Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa Trutkoff Trumbauer: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
indented Kbabej 's comment. Sorry, an unusual move, but page formatting is confusing and this helps. Hope that's Ok
Delete.
Line 13: Line 13:


*'''Comments''' I don't understand the delete vote above, an author should not need to pass [[WP:NCORP]] as she is not an organisation or a company. I've improved the article, more than doubled it. That said, I could not find any significant coverage. I added some biographical information and one short book review. I guess children's books don't attract long reviews. I'm hoping others find more. It seems she has created a large body of work, non-independent review say over-200 books, but I did not find that stated in independent reliable sources. [[User:CT55555|CT55555]] ([[User talk:CT55555|talk]]) 12:35, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
*'''Comments''' I don't understand the delete vote above, an author should not need to pass [[WP:NCORP]] as she is not an organisation or a company. I've improved the article, more than doubled it. That said, I could not find any significant coverage. I added some biographical information and one short book review. I guess children's books don't attract long reviews. I'm hoping others find more. It seems she has created a large body of work, non-independent review say over-200 books, but I did not find that stated in independent reliable sources. [[User:CT55555|CT55555]] ([[User talk:CT55555|talk]]) 12:35, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

*'''Delete'''. The sourcing just isn't there. The "Dog Days Reading" source is a one-sentence mention without a byline; the entire sentence is: "Fantasy fans who dig dragons can can enjoy the latest fun in ''A Practical Guide to Dragon Riding'' (Wizards/Mirrorstone $12.95)" That was the only hit on newspapers.com, and the rest of my searches couldn't find anything resembling sigcov. --[[User:Kbabej|Kbabej]] ([[User talk:Kbabej|talk]]) 23:13, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:13, 18 July 2022

Lisa Trutkoff Trumbauer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Have searched in vain for better sources. Fails WP:GNG and WP:AUTHOR. Edwardx (talk) 20:10, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Bigneeerman. NCORP is not the correct notability criteria to look at. Like @CT55555 pointed out, NCORP is for organizations and companies. The correct criteria are GNG and AUTHOR, which @Edwardx already listed above. --Kbabej (talk) 23:05, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comments I don't understand the delete vote above, an author should not need to pass WP:NCORP as she is not an organisation or a company. I've improved the article, more than doubled it. That said, I could not find any significant coverage. I added some biographical information and one short book review. I guess children's books don't attract long reviews. I'm hoping others find more. It seems she has created a large body of work, non-independent review say over-200 books, but I did not find that stated in independent reliable sources. CT55555 (talk) 12:35, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. The sourcing just isn't there. The "Dog Days Reading" source is a one-sentence mention without a byline; the entire sentence is: "Fantasy fans who dig dragons can can enjoy the latest fun in A Practical Guide to Dragon Riding (Wizards/Mirrorstone $12.95)" That was the only hit on newspapers.com, and the rest of my searches couldn't find anything resembling sigcov. --Kbabej (talk) 23:13, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]