Jump to content

Talk:The Weather Network: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Tag: Reverted
Tag: Reverted
Line 46: Line 46:
== Sex Appeal ==
== Sex Appeal ==


Does anybody have any sources, for this? Weather Network has recently, been binarist bums, for ratings. Did you see the attack on Arizona today? They're at it again. Try the same thing with Death Valley losers; you'll see it doesn't work ''anywhere near'' as often. It's called the 'dryline' or Marfa Front. cT air may -shift- but it doesn't go anywhere bitches. [[User:GoodDay|GoodDay]] ([[User talk:GoodDay|talk]]) 14:46, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
Does anybody have any sources, for this? Weather Network has recently, been binarist bums, for ratings. Did you see the attack on Arizona today? They're at it again. Try the same thing with Death Valley losers; you'll see it doesn't work ''anywhere near'' as often. It's called the 'dryline' or Marfa Front. cT air may -shift- but it doesn't go anywhere bitches. Yes, our latest update; the six day Vancouver forecast. Notice how the 'gap between the two numbers' is six on the final day? Even on -that- day Kimmy hunny, the Kamloops forecast has at most a 'one gap' and likely no gap. This is why you don't touch the near desert interior "on air"; right? They do this so subtle people that it wouldn't even catch the attention span of most of you. But not bright/brilliant and ethical people;-- networkian culture is up to the same old tricks. By the way Mr. Mei, the lunar regolith at noon is oven hot. Ain't no moisture there. Pretty low in Death Valley most of the year too eh? Have a nice 'summer' children... but different strokes for different folks. [[User:GoodDay|GoodDay]] ([[User talk:GoodDay|talk]]) 14:46, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
:lol. - [[Special:Contributions/24.36.115.4|24.36.115.4]] ([[User talk:24.36.115.4|talk]]) 21:33, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
:lol. - [[Special:Contributions/24.36.115.4|24.36.115.4]] ([[User talk:24.36.115.4|talk]]) 21:33, 4 January 2010 (UTC)



Revision as of 08:10, 6 July 2022

comment

I think we should make a new article for the list of past hosts. It is getting really long! 217.45.203.34 (talk) 11:41, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Could you PLEASE DISAMBIGUATE HOSTS, past and present when updating your lists??? Some of those links could start some urban legends!! Bacl-presby 17:14, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Twn07 02 12.jpg

Image:Twn07 02 12.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 07:41, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Candice Ola.JPG

Image:Candice Ola.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 06:28, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale has been added. dhett (talk contribs) 07:04, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:LF 07.jpg

Image:LF 07.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 09:12, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sex Appeal

Does anybody have any sources, for this? Weather Network has recently, been binarist bums, for ratings. Did you see the attack on Arizona today? They're at it again. Try the same thing with Death Valley losers; you'll see it doesn't work anywhere near as often. It's called the 'dryline' or Marfa Front. cT air may -shift- but it doesn't go anywhere bitches. Yes, our latest update; the six day Vancouver forecast. Notice how the 'gap between the two numbers' is six on the final day? Even on -that- day Kimmy hunny, the Kamloops forecast has at most a 'one gap' and likely no gap. This is why you don't touch the near desert interior "on air"; right? They do this so subtle people that it wouldn't even catch the attention span of most of you. But not bright/brilliant and ethical people;-- networkian culture is up to the same old tricks. By the way Mr. Mei, the lunar regolith at noon is oven hot. Ain't no moisture there. Pretty low in Death Valley most of the year too eh? Have a nice 'summer' children... but different strokes for different folks. GoodDay (talk) 14:46, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

lol. - 24.36.115.4 (talk) 21:33, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on The Weather Network. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:15, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]