Talk:Doo Doo Doo Doo Doo (Heartbreaker): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 03:00, 9 July 2022

The Rolling Stones Stub‑class Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject The Rolling Stones, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Rolling Stones on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.The Rolling StonesWikipedia:WikiProject The Rolling StonesTemplate:WikiProject The Rolling StonesThe Rolling Stones
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Songs C‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Fair use rationale for Image:Doo.jpg

Image:Doo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:20, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

“According to Whom” can be removed with edit

The sentence that says the song is about notorious shootings at the time has an “according to whom” tag - there is no source for this claim. However, the subsequent paragraph is a highly plausible background to the first stanza.

There is an argument to be made about highly plausible vs direct quote from Jagger and Richards themselves, but I believe that the shooting mentioned conveys that there was at least one event that confirms the point, ergo removing the need for a “whom” citation. Misterniceguii (talk) 03:00, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Missing rationale2 -->[[User:BetacommandBot|BetacommandBot]] 01:20, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
+== “According to Whom” can be removed with edit ==
+The sentence that says the song is about notorious shootings at the time has an “according to whom” tag - there is no source for this claim. However, the subsequent paragraph is a highly plausible background to the first stanza.
+There is an argument to be made about highly plausible vs direct quote from Jagger and Richards themselves, but I believe that the shooting mentioned conveys that there was at least one event that confirms the point, ergo removing the need for a “whom” citation. [[User:Misterniceguii|Misterniceguii]] ([[User talk:Misterniceguii|talk]]) 03:00, 9 July 2022 (UTC)