Jump to content

User talk:Eyebeller: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Tag: MassMessage delivery
Tag: MassMessage delivery
Line 1,064: Line 1,064:
</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Kudpung@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=1089313003 -->
<!-- Message sent by User:Kudpung@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=1089313003 -->

== New Page Patrol newsletter June 2022 ==

<div style="border:2px solid #90C0FF; background:#F0F0FF; width:99%; padding:4px">
{| style="float: right; border: 1px solid #BBB; background: #FFFFFF;
|- style="font-size: 86%;"
|}
[[File:Wikipedia New page reviewer.svg|right|70px]][[File:NPP backlog June 2022.jpg|thumb|500px|New Page Review queue June 2022]]
Hello {{BASEPAGENAME}},

;Backlog status
At the time of the last newsletter (No.27, May 2022), the backlog was approaching 16,000, having shot up rapidly from 6,000 over the prior two months. The attention the newsletter brought to the backlog sparked a flurry of activity. There was new [[Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers|discussion]] on process improvements, efforts to invite new editors to participate in NPP increased and more editors requested the NPP user right so they could help, and most importantly, the number of reviews picked up and the backlog decreased, dipping below 14,000{{efn|not including another ~6,000 redirects}} at the end of May.

Since then, the news has not been so good. The backlog is basically flat, hovering around 14,200. I wish I could report the number of reviews done and the number of new articles added to the queue. But the available statistics we have are woefully inadequate. The only real number we have is the net queue size.{{efn|The number of weekly reviews reported in the NPP feed includes redirects, which are not included in the backlog we primarily track.}}

In the last 30 days, [[Wikipedia:Database_reports/Top_new_article_reviewers#Last 30 days|the top 100 reviewers]] have all made more than 16 patrols (up from 8 last month), and about 70 have averaged one review a day (up from 50 last month).

While there are more people doing more reviews, many of the ~730 with the NPP right are doing little. Most of the reviews are being done by the top 50 or 100 reviewers. They need your help. We appreciate every review done, but please aim to do one a day (on average, or 30 a month).

;Backlog drive
A backlog reduction drive, coordinated by [[User:buidhe|buidhe]] and [[User:Zippybonzo|Zippybonzo]], will be held from July 1 to July 31. Sign up [[Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Backlog drives/July 2022/Participants|here]]. [[File:WikiProject Barnstar Hires.png|25px]] Barnstars will be awarded.

;TIP – New school articles
Many new articles on schools are being created by new users in developing and/or non-English-speaking countries. The authors are probably not even aware of Wikipedia's projects and policy pages. [[WP:WPSCH/AG]] has some excellent advice and resources specifically written for these users. Reviewers could consider providing such first-time article creators with a link to it while also mentioning that not all schools pass the GNG and that elementary schools are almost certainly not notable.

;Misc
There is a new template available, {{txl|NPP backlog}}, to show the current backlog. You can place it on your user or talk page as a reminder:
:{{NPP backlog}}

There has been significant discussion at [[WP:VPP]] recently on NPP-related matters (Draftification, Deletion, Notability, Verifiability, Burden). Proposals that would somewhat ease the burden on NPP aren't gaining much traction, although there are suggestions that the role of NPP be fundamentally changed to focus only on major CSD-type issues.

{{refbegin}}
;Reminders
*Consider staying informed on project issues by putting [[Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers|the project discussion page]] on your watchlist.
*If you have noticed a user with a ''good'' understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, suggest they help the effort by placing {{tq|<nowiki>{{subst:NPR invite}}</nowiki>}} on their talk page.
*If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.
*To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself [[Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter list|here.]]
;Notes
{{notelist}}
{{refend}}
<!-- Drafted by User:MB. Copyedited by User:Kudpung. Proofread by user: DanCherek--> </div>
[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 10:02, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Nnadigoodluck@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=1094756077 -->

