Muslim feminist views on hijab: Difference between revisions
m Fix reference site title to remove external link |
FossilWave (talk | contribs) split into categories |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{Multiple issues| |
{{Multiple issues| |
||
{{Tone|date=July 2020}} |
{{Tone|date=July 2020}} |
||
{{Cleanup reorganize|date=July 2020}} |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
Line 10: | Line 9: | ||
An issue that concerns Muslim women is the [[dress code]] expected of them. Islam requires both men and women to dress modestly; this concept is known as ''[[hijab]]'' and covers a wide interpretation of behavior and garments. There is mixed opinion among Muslim feminists concerning externally imposed control. Sufi groups such as [[Al-Ahbash]] do not make it mandatory for women to wear traditional Islamic clothing, even allowing jeans.<ref>{{cite book|last1=Elrich|first1=Hagai|url=http://aigaforum.com/documents/Al-Ahbash-whaibyya.pdf|title=Al-Ahbash and Wahabi|publisher=Cambridge University|page=528|access-date=2018-08-06|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171215113032/http://aigaforum.com/documents/Al-Ahbash-whaibyya.pdf|archive-date=2017-12-15|url-status=live}}</ref> |
An issue that concerns Muslim women is the [[dress code]] expected of them. Islam requires both men and women to dress modestly; this concept is known as ''[[hijab]]'' and covers a wide interpretation of behavior and garments. There is mixed opinion among Muslim feminists concerning externally imposed control. Sufi groups such as [[Al-Ahbash]] do not make it mandatory for women to wear traditional Islamic clothing, even allowing jeans.<ref>{{cite book|last1=Elrich|first1=Hagai|url=http://aigaforum.com/documents/Al-Ahbash-whaibyya.pdf|title=Al-Ahbash and Wahabi|publisher=Cambridge University|page=528|access-date=2018-08-06|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171215113032/http://aigaforum.com/documents/Al-Ahbash-whaibyya.pdf|archive-date=2017-12-15|url-status=live}}</ref> |
||
⚫ | The [[Quran|Qur'an]] states that both men and women should be dressed modestly (33:59-60, 24:30-31; in translation by Ali, 1988, 1126–27). However, it does not use the words veil, hijab, burka, chador, or abaya. It uses the words ''jilbab'' meaning cloak and ''khumur'' meaning shawl. These do not cover the face, hands, or feet. Furthermore, until the third through the ninth century{{clarify|Third to ninth century in Islamic calendar, presumably? That should probably just be changed to the corresponding centuries in the Common Era, for clarity. Also, ''until'' the third ''through'' the ninth makes little sense|date=October 2017}} women prayed in the mosques unveiled. The whole body covering with the burka, chador, and other items of clothing is a tradition and cultural manifest from a conservative reading of the Qur'an by Mullahs; men. It is not what the Qur'an itself states.<ref>"Believing Women in Islam" by Asma Barlas, University of Texas Press, Austin. 2002, 53-55.</ref> |
||
== Views in opposition to the hijab == |
|||
A number of Islamic feminists, including [[Fadela Amara]] and [[:fr:Hédi M'henni|Hedi Mhenni]], support bans on the ''hijab'' for various reasons. Amara explained her support for [[Islamic scarf controversy in France|France's ban of the garment in public buildings]]: "The veil is the visible symbol of the subjugation of women, and therefore has no place in the mixed, [[Laïcité|secular spaces]] of [[Education in France|France's public school system]]."<ref name="guardian17Jul2006">{{cite news|last=George|first=Rose|date=July 17, 2006|title=Ghetto warrior|work=The Guardian|location=London|url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2006/jul/17/france.politicsphilosophyandsociety|url-status=live|accessdate=May 5, 2010|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130830072547/http://www.theguardian.com/world/2006/jul/17/france.politicsphilosophyandsociety|archive-date=2013-08-30}}</ref> When some feminists began defending the headscarf on the grounds of "tradition", Amara's retort was: "It's not tradition, it's archaic! French feminists are totally contradictory. When [[Women in Algeria|Algerian women]] fought [[Hijab by country#Algeria|against wearing the headscarf in Algeria]], [[Feminism in France|French feminists]] supported them. But when it's some young girl in a [[Banlieue|French suburb]] school, they don't. They define [[Liberté, égalité, fraternité|liberty and equality]] according to what colour your skin is. It's nothing more than [[neocolonialism]]."