Talk:Soy milk: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 00:20, 24 February 2007

China Unassessed

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Links to manufacturers

Why? — Pekinensis 14:46, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I actually think we need links to more manufacturers because there's a distinct difference between western and eastern soymilk/drink. Can someone look up some Asian manufacturers? Janet13 9 July 2005 05:59 (UTC)

History

Could someone add a history section? I think this is actually a really old drink instead of a modern health food industry invention, as many might be percieving. --69.212.101.139 29 June 2005 20:25 (UTC)

Taste

Article: Soy milk can be used as a replacement for cow milk in most types of recipes.

Well, most soy milks don't taste close to cow milk at all, so i would say in most cases, soy milk isn't a good substitute for taste. Compared even to low-fat cow milk, soy milk tastes watery and hollow - someone disagree? --Abdull 09:12, 16 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Only fat-free soymilk tastes watery. Regular soymilk can usually be used in recipes, unless you're using a lot, obviously. -QT314

Soy milk has a different pH than cow's milk, so the substitution in leavened baked goods is not straitforward. Taste otoh I think is very subjective. dikaiopolis 07:31, 28 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

New picture

That picture looks really gross and yellowed. Surely there's a better image of soymilk out there than that!

I agree. Also, why is there a branded can in the picture with a link to the manufacturer? It looks like an advertisement to me! AgarrateCatalina. Jan. 8, 07

Health arguments

An anonymous poster recently added a large number of negative health arguments without a reference. Is it justifiable to remove these until some sort of factual backing is provided? Uriah923 20:34, 15 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Reference re-added

A reference was removed without explanation. It has been re-added, as it was used to add content to the article on July 25, 2005. Per Wikipedia policy, a reference must be provided when information is "gleaned from an external souce." As that is the case here, to remove the reference would put the article in copyright violation. Uriah923 17:29, 1 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I should like to intoroduce the oposing view on Soy & Health as presented at the following link .... http://www.soyonlineservice.co.nz/

The page opens with the following....Italic text'"The Truth about Soy

Have you ever wondered about soy? It's promoted as the miracle food that will feed the world while at the same time prevent and cure all manner of diseases. But what if all you've read about soy is nothing but a multi-million dollar marketing strategy based on scanty facts, half-truths and lies?"......'

Value of ON content and quality of reference

The content added from the ON reference remains in this article, but the reference has been removed. This action is disputed and a conversation is ongoing here. Uriah923 06:21, 2 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Taste and aftertaste

After drinking soy milk, I sometimes have an aftertaste which I can only describe as "grassy". I'm also pretty sure it aggravates my allergies, plugging up my nasal passageways. I can also feel my stomach becoming more acidic while it's in there. These are probably all side-effects of the vegetable nature of soy milk, which is not all good in all cases. Cow's milk, on the other hand, goes down very well for me, though I do feel guilty these days about how the milk is extracted from the poor cows. At any rate, I don't think it's a good substitute for cow's milk as far as chemical make-up is concerned, and my body can testify to that. Perhaps other people with similar reactions to soy milk can attest to this as well. --211.116.88.76 14:16, 18 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Or perhaps people with reactions to cow's milk or dairy products can attest to that. :-) -- 28 dec 2005

I drink soy milk and have not experienced the "grassy" taste you're talking about. Course, I get the vanilla flavor. Jwigton 04:54, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Flavoured Soy Milk

Article: In the United States, soy milk is commonly available in vanilla and chocolate flavors as well as its original unflavored form.

Just the United States?? In Australia it is available in many flavours, and surely many other countries besides.

Protein?

"It naturally has about the same amount of protein as cow milk." -- Although it has about the same amount of protein as cow's milk, I assume that the proteins are not the same. Can anybody clarify this? -- 28 dec 2005

The proteins are definitely not considered the same. Soy protein and milk protein are made up of extremely different amino acids. That might lead some to argue that this article is biased a little in the sense that it is pro-soy milk. Unfortunately I can't seem to find reliable internet sources with the exact studies showing the results of people drinking soy versus cow milk, but at issue seems to be that people who drink soy have a greater incidence of mood imbalance, lower muscle mass, and higher estrogen production. -22 may 2006

