Jump to content

User talk:Dzubint: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
username.
Line 57: Line 57:


Unfortunately we can't guard against people not taking notice of wikipedia's rules and guidelines. [[User:Stui|Stui]] 16:13, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
Unfortunately we can't guard against people not taking notice of wikipedia's rules and guidelines. [[User:Stui|Stui]] 16:13, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

== username. ==

erm...thanks --[[User:Lenin and McCarthy|Lenin and McCarthy]] | ([[User talk:Lenin & McCarthy|Complain here]]) 16:28, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:28, 19 February 2007

Put your comments to Dzubint at the end of this page

IF YOU MAKE COMMENTS ON THIS PAGE I WILL RESPOND TO YOU ON THIS PAGE. PLEASE ADD IT TO YOUR WATCHLIST.


Added comment section Dzubint 14:06, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

From Brettpam - the number one albums in 1984 page you speak of is incorrect according to billboard. Thriller was never number one at any stage during 1984. Billboard.com released a list of the first 700 #1 albums of which I printed. However, I cannot find this on the net anymore.

The preceding comment was from User:Brettpam 00:40, 1 February 2007

Aden Bowman

Hi. For some reason my comment got deleted immediately after I posted it. Weird. Anyway, I was saying that yes I was at Bowman from 83 to 87. Happy holidays! 23skidoo 01:49, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hotel California (song)

FYI: I'm closely watching the Hotel California (song) page for people continuing to add (or expand) rumors that have been discounted time and time again. If you are reading this because you think I wrongly reverted an edit by you, please take a look at the history page for the article and look at past edits by various people. Most of the "popular" rumors & myths about the song ARE already mentioned on the page, and it is un-encyclopedic to expand on them UNLESS YOU HAVE SOMETHING NEW TO ADD such as a real actual reference. (i.e: NOT: "I read in my local newspaper that their prime entertainment reporter Bob Smith says that Don Henley's dentist's brother says that the studio's Janitor admitted the song is Satanic) Dzubint 13:56, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for catching the Dog vandalism

Glad I could help, I will read the article in length, see if I missed a thing or two - Myanw 14:32, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Bells

I was inspired to writ the article aftering Jackie Ralph interviewed on VCBC radio this monring. It aired around 1:30 AM or so Atlantic time. You can probably still hear it today on one of the western Canada feeds. See: http://www.cbc.ca/programguide/program/index.jsp?program=Go. Verne Equinox 16:48, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dzubint

Ok I got It. Thanks. King Lopez 11:26, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What's a BREP? (comment moved from main page)

You're a BREP!  (added by 81.157.177.105)

I don't even know what a "brep" is...I guess I'll take it to mean hip (slang) ...sooo Thanks! Thomas Dzubin Talk 14:46, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE:I like your userboxes...

Anyone is free to use any userboxes on Wikipedia (except things like "I'm an admin" when your not). Feel free to use any on my page, archive, ect. -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 23:26, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, actually I have all the permission for copy the content of the web http://www.magistermusicae.com you can see this in Wikipedia:Autorizaciones/Fundación Albeniz y Magister Musicae [1]; but now I have the problem that I don't know what can I do for recover the articles deleted and if I have to put the pattern I created Plantilla: Fundacion Albéniz y Magister Musicae in the articles deleted or where and in what position or how. I was very grateful if you could help me. I have too something to do about the alert message about Spam I read text in my user talk but I don't know if this is the place for do it. Thank you for your help.--Cada2 16:39, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am not a wikipedia Admin, so I am unable to help you recover any deleted articles. In the future, you should make sure that people are aware that you have permission to use the web content. All I saw was someone named "Cada2" creating articles that were copied from another web site, that is why they were marked as copyright infringment. Thomas Dzubin Talk 19:02, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
see also WP:CP Thomas Dzubin Talk 19:11, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Popups

Thanks for the note... yes, unfortunately there is an issue with Lupin's "popups" script. A few days back, the script was updated - bringing new updates, but also a glitch that causes problems with Internet Explorer 6+. (I usually use Firefox, which isn't affected, but have to use IE sometimes.) --Ckatzchatspy 16:43, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kothay

Kothay should probably be deleted - simply not notable and it reads, as you said earlier, like an autobiography Stui 14:21, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

yeah, he kept removing the speedy delete tags before, but now that the "article" is complete, I think it's time to be re-tagged with speedy

Done. Is it worth blanking the article? Stui 15:36, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

no don't bother blanking. It's a shame, and I feel bad because it looks like the guy put about two hours of work into it today, but it just isn't notable. Oh well. It will get speedy deleted. Hopefully he will learn. Thomas Dzubin Talk 15:39, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately we can't guard against people not taking notice of wikipedia's rules and guidelines. Stui 16:13, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

username.

erm...thanks --Lenin and McCarthy | (Complain here) 16:28, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]