User talk:Mako001

Welcome to my talk page! If you haven't been here before, please read the below paragraphs.

Are you here because I reverted your edit? If so, please read the below First of all, click on all the links in the template I left on your user page (usually there will be one), then take a deep breath, remember to avoid making it personal, and post here if you still think it necessary. If your request is a reasonable objection (I.e. I stuffed up, again, since I am not exactly perfect), I will typically self-revert (if the edit is still live), strike the warning template, and leave an apology note below it. If, however, the edit cannot be reinstated in its current form, but can be made suitable, I will give some direction to policies, guidelines or help pages, and suggest that you try to fix it yourself first (you will probably learn more this way than if I do it for you). If you still aren't sure how to fix it, then let me know and I will make the requested change.

Dealing with discussions which need to be put on hold for a bit

Click "show" to read

Discussion is very important on Wikipedia. However, sometimes, due to various reasons, discussion sometimes ends up on a course which will never become productive, or resolve any kind of dispute. If this happens here, I may request that you temporarily refain from posting further messages here (except required notices), per WP:NOBAN. The objective is to act as a metaphorical circuit breaker (before we have a metaphorical fire). It is nothing against you or your viewpoint, but simply me assessing that the discussion needs to be put on hold for a while, since its current trajectory isn't going anywhere good. If I ask you to stay off, please respect this. I don't take it lightly. I will also try to stay out of your way for the duration of the temporary pause.

If I am acting a bit odd-er

Should I ever go on some random vandalism spree or start acting much weirder than usual, don't waste time warning me here, just limit the damage and block me immediately, as my account would have been compromised.

Archiving and deleting

I tend to keep this page trimmed down a bit, and will usually archive finished discussions fairly quickly (usually in less than a week). I don't like to delete them entirely, unless it is mere vandalism or personal attacks with no real critical value. Personal attacks with critical value will be archived as usual. I also delete any sort of "awards" given by editors later found to be sockpuppets, or evading a block. The archives can be found at Archive 0 (an old version of my talkpage) and /Archive 1.

Stay safe and happy editing! Mako001 (C)  (T) 

New topic shortcuts, choose the one which best matches what you want to do.

* Click here to leave me a complaint 👎

* Click here to leave me a compliment 👍

* Click here to leave me profanity, vandalism or personal attacks

* Click here to do nothing.

* Click here to say anything else 🙂

Thank for the reply, the editor added Tuluva Udupi cuisine for Masala dosa page but deleted my same edit ( Udupi cuisine ) in the " dosa " page. It means there is no proper evidence.

Edits to Beatrice Huntington page

Hi, you've just removed pictures that I added to the Beatrice Huntington page. I'm new to this, but I added them on purpose - please reinstate. Many thanks. TWSFAS (talk) 13:27, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

Sorry, my bad, I didn't notice that you had added some photos as well.

I will explain what the issue was:

Basically, you can only specify one dimension for image sizes (e.g "180x200px" is an invalid entry, so it will not work correctly), even so, usually the size is not set as a specific number of pixels (e.g 200px). See WP:Images for more details on this.

Also, I'm not sure why you added a few hundred spaces to the page, but you may want to read up a bit more on Markup and play around with it a bit in your sandbox until you get used to it.

I can't reinstate the edit right now as I need to get some sleep, but you are welcome to re-add the images yourself. If it doesn't work quite right, or you still haven't added them by tomorrow, I'll do it myself, but I'll let you have a go at getting it right first. You can copy part of the article to your sandbox if you want to try formatting stuff there without messing up the article. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 13:53, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

@TWSFAS: pinging Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 13:53, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

Great, many thanks, don't do any more on this - I'll look into it in the next couple of weeks! TWSFAS (talk) 13:55, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

@TWSFAS: OK, I'll leave you to it then. Don't hesitate to ask if you need any assistance or guidance. You can either ask here, or at the Teahouse. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 03:57, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

Hello, take a look

Hello, I hope this message meets you well. Since you're online, if you aren't too busy, take a look at this page, give pointers and advise and review the page Neo (BBNaija). Thanks. Amaekuma (talk) 12:59, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

@Amaekuma: I think that some of the words used could be switched for a more encyclopedic alternative, for instance: "beef" would be better as "dispute". "Pants" and "panties" would be better as "underwear" or something similar, since "pants" in some countries (e.g. Australia) means 👖 instead.

There are also some possible peacock terms in the article ("eminent lawyer" for instance) which are probably not necessary.

The controversies seem to take up a large amount of the article, and whilst it might be due weight, you may want to review whether it is or not.

