User talk:CT55555: Difference between revisions

	; Archives (Index) ;
	2022 1; 2022 2; 2023 1; 2023 2; 2024 1;
	This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 02:33, 9 June 2022

This is CT55555's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: Index, 1, 2: 30 days

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Agtx. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Jean-Marc Bouju, and have marked it as unreviewed. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

agtx 19:05, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Erik Reinert

Why did you place Erik Refner (photographer) on Erik Reinert? I can't find any indication, either in Wikipedia or by googling, that the photographer is known as Erik Reinert. Leschnei (talk) 12:29, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for catching this. Basically I made a mistake, which I have now fixed. The slightly longer explanation was that when I searched for "Erik Refner" it was taking me to "Erik Reinert", sorry for this, quite silly mistake to make and out of character for me. CT55555 (talk) 13:23, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks CT55555 - been there/done that Leschnei (talk) 21:00, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Syrian Canadian Foundation (May 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jovanmilic97 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Passing mentions aren't enough to establish notability of this foundation.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Syrian Canadian Foundation and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Syrian Canadian Foundation, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jovanmilic97 (talk) 08:04, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CT55555! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jovanmilic97 (talk) 08:04, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Knut Helge Hurum

Hello, CT55555. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Knut Helge Hurum, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:01, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NORACISTS

Moved from AFD, as it's not direct relevant there. Although obviously race is a farcical idea with as much scientific credence as fairies at the bottom of the garden, it is in common use (census data for instance). So if the US census was categorising people into certain groups, we would then have articles about those groups (however dumb that grouping was). That's the point I was trying to make, and that the editors of the article were acting in good (if misguided) faith. - LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 10:23, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the explanation. CT55555 (talk) 12:53, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cooke Creek mine

There is no mention of Cooke Creek mine at pages 316 or 317 of the Mines Dept pdf that is quoted as a source... ??? JarrahTree 02:11, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I used the pages from the PDF reader, not the actual document. I hope that helps. CT55555 (talk) 02:14, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've fixed the page numbers now CT55555 (talk) 02:19, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks JarrahTree 03:42, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, CT55555

Thank you for creating Kavita Naidu.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 23:08, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the feedback User:North8000 :-) CT55555 (talk) 23:29, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Glad you stuck around

Hi CT55555, I know earlier on you contemplated giving up on Wikipedia but I am so glad you stuck around. You have grown so much as an editor and contribute so much. Anyway, thank you. S0091 (talk) 23:57, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Some early interactions felt rough, but I appreciate your guidance and encouragement, which happened to land just as I was on the brink of giving up. I'm quite enjoying my new hobby, thanks again sincerely for the encouragement. CT55555 (talk) 00:13, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've gone from struggling to get through AfD to my first Good Article. Sending the good vibes back to you today. User:S0091 CT55555 (talk) 19:49, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I can always use some good vibes. :) Congratulations on the GA! S0091 (talk) 15:08, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Tracey Medeiros

On 16 May 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Tracey Medeiros, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that The Art of Cooking with Cannabis by Tracey Medeiros was praised by the Los Angeles Times for showcasing a wide range of recipes outside of the "tired pot-brownie cliché"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tracey Medeiros. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Tracey Medeiros), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:04, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Uranium mining in the Bancroft area GAN

FYI, I posted my latest at Talk:Uranium mining in the Bancroft area/GA1 on 5 May. – Reidgreg (talk) 17:24, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Sorry for the delay. I think you noted I made editing errors in my last round of edits, so I'm waiting until I can do this in a not-rushed manner - i.e. probably this weekend. User:Reidgreg CT55555 (talk) 12:55, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Make sure to ping me when you're done. – Reidgreg (talk) 23:53, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Beaverhouse

The land claim is completed. They achieved First Nation recognition! Signed with Four tildes.🧚thank you for mentor offer. I think I will avoid editing and just learn on Wikipedia. 66.103.52.68 (talk) 04:04, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Great news. Thanks for sharing. I have updated the article on Beaverhouse First Nation. I am still not 100% sure the connection between McGary and Beaverhouse, can you say more about that? Are there any newspaper articles that link Beaverhouse and McGarry? Obviously the locations are near, but I don't think I've read anything that links the two clearly enough. All the best to you. CT55555 (talk) 13:02, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mcgarry

Thank you for the best wishes. McGarry is in the land claim area.🧚four tildes🌲 66.103.52.68 (talk) 15:31, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, CT55555

Thank you for creating Ontario COVID-19 Science Advisory Table.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:12, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pat King (activist)

Hi CT55555, if the disruption continues after the three months, please notify me on my talk page and I'll protect the article for a year. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:01, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. When should I consider the three months to start? From today? CT55555 (talk) 15:06, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well, to be precise, they end at 14:58, 29 August 2022 (UTC).

