User talk:Onel5969

Edit Count

• edit count

Wiki mark-up link

Hi! You might find these handy:

• Simple guide to Wikipedia mark-up
  • Advanced guide to Wiki mark-up

Cheers! — | Gareth Griffith-Jones |The WelshBuzzard| — 22:35, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Other useful links

• Special:New pages feed
• New pages sorted
• Stub Sort
• New Accounts
• Website Archive
• Cheatsheet
• Earwig's Copyvio tool
• Copypatrol copyvio tool
• Dabfix
• Dabsolver
• Dablink
• Dabs with missing entries
• Carbon dating the creation of web content (for checking for wiki mirrors)
• WorldCat
• Google Scholar profile
• WorldCat site
• Pending Changes
• G13 nominees
• Football Club History Database

Links for new editors

If you're leaving a question regarding an article you're attempting to get onto Wikipedia, here are some links you might find helpful:

• General notability criteria
• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• How to structure and layout your article
• On how to properly format your citations

Joaquín Marcó Figueria

Hi Onel! First of all, I hope you are doing well wherever you are, and second of all, I just wanted to thank you for reviewing my article. I was very nervous since it was my first article, and now I can relax haha.

Best regards from Chile, Felipe Carvajal Brown. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fcarvajalbrown (talk • contribs) 15:58, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

Breckinridge Family in the American Civil War

Hello, Onel. I noted your new tag on this article, created by me, and recently approved and posted up.

I have no objection to your post, but I'm just a little puzzled as to why six different sources is considered too few for such a short article. There are much longer articles which quote only one source, or even none. Is there any reference-point in the Wiki guidelines as to how many sources one should aim at? Valetude (talk) 17:16, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Hi Valetude - first, when you leave a comment asking about an article, please leave a link to that article. Second, regarding your question, the # of citations is irrelevant, but that everything in the article be cited. There are quite a few things in that article which have no citations. This also helps protect your hard work, since uncited material may be removed at any time. Hope this helps. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:27, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Sometimes The World Ain't Enough

Hi, I saw you reverted Sometimes The World Ain't Enough back to a redirect. I read the revision history and the reason you gave was that it was 'per afd' as in Articles For Deletion, I suppose. Could you explain the reason? Is it not notable enough? Thanks! BornGabe (talk) 01:48, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Hi BornGabe - as per AfD means as per Articles for Deletion. In other words a discussion was had amongst editors and it was decided that the subject was not notable enough for an article. In addition, looking at the sources you provided, there is only 1 in-depth article about the album from an independent reliable source (the Blabbermouth review), so would not pass another discussion. Hope this helps. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:34, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Indian Ports Association

Hi Onel5969. Thanks for your time and efforts in reviewing this article. However, I observe that speedy deletion tag had been placed on this articele. As its a statutory organisation under Government of India, its written for informational use of wider public. Request you to kindly guide if its not following Wikipedia policy but if it meets requirements kindly remove the tag so that it can be used for wider public. Thanking you. Gardenkur (talk) 12:21, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Hi Gardenkur - Even if the article was about something of unquestionable notability, say, The New York Times, if all the article did was simply promote the newspaper, then it would be subject to deletion. You have to write the article about the subject, not promoting it. Get rid of any "objectives", and then I would re-write the "initiatives" section into prose, rather than list, and simply make sure the citations back up the statements. I started the process of transitioning the second portion to give you an idea. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:42, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Dear Onel5969. I thank you for your suggestions and see that I follow your suggestions in future in all my articles. With vast experience you have I respect your guidance. Thanks a lot again for this favour and will get back to you soon after recommended changes. Gardenkur (talk) 02:27, 2 February 2022 (UTC) Dear Onel5969. I made improvements in article as suggested by you and resubmiited. Kindly have a look and let me know for any changes. Thanking you. Gardenkur (talk) 05:23, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Kearis Jackson

I have gone back in and I have tried to fix my Kearis Jackson article by adding better references and removing the ESPN references etc. Please respond asap so I can fix the article based on how much more you think I should do. I want to work to come to a satisfying conclusion. Thanks! BullDawg2021 (talk)