A grammar adjustment would be "He is a cousin to" --> "He is the cousin of".

I would also suggest making sure that the topic doesn't clash with WP:BLP1E, basically, make sure that he is notable for more than just his participation in BBNaija.

The last thing I can think of right now would be to check if this is the correct title, as he seems to be referred to as "Neo Akpofure"? The current tile would be a useful redirect though.

The quality of the article overall is good. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 14:35, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

{{u|mako001} I have made all the adjustments you suggested. Thanks. I'll read up on the Wikipedia editing yardsticks you pointed out. Amaekuma (talk) 18:31, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

Let me know how it measures up against those yardsticks. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 03:22, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

@Amaekuma: Quite a few of the sources seem to be tabloids. Generally, it is best to avoid using tabloids. Can I also suggest looking at WP:NOTGOSSIP? The article quality overall is good, but if the sourcing can be improved, it will be a lot more likely to survive a potential AfD. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 03:28, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

BRITNEY SPEARS CERTIFICATION UPDATES

Hello, I'm sorry I didn't provided the official source because I don't know how to do it. I found recently this official source https://www.dropbox.com/s/rkgailb0fncipwj/2018%20Accreds.pdf?dl=0. As you can see the certifications as of 2018 are the following: The Singles Collection: Platinum (70000) Greatest Hits My Preogative: x7 Platinum (490000) Circus: x5 Platinum (350000)

Thanks for your attention. 88.7.36.115 (talk) 10:06, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

Sorry, that link doesn't work for me, but you may want to look at WP:Citing sources which will explain how to do so. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 11:30, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Fear Factor: Khatron Ke Khiladi 12

Hello @Mako001 I hope you're doing well. Can you look at my article creation, if it's eligible for page triage would you consider marking it. I know it's not advice to ask for review due to backlog. Thanks for your consideration. C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 12:04, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

I didn't see this for a while, I think it got buried amongst other messages, but it looks like it has, so far, been reviewed, had spam added, removed, added again, removed again, and then been semi-protected after more spamming. So I guess I was a bit late to the party. 😁 Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 11:43, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

@Mako001 Yeah it has only been protected for 2 week due to spamming. But if you can look and review it would be great. Thanks C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 13:59, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

@C1K98V: My bad, the page curation tool had failed to load, so I thought that it had already been reviewed. It has now, since notabilty for earlier seasons has been established so this one should be fine as far as that goes. I don't see any glaring maintenance issues, and have given it a C rating. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 05:17, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

No problem, tool failure happens. Thanks for the quick response C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 05:20, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

Rooobot

I soft-blocked Rooobot (talk · contribs) for the bot username. I'll leave the house training for the vandalism to you. The last edit seems well-intentioned, if a little clumsy. Cabayi (talk) 12:12, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

@Cabayi:: That was largely why I hadn't sent them to AIV, as it definitely isn't a VOA. The first two are definitely vandalism, but the third I'd agree that the intent was apparently constructive. FWIW, I'd say the soft block seems most appropriate. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 12:22, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Charlie Gracie

I made mention that Charlie Gracie was born the same day as his contemporary Bobby Darin. Gracie and Darin were both born on May 14th, 1936. They were both Italian-American. They were born on the east coast; Gracie in Philidelphea, Darin in NYC. They both began in the 1950s doing Rock'N'Roll, then did other genres such as jazz, pop, country, and folk. In 2022, as this era of artists are mostly dead and/or forgotten, I thought this was an interesting bit of information. I also added this to the Bobby Darin wiki page, saying that Darin was born the same day as Gracie. 69.14.164.134 (talk) 13:24, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Yes, but it isn't encyclopedic to include trivia in articles, hence why it was removed. Even if it is correct, it is still not really relevant to the topic at hand, unless it had some impact or effect on the articles subject, which I would presume it didn't. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 13:28, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

my edits to "screwdriver"

I'm new to editing Wikipedia, so perhaps you can offer me some personal guidance. Should I have communicated with you directly before submitting my second, more modest single-word edit? Also, I notice that other editors don't use their real names. Should I consider using a pseudonym instead? Ron Blewitt (talk) 14:43, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Nah, that second edit was fine. It's a bit hard to gauge what the scope of an article should be at times, and it's something you can only get with some practice and by reading a few other articles.

