Jump to content

Talk:Bahrain: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
cmt
Creative writing: new section
Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 106: Line 106:


{{ping|NCCGOV}} you added [[Worldometer]] - [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Bahrain&type=revision&diff=1004150506&oldid=1003952863&diffmode=source diff]. I reverted and explained why, but you did the same thing again (which is basically revert of my revert) - [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Bahrain&type=revision&diff=1004160101&oldid=1004155455&diffmode=source diff]. Explain your actions and self-revert per [[WP:BRD]], please. [[WP:RSP]] says, that Worldometer is a [[WP:SPS|self-published source]] and editors have questioned its accuracy and methodology, which means we are not using it - [[WP:GUNREL]].--[[User:RenatUK|Renat]] ([[User talk:RenatUK|talk]]) 19:44, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
{{ping|NCCGOV}} you added [[Worldometer]] - [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Bahrain&type=revision&diff=1004150506&oldid=1003952863&diffmode=source diff]. I reverted and explained why, but you did the same thing again (which is basically revert of my revert) - [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Bahrain&type=revision&diff=1004160101&oldid=1004155455&diffmode=source diff]. Explain your actions and self-revert per [[WP:BRD]], please. [[WP:RSP]] says, that Worldometer is a [[WP:SPS|self-published source]] and editors have questioned its accuracy and methodology, which means we are not using it - [[WP:GUNREL]].--[[User:RenatUK|Renat]] ([[User talk:RenatUK|talk]]) 19:44, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

== Creative writing ==

Hello [[Special:Contributions/116.90.118.6|116.90.118.6]] ([[User talk:116.90.118.6|talk]]) 14:39, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:39, 30 June 2022

Template:Vital article

Former good articleBahrain was one of the Geography and places good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 29, 2012Peer reviewReviewed
October 6, 2012Good article nomineeListed
January 20, 2021Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

Template:Outline of knowledge coverage



Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Bahrain. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:30, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Biased?

Hi, I just wanted to point out that when I read the 'human rights' portion of the page, the second half of the penultimate paragraph and the last paragraph seemed very biased. I took the liberty of removing the last paragraph but please insert it back if I am wrong, as this was just a hunch.

Thank you -User:MrHistorianDude 16:50, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Arabic IPA and Sound Clip don't match.

   I heard [ˈæɫː baħˈɾeɪn] in the Arabic pronounciation sound clip, whereas the article uses the IPA [aɫ baħrajn]. I know some of the differences are unimportant, but I'm suprised that the IPA uses [a] instead of [e].
   I have a hypothesis for why this is: Arabic only has three phonemic vowels /a/, /i/, and /u/. The Wikipedia page on Bahraini Arabic states that "Final Standard Arabic -ah becomes -eh in some positions." This leads me (not being an Arabic speaker at all) to wonder if the written IPA is for standard Arabic, while the speaker in the sound clip is Bahraini. If the sound clip is actually the most common Bahraini pronounciation, than perhaps the IPA should be changed. (I don't really know the policy for written Arabic IPA in articles like this.)
The article uses standard arabic pronunciation, while the sound clip is of the Bahraini accent. During formal articles and writing, standard arabic is used and not informal Bahraini writing. There is no problem. Burglar99 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 06:37, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Media

I added more information to the Media subheading in order to include a more holistic view of the types of media present in the country including newspapers, television, and radio. Shahnawaz01 (talk) 20:42, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment

This discussion is transcluded from Talk:Bahrain/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.

I am bringing this article to GAR, due to a number of concerns regarding the WP:Good article criteria. There are quite a few short and scattered paragraphs throughout the article, and some very short sections, including one completely empty section (1b). There have been a number of longstanding tags appended to some sources in this article, including some citation needing tags, as well as some areas that are currently unsourced without a tag (2c). The article has 75kB of prose, well above what guidelines suggest (3b). This may not be a comprehensive list, being issues that stood out from an immediate look, and so other issues may also need to be addressed if this article is to remain at GA. CMD (talk) 13:15, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, closing this as a delist, with no work taking place on it. CMD (talk) 13:50, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Worldometer(s)

@NCCGOV: you added Worldometer - diff. I reverted and explained why, but you did the same thing again (which is basically revert of my revert) - diff. Explain your actions and self-revert per WP:BRD, please. WP:RSP says, that Worldometer is a self-published source and editors have questioned its accuracy and methodology, which means we are not using it - WP:GUNREL.--Renat (talk) 19:44, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Creative writing

Hello 116.90.118.6 (talk) 14:39, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]