Talk:Ujjani Dam: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
m Tagging + talk page general fixes using AWB (10093) |
→Pros and cons of the dam: new section Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
The numbers in this article are all wrong; in particular 800 cu mi is given for both the volume of the dam and the volume of the lake, and is ridiculous for either. [[Special:Contributions/72.251.57.216|72.251.57.216]] ([[User talk:72.251.57.216|talk]]) 09:59, 9 July 2011 (UTC) |
The numbers in this article are all wrong; in particular 800 cu mi is given for both the volume of the dam and the volume of the lake, and is ridiculous for either. [[Special:Contributions/72.251.57.216|72.251.57.216]] ([[User talk:72.251.57.216|talk]]) 09:59, 9 July 2011 (UTC) |
||
:Fixed. Thanks for pointing that out. I used the Indian National Committee on Large Dams source.--[[User:NortyNort|NortyNort]] <small>[[User talk:NortyNort|(Holla)]]</small> 14:38, 10 July 2011 (UTC) |
:Fixed. Thanks for pointing that out. I used the Indian National Committee on Large Dams source.--[[User:NortyNort|NortyNort]] <small>[[User talk:NortyNort|(Holla)]]</small> 14:38, 10 July 2011 (UTC) |
||
== Pros and cons of the dam == |
|||
Pros and cons of the dam [[Special:Contributions/2405:204:2001:4407:5C23:A6CE:ABBB:BB0B|2405:204:2001:4407:5C23:A6CE:ABBB:BB0B]] ([[User talk:2405:204:2001:4407:5C23:A6CE:ABBB:BB0B|talk]]) 15:38, 7 September 2022 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:38, 7 September 2022
A fact from Ujjani Dam appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 9 July 2011 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Untitled
The numbers in this article are all wrong; in particular 800 cu mi is given for both the volume of the dam and the volume of the lake, and is ridiculous for either. 72.251.57.216 (talk) 09:59, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
- Fixed. Thanks for pointing that out. I used the Indian National Committee on Large Dams source.--NortyNort (Holla) 14:38, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
Pros and cons of the dam
Pros and cons of the dam 2405:204:2001:4407:5C23:A6CE:ABBB:BB0B (talk) 15:38, 7 September 2022 (UTC)