Regarding using your real name, you may want to read this paragraph on using your real name as a username. If you need any more advice, or would like more details, either ask me here, or ask at the Teahouse. I'm in UTC+8, so it's a bit late right now, and I might not get back to any queries until the morning. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 15:09, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Indian Cricket Association Ground edit

Sorry for that disruption. Actually I was just testing to redirect a page. 2409:4060:E88:3E90:0:0:AA4A:D208 (talk) 14:51, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Utter nonsense, and I don't believe a word of it. Why redirect it to that page? I wasn't born yesterday. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 15:01, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Why not? When you redirect a page to the user pages of two indefinitely blocked socks in succession, then make further edits referencing other pathetic socks, it's difficult to assume that you are merely "testing". Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 15:17, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Oh, that is a surprise, you got rangeblocked due to block evasion, didn't see that coming. 🙄 Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 11:32, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Doggy eat dog

Doggy doooooooo dooooooo 174.89.92.13 (talk) 07:46, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Hi, are you feeling OK? Would you like a candy? 😁 Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 07:48, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

deletion becuase of lack of source.

Mako I am the source. I have first hand experience. You only aource when when you use another persons information but in this case am the the 'person'. Go to any South African prison to check the validity of my statements, if proven false then I will agree with your removal but for now please bring back the statement I had written. 41.13.148.78 (talk) 07:34, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Please read Wikipedia:No original research. Unfortunately, that means that you are not able to add that and source it to yourself. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 07:35, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

I am the source. You source when you use another persons information. When I said I am source I never said I am the originator of that information but merely the mouth piece of public information of which it seems you have no knowledge. What I wrote is public knowledge in South African prisons and Townships. In townships this is well known and it seems you are not aware of it. This is public knowledge and those who are not aware of it take the errors written in this risk death, Am a number gangster and I know what is secret and public information, The errors I corrected were not only errors but dangerious information which would get people get killed hence I put the correct public information and if secretive I used a non risky approach to write about not that previous approach of yours.

I would advise you to go into townships and South African prisons to observe what I have stated. Taking down the information I wrote becuase of your misuse wikipedia policy put the lives of people who will read that dangerious article that you prefer. 41.13.191.175 (talk) 07:56, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Also read Wikipedia:No legal threats, as your comments above can be considered to fall foul of that policy. As I said before, there is a policy against using original research, as you are demanding that I do. If you wish to continue to argue this point, I can't stop you, but I doubt there will be any point doing so. Rather, I think it likely to end with you being rangeblocked, but that's up to you really. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 11:26, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

F###ig nose poker

You’re nothing but a sad nose poker who gets unlimited gratification by constantly patrolling random pages on Wikipedia and undoing vandalism. You’re so quick that it seems you get paid $800,000 a year for doing this. 2600:1014:B000:57E1:7D96:A30C:A1F4:3B8D (talk) 03:41, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

Haha, you're funny. I wish I got 800k a year for it. Thanks for the compliment on my reversion speed. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 03:44, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – July 2022

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2022).

Administrator changes

AA • Gwalla • Ioeth • Laurascudder • Moriori (deceased) • Nat • Rfl

Drilnoth → AFigureOfBlue

Bureaucrat changes

Lee Vilenski

Interface administrator changes

Nihiltres

Technical news

• user_global_editcount is a new variable that can be used in abuse filters to avoid affecting globally active users. (T130439)

Arbitration

• An arbitration case regarding conduct in deletion-related editing has been opened.

Miscellaneous

• The New Pages Patrol queue has around 10,000 articles to be reviewed. As all administrators have the patrol right, please consider helping out. The queue is here. For further information on the state of the project, see the latest NPP newsletter.

---

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:29, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

Close discussion of deletion about Sajad Hussain Malik

Hey , this article about Sajad Hussain Malik is officially notable and considered by news agency of Indian news, so help to remove discussion and this article should keep. 2409:4054:11D:8B99:543B:F595:92AD:DB6D (talk) 05:54, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

You can participate in the deletion discussion like anyone else. And no, I will not "help to remove [the] discussion". Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 07:18, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

Your message on my talk page

I made no of changes... plz refer which one... 27.63.19.226 (talk) 07:19, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

This series of changes [1][2][3][4]. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 07:25, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

I deleted the bit about Ken Sprague because it refers to another person

I deleted the bit about Ken Sprague as if refers to another person 213.140.205.216 (talk) 07:43, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

OK, that's all good, just state that in the edit summary when you remove it. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 07:46, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

