Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nedumpally: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Updating nomination page with notices and new AFDC cat (assisted)
Line 1: Line 1:
===[[:Nedumpally]]===
===[[:Nedumpally]]===
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|?}}
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|S}}


<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude>
<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude>

Revision as of 06:19, 16 September 2022

Nedumpally (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

After looking into the sourcing for this article, I realized that it, like many family articles, is likely a vanity page. Majority of sources given turned up negative on reference to any event directly involving the family, much less naming them. Those that did presented the identical information as those found in the retained A.K. Thomas source, which simply names the family in a list of baptized brahmin. Most sources identify this story as a legend (not even going to touch that issue). WP:BEFORE reveals only a couple of non-notable recent individuals and a handful of page mirrors. Pbritti (talk) 01:38, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment from nominator This page was created over 15 years ago during the period of time when IPs could create pages. As such, we unfortunately can not expect commentary from the page creator. If you are the page creator, please provide page numbers on the retained sources. ~ Pbritti (talk) 01:40, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

*Keep seems well-sourced. Middle Eastern christian family names are not in my wheelhouse, but it looks ok to me. Oaktree b (talk) 01:48, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]