Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aaron Erick Lozada

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 03:29, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Aaron Erick Lozada

Aaron Erick Lozada (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable (according to Wikipedia's definition of the term) writer who was heavily involved in creation of the article and has resurrected it after previous deletions. Users and IP's editing this article have also inserted links to this entry into other entries (such as Notable People from Quezon). Also appears that several users and IPs are socks for the author, which is the subject of the entry. ɳorɑfʈ ^Talk! 02:26, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

• Delete on the merits. The sources indicated either don't refer to the subject at all or confirm facts about the subject - he is a blogger, for example - but none of them actually offer the kind of coverage we require to show notability. There are no sources offered, nor can I find any, that actually talk about the subject himself. This may be a case where the Usual Caveats apply, as the subject seems to be early in his career; if he publishes notable work, or if he finds himself covered in reliable sources as required by WP:GNG, then an article may become appropriate. But not yet. UltraExactZZ ^Said ~ Did 13:31, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:04, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:05, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

• Delete The references given are either not independent, or not significant reliable sources, or do not actually mention the subject. While you are at it I would recommend you also nominate for deletion the article about his blog, Pinoy Gossip Boy, for the same reasons. --MelanieN (talk) 23:54, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.