when to begin the counting of seven clean days (among Sephardic Jews) is that, had the woman merely found on her an unclean blood stain (where there was no sensation of any active blood flow), after concluding that all such sightings have stopped, she can begin to count seven days of cleanness after two days have passed since the last time she cohabited with her husband.[55] However, among Ashkenazim, even if a woman merely saw an unclean blood stain, when the blood has ceased to appear, she waits 5 days before beginning to count her seven days of cleanness.[49]

Maimonides mentions a former custom where the menstruants of some Jewish communities would wait a standard 7 days before beginning to count seven days of cleanness, even if the woman had seen blood for only one or two days.[56][57] This custom, though widely practised in the 20th century among the Jews of Yemen,[58][59] Djerba,[58] parts of Morocco,[58] as also with a few families in Baghdad,[58] was later rejected and abandoned by many, as Maimonides calls it an errant practice.[56]

Niddah and fertility

Because the night that the woman ritually traditionally immerses is about 12 days after menstruation began, it often coincides with a woman's ovulation, and thus improves the chances of successful conception if sexual relations occur on that night. However, for certain women, this period extends far past the date of ovulation, and in combination with the ban on sexual relations during the niddah state, effectively results in the woman being unable to conceive,[60] a situation sometimes called "halachic infertility".[61] In the case of this effective infertility, rabbis try on a case-by-case basis to relax halakhic strictures in order to facilitate conception. There have been some calls within Orthodox Judaism for the custom to be modified so that the time between the end of menstruation and the end of niddah is shorter for these women.[62] Another suggestion is to take hormone tablets to lengthen the ovulation cycle.[63]

Checking by bedikah

The bedikah cloth or "checking cloth", called an eid ["witness"] in Hebrew, is a clean piece of white cloth used in the process of purifying a niddah. It is used by observant Jewish women to determine whether they have finished menstruation. The cloth is inserted into the vagina, and if no blood is found, the woman may start counting the seven blood-free days. On each of these days, she performs this examination in the morning and in the later afternoon before sunset. If no blood is found, she may go to the mikveh on the eighth evening after nightfall, and then engage in intercourse with her husband.[64] Such cloths are about two by four inches, and are available at local Judaica stores, the local mikveh, stores in Orthodox neighborhoods in Israel, or may be cut from clean all-white soft cotton or linen fabric.[65]

This practice is also occasionally used by Jewish men to check if he has gotten blood on himself from his wife after intercourse to determine whether she menstruated during intercourse.[66]

Immersion in water

After a woman has counted seven days of cleanness (see supra), she is then required to immerse in a ritual bath (mikveh) that has been constructed in accordance with the Jewish laws of ritual purity. After concluding her seven days of cleanness, she is not allowed to immerse during the daytime, even on the eighth or ninth days, because of a rule introduced on account of her daughter's immersion (Template:Lang-he) and which was enacted for the sake of conformity, so that the daughter will not see her mother immerse during the daytime and wrongly presume that it was her mother's seventh day of counting, and think that it was alright to immerse on the seventh day before nightfall, without realizing that her mother had already concluded her seven clean days. This enactment, therefore, was to prevent an occasion for miscalculation and stumbling. Even if a woman has no daughter, this rule of immersing only in the night still applies, as the Sages did not make any distinction, but have prohibited all women from immersing themselves during daylight hours of the eighth day, or of any day.[67] Under extenuating circumstances, however, the rabbis have also permitted to immerse in the day, after fully completing seven days of cleanness.