Revision as of 10:02, 24 June 2022

Blocked

I'm assuming you know how to request an unblock. And you're most welcome to ask ArbCom if they would like to remove me as an administrator if/when you're unblocked. Nick (talk) 22:00, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You blocking me just proves your temperament and unsuitability to be an Administrator. Eyebeller 22:12, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
That is a common response to someone who has just been blocked, I will obviously allow uninvolved administrators to review both the block and your unblock request, so we can see whether I'm wrong here (hey, it sometimes happens, even the infallible can occasionally be wrong). There is nothing wrong with being wrong, genuinely, you sometimes have to go "oh, right, sorry about that" or "thanks for letting me know I was mistaken". That's the main reason I believe your editing has crossed the line into being disruptive, you have become hostile and instead of accepting you have made some errors, you've become defensive and have attacked people trying to help you. It's not just that though - your work at New Page Patrol was problematic, accepting material which shouldn't have been accepted, and then being hostile and uncooperative at AfD isn't a good look. I'm also worried, not just annoyed, but actively worried, about your attitude with regards to copyrights violations.
In short, you're leaving a mess behind you, you've been asked not to leave a mess and not only do you continue to leave a mess behind you, you actively argue with those trying to help you. We don't have infinite patience or infinite resources, at the moment, you continuing to edit the project risks the project (copyright violations, spam, editing disputes, battleground behaviour) so preventing you from editing is, in my view, the correct choice. Nick (talk) 22:28, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Eyebeller, as your NPPSCHOOL instructor, your attitude over the past few days has been severely problematic. You've ignored pretty much every piece of advice that I've given you to try to avoid this outcome, and this is the predictable conclusion. I hope that one day you'll be able to return and edit constructively, but until you're able to reflect on why your behavior on talk pages and at AfD has been inadequate that's not going to happen. You can start by retracting your accusations against Nick, who made a call that was totally appropriate as an administrator. signed, Rosguill talk 22:35, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nick's call was purely driven by temperamental reasons which have nothing to do with my conduct. If anyone should be blocked, it's them. I will not be returning. Eyebeller 23:27, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Eyebeller (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I do good to the encyclopaedia. I am an experienced anti-vandalism editor. Eyebeller 22:09, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. It is apparent your behavior has been subpar. You would do well to consider what you have done wrong, and your next unblock should address that in significant detail. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n! 22:51, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I edit-conflicted with the decline above, but here is what I typed out: As someone who has been trying to help keep the temperature down around your edits and interactions with other editors, I am genuinely disappointed to see all of this action today. Being wrong? Okay. Being right and having people doubt you? Okay. Discussing disagreements? Okay. Fighting with people who disagree with you? Not cool. Your responses at that AFD are painful to read, because you clearly don't know what you're doing (which is okay) but then you double down on that lack of knowledge. You might be good at fighting vandalism, but it's quickly becoming clear that you are struggling in other areas. Unless there's evidence that something has been learned today, I cannot in good faith unblock you. Primefac (talk) 22:56, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I no longer wish to be unblocked. I'm done here. I've wasted enough of my life here. If people provided clear direction on how to improve instead of you're doing bad at this we wouldn't be here. Enjoy the AfC & NPP backlogs. Eyebeller 23:26, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.  Nosebagbear (talk) 13:47, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Advice

Hi Eyebeller, I swithered about whether or not to drop you a note here. When I first saw the IP edits to this page, I wasn't sure whether or not it was you - there are plenty of WP:LTAs who get excited about the idea of editing through an IP and pretending to be a blocked user for the lolz, but in this case I think it's probably you; since we spent a fair amount of time interacting, I'm going to offer you some advice. I don't offer it to help you get unblocked, or to help you edit here in future (although it might be useful if you want to do either of those things). I'm assuming you're quite young, so this is really just some general life advice from a teacher; read it or ignore it as you wish.

When you are new to something, you need to approach it with a minimum of ego; listen far more than you speak. If someone disagrees with you, or even criticises you, don't go into self-defence mode, just ask them to explain their perspective. They might be right, and if that's the case then it will feel much better afterwards if you don't double-down on a wrong position. Even if they aren't as polite as they might have been, or if you end up believing that they are wrong, you might still learn something in the process of discussing it with them, and you will still have felt better about having discussed it with them maturely: it's a win-win. Don't respond to pointiness, just look for what you can gain from the interaction. We don't learn simply by being told that we're awesome. Positive encouragement is an important part of the learning process, and I hope you recognised that I praised your efforts during the CVUA course; however, an important part of learning is making mistakes, and being corrected on them. That's the harder part to swallow, unfortunately - it doesn't always feel good, but if you approach it with the right attitude, you can learn from it while maintaining a positive relationship with the person who's giving out the criticism.

