User talk:Kbabej

Bruce Schroeder

If you observe, virtually the same sentence as what you wrote in this diff in the Bruce_Schroeder#Judicial_career section where it says "Schroeder came to national attention in 2021 while presiding over the Kyle Rittenhouse trial". I would also advise of WP:BRD. When and edit has been reverted, the generally accepted action isn't to re-revert and engage in discussion via edit summaries. Please see WP:BRD. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 19:25, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

@Hammersoft: It's stunningly obvious the judge only became notable because of the trial. His article didn't even exist until a few days ago. To not mention it in the lead goes against all common sense. I would encourage you to review WP:COMMON. If you believe the sentence duplication isn't ideal, then edit the sentence. --Kbabej (talk) 19:37, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

Sure. Then pick one. --Hammersoft (talk) 20:37, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Bobbi Kristina Brown

The article Bobbi Kristina Brown you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Bobbi Kristina Brown for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of David Fuchs -- David Fuchs (talk) 21:41, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

Congrats! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 21:49, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Bobbi Kristina Brown

Hello! Your submission of Bobbi Kristina Brown at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Therapyisgood (talk) 16:46, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

Merry Christmas Kbabej!

Ganesha811 (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Flaming/MC2008}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Sealand

Please stop pushing an agenda about Sealand. Whatever you or I might think about it, the FACTS are that this is NOT a sovereign country or even a partially recognised one. It's the project of one family. Simply calling yourself royalty does not make it true. Also, your comment that Michael Bates is not a self-proclaimed prince is inaccurate. His father was not in a position to bestow a royal title, so even if he did 'declare' his son the Prince of Sealand, it's meaningless. Michael Bates is still trying to claim the title as legitimate, therefore he is self-proclaimed. 2A00:23C7:8905:CC01:791F:C50E:DD44:B86 (talk) 11:59, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

GOCE review of Comedian (artwork)

@Tdslk: Thank you! Much appreciated. Hope you are having a good holiday season. --Kbabej (talk) 17:50, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Bobbi Kristina Brown

On 5 January 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Bobbi Kristina Brown, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Bobbi Kristina Brown died less than four years after her mother Whitney Houston died in similar circumstances? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bobbi Kristina Brown. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Bobbi Kristina Brown), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 12,385.5 views (1,032.1 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of January 2022 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/she) 08:01, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

@Theleekycauldron: Oh, that's very cool! Thanks for the update. --Kbabej (talk) 15:49, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

Congrats! Great work on the GA and the DYK nomination. Bruxton (talk) 20:43, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

@Bruxton: Thanks! And thank you for the review and help. It was my first DYK nom (and third non-joint GA) and it was great to see it come to fruition. Hope you're well! --Kbabej (talk) 21:01, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Comedian (artwork)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Comedian (artwork) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 18:01, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

@GhostRiver: thank you! Very much appreciated. I am willing to make any needed changes to get this to GA status. --Kbabej (talk) 17:03, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Comedian (artwork)

The article Comedian (artwork) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Comedian (artwork) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 17:20, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Comedian (artwork)

The article Comedian (artwork) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Comedian (artwork) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 00:41, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Congrats! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 01:00, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Please stop reverting cited edits in the "Sealand" page.

I am unsure of why you hold such strong views on Sealand and Michael Bates, that you are trying to, falsely, portray that it is a legitimate nation state or that Michael Bates has any legitimate royal titles, but Sealand is wholly unrecognized by every sovereign state. It is unrecognized, and by the way, "micronation" does not automatically mean unrecognized. Take Andorra, an internationally recognized state in Iberia, which is referred to as a micronation not because of its recognition but because of its geographic size. I do not want this situation to devolve into edit warring so I kindly ask you to stop doing this. I am apparently not the first to try to address this, by the way. Chastizement (talk) 22:31, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Comedian (artwork)

On 28 January 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Comedian (artwork), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the artwork Comedian, a fresh banana taped to a wall with duct tape, sold for $120,000 in 2019? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Comedian (artwork). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Comedian (artwork)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Jacqueline Jackson

@Kbabej: I am copyediting Jacqueline Jackson (a fascinating woman) and have a question. Is the Peace & Justice Award from Jesse Jackson's Rainbow/Push Coalition? There's a paywall on the citation. Thanks. Cleveland Todd (talk) 20:17, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

@Cleveland Todd: Hello! Thank you for taking this on. Much appreciated. Yes, I believe the award is from that organization. --Kbabej (talk) 20:51, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

@Kbabej: Re: "Done" template. Kbabelj Yes. I put the "done" template on the article up on 2/15. Cleveland Todd (talk) 13:19, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Sayali Sanjiv

Hello sir, Network of these people is very big

• Amitbhb12 - Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Amitbhb12/Archive

• Amitbhb12 - Akshay Bardapurkar [1]
• Akshay Bardapurkar - Planet Marathi Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Planet Marathi OTT
• Planet Marathi - Sayali Sanjiv [2] Cinzia007 (talk) 22:52, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Kbabej

Thank you for creating Nothing tastes as good as skinny feels.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 21:01, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Thank you @North8000! Very much appreciated! --Kbabej (talk) 21:08, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Hi Kbabej, thank you, thank you, THANK YOU for expanding and putting context to Millie Bobby Brown's personal life. S0091 (talk) 23:22, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

Thank you @S0091! Much appreciated. It looks like it's been reverted by a new editor who is misapplying WP:WAW, which is actually an essay and not policy. Even if it were policy, I believe the information added is from green-level RS from WP:RSP. There's a discussion on the talk page here, but the section has been reverted and the editor has not responded to my points. I'd be interested in hearing your thoughts one way or another. --Kbabej (talk) 19:27, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Sam Asghari

There is Draft:Sam Asghari, could you please transfer select content from that to the main article? Kailash29792 (talk) 03:48, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Hello @Kailash29792! Will work on this! --Kbabej (talk) 00:26, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

J. K. Rowling

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

SandyGeorgia (Talk) 00:25, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

Just noting this was not a repeat; the article is under double sanctions (BLP and gender). SandyGeorgia (Talk) 00:30, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

Oh, oops, I didn't read it that closely (obviously). I'll reinstate! Thanks! --Kbabej (talk) 00:46, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

July 2022

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Nicholas Alahverdian. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Aoidh (talk) 17:01, 12 July 2022 (UTC)