There are differing customs about how many immersions are performed at each visit to a mikveh. It is the custom of many in the Orthodox community to immerse at least twice.[68] Accordingly, they would immerse, recite the blessing, then immerse again. The other opinion states that like other commandments, here too the blessing should be recited before performing the commandment.[69]

Immediate preparation for a mikveh includes a bath or shower wherein every part of the body (including the ears and underneath the nails) is thoroughly washed; plus other routine hygiene practices which include trimming fingernails and toenails, brushing and flossing the teeth, and combing the hair. Prior to every immersion, the woman is required to inspect herself to make sure that there is nothing clinging to her skin and hair that would obstruct the water from making contact with it during her actual immersion, or what is known as ḥaṣīṣah = "interposing objects" (e.g. clay, dough, paint, gum resin, etc.).[70] At the mikveh itself, a female attendant is present to make certain that the woman immerses herself fully, including her hairs. Though that is the attendant's foremost duty, she may also help by checking a woman's back or answer questions regarding proper ritual protocol.

Refrainment from relations on days that menstruation is expected to begin

The classical regulations also forbid sexual relations on the day that a woman expects to start menstruating.[71] Generally speaking, there are three days that fall under this regulation, known as the veset, namely the same day of the month, (according to the Hebrew calendar), as her previous menstruation began; the day exactly 30 days after the previous menstruation started; and the day that is of equal distance from the day of her previous menstruation as the menstruation before the last.[72] For instance: If the interval between her last two periods was 28 days - the couple must refrain from sexual relations on the 28th day. According to most Orthodox authorities, this is measured from the beginning of the former period to the beginning of the latter. Yet some authorities, espeically in Chabbad circles, rule that this is measured from the end of the preceding menstruation to the beginning of the following one[73].

If the woman is not actually menstruating during a veset day, then there are certain circumstances wherein sexual activity is permitted according to most authorities, for example, if a woman's husband is about to travel, and will return only after menstruation has begun.[74]

Newlyweds

According to all Orthodox authorities, the first time a virgin has intercourse, she also becomes niddah as a result of her "dam betulim" (Hebrew: "hymenal blood flow"). This is observed even if no blood was discovered. However, a bride counts only four days before performing a hefsek taharah (Hebrew: lit. pause of purity), instead of the usual five.[75] The hefsek taharah simply entails a woman checking herself to make sure that all uterine bleeding has stopped, by inserting a piece of inspection cloth within her vagina and having it come out clean, in order to begin on the following day her seven days of cleanness. Some Conservative authorities rule that a woman is not a niddah in such a case unless uterine bleeding is observed.[33]

Privacy of the niddah process

Out of tzniut (Hebrew for "modesty"), many Orthodox Jews and some Conservative Jews follow a custom of keeping their times of niddah secret from the general public.[76]

Conservative Judaism

Conservative Judaism authorities teach that the laws of family purity are normative and still in force, including the requirement to refrain from sexual relations during niddah, yet there is a difference of opinions over how much other strictures need to be observed, such as whether there should be complete prohibition on any touching during niddah and whether women are required to count seven "clean" days before immersing in the mikveh.

In December 2006, the Rabbinical Assembly's Committee on Jewish Law and Standards passed three responsa discussing the extent of Biblical requirements and continuing applicability of rabbinic prohibitions concerning niddah for Conservative Jews. Each responsum advocated different standards of observance;[77] three responsa were passed as majority opinions - one by Susan Grossman[41] and one by Avram Reisner,[78] the third responsum, by Miriam Berkowitz.[79]

The majority of orthodox rabbis contend that the seven days of cleanness still apply to all menstruant women today, even though it is only a rabbinic injunction.[80][81][82][83] According to two lesser opinions representing the movement of Conservative Judaism, one by Grossman and the other by Reisner, whose views are not shared by orthodox Jewish circles, the "seven clean days" need not be observed today and women may immerse and resume sexual relations after seven days from the beginning of menstruation, or after its cessation, if it lasts longer than seven days. Grossman and Berkowitz ruled that women may rely on their own discretion about when menstruation has ended, and need not routinely engage in bedikah as described above.[41][78][79]

Despite the official stance, the practices related to family purity have often not been widely followed by Conservative Jews. However, in an issue of the United Synagogue Review that focused on issues of mikvah and niddah (published in conjunction with the passing of the responsa mentioned above, in Fall/Winter 2006), Rabbi Myron S. Geller, a member of the Committee on Jewish Law and Standards, wrote about an upswing in the observance of the laws of family purity within the Conservative Jewish community:[84]