<ref name="guardian17Jul2006" /> Mhenni also expressed support for [[Hijab by country#Tunisia|Tunisia's ban on the veil]]: "If today we accept the headscarf, tomorrow we'll accept that women's rights to work and vote and receive an education be banned and they'll be seen as just a tool for reproduction and housework."<ref>{{cite web|title=Archived copy|url=http://www.islamonline.net/English/News/2006-10/06/06.shtml|url-status=dead|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20100601165818/http://www.islamonline.net/English/News/2006-10/06/06.shtml|archivedate=June 1, 2010|accessdate=August 31, 2009}}</ref> |
A number of Islamic feminists, including [[Fadela Amara]] and [[:fr:Hédi M'henni|Hedi Mhenni]], support bans on the ''hijab'' for various reasons. Amara explained her support for [[Islamic scarf controversy in France|France's ban of the garment in public buildings]]: "The veil is the visible symbol of the subjugation of women, and therefore has no place in the mixed, [[Laïcité|secular spaces]] of [[Education in France|France's public school system]]."<ref name="guardian17Jul2006">{{cite news|last=George|first=Rose|date=July 17, 2006|title=Ghetto warrior|work=The Guardian|location=London|url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2006/jul/17/france.politicsphilosophyandsociety|url-status=live|accessdate=May 5, 2010|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130830072547/http://www.theguardian.com/world/2006/jul/17/france.politicsphilosophyandsociety|archive-date=2013-08-30}}</ref> When some feminists began defending the headscarf on the grounds of "tradition", Amara's retort was: "It's not tradition, it's archaic! French feminists are totally contradictory. When [[Women in Algeria|Algerian women]] fought [[Hijab by country#Algeria|against wearing the headscarf in Algeria]], [[Feminism in France|French feminists]] supported them. But when it's some young girl in a [[Banlieue|French suburb]] school, they don't. They define [[Liberté, égalité, fraternité|liberty and equality]] according to what colour your skin is. It's nothing more than [[neocolonialism]]."<ref name="guardian17Jul2006" /> Mhenni also expressed support for [[Hijab by country#Tunisia|Tunisia's ban on the veil]]: "If today we accept the headscarf, tomorrow we'll accept that women's rights to work and vote and receive an education be banned and they'll be seen as just a tool for reproduction and housework."<ref>{{cite web|title=Archived copy|url=http://www.islamonline.net/English/News/2006-10/06/06.shtml|url-status=dead|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20100601165818/http://www.islamonline.net/English/News/2006-10/06/06.shtml|archivedate=June 1, 2010|accessdate=August 31, 2009}}</ref> |
||
[[Sihem Habchi]], director of [[Ni Putes Ni Soumises]], expressed support for [[Hijab by country#France|France's ban on the burqa in public places]], stating that the ban was a matter of 'democratic principle' and protecting French women from the 'obscurantist, fascist, right-wing movement' that she claims the burqa represents.<ref>{{cite news|last=Malik|first=Zubeida|date=March 15, 2010|title=France's burka dilemma|work=BBC News|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/today/hi/today/newsid_8568000/8568024.stm|url-status=live|access-date=2010-07-15|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100809035550/http://news.bbc.co.uk/today/hi/today/newsid_8568000/8568024.stm|archive-date=2010-08-09}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=Archived copy|url=http://www.vingtparismagazine.com/2010/01/ni-putes-ni-soumises-organizes-a-protest-against-the-burqa.html|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100522080511/http://www.vingtparismagazine.com/2010/01/ni-putes-ni-soumises-organizes-a-protest-against-the-burqa.html|archive-date=2010-05-22|access-date=2010-07-15}}</ref> |
