User talk:Antunar

Hello, Tomandandy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! - wolf 20:37, 3 February 2019 (UTC) Getting started Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

February 2019

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Delta Force, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. - wolf 20:38, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

1st SFOD-D

I see you briefly posted a comment on the Delta talk page. It seems you're unhappy with the article. Hopefully you only removed it to re-write it. While comments like "this page is obsolete, laughable and borderline retarded. Your loss." and "Maybe I'll manage to implement the "reliable sources" so this page can cease being a diarrhea of an article." are not helpful, one of the purposes of the talk page is to post problems with the article so they can hopefully be corrected. You saw that already on the same page when I helped another editor with a previous issue on that page. Please consider re-posting those problems (without the needless commentary), you may find others stepping up to help find sources and make corrections. At the very least, you can say you tried, right? - wolf 15:55, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

January 2021

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to SEAL Team Six, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. - wolf 18:00, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

DEVGRU

As with 1stSFOD-D, please consider discussing your changes on the talk page. Your edit summary of "Some info was false, incomplete or/and not up to date. Corrected now" did not equate to mass removal sourced content in your edit. Thank you - wolf 18:04, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

February 2022

Please do not add or change content, as you did at LWRC M6, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Loafiewa (talk) 16:41, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

1st SFOD-D again

On the Delta Force article, I noticed you have again removed sourced content ([1] & [2]) without providing a sufficient reason, or any reason at all. This has come up before, so I know you're aware of the article talk page, and the need to discuss disputed edits there, per WP:BRD: (where you have)

• Boldly made an edit, it was
• Reverted, but you disagree, so you then
• Discuss the issue in the article talk page.

This is a widely-accepted practice that is basically expected of all editors in such disputes. I will again ask that, instead of making reverts, (which is disruptive and can lead to an edit warring violation), that you go to the article talk page and explain your edit, so that through discusion, I (and others) can better understand the reason for it, and hopefully come to a resolution. I also note that as of this post, your accounts have a combined total of 35 edits. There is a great deal to learn when editing this project and the learning curve can seem steep, with seemingly numerous policies & guidelines being thrown at you after every edit you make. We all go through that at first. You're not alone and help is available. Along with the article talk pages, where you can discuss specific articles, and user talk pages where you can discuss general issues, there are resources such as the Help Desk and Teahouse. I would also strongly encourage you to read through the 'welcome' template at the top of this page, and the links it contains, as they provide a great deal of useful information. Meanwhile, I will watch for your comments at the Delta talk page. Have a nice day - wolf 22:07, 19 June 2022 (UTC)