Conservative Judaism has largely ignored this practice in the past, but recently has begun to reevaluate its silence in this area and to consider the spiritual implications of mikvah immersion for human sexuality and for women.[citation needed]

Reform Judaism

Reform Judaism and other liberal denominations have largely rejected many of the rituals and prohibitions associated with menstruation, particularly the use of a mikveh.[2]

See also

Further reading

  • Kahana, K. (1970). Daughter of Israel - Laws of Family Purity (טהרת בת ישראל : הלכות נדה). Translated by Leonard Oschry (3 ed.). Jerusalem - New York: Feldheim. OCLC 21284290.

References

  1. ^ Leviticus 15:19-30, 18:19, 20:18
  2. ^ a b c d e f "Female Purity (Niddah) | Jewish Women's Archive". jwa.org. Retrieved 2020-02-19.
  3. ^ "Why Some Jewish Women Go to the Mikveh Each Month". My Jewish Learning. Retrieved 2020-02-19.
  4. ^ a b Werczberger, R.; Guzmen-Carmeli, S. (2020). "Judaim". In Yaden, David Bryce; Newberg, Andrew B.; Zhao, Yukun; Peng, Kaiping (eds.). Rituals and Practices in World Religions: Cross-cultural Scholarship to Inform Research and Clinical Contexts. Springer. ISBN 9783030279530. women and menstruation. Later on, the rabbis increased the period of sexual separation between a menstruating wife and her husband from 7 to 12 days, and decreed that following that period, the woman would immerse herself in the miqveh... According to the halacha, the immersion in the miqveh must take place after dark. It also requires that the woman undress completely and clean herself before entering. The immersion must be witnessed by a Jewish woman (balanit) whose role is to ensure that all body parts, including the hair, are submerged in the water. Some attendants offer to check the hands, feet, and back for possible barriers (chatzitzot) between the body and the water, such as nail polish. Upon immersing, the woman recites the designated blessing...
  5. ^ a b Liss (2015). "Patterns of intensification". Discourses of Purity in Transcultural Perspective (300–1600). BRILL. p. 272. ISBN 978-90-04-28975-8.
  6. ^ Marmon-Grumet, Naomi (2017). "The Transmission of Sexual Mores, Norms of Procreation, and Gender Expectations through Pre-Marital Counselling (Hadrakhat Hatanim/Kallot)". In Gross, Martine; Nizard, Sophie; Scioldo-Zurcher, Yann (eds.). Gender, Families and Transmission in the Contemporary Jewish Context. Cambridge Scholars Publishing. p. 40. ISBN 978-1-4438-9232-2. According to Marienberg (2003), the term "taharat hamishpaha", was most likely coined to hide the association of impurity and encourage thinking about the Talmudic notion that niddah can have consequences on the purity of offspring.
  7. ^ Wasserfall, Rahel (2015). Women and Water: Menstruation in Jewish Life and Law. Brandeis University Press. pp. 32–33. ISBN 978-1-61168-870-2. probably generated by the Neo-Orthodox movement as a response to the Reform rejection of some of the normative menstrual laws, particularly use of the miqveh. The Reform movement claimed that the law was instituted at a time when public bathing facilities were the norm, but was no longer valid with the advent of home bathtubs and greater concern for personal hygiene... The term family purity is euphemistic and somewhat misleading, since the topic is, in fact, ritual impurity.
  8. ^ Biale, David (2008). Blood and Belief: The Circulation of a Symbol Between Jews and Christians. University of California Press. p. 175. ISBN 978-0-520-25798-6. for the modern Orthodox Jews of Germany, the phrase "family purity" (Reinheit des Familienlebens) came to designate the laws of menstruation. Whereas in Talmudic law, a menstruating woman conveyed a kind of technical impurity, in this new, bourgeois conception, the family as a whole was purified by avoidance of menstrual blood.
