Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Women scientists: Difference between revisions
Geoffhunt3 (talk | contribs) Post about de-orphaning |
Kj cheetham (talk | contribs) →De-orphaning?: reply |
||
Line 96: | Line 96: | ||
==De-orphaning?== |
==De-orphaning?== |
||
Is adding links on this page sufficient to de-orphan an article? I'm going through the cleanup page for [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Microbiology|WikiProject Microbiology]] and trying to address some of the calls for help. [[User:Geoffhunt3|Geoffhunt3]] ([[User talk:Geoffhunt3|talk]]) 21:03, 8 July 2022 (UTC) |
Is adding links on this page sufficient to de-orphan an article? I'm going through the cleanup page for [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Microbiology|WikiProject Microbiology]] and trying to address some of the calls for help. [[User:Geoffhunt3|Geoffhunt3]] ([[User talk:Geoffhunt3|talk]]) 21:03, 8 July 2022 (UTC) |
||
: Hi {{u|Geoffhunt3}}, I'm afraid not, as per [[WP:ORPH]] the links need to be in article mainspace. -[[User:Kj cheetham|Kj cheetham]] ([[User talk:Kj cheetham|talk]]) 21:15, 8 July 2022 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:15, 8 July 2022
This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
To-do list for Wikipedia:WikiProject Women scientists:
|
This article has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
|
||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
Female scientists from third world countries
Jimbo likes the idea of paying editors to write about female scientists from third world countries.[1]
May 2018 at Women in Red
Welcome to Women in Red's May 2018 worldwide online editathons.
| ||
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
Wiki Women in Red - a proposed User Group
Having worked for 2 years editing articles for Women In Red, a group of organizers have concluded that sourcing is one of the biggest hurdles in creating articles on women and non-binary genders. Though it is true that a lot of sourcing simply doesn’t exist, it is also true that there are sources, but we have no access to them. As these groups did not typically become subjects for academic study until the 1970s, many of the sources are not on line or are behind paywalls. Failure to include women and non-binary people in the encyclopedia presents a one-dimensional view of society and history. To address those issues, we are forming a new User Group aimed at referencing and support for like-minded groups and would appreciate your input or input from your supporters in our organizational process. See link: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wiki_Women_in_Red MauraWen (talk) 09:25 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Invitation to participate in the #SheSaid Campaign 2021
We are delighted to share with you that the #SheSaid Campaign will be running again this year and you are invited to participate in Oct/Nov 2021.The goal is to celebrate notable women and add more entries on Wikiquote. Please have a look at some of the cool bookmarks we have completed and ready for you to print if you wish to do so. If you would like to have the editable version of the bookmark please contact me at Shoodho , visit some sample of bookmarks here:Bookmarks.For more information, please visit the campaign page here:SheSaid page If you have any questions or query please feel free to contact Islahaddow, Anthere or Shoodho.
Kind regards, Shoodho
User script to detect unreliable sources
I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Wikipedia. The idea is that it takes something like
- John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (
John Smith "[https://www.deprecated.com/article Article of things]" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14.
)
and turns it into something like
- John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.
It will work on a variety of links, including those from {{cite web}}, {{cite journal}} and {{doi}}.
The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.
Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.
This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:02, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
De-orphaning?
Is adding links on this page sufficient to de-orphan an article? I'm going through the cleanup page for WikiProject Microbiology and trying to address some of the calls for help. Geoffhunt3 (talk) 21:03, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
- Hi Geoffhunt3, I'm afraid not, as per WP:ORPH the links need to be in article mainspace. -Kj cheetham (talk) 21:15, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
- Project-Class biography pages
- Project-Class biography (science and academia) pages
- NA-importance biography (science and academia) pages
- Science and academia work group articles
- Project-Class Women's History pages
- NA-importance Women's History pages
- All WikiProject Women-related pages
- WikiProject Women's History articles
- Project-Class science pages
- NA-importance science pages
- Project-Class WikiProject Women pages
- WikiProject Women articles
- Project-Class Women scientists pages
- NA-importance Women scientists pages
- WikiProject Women scientists articles
- Wikipedia pages with to-do lists
- Wikipedia pages referenced by the press