Invention of soy milk

"Soybean or "vegetable" milk is reported to have been developed and used in China by the philosopher Whi Nain Tze, who is credited also with the development of doufu or 'Tofu' in Japan." -- No Google hits for Whi Nain Tze. Liu An says, "Liu An (劉安, 179-122 BC) was an advisor to Emperor Wu of Han China and the inventor of tofu." More history info at http://www.soya.be/history-of-soy-milk.php

I believe that no matter the original development of vegetable milks, it was Dr Harry Miller, an Adventist missionary doctor in China, who tried to popularize and mass produce it as infant formula. I also think I read in a biography written for Adventist children (back when i was one, heh) that plaster of Paris (!) was one an additive. Mang 10:20, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The first citation about Soy Milk coming from China leads to a company's page that does not explain how they got their sources. Chinese sources are of course also among the most unreliable at times do to nationalist agenda. Swatpig 00:18, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ecological Impact

I have removed the part about the ecological impact of soymilk because the link supplied WWF clearly states that "the main product is soy meal [...] much sought after as animal feed", so not for the production of soy milk (the paragraph seems to try to expose those soy milk drinking tree hugging hippies destroying the rainforest they love so much)

The reasoning seems off to me: "This however is not valid in many parts of the developing world where feed for cows and buffaloes is not cultivated separately but is often the by product of rice or other vegetable cultivation intended primarily for humans". This part suggests that you cant feed cows/buffaloes with soy by products, while rice and other vegetables is fine (And it also suggests that by products would be lost if you did not feed them to cows/buffaloes, but if you don't use them as animal food you will use them in cultivating other plants). So the claim that soy cultivation can be counterproductive compared to cow raisinig really needs to be backed up with some references. --Kiesa 10:09, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I moved the doubtful part here for discussion:

This however is not valid in many parts of the developing world where feed for cows and buffaloes is not cultivated separately but is often the by
product of rice or other vegetable cultivation intended primarily for humans.
In fact, excessive soy cultivation is often counterproductive in such countries.

--Kiesa 04:33, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Huainanzi

A few edits back, there was a sentance that refrenced this in the second paragraph that made sense (at least in form--I can't vouch for it being factual). Since then it's been moved around at random ending up all by itself as a link at the end of the paragraph. In previous versions it never was clear exactly what it's relationship to the history of soy milk was, really. I solved this problem by removing the refrence entirely. If anyone wants to put it back, go ahead but at least fit it in w/ the paragraph rather than just tacking it on the end.Frank 17:30, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

defatting unsourced

"Lower fat varieties of soy milk are often significantly lower in protein than cow's milk because the defatting process is not one of skimming risen cream, rather it involves adding water." Deleted for lack of source. Jclerman 10:04, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

debate over the use of infant formula

There's substantial debate in the medical community currently over whether soy-milk baby formula should be used, as it commonly is, as a substitute for infants who are allergic to cow's milk. There is evidence that soy protein is a moderately sensitizing protein, especially in young infants, and even more especially so in infants who have already shown signs of cow-milk-protein allergy (there is debate over why that would be). Some evidence suggests that using soy milk as a substitute in that case puts such infants at a much higher risk of developing soy allergy than normal. As a result, some organizations now recommend against the use of soy milk as a substitute for cow-milk-sensitive infants, but this recommendation is not universally agreed upon. This paper has some details. --Delirium 05:36, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Soy and Dementia

This is apparently a widespread debate. I have no idea either way, but I'm very surprised that potential health risks aren't really mentioned in thier own section in this article.

Add more detail to "Ecological Impact"

It says the "explosion of soybean cultivation" in Brazil caused losses of large tracts of forest lands, but it didn't say how or why. I want details. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.38.242.66 (talk • contribs)

Section Origins states:

Soy milk originated in China

soymilk has a US patent around 1930. This would counterdict this information. --meatclerk 21:38, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Would it? Just because something is patented today doesn't mean it didn't exist yesterday. Or are you basing your statement on a Wikipedia-specific guideline? Paul Haymon 09:09, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Citation added. Soy milk, as well as its bi-product Doufu, appeared in China 2,000 years ago. In my opinion, a patent of less than one century is merely a modern stuff of making $$$. --supernorton 05:32, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]