  9. ^ Stollman, Aviad (2006). "A Lifetime Companion to the Laws of Jewish Family Life, and: Man and Woman: Guidance for Newlyweds (review)". Nashim: A Journal of Jewish Women's Studies & Gender Issues. 12 (1): 309–329. ISSN 1565-5288. According to Evyatar Marienberg, the term "Tahorat haMishpahah", itself is of German-Jewish origin, late in the nineteenth century, probably a translation of the expression "Reinheit des Familienlebens". The original expression was most likely coined as an attempt to suppress the obvious halakhic fact that a woman who menstruates is impure. Instead of discussing the impurity of the niddah, one is encouraged to think of the purity of the family. It is also probable that the term came into use to emphasize the talmudic notion that not keeping the laws of niddah can have consequences on the purity of the offspring.
  10. ^ Fonrobert, Charlotte Elisheva (2005). "Purification: Purification in Judaism". In Jones, Lindsay (ed.). Encyclopedia of Religion. Vol. 11 (2nd ed.). Macmillan Reference USA. This term is technically a misnomer... It entered Jewish legal discourse in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century, before it was popularized in the market of handbooks for married couples. One of its main functions is rooted in its polemical force, vis a vis liberal, non-observant Jews
  11. ^ a b c Sigvartsen, Jan A. (2017). "The Biblical Law of Niddah and Its Muslim". {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  12. ^ a b Wasserfall, Rahel R. (1999). Women and Water: Menstruation in Jewish life and law. University Press of New England. p. 23. ISBN 978-0-87451-960-0.
  13. ^ a b Jacobs, Joseph and Judah David Eisenstein (1906). "Red Heifer", Jewish Encyclopedia.
  14. ^ Botterweck, et al. (1999), p. 163 (vol. 4)
  15. ^ David L. Petersen Late Israelite prophecy: studies in deutero-prophetic literature ISBN 0891300767. 1977 "The final product, 2 Chronicles 29, represents more than just a simple description of Hezekiah's temple rededication; ... Levites dovetails so neatly with the narrative's description of what they did: the carrying of the tumah/niddah."
  16. ^ Klein, et al. (2008), p. 373.
  17. ^ Knohl (2014), p. 159
  18. ^ a b Teherani (2019), p. 6 (chapter 2)
  19. ^ a b Teherani (2019), p. 24 (chapter 3)
  20. ^ Scientifically, the brown colorization found in the spotting of white panties is often the result of period blood being trapped in the vagina and its exposure to the vagina's acidic environment (lactic acid), causing the oxidation, or chemical break-down, of the blood. See Obstetrician-Gynecologist/Physician Danielle Jones, MD FACOG, 5 "Strange" Things Your Vagina Does That Are NORMAL on YouTube, educational information video / May 2021, minutes 3:52–4:34.
  21. ^ Babylonian Talmud (Berakhot 31a)
  22. ^ Maimonides (1974), Hil. Issurei Bi'ah 11:3–4
  23. ^ Maimonides, Mishne Torah (Hil. Issurei Bi'ah 6:1–5)
  24. ^ Babylonian Talmud (Berakhot 31a, Rashi s.v. יושבת עליה ז' נקיים‎)
  25. ^ Tshuvath HaRambam (as quoted in Igrot Kodesh vol. 3 p. 374)
  26. ^ Shelah, vol. 1 p. 452, Pitchei Harakanti (Menahem Recanati) Chap. 586, Teshuvat HaRif Chap. 297
  27. ^ With the exception for unique individuals - Igrot Kodesh vol. 3 p. 374
  28. ^ Cohen, A. (1984)