[[Sihem Habchi]], director of [[Ni Putes Ni Soumises]], expressed support for [[Hijab by country#France|France's ban on the burqa in public places]], stating that the ban was a matter of 'democratic principle' and protecting French women from the 'obscurantist, fascist, right-wing movement' that she claims the burqa represents.<ref>{{cite news|last=Malik|first=Zubeida|date=March 15, 2010|title=France's burka dilemma|work=BBC News|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/today/hi/today/newsid_8568000/8568024.stm|url-status=live|access-date=2010-07-15|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100809035550/http://news.bbc.co.uk/today/hi/today/newsid_8568000/8568024.stm|archive-date=2010-08-09}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=Archived copy|url=http://www.vingtparismagazine.com/2010/01/ni-putes-ni-soumises-organizes-a-protest-against-the-burqa.html|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100522080511/http://www.vingtparismagazine.com/2010/01/ni-putes-ni-soumises-organizes-a-protest-against-the-burqa.html|archive-date=2010-05-22|access-date=2010-07-15}}</ref> |
||
== Views in support of the hijab == |
|||
There is also strong support in favor of the veil. Both men and women now view the veil as a symbol of Islamic freedom. As a growing number of individuals have accepted and incorporated the hijab into their cultural dress, women are beginning to reclaim the meaning behind the veil. The veil itself acts as a different experience lived by each woman who wears it.<ref name="ReferenceB">{{cite journal|last1=Berger|first1=Anne-Emmanuelle|date=1998|title=The Newly Veiled Woman: Irigaray, Specularity, and the Islamic Veil|journal=Diacritics|volume=28|issue=1|pages=93–119|doi=10.1353/dia.1998.0001|jstor=1566326}}</ref> “It is no longer a bandanna version of the all-encompassing Afghan burqa, signaling a woman's brainwashed submissiveness or at the very least her lack of choice”.<ref>{{cite news|last=Moeveni|first=Azadeh|date=June 13, 2011|title=Is the Veil Now a Symbol of Islamic Freedom?|work=Time|url=http://content.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,2076653,00.html|url-status=live|access-date=2014-05-02|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140503061813/http://content.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,2076653,00.html|archive-date=2014-05-03}}</ref> Many scholars agree that there is no scripture that requires women to wear the hijab but many still do as an act of religious piety. |
There is also strong support in favor of the veil. Both men and women now view the veil as a symbol of Islamic freedom. As a growing number of individuals have accepted and incorporated the hijab into their cultural dress, women are beginning to reclaim the meaning behind the veil. The veil itself acts as a different experience lived by each woman who wears it.<ref name="ReferenceB">{{cite journal|last1=Berger|first1=Anne-Emmanuelle|date=1998|title=The Newly Veiled Woman: Irigaray, Specularity, and the Islamic Veil|journal=Diacritics|volume=28|issue=1|pages=93–119|doi=10.1353/dia.1998.0001|jstor=1566326}}</ref> “It is no longer a bandanna version of the all-encompassing Afghan burqa, signaling a woman's brainwashed submissiveness or at the very least her lack of choice”.<ref>{{cite news|last=Moeveni|first=Azadeh|date=June 13, 2011|title=Is the Veil Now a Symbol of Islamic Freedom?|work=Time|url=http://content.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,2076653,00.html|url-status=live|access-date=2014-05-02|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140503061813/http://content.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,2076653,00.html|archive-date=2014-05-03}}</ref> Many scholars agree that there is no scripture that requires women to wear the hijab but many still do as an act of religious piety. |
||
Line 18: | Line 22: | ||
A growing number of women have begun to incorporate the hijab into their cultural dress, whether they live in predominantly Muslim countries or not. The veil itself acts as a different experience lived by each woman who wears it, rather than a homogenizing item of clothing. Over the past ten years, the hijab has become more prominent in countries of the world where wearing the hijab itself is not required of women by state law.<ref name="ReferenceB" /> The willingness to wear the veil outside of required states acts as a radical statement in some instances, in a way reclaiming the symbol and meaning of the veil. Where the veil once stereotypically represented the oppression of women, it now acts as a power statement of pride in religion, femininity, and sexual identity. [[Feminist philosophy|Feminist philosophers]] such as [[Luce Irigaray]] also note that the veil can take on the role of empowerment regarding a woman's sexual difference from man.<ref name="ReferenceB" /> |
