User talk:Liance

Click here to leave Liance a message!

Thank you for your review!

	Awesome Draft Reviewer
	Stay awesome :) FlantasyFlan (talk) 18:50, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Thank you :) -Liance^{talk/contribs} 23:52, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

List of google easter egg's edits

You made multiple large edits without giving an edit summary, please remember to give an edit summary unless you are making a minor edit. Idontknowwhattouseasmyusername300 (talk) 12:58, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

Could you point out which edits you're referring to? Checking the edit history I added an edit summary for every major edit with content addition, I didn't add summaries only for minor edits where an additional ref was added or formatting was changed. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 16:05, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

A Barnstar For You!!!

		The Original Barnstar
		A Barnstar for being one of the best reviewers!

- Free Barnstar from OGxSLAY3R!

Thanks! -Liance^{talk/contribs} 04:45, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

Revised - 90s Art School page

Thanks for your feedback Liance. The entry has been updated based upon your input. Additional reliable sources added. Liz Marks (talk) 15:09, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Question from Home Service99 on User:Home Service99 (17:56, 4 April 2022)

I want to delete this message --Home Service99 (talk) 17:56, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Question from Helloheart (00:28, 8 April 2022)

Hello! What pages need creating? --Helloheart (talk) 00:28, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

Hello Helloheart! I am Liance, your Wikipedia mentor. What subjects are you most interested in? We have many WikiProjects, so if you find one about a topic you are interested in or know a lot about that would be a good place to start! -Liance^{talk/contribs} 00:12, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

Request for Review

Hi Liance, Previously you have rejected my article on Akshita Mudgal. That was my first submission and I was not sure on all the changes I could make. I added some citations and references and resubmitted it. I am not sure if I resubmit an article it will go back to your bucket. Please review my article and help me if any improvements are needed in it — Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiEditor0809 (talk • contribs) 09:48, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

WikiEditor0809 If you resubmit the article using the blue "Resubmit" button at the top, then another reviewer will review it soon and provide you with feedback. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 00:19, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

Draft: Ludovico Technique

Hello Liance! Recently you reviewed my draft for the band Ludovico Technique. I have added several new sources addressing the issue of notability you had brought up. Specifically, the band has released three releases (2 full lengths and an EP) on Metropolis Records , a significant indie that has operated for 30 years and represents many notable artists (meets WP:BAND #5) and have documented evidence of having toured (meets WP:BAND #4). Additionally, an appearance on the German Alternative Charts (DAC) should meet WP:BAND #2. Is it possible for you to take another peek? Thank you so much!! CorinneWestbrook (talk) 16:29, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

References

Hi CorinneWestbrook - you can resubmit the draft for review using the blue "Resubmit" button at the top of your draft and a reviewer will look it over soon. I do not re-review draft articles for the sake of fairness so a fresh set of eyes can provide a second opinion. If possible I would leave a note with this information at the top of the draft as well. Hope this helps. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 00:16, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

Ok thank you so much! :) I had done all of that last month :) Either way, I appreciate your time!! CorinneWestbrook (talk) 11:49, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

Iceland: Beyond Sigur Rós

Hi Liance,

Thank you for taking the time to review my article, It is a film I really like that we watched in class for study. I am just wondering what else is needed for it to meet the criteria, it has an IMBD and a production website.

Any help would be appreciated! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Clarkeofsalford (talk • contribs) 07:55, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Hey Clarkeofsalford - Articles on Wikipedia need to meet notability criteria in order to be included. This means having references that show significant coverage in secondary independent sources - you can refer to WP:NFILM for more info. If the film meets any criteria at WP:NFO there is a good chance it is notable. Hope this helps. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 06:01, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

Question from Nora bonaccorso on User:Nora bonaccorso (15:34, 13 April 2022)

Hello, how do i delete my account --Nora bonaccorso (talk) 15:34, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Hi Nora bonaccorso - unfortunately it is not possible to completely delete a Wikipedia account as all edits need to be attributed. You can request pages you created be deleted, or see WP:DELETEACC for more options. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 05:59, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

Thank you; specific questions on specific issues cited?