On to the block(s). I initially blocked the IP for PAs/harassment because (a) I interpreted the comments as including both of those, and (b) I wasn't entirely certain that it was you. Now that I've convinced myself that it was you, the block is clearly necessary because it is a clear-cut case of block evasion. When a user is blocked, they are not permitted to edit here except on your own talk page; when their talk page access is withdrawn, they are not permitted to edit here at all. This applies even if you think the block is unfair, and it applies to the person, not the account. Any attempts by you to edit by IP will inevitably be met by blocks as soon as they are discovered, per the very clear instructions in our blocking policy. If the comments you directed towards various individuals in your last posts truly represent your feelings, you obviously should not return. If, on the other hand, you were venting because you were pissed off, please consider my points above before e-mailing UTRS. Recognise where you went wrong, and commit to do better. Best wishes for the future. GirthSummit (blether) 19:56, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Girth Summit: - it isn't Eyebeller. I'll apply semi-protection to this page. SQLQuery me! 22:10, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks SQL - I guess I called it wrong. I'll leave these thoughts here, in case they're helpful to the real Eyebeller. Cheers GirthSummit (blether) 23:25, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@SQL and @Girth Summit, can second this, known Eyebeller online for a while and actually introduced him to the 'pedia. We haven't spoken since November, however, I can say with 100% certainty the IP is definitely not Eyebeller. ✨ Ed talk!23:27, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ed6767, thanks for letting me know. GirthSummit (blether) 23:29, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I've restored talk page access. Unblock requests should happen here (not UTRS or ArbCom). Primefac (talk) 18:49, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Girth Summit: I'm not a part of this, but this guy seems alright. Give him another chance perhaps... Hockeycatcat (talk) 09:08, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hockeycatcat, this user has stated their desire not to edit any more. If they change their mind, they are now able to make an unblock request, which will be considered in due course. GirthSummit (blether) 09:11, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Girth Summit: OK sir or madam. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hockeycatcat (talkcontribs) 09:15, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

16:09, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

18:30, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

22:38, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

17:40, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

17:54, 15 February 2021 (UTC)


00:16, 23 February 2021 (UTC)


19:06, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

17:50, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Blanking of Draft:Mitchell James Kaplan

Hi Eyebeller, you recently blanked after declining an AfC Draft Draft:Mitchell James Kaplan and neither 331dot nor I do understand exactly why you did so - can you please explain why you blanked the draft? It seemed good sourced and the author is asking at the Helpdesk why it has been declined. CommanderWaterford (talk) 20:02, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

23:20, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

16:51, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

17:29, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

19:38, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

16:47, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

21:23, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

15:42, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

15:08, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

13:47, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

17:05, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

17:04, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

20:01, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

20:25, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

15:48, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

16:31, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

17:31, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

15:29, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

21:09, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

20:45, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

16:18, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

19:25, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

21:57, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Read-only reminder

A maintenance operation will be performed on Wednesday August 25 06:00 UTC. It should only last for a few minutes.

Also during this time, operations on the CentralAuth will not be possible (GlobalRenames, changing/confirming e-mail addresses, logging into new wikis, password changes).

For more details about the operation and on all impacted services, please check on Phabricator.

A banner will be displayed 30 minutes before the operation.

Please help your community to be aware of this maintenance operation. Thank you!

20:33, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

15:59, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

15:19, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

15:31, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter September 2021

New Page Review queue September 2021

Hello Eyebeller,

Please join this discussion - there is increase in the abuse of Wikipedia and its processes by POV pushers, Paid Editors, and by holders of various user rights including Autopatrolled. Even our review systems themselves at AfC and NPR have been infiltrated. The good news is that detection is improving, but the downside is that it creates the need for a huge clean up - which of course adds to backlogs.

Copyright violations are also a serious issue. Most non-regular contributors do not understand why, and most of our Reviewers are not experts on copyright law - and can't be expected to be, but there is excellent, easy-to-follow advice on COPYVIO detection here.

At the time of the last newsletter (#25, December 2020) the backlog was only just over 2,000 articles. New Page Review is an official system. It's the only firewall against the inclusion of new, improper pages.

There are currently 706 New Page Reviewers plus a further 1,080 admins, but as much as nearly 90% of the patrolling is still being done by around only the 20 or so most regular patrollers.