A growing number of women have begun to incorporate the hijab into their cultural dress, whether they live in predominantly Muslim countries or not. The veil itself acts as a different experience lived by each woman who wears it, rather than a homogenizing item of clothing. Over the past ten years, the hijab has become more prominent in countries of the world where wearing the hijab itself is not required of women by state law.<ref name="ReferenceB" /> The willingness to wear the veil outside of required states acts as a radical statement in some instances, in a way reclaiming the symbol and meaning of the veil. Where the veil once stereotypically represented the oppression of women, it now acts as a power statement of pride in religion, femininity, and sexual identity. [[Feminist philosophy|Feminist philosophers]] such as [[Luce Irigaray]] also note that the veil can take on the role of empowerment regarding a woman's sexual difference from man.<ref name="ReferenceB" /> |
||
== Views emphasizing the freedom of choice == |
|||
⚫ | The [[Quran|Qur'an]] states that both men and women should be dressed modestly (33:59-60, 24:30-31; in translation by Ali, 1988, 1126–27). However, it does not use the words veil, hijab, burka, chador, or abaya. It uses the words ''jilbab'' meaning cloak and ''khumur'' meaning shawl. These do not cover the face, hands, or feet. Furthermore, until the third through the ninth century{{clarify|Third to ninth century in Islamic calendar, presumably? That should probably just be changed to the corresponding centuries in the Common Era, for clarity. Also, ''until'' the third ''through'' the ninth makes little sense|date=October 2017}} women prayed in the mosques unveiled. The whole body covering with the burka, chador, and other items of clothing is a tradition and cultural manifest from a conservative reading of the Qur'an by Mullahs; men. It is not what the Qur'an itself states.<ref>"Believing Women in Islam" by Asma Barlas, University of Texas Press, Austin. 2002, 53-55.</ref> |
||
Rachel Woodlock, an academic and writer who conducts research on Islam and Muslims, points out that the wearing of hijab is contextualised by culture.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Woodlock |first=Rachel |title=Dr Rachel Woodlock |url=https://www.rachelwoodlock.com/ |access-date=17 May 2022 |website=www.rachelwoodlock.com/}}</ref> In addition, modern Muslim feminists believe that ultimately the importance lies in a woman's freedom of choice---her choice to wear the veil or not to, and not have her right to do so threatened. In accordance with a Muslim feminist's personal interpretation of Islamic faith, Muslim women should be able to define dress codes for themselves and what they deem to be morally right.<ref>{{cite web|title=Veiling and Hijab as understood|url=http://www.irfi.org/articles/articles_301_350/veiling_and_hijab_as_understood.htm|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151115172313/http://www.irfi.org/articles/articles_301_350/veiling_and_hijab_as_understood.htm|archive-date=2015-11-15|accessdate=9 December 2015|work=irfi.org}}</ref> |
Rachel Woodlock, an academic and writer who conducts research on Islam and Muslims, points out that the wearing of hijab is contextualised by culture.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Woodlock |first=Rachel |title=Dr Rachel Woodlock |url=https://www.rachelwoodlock.com/ |access-date=17 May 2022 |website=www.rachelwoodlock.com/}}</ref> In addition, modern Muslim feminists believe that ultimately the importance lies in a woman's freedom of choice---her choice to wear the veil or not to, and not have her right to do so threatened. In accordance with a Muslim feminist's personal interpretation of Islamic faith, Muslim women should be able to define dress codes for themselves and what they deem to be morally right.<ref>{{cite web|title=Veiling and Hijab as understood|url=http://www.irfi.org/articles/articles_301_350/veiling_and_hijab_as_understood.htm|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151115172313/http://www.irfi.org/articles/articles_301_350/veiling_and_hijab_as_understood.htm|archive-date=2015-11-15|accessdate=9 December 2015|work=irfi.org}}</ref> |
Revision as of 11:19, 19 May 2022
This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
|
Islamic feminist views on dress codes include feminist views on the issues surrounding women's dress codes in the Islamic religion.