Hello,

First of all, thank you for the prompt review of this page: [[1]]

Apologies in advance for asking questions that might be answered elsewhere. I have actually looked through many help articles and tried to assimilate information as best as possible, however, it seems there are some specific issues that exist that need to be fixed.

There are no specific flags in the draft article submitted, that I am able to locate, that indicate what the specific problems are that need to be fixed.

Can you provide detail on the specific issues that caused the article to be rejected? Without specific issues highlighted, it becomes a guessing game as to what/how to fix them. I would like to make the adjustments and resubmit the article, which, hopefully, would be the first of several on newer manufacturing, supply chain, and IIoT technologies.

Thank you very much in advance, respectfully yours,

--Viobeatty (talk) 16:05, 13 April 2022 (UTC)Viobeatty

Hi Viobeatty - articles on Wikipedia must be written with a neutral point of view in order to be included. This means language should objectively describe the subject of the article. Draft:Decisyon had some issues with this, such as, for example, Decisyon Digital Factory is positioned as a "turnkey" solution for manufacturers which is a bit promotional in tone. External links should also be removed from the body of the article. Lastly please review WP:NCORP before resubmitting to ensure your draft meets the notability criteria. Hope this helps. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 06:04, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

sup bro, hope you are doing good, i got a question about the reach free school article

hello, just got a question so that i can improve my article; what sources were not good to be used in the reach free school article? so far, after reading more about independent sources, i think that these sources i used need to change: 2,3,7,?10? is there any else that were not reliable enough, or that were not notable enough? i'm quite new to this. thanks in advance if you respond bro. SPPoonsQwert (talk) 16:10, 14 April 2022 (UTC)sPPoonsQwert

SPPoonsQwert Articles on most educational institutions must meet the criteria at WP:NSCHOOL which I commented on your draft. Specifically you need additional significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent to demonstrate the draft is notable enough for inclusion. I would recommend picking the WP:THREE sources that best fit the criteria and then note them on your draft. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 04:04, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Draft: Goldback

Hi again Liance! I just wanted to see if you know of any way to "bump" my draft submission that you reviewed and declined the first time around. I think it has enough RS'es now for approval, but I don't want to step out of bounds or out of line, but I was also hoping to see if there was any way to have some visibility into the approval process as to when it may (or may not) be approved into the main space. Thank you! ♥Th78blue (talk)♥ 17:36, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Th78blue Unfortunately a vast majority of AfC reviewers do not perform reviews on request and there are no real ways to "bump" a submission (which some editors might see as gaming the system), so you just have to sit tight for now. One suggestion I have is locating a WikiProject relevant to your draft subject and asking someone with lots of expertise in the area to check it over and make sure it looks good to prevent another decline. Hope this helps. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 04:02, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Certainly no intention to "game the system", thank you for the information. ♥Th78blue (talk)♥ 12:52, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Clarification about article creation criteria

Hi Liance,

Thank you for taking the time to review my article and for contributing to Wikipedia in general. (I also think your Equality for All userbox is really cool.) I was wondering if you could give me more details about article creation criteria. I saw that you denied my article because of WP:LOCALCOVERAGE, and when I read this it said that local sources are considered less significant, but I was wondering if the local independent secondary sources could be considered in combination with the one national independent secondary source as part of the "multiple" count, and if the local coverage being from a major city has an effect on this. If not, how many more national sources would you recommend I add before re-nominating my article?

Thank you! JA's New Camera (talk) 05:31, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Hi JA's New Camera - articles about organizations on Wikipedia must meet WP:NCORP, which means (generally at least three) secondary, reliable sources that are independent of the subject and demonstrate significant coverage. Aside from the SD News and Del Mar Times sources the references are not suitable, YouTube is also considered an unreliable source. WP:LOCALCOVERAGE states that at least one regional, statewide, provincial, national, or international source is necessary so as long as you have one of those it would work. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 05:37, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for the explanation. In regards to your comment about YouTube, do you mean that YouTube is always considered unreliable on Wikipedia, or is it possible to provide additional attribution showing that a particular video's source can be considered credible? JA's New Camera (talk) 05:44, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

JA's New Camera Unless the video is uploaded officially by an organization/credible source, YouTube is considered unreliable and should not be used if possible (more info at WP:RSPYT). Using YouTube as a source is acceptable at best but should be avoided if a substitute can be located. Hope this helps. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 05:52, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

