Jump to content

Talk:Kindness: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Nice Guy section: new section
Line 72: Line 72:
Why is a minor contemporary left-wing misandryist agenda permitted on a page about the most basic and elemental of human motives?
Why is a minor contemporary left-wing misandryist agenda permitted on a page about the most basic and elemental of human motives?
Is this where we are now in the culture, that dictionaries and encyclopedias are rewritten to suit the feelings and whims of feminists?
Is this where we are now in the culture, that dictionaries and encyclopedias are rewritten to suit the feelings and whims of feminists?
--[[User:Threadbareparson|Threadbareparson]] ([[User talk:Threadbareparson|talk]]) 19:22, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:22, 25 June 2022

WikiProject iconPhilosophy: Ethics Start‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
Ethics

Kindness

For a weakness? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.202.100.196 (talk) 18:52, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Kindness. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:41, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Kindness. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:16, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kindness

Nvhjvvghhhhhhfdh 2409:4054:406:E22E:C49A:43EA:1997:A947 (talk) 11:59, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nice Guy section

What on earth does the trite ideological sloganeering putting down "some males" as dubious "Nice Guys" have to do with kindness? Why is a minor contemporary left-wing misandryist agenda permitted on a page about the most basic and elemental of human motives? Is this where we are now in the culture, that dictionaries and encyclopedias are rewritten to suit the feelings and whims of feminists? --Threadbareparson (talk) 19:22, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]