  29. ^ Rahamim Shaul Sultan. Rose of the Valley. Feldheim. p. 50. Since the laws of ketamin are very broad and intricate, and numerous factors need to be taken into account, one should always seek the advice of a rabbi who specializes in the laws of nidah whenever a ketem is found
  30. ^ Goldin, Simha (3 January 2020). Jewish Women in Europe in the Middle Ages: A quiet revolution. Manchester University Press. p. 220n78. ISBN 978-1-5261-4827-8.
  31. ^ Wasserfall, Rahel (2015). Women and Water: Menstruation in Jewish Life and Law. Brandeis University Press. p. 102. ISBN 978-1-61168-870-2.
  32. ^ The original Torah instruction was that a woman may immerse herself immediately following the cessation of blood discharge. Seven days are given to all women during their regular monthly menstrual cycle, known as the "days of the menstruate" (Hebrew: niddah), even if her actual period lasted only 3 to 5 days. Only with the woman who had an "irregular flow" (Heb. zivah) was she required to count seven days of cleanness when her menstrual flow ceased (Leviticus 15:25–28). The "irregular flow" (Heb. zivah) was determined in the following manner: From the eighth day after the beginning of her period (the terminus post quem, or the earliest date in which they begin to reckon the case of a zavah), when she should have normally concluded her period, these are days that are known in Hebrew as the days of a running issue (Hebrew: zivah), and which simply defines a time (from the 8th to the 18th day, for a total of eleven days) that, if the woman had an irregular flow of blood for two consecutive days during this time, she becomes a zavah and is capable of defiling whatever she touches, and especially whatever object she happens to be standing upon, lying upon or sitting upon. Because of the complexities in determining these days in most women, especially with those who do not have fixed periods, the Sages of Israel declared that all menstruant women are to be viewed in such a doubtful condition, regardless of when they saw blood, requiring them all to count seven days of cleanness before their immersion. See: Jerusalem Talmud (Berakhoth 37a [5:1]). Explained by Maimonides in his Mishne Torah (Hil. Issurei Bi'ah 6:1–5)
  33. ^ a b c Berkowitz, Miriam (2006). "Reshaping the Laws of Family Purity for the Modern World" (PDF). The Rabbinical Assembly.
  34. ^ "A Developmental Perspective on the Laws of Niddah", David C. Kraemer, Exploring Judaism: The Collected Essays of David Kraemer, Univ Pr of America, 1999
  35. ^ There is a dispute as to whether this prohibition is biblical or rabbinic. See Negiah; see also Badei HaShulchan 195:14.
  36. ^ There are additional restrictions in the time of the Holy Temple because of the Biblical concept of Tumah.
  37. ^ Remah Yoreh Deah 183:1; see Shiurei Shevet HaLeivi 183:7
  38. ^ When the wife is a niddah, touch between spouses that is not Derech Chiba v'Taavah is only prohibited rabbinically according to some authorities, although most rabbis disagree, prohibiting all forms of intimacy where physical touching is involved. See Badei HaShulchan 195:14.
  39. ^ Shulhan Arukh (Yoreh De'ah 195)
  40. ^ a b Knohl (2014), pp. 163–173 (chapter 7)
  41. ^ a b c Susan Grossman, Mikveh and the Sanctity of Being Created Human, Committee on Jewish Law and Standards, Rabbinical Assembly, December 6, 2006]
  42. ^ Teherani (2019), p. 104, section 1, citing Yosef, O. (2018), vol. 2. p. 292.
  43. ^ Teherani (2019), p. 109, section 24, citing the Shulhan Arukh (Yoreh De'ah 196:1).
  44. ^ Teherani (2019), p. 113, section 1, citing the Shulhan Arukh (Yoreh De'ah 196:1).
  45. ^ Knohl (2014), p. 90