In my situation, there are sadly no other sources for the information I am citing. Is there any way for me to provide supplementary information to verify the reliability of the channel that posted the video I'm citing? JA's New Camera (talk) 06:13, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

You can cite the media/source directly without linking to a potentially copyright-violating YouTube video if the original source is reliable. Templates like {{cite episode}} or {{cite AV media}} could work. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 06:18, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

The video was originally posted on YouTube, the channel is run by the executive director of the foundation that administers the competition that the video is about. I was just wondering if there were some way for me to cross-reference the video to show that it's reliable. JA's New Camera (talk) 06:31, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Unfortunately I'm not terribly certain if there's an elegant or correct way to do that. I would just cite the YouTube video as you would with any web source and note the publisher is the organization you are referring to if there are absolutely no alternatives to the YT vid. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 06:34, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Forgot to mention that actually the SD News source would not be considered independent because it is an interview with individuals related to the subject, so it would not count toward notability. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 05:38, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Thank you so much for your guidance! JA's New Camera (talk) 07:16, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

JoJo's Pitter Patter Pop Article Creation

Hi there. I noticed you declined my submission for the creation of the JoJo's Pitter Patter Pop article. Could you please provide some ways I could improve the article to increase its 'acticleness'. Thanks :) FishandChipper (talk) 15:19, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Hi FishandChipper - I commented on Draft:JoJo's Pitter Patter Pop! that the draft did not meet WP:NGAME (notability for video games). On Wikipedia all articles must meet notability criteria, which is significant coverage in independent, secondary, reliable sources. Twitter should not be cited as it is not a secondary source. Otherwise, the draft cites two sources which only cover the game's announcement and shutdown, which is not enough to establish significant coverage of the game. Please add more references to demonstrate notability. Hope this helps. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 15:26, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for this feedback. This is my first article so Im pretty new to this. FishandChipper (talk) 15:28, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Regarding an AfC comment

[2] - YouTube is not a source at all. It’s a publishing platform. The level of reliability comes from whoever uploaded it. SK2242 (talk) 19:05, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Per WP:RSPYT YouTube is, in almost all cases, not considered a reliable source which is why I state it's an unreliable source if it is cited as one by a draft author. Although it can be considered a reliable source if a news org, etc uploads it, that was not the case for the review in question. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 16:17, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

Question from Moses Brian on User:Moses Brian (14:04, 19 May 2022)

Hello good evening. Could you please help me on how to publish my reports here. Thanks --Moses Brian (talk) 14:04, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Hi Moses Brian, welcome to Wikipedia. Articles on Wikipedia must meet specific notability criteria. Assuming you are referring to your user page, autobiographies are highly discouraged due to the unavoidable bias they cause. You can take a look at Help:Your first article for more information. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 20:30, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Request for review & approval of Wikipedia Page/Article

Hi Liance, please I need help with my article page with review and approval it has been 6 months now. I will appreciate any feedback. warm regards! — Preceding unsigned comment added by George Nyiam (talk • contribs) 12:14, 21 May 2022 (UTC) George Nyiam (talk) 12:26, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Question from DetectiveTheBand (13:36, 21 May 2022)

Hello. I would like to add a website link to Detective, a band, as well as for Jon Hyde, the drummer in Detective. I just created an account under DetectiveThe Band, but I can't figure out how to add the band's website to the Wikipedia entries. Can you help me? --DetectiveTheBand (talk) 13:36, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Re-submission

Since I was not the original author, I might not be the right person to re-submit Draft:exaly; but I believe the latest version meets your expectation! — Preceding unsigned comment added by MojoDiJi (talk • contribs) 23:21, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Request on 20:06:24, 27 May 2022 for assistance on AfC submission by Karupatti

• Karupatti (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Lingesh (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I've edited it, added citations, backed it up with resources, and submitted it again. Since then, it has just been there. Hasn't been approved or declined. As time goes by, I feel like I did it wrong or missed something. Can you please check? Am kinda clueless right now and need help to understand what I need to do to get it accepted. Can you please help?

Karupatti (talk) 20:06, 27 May 2022 (UTC)