Vaish varna

The word Vaish is believed to have originated from the Hindu deity Kubera who was the son of sage Vishrava, and he came to be called Vaishravana, and he is the elder brother of Ravana. So he is considered to be the god of wealth, only then after breaking the word Vaish from Vaishravana, it was made an introduction to the rich people!(The name Vaiśravaṇa is derived from the Sanskrit viśravaṇa which means "son of Vishrava", a usual epithet of the Hindu god Kubera. Vaiśravaṇa is also known as Kubera) 103.206.177.47 (talk) 03:21, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

Pasting the content you tried to add to the article onto my talkpage won't help your cause. Please provide a reliable source as I asked. Also the way you have written it does not fit the encyclopedic tone expected of Wikipedia articles. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 03:31, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

I had heard this orally from my guru and it is a fact that rich people in India are believed to have taken blessings from Kuber dev and Kuber dev is known as Vaish+ravan.(the elder brother of Ravan) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.206.177.47 (talk) 03:39, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

Please provide a reliable source. Your guru is not a reliable source by Wikipedia's standards. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 03:44, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

You're part of the problem.

Misinformation is an easy claim to make when your sources are news anchors and career politicians, or worse, pharmaceutical CEOs self-proclaiming the safety and efficacy of their own products. You're an edit-warring user. Please cease and desist. MD Ronald Tarson (talk) 03:50, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

If you are willing to travel, I will be more than happy to show you my endless months of cellular research into the effects of the Pfizer-BioNtech SARS-CoV-2 vaccine as well. I'm licensed to study and receive the vaccines in my office. If you refuse to see evidence, you shouldn't be editing my edits. MD Ronald Tarson (talk) 03:55, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

Using your real-world achievements to put additional weight behind your statements is not going to get you far here. You don't own your edits. You are welcome to add content to the articles, so long as you have sourced it correctly, but your quest to right great wrongs will end very swiftly if you persist in doing so without getting consensus on the article talkpage. Also see the guidelines on due weight and on fringe content, as it seems like your view is potentially not a mainstream view. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 08:00, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

Parliamentary processes is

Sourced. See the citation which uses the phrase. Doug Weller talk 15:10, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

Mosvik

You reverted my edit on Mosvik. As I explained in my comment, the section is no longer relevant. This is due to the municipality no longer existing, so statements like "are responsible for primary education" are misleading; the municipality is no longer responsible for primary education. Allerla (talk) 07:32, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

@Allerla:Sorry for the slow response. Whilst there was a summary, it was a bit vague, and wasn't quite enough to tell why you had removed it, hence why I reverted it. Yes, it wasn't relevant, but why wasn't it relevant? Thanks for the more complete explanation, if you haven't reinstated your changes, feel free to do so. Cheerio and happy editing. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 10:15, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

Sure, I should have been more specific in my first explanation. Cheers, Allerla (talk) 10:33, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

Rgw

That policy you linked me says a source has to be verifiable for the claim is added. Since it is a word, and I verified that as such, please can u tell me what was wrong with my edit? I have stopped for now cos I don't wanna edit war Stephanie921 (talk) 13:18, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

Would you be OK with shifting this discussion to your talkpage? I'd left a longer comment there before I saw this. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 13:26, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

@Stephanie921: sorry, forgot to ping Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 13:26, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

Yes I'd be fine with that :) Stephanie921 (talk) 13:27, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

Pronouns

I noticed you had your talk page set to say your pronouns when you ping someone on it :) Please could u tell me how to do that? Stephanie921 (talk) 13:34, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

Go to the "Preferences", on the desktop version it will be at the top right, on mobile it is in a menu off to the left when you tap some button (I forget exactly how to do it). You should then see an option on the first page (User Profile), "Gender used in messages" or similar. Then you can set it. You can also do so for all Wikimedia wikis by doing the same thing on https://meta.wikimedia.org. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 13:42, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello

Threatening to block me for fact-checking another Wikipedia user is uncalled for. I have been a responsible Wikipedia contributor for 7 years. Please do not mistake my intention to fact-check another user with aggression. The so-called "original research" that you have mentioned are actually corroborated by third-party publications and it only happens I have intimate familiarity. Vgyu 08:29, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

@Vgyu:Sorry, I misunderstood the situation, my sincere apologies. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 10:24, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

Whilst I didn't exactly threaten to block you, I am sorry that it came across that way. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 10:33, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

Apologies accepted. Vgyu 01:21, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Greetings

