User talk:45.3.234.214

Block evasion

Please note that block evasion using IP addresses is prohibited. The appropriate way is to have the block on your account CUfiveo lifted and then edit articles using that account. Thank you.--HamiltonProject (talk) 04:12, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

Your message is unclear to me.

( 45.3.234.214 ) is not associated with ( USER: CUfiveo ) 45.3.234.214 (talk) 16:45, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

June 2020

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for block evasion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Drmies (talk) 04:15, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

August 2022

Hello, I'm BilCat. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Talk:Amerigo Vespucci have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 20:01, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

@BilCat Thank you for providing this information.

After briefly reviewing your terms and the terms expressed in the ' soapbox ' article, your reason for reverting this request is inadequate;

Advertising, marketing or public relations.

... Wikipedia articles about a person, company or organization are not an extension of their website, press releases, or other social media marketing efforts. External links to commercial organizations are acceptable if they identify notable organizations which are the topic of the article. Wikipedia neither endorses organizations nor runs affiliate programs. ...

External links or Internet directories.

... There is nothing wrong with adding one or more useful content-relevant links to the external links section of an article; however, excessive lists can dwarf articles and detract from the purpose of Wikipedia. On articles about topics with many fansites, for example, including a link to one major fansite may be appropriate. ...

Wikipedia is not a dictionary, or a usage or jargon guide.

A Wikipedia article should not be a complete exposition of all possible details, but a summary of accepted knowledge regarding its subject.

Wikipedia is not a place to publish your own thoughts and analyses or to publish new information.

Please try to stay on the task of creating an encyclopedia.

Contributors must disclose any payments they receive for editing Wikipedia.

May you please authenticate your reason for reverting the request to add WEBSITE: www.amerigovespucci.com to the article Amerigo Vespucci?

I will follow through with your response by notifying wikipedia support to confirm proper action, I am not an attorney. 45.3.234.214 (talk) 15:16, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.