User talk:Room345

Welcome!

Hi Room345! I noticed your contributions to Gini coefficient and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 01:20, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Thank you! Room345 (talk) 01:31, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Your edit to Denbigh School

I accidentally published my reversion of your edit before writing a proper edit summary. Thank you for your WP:good faith edit to Denbigh School, which with regret I had to revert for these reasons:

• The school's own website is not a great reference for itself. Not terrible but not great. See WP:SELFSOURCE for long explanation. Plus it is already given in the article.
• The more serious problem was your citation of https://en-academic.com/dic.nsf/enwiki/1873042. This is a copy of Wikipedia, so is not a WP:reliable source. For the formal policy statement, see WP:CIRCULAR; for the amusing version, see Citogenesis.

Please don't be discouraged: these mistakes are easy to make, and making mistakes is how we all learned how to wrangle Wikipedia editing. Thank you for trying to improve the article, do please continue to search for reliable sources. Have fun! John Maynard Friedman (talk) 18:28, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

I did not want to cite them but for a huge portion of the history and old site sections were exact words from https://en-academic.com/dic.nsf/enwiki/1873042. Room345 (talk) 18:37, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

Not exactly. The en-academic.com article is a straight copy of our article, so the "history and old site sections were exact words " there are from wikipedia. Not the other way round. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 19:55, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

Oh, that makes sense. What's the real source then? 2600:8805:9300:E00:4D2:4784:CFD4:DB99 (talk) 20:06, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

That was me not logged in, sorry. Room345 (talk) 20:47, 24 July 2022 (UTC)