Hello, I made a very quick minor edit to the page Muslim conquest of the Maghreb, and yes it is true it was a very minor edit, but it was definitely a constructive edit. The article itself quite literally gives a date range of 647–709 AD. If one clicks on the link to the Persian Empire that is mentioned in the introduction text, then one will find that this particular iteration of the empire collapsed in 330BC. That is a gap of 977 years! How can it be not constructive to change it to the actual Sasanian Empire that co-existed with the event in the article? Obviously I'm just some random internet editor so you should take what I do with a grain of salt, but to say it is a non-constructive edit when it is actually an accurate one is bizzare. 2001:8003:3D84:4E00:3DF8:8EC0:388E:183A (talk) 14:02, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Ah, right, that makes more sense. Sorry, it seemed a bit odd to change the target for that, and it's a fairly common sort of disruption. I'll strike that warning. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 14:15, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Masala dosa

Dear sir Masala dosa or dosa is not entirely Tuluva cuisine. Udupi is bilingual kannada & Tulu both spoken. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Laks883 (talk • contribs) 14:19, 24 July 2022 (UTC) Page is about Masala dosa not just dosa. Masala dosa can be found in other parts of South India too, Finding masala dosa origin is difficult but Dosa origin traced in Tamil sangam literature & Someshwara ||| 's Manasollasa Kalyana chalukyas > — Preceding unsigned comment added by Laks883 (talk • contribs) 14:47, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello Laks883, could you please provide a reliable source to support your changes? Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 08:38, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

Dear sir, Dr. Thankappa Nair haven't mentioned masala dosa is Tuluva cuisine. Upupi is bilingual. Laks883 (talk) 18:52, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

https://books.google.com/books?id=swNuAAAAMAAJ South India comprises Kannadigas, Tamils Tuluvas, Konkanis, malayalees Telugus Kodavas. Laks883 (talk) 19:02, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

https://books.google.com/books?id=swNuAAAAMAAJ Text reference : Manasollasa Laks883 (talk) 19:47, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

https://books.google.com/books?id=bk9RHRCqZOkC&pg=PA80 reliable text reference : Manasollasa Laks883 (talk) 19:49, 25 July 2022 (UTC) https://books.google.com/books?id=swNuAAAAMAAJ South Comprises Kannadigas, Tamils, Tuluvas, Kodavas Konkanis, malayalees. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Laks883 (talk • contribs) 19:01, 25 July 2022 (UTC) https://books.google.com/books?id=bk9RHRCqZOkC&pg=PA80 Origin — Preceding unsigned comment added by Laks883 (talk • contribs) 19:09, 25 July 2022 (UTC) Information about preparing cuisine can't be a reference. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Laks883 (talk • contribs) 19:12, 25 July 2022 (UTC) There is changes by anonymous user - creating multiple accounts review. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Laks883 (talk • contribs) 02:08, 26 July 2022 (UTC) Hello sir, I talked with you & provided source editing contents after talk. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Laks883 (talk • contribs) 16:28, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

@Laks883: Thanks for getting the sources, so long as they comply with Wikipedia:Reliable sources, then they should be good. I'll take a look at whether the editor you are talking about may be engaging in sockpuppetry. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 09:08, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Thanks! Laks883 (talk) 11:52, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Draft:Driton Halimi

Hi, I have improved this draft Draft:Driton Halimi. There are many more citations added. Is it possible to have another look? Aporesing60 (talk) 20:02, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

@Aporesing60: It has definitely been improved from what it was! You seem to have done a good job here. However, I am not really confident to declare this one as notable or not, as I am not familiar enough with sports topics. Sorry, you'll probably just have to wait for another editor to review it. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 08:08, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

Edits related to Wion

Hello Mako001. Thanks for writing to me. I added that segment about anti-China bias based on my personal observations for past 2 years. Also I found out that when this channel started it felt great that India has its own international channel and Indians will be open to world news in a different way than the western way which is thrust on India by cnn bbc etc since all these years. But soon wion reduced itself to a English version of a typical indian hindi news channel who will just give conspiracy theories without any fact checks or validity. They literally pick up OP ED from news portals like NYT and WSP etc and convert it into breaking news showing that the opinions in those articles are actual happenings. Later it became a typical India jingoistic channel and lost more credibility. And when it started its anti china rhetoric., that was end of it. Palki Sharma at 9 pm China bashing became a daily ritual. The way she talks looks less like news more like some agenda driven women taking out some personal grudge. It's difficult to get citations, as other sources wouldn't care to cross check. I suggest you personally see some of their videos, & after proof checking undo the changes. P.S. Wion is owned by zee news, you can google controversies about zee news, & you'll get clear picture. Thanks...have a great day !!! 117.211.128.189 (talk) 10:36, 27 July 2022 (UTC)