Overview
An issue that concerns Muslim women is the dress code expected of them. Islam requires both men and women to dress modestly; this concept is known as hijab and covers a wide interpretation of behavior and garments. There is mixed opinion among Muslim feminists concerning externally imposed control. Sufi groups such as Al-Ahbash do not make it mandatory for women to wear traditional Islamic clothing, even allowing jeans.[1]
The Qur'an states that both men and women should be dressed modestly (33:59-60, 24:30-31; in translation by Ali, 1988, 1126–27). However, it does not use the words veil, hijab, burka, chador, or abaya. It uses the words jilbab meaning cloak and khumur meaning shawl. These do not cover the face, hands, or feet. Furthermore, until the third through the ninth century[clarification needed] women prayed in the mosques unveiled. The whole body covering with the burka, chador, and other items of clothing is a tradition and cultural manifest from a conservative reading of the Qur'an by Mullahs; men. It is not what the Qur'an itself states.[2]
Views in opposition to the hijab
A number of Islamic feminists, including Fadela Amara and Hedi Mhenni, support bans on the hijab for various reasons. Amara explained her support for France's ban of the garment in public buildings: "The veil is the visible symbol of the subjugation of women, and therefore has no place in the mixed, secular spaces of France's public school system."[3] When some feminists began defending the headscarf on the grounds of "tradition", Amara's retort was: "It's not tradition, it's archaic! French feminists are totally contradictory. When Algerian women fought against wearing the headscarf in Algeria, French feminists supported them. But when it's some young girl in a French suburb school, they don't. They define liberty and equality according to what colour your skin is. It's nothing more than neocolonialism."[3] Mhenni also expressed support for Tunisia's ban on the veil: "If today we accept the headscarf, tomorrow we'll accept that women's rights to work and vote and receive an education be banned and they'll be seen as just a tool for reproduction and housework."[4]
Sihem Habchi, director of Ni Putes Ni Soumises, expressed support for France's ban on the burqa in public places, stating that the ban was a matter of 'democratic principle' and protecting French women from the 'obscurantist, fascist, right-wing movement' that she claims the burqa represents.[5][6]
Views in support of the hijab
There is also strong support in favor of the veil. Both men and women now view the veil as a symbol of Islamic freedom. As a growing number of individuals have accepted and incorporated the hijab into their cultural dress, women are beginning to reclaim the meaning behind the veil. The veil itself acts as a different experience lived by each woman who wears it.[7] “It is no longer a bandanna version of the all-encompassing Afghan burqa, signaling a woman's brainwashed submissiveness or at the very least her lack of choice”.[8] Many scholars agree that there is no scripture that requires women to wear the hijab but many still do as an act of religious piety.
A growing number of women have begun to incorporate the hijab into their cultural dress, whether they live in predominantly Muslim countries or not. The veil itself acts as a different experience lived by each woman who wears it, rather than a homogenizing item of clothing. Over the past ten years, the hijab has become more prominent in countries of the world where wearing the hijab itself is not required of women by state law.[7] The willingness to wear the veil outside of required states acts as a radical statement in some instances, in a way reclaiming the symbol and meaning of the veil. Where the veil once stereotypically represented the oppression of women, it now acts as a power statement of pride in religion, femininity, and sexual identity. Feminist philosophers such as Luce Irigaray also note that the veil can take on the role of empowerment regarding a woman's sexual difference from man.[7]
Views emphasizing the freedom of choice
Rachel Woodlock, an academic and writer who conducts research on Islam and Muslims, points out that the wearing of hijab is contextualised by culture.[9] In addition, modern Muslim feminists believe that ultimately the importance lies in a woman's freedom of choice---her choice to wear the veil or not to, and not have her right to do so threatened. In accordance with a Muslim feminist's personal interpretation of Islamic faith, Muslim women should be able to define dress codes for themselves and what they deem to be morally right.[10]
See also
- Islamic feminism
- Hermeneutics of feminism in Islam
- Haya (Islam)
- Sartorial hijab
- Islamic clothing
- Awrah
- Purdah
- Hijab by country
Bibliography
- Hammad, Amber (2021) Unveiling The Veil: Self-Representation in Contemporary Muslim Female Art https://doi.org/10.26190/unsworks/2038
References
- ^ Elrich, Hagai. Al-Ahbash and Wahabi (PDF). Cambridge University. p. 528. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2017-12-15. Retrieved 2018-08-06.
- ^ "Believing Women in Islam" by Asma Barlas, University of Texas Press, Austin. 2002, 53-55.
- ^ a b George, Rose (July 17, 2006). "Ghetto warrior". The Guardian. London. Archived from the original on 2013-08-30. Retrieved May 5, 2010.
- ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on June 1, 2010. Retrieved August 31, 2009.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) - ^ Malik, Zubeida (March 15, 2010). "France's burka dilemma". BBC News. Archived from the original on 2010-08-09. Retrieved 2010-07-15.
- ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2010-05-22. Retrieved 2010-07-15.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) - ^ a b c Berger, Anne-Emmanuelle (1998). "The Newly Veiled Woman: Irigaray, Specularity, and the Islamic Veil". Diacritics. 28 (1): 93–119. doi:10.1353/dia.1998.0001. JSTOR 1566326.
- ^ Moeveni, Azadeh (June 13, 2011). "Is the Veil Now a Symbol of Islamic Freedom?". Time. Archived from the original on 2014-05-03. Retrieved 2014-05-02.
- ^ Woodlock, Rachel. "Dr Rachel Woodlock". www.rachelwoodlock.com/. Retrieved 17 May 2022.
- ^ "Veiling and Hijab as understood". irfi.org. Archived from the original on 2015-11-15. Retrieved 9 December 2015.