~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:39, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for answering the question that I should have asked. :-) I think we might be speaking in early September, but fingers crossed otherwise.... CT55555 (talk) 15:42, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, you're optimistic. All the best, ~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:51, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm assuming good faith. But wouldn't bet on it. lol CT55555 (talk) 15:52, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, CT55555

Thank you for creating Brittlestar.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 15:43, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, CT55555

Thank you for creating Denise Andrea Campbell.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 02:16, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June events from Women in Red

Women in Red June 2022, Vol 8, Issue 6, Nos 214, 217, 227, 231, 232, 233

Online events:

New: LGBTQ+ women | Greenland and the Faroes | Women in music
Contest (Apr/May/Jun): Translation contest (third and last month)
Continuing: Climate (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 09:19, 31 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Your GA nomination of Grand Bargain (humanitarian reform)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Grand Bargain (humanitarian reform) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Figureskatingfan -- Figureskatingfan (talk) 17:21, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Grand Bargain (humanitarian reform)

The article Grand Bargain (humanitarian reform) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Grand Bargain (humanitarian reform) for issues which need to be addressed. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 17:22, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Grand Bargain (humanitarian reform)

The article Grand Bargain (humanitarian reform) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Grand Bargain (humanitarian reform) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Figureskatingfan -- Figureskatingfan (talk) 19:42, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again. Actually it was a "did you know" so I guess that precludes it. User:Figureskatingfan CT55555 (talk) 19:44, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Group AfD

Your guess on structure is as good as mine. I just wasn't looking to subject community to 14 different votes. I have no strong feelings on the topic (and I rarely engage in strident defense of AfD nominations except obvious NCORP/COIs), just want the community decision so I can judge future similar article in line with community consensus. Slywriter (talk) 23:46, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All good. In some ways I appreciate them like this, but I've seen others (about Nobel laureates) get messy when people start to say some are notable and some are not, so let's see how it goes. Thanks for the note. And of course, without the academic papers, I see the logic in your AfD. All the best, CT55555 (talk) 00:04, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Related to your recent discussion at the village pumps, you might be interested in the sidebox we put into WP:RFC. Instead of a "don't break the rules" approach, we provided people with a factual statement. Most editors don't want to be seen deviating from the norms, so a statement of norms can often have a desirable effect. WhatamIdoing (talk) 19:06, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello My name is Jessica and I am a journalist with a news outlet called 19thnews.org. I'm writing about gender bias on wikipedia and Women in Red's latest initiative on adding women in climate and was wondering if you might be willing to chat about your work on wikipedia? my email is jkutz@19thnews.org. Loutucson15 (talk) 20:51, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Theresa Nyabeze

It takes a lot more than just two newspaper articles to establish that a writer passes WP:AUTHOR, especially if one of them is from the local media in the city where she lives and the other one is from a community hyperlocal weekly in another small town where she had previously also lived. If there were major literary awards in the mix, such as the Governor General's Award for English-language children's literature or one of the other awards in Category:Canadian children's literary awards, then one or two sources would be enough because there was a major literary award involved — but if you're shooting for "a writer is notable just because media coverage of her writing exists", then it takes a lot more than just two media hits to achieve that. Bearcat (talk) 01:38, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AUTHOR criterion 3 requires her to play a "major role in co-creating"...a..."well-known work"...which..."must have been the primary subject of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews."

She meets the criterion. It doesn't require awards on top. If it did, it would be pointless, as any major award meets WP:ANYBIO anyway. CT55555 (talk) 02:39, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's a small details and probably not a game-changer in this context, but as you mentioned it at AfD talk, the draft article has three citations about her book.

Concern regarding Draft:SeeChange Initiative

Hello, CT55555. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:SeeChange Initiative, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:06, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Seventh Generation Midwives

Hello, CT55555. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Seventh Generation Midwives, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:09, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Steve Dennis (humanitarian)

Hello, CT55555. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Steve Dennis (humanitarian), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:21, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My apology for without using an edit summary

Hi, I will apologize to you for not using the edit summary and the good news, I restore a few categories back at the Phyllis Marshall article. Also, do not use both categories to double categorize "People from" and "Musicians from" because it already in subcategories and cause confusion to readers. It best to have one specific occupation category to use "Musicians from" and do not use "People from" because occupations is more "specific". I hope you will accept my apology and move on also do not double categorize "People from" categories. I hope you will reply me back. Thanks. 2001:569:7D4F:CC00:878:74DF:C0C4:8766 (talk) 02:17, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I accept your apologies. But I am not sure if I accept your logic. I think it is possible to be a Person from Barrie and also a Musician from Toronto. Because the XXXX...from Toronto type categories include people who lived there for a while. So in Wikipedia categories you can be from two places. However, Musicians from Barrie is not an option. My point is that people can be people and musicians and also from Barrie and also from Toronto. I realise it may be confusing, but that is the system we use here I think. People are not looking at categories to see where people are from, but people are using them to find similar articles.

So basically I disagree. I don't strongly disagree because it's not about my opinion, more it's about consensus. And I'm not sure, but I think the way I have been doing it is in line with consensus.

Thanks for the note and for reacting to my feedback. CT55555 (talk) 02:23, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Really quick reply, I restore both Toronto and Barrie categories by myself. Thanks for the reply. 2001:569:7D4F:CC00:878:74DF:C0C4:8766 (talk) 02:33, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 265: / Line 265: @@
 :So basically I disagree. I don't strongly disagree because it's not about my opinion, more it's about consensus. And I'm not sure, but I think the way I have been doing it is in line with consensus.
 :Thanks for the note and for reacting to my feedback. [[User:CT55555|CT55555]] ([[User talk:CT55555#top|talk]]) 02:23, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
+::Really quick reply, I restore both Toronto and Barrie categories by myself. Thanks for the reply. [[Special:Contributions/2001:569:7D4F:CC00:878:74DF:C0C4:8766|2001:569:7D4F:CC00:878:74DF:C0C4:8766]] ([[User talk:2001:569:7D4F:CC00:878:74DF:C0C4:8766|talk]]) 02:33, 9 June 2022 (UTC)