Talk:Bee: Difference between revisions
→Types of bees: new section Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
remove nonsense discussion |
||
Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
Should the description of the Bee Movie be changed from saying "The humorous 2007 animated film" to "The 2007 animated comedy film" to upkeep the NPOV? [[Special:Contributions/2600:1009:B026:F555:ECEE:C8A4:F327:3EFA|2600:1009:B026:F555:ECEE:C8A4:F327:3EFA]] ([[User talk:2600:1009:B026:F555:ECEE:C8A4:F327:3EFA|talk]]) 18:15, 10 July 2022 (UTC) |
Should the description of the Bee Movie be changed from saying "The humorous 2007 animated film" to "The 2007 animated comedy film" to upkeep the NPOV? [[Special:Contributions/2600:1009:B026:F555:ECEE:C8A4:F327:3EFA|2600:1009:B026:F555:ECEE:C8A4:F327:3EFA]] ([[User talk:2600:1009:B026:F555:ECEE:C8A4:F327:3EFA|talk]]) 18:15, 10 July 2022 (UTC) |
||
:Fair point. Done. [[User:Dyanega|Dyanega]] ([[User talk:Dyanega|talk]]) 17:48, 20 July 2022 (UTC) |
:Fair point. Done. [[User:Dyanega|Dyanega]] ([[User talk:Dyanega|talk]]) 17:48, 20 July 2022 (UTC) |
||
== Types of bees == |
|||
A female voice [[Special:Contributions/2C0F:F8F0:F790:0:F08C:5AE2:6DFC:1A03|2C0F:F8F0:F790:0:F08C:5AE2:6DFC:1A03]] ([[User talk:2C0F:F8F0:F790:0:F08C:5AE2:6DFC:1A03|talk]]) 16:58, 17 August 2022 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:58, 17 August 2022
Bee has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: July 16, 2015. (Reviewed version). |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bee article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
There is a request, submitted by 92.18.164.107 (talk), for an audio version of this article to be created. For further information, see WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia. The rationale behind the request is: "important subject". |
A fact from Bee appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 9 August 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 2 February 2021 and 17 May 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Alexa-playjonimitchell.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 15:30, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Bee Subclass Pterygota
I think that it would be good to add the subclass Pterygota in the scientific classification of the bee on the sidebar. Also, the taxon Dicondylia could also be added. Since I just created my account for this change, I thought I would put this in talk instead of submitting an edit request. I also thought that since I am new to Wikipedia editing, there might be an obvious reason it is not included -- AnonymousCornCob (talk) 05:14, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
- That would add zero information of any relevance. All insects that are not either Archaeognatha or Zygentoma are in both Dicondylia and Pterygota. There are no articles in Wikipedia for major insect orders in these groups that includes these ranks in their visible classification, for this exact reason. If it doesn't merit inclusion in the articles for insect orders, it certain doesn't merit inclusion for a taxon as far down the hierarchy as a superfamily, and bees are an even lower rank than that. Putting this information into every article for every group of insects down to the rank of superfamily would require hundreds upon hundreds of edits. Dyanega (talk) 17:57, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
Global Patterns and Drivers of Bee Distribution
2020 study in Current Biology Mapsax (talk) 22:42, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 24 March 2022
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
In the opening sentence, suggest change "Bees are insects with wings closely related to wasps and ants" to "Bees are winged insects closely related to wasps and ants" (reads better). 2A00:23C8:7B09:FA00:1952:93D5:4B7E:BCA5 (talk) 21:00, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
- Done signed, 511KeV (talk) 04:18, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
Description of Bee Movie
Should the description of the Bee Movie be changed from saying "The humorous 2007 animated film" to "The 2007 animated comedy film" to upkeep the NPOV? 2600:1009:B026:F555:ECEE:C8A4:F327:3EFA (talk) 18:15, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
- Fair point. Done. Dyanega (talk) 17:48, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- Wikipedia good articles
- Natural sciences good articles
- All unassessed articles
- GA-Class Agriculture articles
- Mid-importance Agriculture articles
- WikiProject Agriculture articles
- GA-Class Insects articles
- High-importance Insects articles
- GA-Class Hymenoptera articles
- Top-importance Hymenoptera articles
- Hymenoptera articles
- WikiProject Insects articles
- Spoken Wikipedia requests
- Wikipedia Did you know articles