Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa Trutkoff Trumbauer: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
indented Kbabej 's comment. Sorry, an unusual move, but page formatting is confusing and this helps. Hope that's Ok |
Delete. |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
*'''Comments''' I don't understand the delete vote above, an author should not need to pass [[WP:NCORP]] as she is not an organisation or a company. I've improved the article, more than doubled it. That said, I could not find any significant coverage. I added some biographical information and one short book review. I guess children's books don't attract long reviews. I'm hoping others find more. It seems she has created a large body of work, non-independent review say over-200 books, but I did not find that stated in independent reliable sources. [[User:CT55555|CT55555]] ([[User talk:CT55555|talk]]) 12:35, 18 July 2022 (UTC) |
*'''Comments''' I don't understand the delete vote above, an author should not need to pass [[WP:NCORP]] as she is not an organisation or a company. I've improved the article, more than doubled it. That said, I could not find any significant coverage. I added some biographical information and one short book review. I guess children's books don't attract long reviews. I'm hoping others find more. It seems she has created a large body of work, non-independent review say over-200 books, but I did not find that stated in independent reliable sources. [[User:CT55555|CT55555]] ([[User talk:CT55555|talk]]) 12:35, 18 July 2022 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete'''. The sourcing just isn't there. The "Dog Days Reading" source is a one-sentence mention without a byline; the entire sentence is: "Fantasy fans who dig dragons can can enjoy the latest fun in ''A Practical Guide to Dragon Riding'' (Wizards/Mirrorstone $12.95)" That was the only hit on newspapers.com, and the rest of my searches couldn't find anything resembling sigcov. --[[User:Kbabej|Kbabej]] ([[User talk:Kbabej|talk]]) 23:13, 18 July 2022 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:13, 18 July 2022
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Lisa Trutkoff Trumbauer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Have searched in vain for better sources. Fails WP:GNG and WP:AUTHOR. Edwardx (talk) 20:10, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Women, and Science fiction and fantasy. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 07:29, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
- The article doesn`t cover WP:NCOPR and deserves to be removed - *Delete --Bigneeerman (talk) 06:07, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
- Hi @Bigneeerman. NCORP is not the correct notability criteria to look at. Like @CT55555 pointed out, NCORP is for organizations and companies. The correct criteria are GNG and AUTHOR, which @Edwardx already listed above. --Kbabej (talk) 23:05, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
- Comments I don't understand the delete vote above, an author should not need to pass WP:NCORP as she is not an organisation or a company. I've improved the article, more than doubled it. That said, I could not find any significant coverage. I added some biographical information and one short book review. I guess children's books don't attract long reviews. I'm hoping others find more. It seems she has created a large body of work, non-independent review say over-200 books, but I did not find that stated in independent reliable sources. CT55555 (talk) 12:35, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. The sourcing just isn't there. The "Dog Days Reading" source is a one-sentence mention without a byline; the entire sentence is: "Fantasy fans who dig dragons can can enjoy the latest fun in A Practical Guide to Dragon Riding (Wizards/Mirrorstone $12.95)" That was the only hit on newspapers.com, and the rest of my searches couldn't find anything resembling sigcov. --Kbabej (talk) 23:13, 18 July 2022 (UTC)