Jump to content

Talk:Pythom: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Task 1: Remove redirect-class assessment from non-redirect
Irrelevant notes: new section
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WPAFC|class=|ts=20170417044603|reviewer=Boomer Vial}}
{{WPAFC|class=|ts=20170417044603|reviewer=Boomer Vial}}

== Irrelevant notes + general feel of a company website ==

The History section notes that many of the industry professionals who criticized the safety procedures during the March 2022 hold down test are employed by Pythom's potential competitors. While this is partially true (one of the louder voices works for Blue Origin, who is in the heavy lift market with their ''New Glenn'' rocket and therefore does not compete with Pythom), I feel this is irrelevant to the discussion.

Additionally, this just kind of feels like a company website? There's a lot of weird and unnecessary detail (see the part about the Space Cowboys group doubling in size since their investment in Pythom) that seems like it's there to attract investors instead of just a straight retelling of the facts. [[User:SpaceAlex1|SpaceAlex1]] ([[User talk:SpaceAlex1|talk]]) 19:16, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:16, 6 September 2022

WikiProject iconArticles for creation Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Note icon
This article was accepted on 17 April 2017 by reviewer Boomer Vial (talk · contribs).

Irrelevant notes + general feel of a company website

The History section notes that many of the industry professionals who criticized the safety procedures during the March 2022 hold down test are employed by Pythom's potential competitors. While this is partially true (one of the louder voices works for Blue Origin, who is in the heavy lift market with their New Glenn rocket and therefore does not compete with Pythom), I feel this is irrelevant to the discussion.

Additionally, this just kind of feels like a company website? There's a lot of weird and unnecessary detail (see the part about the Space Cowboys group doubling in size since their investment in Pythom) that seems like it's there to attract investors instead of just a straight retelling of the facts. SpaceAlex1 (talk) 19:16, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]