If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process or its software.

Various awards are due to be allocated by the end of the year and barnstars are overdue. If you would like to manage this, please let us know. Indeed, if you are interested in coordinating NPR, it does not involve much time and the tasks are described here.


To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. Sent to 827 users. 04:31, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

18:29, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

22:20, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

16:28, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

15:29, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

20:52, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

November 2021 backlog drive

New Page Patrol | November 2021 Backlog Drive
  • On November 1, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

(t · c) buidhe 01:58, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

20:07, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

20:26, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

20:35, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

22:05, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol newsletter May 2022

New Page Review queue March 2022

Hello Eyebeller,

At the time of the last newsletter (No.26, September 2021), the backlog was 'only' just over 6,000 articles. In the past six months, the backlog has reached nearly 16,000, a staggering level not seen in several years. A very small number of users had been doing the vast majority of the reviews. Due to "burn-out", we have recently lost most of this effort. Furthermore, several reviewers have been stripped of the user right for abuse of privilege and the articles they patrolled were put back in the queue.

Several discussions on the state of the process have taken place on the talk page, but there has been no action to make any changes. The project also lacks coordination since the "position" is vacant.

In the last 30 days, only 100 reviewers have made more than 8 patrols and only 50 have averaged one review a day. There are currently 803 New Page Reviewers, but about a third have not had any activity in the past month. All 851 administrators have this permission, but only about a dozen significantly contribute to NPP.

This means we have an active pool of about 450 to address the backlog. We cannot rely on a few to do most of the work as that inevitably leads to burnout. A fairly experienced reviewer can usually do a review in a few minutes. If every active reviewer would patrol just one article per day, the backlog would very quickly disappear.

If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, do suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}} on their talk page.

If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
Sent 05:17, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter June 2022

New Page Review queue June 2022

Hello Eyebeller,

Backlog status

At the time of the last newsletter (No.27, May 2022), the backlog was approaching 16,000, having shot up rapidly from 6,000 over the prior two months. The attention the newsletter brought to the backlog sparked a flurry of activity. There was new discussion on process improvements, efforts to invite new editors to participate in NPP increased and more editors requested the NPP user right so they could help, and most importantly, the number of reviews picked up and the backlog decreased, dipping below 14,000[a] at the end of May.

Since then, the news has not been so good. The backlog is basically flat, hovering around 14,200. I wish I could report the number of reviews done and the number of new articles added to the queue. But the available statistics we have are woefully inadequate. The only real number we have is the net queue size.[b]

In the last 30 days, the top 100 reviewers have all made more than 16 patrols (up from 8 last month), and about 70 have averaged one review a day (up from 50 last month).

While there are more people doing more reviews, many of the ~730 with the NPP right are doing little. Most of the reviews are being done by the top 50 or 100 reviewers. They need your help. We appreciate every review done, but please aim to do one a day (on average, or 30 a month).

Backlog drive

A backlog reduction drive, coordinated by buidhe and Zippybonzo, will be held from July 1 to July 31. Sign up here. Barnstars will be awarded.

TIP – New school articles

Many new articles on schools are being created by new users in developing and/or non-English-speaking countries. The authors are probably not even aware of Wikipedia's projects and policy pages. WP:WPSCH/AG has some excellent advice and resources specifically written for these users. Reviewers could consider providing such first-time article creators with a link to it while also mentioning that not all schools pass the GNG and that elementary schools are almost certainly not notable.

Misc

There is a new template available, {{NPP backlog}}, to show the current backlog. You can place it on your user or talk page as a reminder:

Very high unreviewed pages backlog: 13538 articles, as of 04:00, 25 November 2024 (UTC), according to DatBot

There has been significant discussion at WP:VPP recently on NPP-related matters (Draftification, Deletion, Notability, Verifiability, Burden). Proposals that would somewhat ease the burden on NPP aren't gaining much traction, although there are suggestions that the role of NPP be fundamentally changed to focus only on major CSD-type issues.

Reminders
  • Consider staying informed on project issues by putting the project discussion page on your watchlist.
  • If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}} on their talk page.
  • If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.
  • To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
Notes
  1. ^ not including another ~6,000 redirects
  2. ^ The number of weekly reviews reported in the NPP feed includes redirects, which are not included in the backlog we primarily track.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:02, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]