User talk:Benny-T5252

Welcome!

Hi Benny-T5252! I noticed your contributions to Open Society Foundations and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Marquardtika (talk) 14:59, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Benny-T5252 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hello, my names Benny, i wanted to use my account to spread some positivity on the site, noting the good gestures and moments of those around the world, i am very new to wiki as a whole, and had no idea we were not allowed more than one account, i figured having two accounts for different topic types would be the best way to go about it, i see now this is an issue and would like this account unblocked if possible? i understand that there was a problem with the proxies i used for the account? general internet security is rather important to myself so i used proxys or VPN's for almost everything i do, again i apologise if this is an issue.

Decline reason:

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a place to "spread some positivity", I'm afraid. You haven't addressed WP:UPE which is a significant issue flagged in your sockpuppet investigation. Yamla (talk) 12:32, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Natasha Tsukanova moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Natasha Tsukanova, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. MarioGom (talk) 22:10, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Benny-T5252. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she/they) 02:06, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Benny-T5252 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Request 2: Hello, while i do understand this is an encyclopedia, i feel my posts so far have had noteworthy merit in addition to being positive sources about aiding foundations that aim to better communities in need, therefore spreading positivity (i apologise if i was too vague in my reasoning of ethos for my account) in regards to the UPE issue, again, being new i'm a little lost as to why people would pay when they could do it themselves? Furthermore, i'm at a loss as to why this would be the case for my account, im unsure what i did or posted that would have lead to this? i feel my edits have been geared toward technological advancements on one account in addition to philanthropy on this account and don't understand why this is not allowed considering in the guild-lines i see it states you are allowed more than one account, and i feel my posts have been noteworthy.

Decline reason:

There are legitimate uses of alternate accounts, but you created this account after your prior account was blocked. Blocks are on the person, not just the account; you may not edit under any account or IP address if any one of your accounts is blocked. Telling the world about good works is a nice thing to do, but this this isn't the place to do it. 331dot (talk) 13:45, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Benny-T5252 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Request 3: "but you created this account after your prior account was blocked." I have no clue what your referring too, i have two accounts, this one and James-G369 and they were created around the same time for two separate industries, technology and philanthropy(my interests). I feel as though i'm getting passed from person to person without anyone actually responding to my reasoning here, if you read this please look into the claims made and my rebuttal before throwing some guideline at me i have been unaware of, again i am new to the platform and have not made edits to the site prior to these accounts at any stage of my life.

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Request 3: "but you created this account after your prior account was blocked." I have no clue what your referring too, i have two accounts, this one and James-G369 and they were created around the same time for two separate industries, technology and philanthropy(my interests). I feel as though i'm getting passed from person to person without anyone actually responding to my reasoning here, if you read this please look into the claims made and my rebuttal before throwing some guideline at me i have been unaware of, again i am new to the platform and have not made edits to the site prior to these accounts at any stage of my life. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Request 3: "but you created this account after your prior account was blocked." I have no clue what your referring too, i have two accounts, this one and James-G369 and they were created around the same time for two separate industries, technology and philanthropy(my interests). I feel as though i'm getting passed from person to person without anyone actually responding to my reasoning here, if you read this please look into the claims made and my rebuttal before throwing some guideline at me i have been unaware of, again i am new to the platform and have not made edits to the site prior to these accounts at any stage of my life. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Request 3: "but you created this account after your prior account was blocked." I have no clue what your referring too, i have two accounts, this one and James-G369 and they were created around the same time for two separate industries, technology and philanthropy(my interests). I feel as though i'm getting passed from person to person without anyone actually responding to my reasoning here, if you read this please look into the claims made and my rebuttal before throwing some guideline at me i have been unaware of, again i am new to the platform and have not made edits to the site prior to these accounts at any stage of my life. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}