User talk:AssociateAffiliate: Difference between revisions
Comment |
|||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
*''"make useful contributions"'' what a fucking joke, 60,000 edits and 6,500 new articles created. I'm done. This encyclopedia is now overrun by people who are incompetent and make absolutely no useful contributions, if they could they would, but their inability to speaks volumes. AA (2009-2022), out. [[User:AssociateAffiliate|StickyWicket]] ([[User talk:AssociateAffiliate#top|talk]]) 07:07, 3 August 2022 (UTC) |
*''"make useful contributions"'' what a fucking joke, 60,000 edits and 6,500 new articles created. I'm done. This encyclopedia is now overrun by people who are incompetent and make absolutely no useful contributions, if they could they would, but their inability to speaks volumes. AA (2009-2022), out. [[User:AssociateAffiliate|StickyWicket]] ([[User talk:AssociateAffiliate#top|talk]]) 07:07, 3 August 2022 (UTC) |
||
** When you come back from your retirement, keep in mind that there are no vested contributors on this website. You are required to treat everyone with respect. This includes making snide comments to new users. If you have ''evidence'' that someone has engaged in sock puppetry, you can file a report at [[WP:SPI]]. Otherwise, you need to keep your suspicions to yourself. [[User:NinjaRobotPirate|NinjaRobotPirate]] ([[User talk:NinjaRobotPirate|talk]]) 07:43, 3 August 2022 (UTC) |
** When you come back from your retirement, keep in mind that there are no vested contributors on this website. You are required to treat everyone with respect. This includes making snide comments to new users. If you have ''evidence'' that someone has engaged in sock puppetry, you can file a report at [[WP:SPI]]. Otherwise, you need to keep your suspicions to yourself. [[User:NinjaRobotPirate|NinjaRobotPirate]] ([[User talk:NinjaRobotPirate|talk]]) 07:43, 3 August 2022 (UTC) |
||
I suppose I should really back off here and I would appreciate any comment by [[User:NinjaRobotPirate|NinjaRobotPirate]], but I think it is reasonable to point out that my first venture into AFD came after 46 days membership and over 300 edits. Back in 2009–2010, AssociateAffiliate made their first venture into AFD exactly 46 days after opening their account. What a coincidence. |
|||
However, as I have already said at the AFD page, I hope that despite their outburst, obviously caused by frustration, AssociateAffiliate will think twice about quitting the site. I am more than happy to accept consensus if any or all of the articles I nominated should be retained. If I have made any mistakes, I shall learn from them as I always do. |
|||
I've said my piece and now I will move on. Thank you. |
|||
[[User:Sistorian|Sistorian]] ([[User talk:Sistorian|talk]]) 16:10, 3 August 2022 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:11, 3 August 2022
August 2022
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Editor making rapid, nonsense !votes at AfD and refusing to accept new sports SNG. Thank you. StAnselm (talk) 18:24, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:04, 3 August 2022 (UTC)- "make useful contributions" what a fucking joke, 60,000 edits and 6,500 new articles created. I'm done. This encyclopedia is now overrun by people who are incompetent and make absolutely no useful contributions, if they could they would, but their inability to speaks volumes. AA (2009-2022), out. StickyWicket (talk) 07:07, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
- When you come back from your retirement, keep in mind that there are no vested contributors on this website. You are required to treat everyone with respect. This includes making snide comments to new users. If you have evidence that someone has engaged in sock puppetry, you can file a report at WP:SPI. Otherwise, you need to keep your suspicions to yourself. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:43, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
I suppose I should really back off here and I would appreciate any comment by NinjaRobotPirate, but I think it is reasonable to point out that my first venture into AFD came after 46 days membership and over 300 edits. Back in 2009–2010, AssociateAffiliate made their first venture into AFD exactly 46 days after opening their account. What a coincidence.
However, as I have already said at the AFD page, I hope that despite their outburst, obviously caused by frustration, AssociateAffiliate will think twice about quitting the site. I am more than happy to accept consensus if any or all of the articles I nominated should be retained. If I have made any mistakes, I shall learn from them as I always do.
I've said my piece and now I will move on. Thank you.