  46. ^ Yisrael Meir (1971), p. 71
  47. ^ Teharani (2019), p. 113, section 2, citing Yosef, O. (2018), vol. 2, p. 301.
  48. ^ Teharani (2019), p. 118, section 29, citing Yosef, O. (2018), vol. 2, p. 338.
  49. ^ a b Badiḥi (2011), p. 165 (responsum no. 41).
  50. ^ Yisrael Meir (1971), p. 72–74
  51. ^ a b Knohl (2014), pp. 104–105
  52. ^ Teherani (2019), p. 121, section 44, citing the Shulhan Arukh (Yoreh De'ah 196:11).
  53. ^ Teherani (2019), p. 121, section 44, brings down a different example, having the same import. If she cohabited with her husband on Sunday night, she performs the hefseq be-ṭaharah on Thursday, shortly before sunset, and then on Friday she begins the 1st day of counting 7 days of cleanness, which she then concludes on Thursday of the following week. On that same Thursday night she immerses in the mikveh.
  54. ^ Teherani (2019), p. 121, section 45, citing the Shulhan Arukh (Yoreh De'ah 196:11).
  55. ^ Teherani (2019), p. 122, section 49, citing Yosef, O. (2018), vol. 2, p. 427.
  56. ^ a b Maimonides (1974), Hil. Issurei Bi'ah 11:14
  57. ^ Compare the medieval homiletic work, Midrash Tanḥuma, Parashat Metzora, end of section 7, which is perhaps the source for this custom.
  58. ^ a b c d Ratsabi (1992), p. 46
  59. ^ Badiḥi (2011), pp. 169–170 (responsum no. 41). According to Badihi, there were actually three customs practised in Yemen. Some followed the ruling of Rabbi Moses Isserles and waited 5 days before proceeding to count seven days of cleanness, while others waited 7 days before they began to count seven days of cleanness, and, yet, others (who had not cohabited with their husbands in the past 72 hours) would inspect themselves when all bleeding had stopped and then, on the next day, begin to count seven days of cleanness.
  60. ^ Evyatar Marienberg, "Traditional Jewish Sexual Practices and Their Possible Impact on Jewish Fertility and Demography," Harvard Theological Review 106:3 (2013) 243-286
  61. ^ Ivry (2013), pp. 208–226
  62. ^ "Haaretz Newspaper, "Be pure or be fruitful" December 15, 2006". haaretz.com. Retrieved 17 March 2018.
  63. ^ Sternbuch (1992–1997), vol. 4
  64. ^ Mishneh Torah Kedushah Laws of forbidden relations 4:6
  65. ^ Mishneh Torah Kedushah Laws of forbidden relations 4:15
  66. ^ Mishneh Torah, Hilchot Issurei Biah 4:14
  67. ^ Teherani (2019), p. 126 (chapter 14, section 13), citing Shulhan Arukh (Yoreh De'ah 197:3); Taharat ha-Bayt (vol. 2, p. 597).
  68. ^ Shulhan Arukh (Yoreh De'ah 200)
  69. ^ Jacobs, F. (2000), chapter 10
  70. ^ Shulhan Arukh (Yoreh De'ah 199:5)
  71. ^ Yoreh Deah 184:2
  72. ^ Shulhan Arukh (Yoreh De'ah 189:1-2)
  73. ^ Shulchan Aruch HaRav, Yoreh De'ah 184:22.
  74. ^ Shulhan Arukh (Yoreh De'ah 184:10)
  75. ^ Shulhan Arukh (Yoreh De'ah 196:11); Turei Zahav, ibid. 5.
  76. ^ Teherani (2019), p. 157 (chapter 17, section 22).
  77. ^ Miriam Berkowitz, Mikveh and the Sanctity of Family Relations, Committee on Jewish Law and Standards, Rabbinical Assembly, December 6, 2006]
  78. ^ a b Reisner (2006).
  79. ^ a b Miriam Berkowitz, Reshaping the Laws of Family Purity for the Modern World, Committee on Jewish Law and Standards, Rabbinical Assembly, December 6, 2006]
  80. ^ Knohl (2014), pp. 102–111 (chapter 2)
  81. ^ Teherani (2019), p. 113–124 (chapter 13)
  82. ^ Yosef, Ovadiah (2018), vol. 2, pp. 301–ff.
  83. ^ Yosef, Ovadiah (1986–1995), vol. 5, Yoreh De'ah, sec. 16
  84. ^ Archive of United Synagogue Review, text on Interfaithfamily.com Sanctifying Waters: The Mikvah and Conservative Judaism, retrieved 12-30-2011

Bibliography