User talk:Cormorantxyz: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 06:20, 29 August 2022

Welcome!

Hi Cormorantxyz! I noticed your contributions to Live (Gipsy Kings album) and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Muhandes (talk) 08:32, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Intellect (August 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

see WP:SOLUTIONS.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Intellect and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 09:21, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cormorantxyz! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 09:21, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Intellect (August 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Greenman were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Claims of being "the leading" etc. are not backed up by sources, and read as highly promotional. See also WP:COI.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Intellect and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 12:49, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Intellect (August 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Also see WP:SOLUTIONS.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Intellect and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 10:43, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Theroadislong, could I clarify why you're flagging the page as having not significant coverage? The organisation has been featured by independent, reliable sources extensively including Forbes, Techcrunch, Yahoo, and more. As per the references below:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/jonathanburgos/2022/07/11/singapores-mental-health-startup-intellect-raises-10-million-in-funding-round-led-by-tiger-global/

https://techcrunch.com/2022/01/24/intellect-the-mental-health-startup-focused-on-apac-raises-10m-series-a/

https://finance.yahoo.com/finance/news/mental-health-startup-intellect-gets-064127270.html Cormorantxyz (talk) 06:20, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 72: / Line 72: @@
 [[User:Theroadislong|Theroadislong]] ([[User talk:Theroadislong|talk]]) 10:43, 26 August 2022 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC decline-->
+:Hi [[User:Theroadislong|Theroadislong]], could I clarify why you're flagging the page as having not significant coverage? The organisation has been featured by independent, reliable sources extensively including Forbes, Techcrunch, Yahoo, and more. As per the references below:
+:https://www.forbes.com/sites/jonathanburgos/2022/07/11/singapores-mental-health-startup-intellect-raises-10-million-in-funding-round-led-by-tiger-global/
+:https://techcrunch.com/2022/01/24/intellect-the-mental-health-startup-focused-on-apac-raises-10m-series-a/
+:https://finance.yahoo.com/finance/news/mental-health-startup-intellect-gets-064127270.html [[User:Cormorantxyz|Cormorantxyz]] ([[User talk:Cormorantxyz#top|talk]]) 06:20, 29 August 2022 (UTC)