Talk:Cruentation

I am not used to all of what wikipedia does, but I have noticed that this article is sort of below standards. It looks like it started out as a college paper, and has redundancy. I would not know how to go about fixing this, but I thought I could at least bring this up for someone who knows. --68.61.250.127 (talk) 23:55, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

I agree with the above; it's largely because the 4th and 5th paragraph appear to be copied verbatim from reference [5]. Will attempt a re-write when I get a chance. 21:21, 20 April 2011 (UTC) EddyH — Preceding unsigned comment added by EddyH (talk • contribs)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Cruentation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache%3AjAoSpp14TuEJ%3Awww.scribd.com%2Fdoc%2F1107265%2FNational-Institutes-of-Health-highlights%20ius%20cruentationis&cd=3&hl=nl&ct=clnk&gl=nl&source=www.google.nl
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100310102701/http://u0028844496.user.hosting-agency.de/malexwiki/index.php/Gottesurteil to http://u0028844496.user.hosting-agency.de/malexwiki/index.php/Gottesurteil

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:34, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Etymology?

What does/ do the older latin name/s mean in translation, etc.? An 'Etymology' chapter or at least paragraph is really, really missing!