Hi BullDawg2021 - First, you do not need anyone's permission to remove a prod tag. Since you are disputing the prod here, I've gone ahead and removed it on your behalf. Second, the only coverage about this player is what I deem as WP:ROUTINE. And as such, he does not qualify as per WP:GNG. In addition, there is nothing in the article to indicate he satisfies any of the conditions of WP:COLLATH. I prodded it due to the fact that it was tagged for improvement for a month, without anything being done to attempt to fix the article. Unless better, in-depth sourcing is added to the article, it will probably end up at AfD. Third, there is nothing wrong with the ESPN references, other than their lack of depth of coverage. It wasn't your sources, but the lack of in-depth coverage about the subject. Hope this helps. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:42, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Repeated recreation of Lovejoy (band) despite consensus. Thank you. wizzito | say hello! 01:48, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

Ed Bolian

Hello, you reverted my edit with adding an article and changing Ed Bolian back to a redirect. I was aware of the previous AFD, but at this point, I thought he passed Wikipedia:ONEEVENT due to the popularity of his YouTube channel, and the RS's that have wrote about it. Can you please explain how "nothing new since it occoured" is true in the case of the overwhelming popularity of his channel? Cheers! Sea Cow (talk) 12:06, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

Sure. The AfD occurred in 2016, and nothing new has happened since then. The popularity of a channel might indicate notability for the channel, not necessarily for the man. In addition, other than the BIO1E, your version was mostly sourced by primary sources or unreliable sources (e.g. twitter, instagram, youtube, linked in). Hope this explains it better. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:11, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

I'm going to bring this back to my sandbox, and try and put in more RS's in order to fulfill notability guidelines better. Cheers! Sea Cow (talk) 13:02, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

Smerinthus astarte reversion

Hi, Onel5969. Why did it get reverted? Is it because I made it in a redirect page? Or is it because you don’t think it was valid? If it’s the former, then it’s because I was worried when I made it myself it was gonna make and error or link the redirect instead. If the latter, I’m sure it is valid. I am sure the Sphingidae Taxonomic Inventory is a trusted source, and there was even a study. If there is anyway I can resubmit this, please answer and thank you in advance. Mcatto (talk) 14:24, 3 February 2022 (UTC) Monarchatto Mcatto (talk) 14:24, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

As was said in the edit summary, it was because it was a copyright violation (COPYVIO). WP takes copyright infringement very seriously, so please refrain from doing so, as it could get you blocked. See WP:COPYVIO. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:05, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

February 2022

Hello, I'm Hajoon0102. I noticed that you recently removed content from Samsung Galaxy A13 without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. --Hajoon0102 💬 14:58, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

Wrong. I explained completely why, there are not enough in-depth sources from independent sites to show it passes WP:GNG. Sorry if that is too difficult for you to comprehend. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:06, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

Brandon Lorenzo

User:onel5969 Good day, thank you for your suggestion and feedback. Duly noted. There have been by myself and with other Wikipedia users/editors a total of 7 reliable and independent sourced citations submitted to the Brandon Lorenzo article. Please provide feedback as you've moved this article to drafts. Thank you kindly. WikiHuman2021 WikiHuman2021 (talk) 17:45, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

I've removed all the uncited material to give you an idea of what it was lacking, virtually gutting the article, which is something I didn't want to do, which is why I moved it into draftspace for you to work on. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:24, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society

I appreciate your diligence, but I would like to understand why there is (maybe not only from you but possibly other editors) constant effort to continuously revert the changes on creating this page, especially due to this journal being a critical part of American history, specifically the oldest and longest running journal covering intellectual property (and founded in 1918). Do you suggest creating it in that alternate test space first? I just want to understand what you and these other editors take issue with is all before proceeding, and would like to get your blessing to create this page.

There would be no issue with you creating it in draft space and working on it there. However, while there is not a question of notability regarding the journal, there is the question, why? Why does WP need a single line article about a journal, which is already covered in another very short article about the organization? Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:58, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Aynus Antony

User:onel5969 Why was this article moved to draft? All listed sources are top media houses in India. What more sources are expected? — Preceding unsigned comment added by JaisonAbeySabu (talk • contribs) 11:15, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

It was explained in the edit summary, you appear to have some connection with the article's subject, so you should take a look at WP:UPE and WP:COI to see how you can comply with WP guidelines. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:59, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

You deleted my Wikipedia page I would like to know the reason why This is Alexander DeVoe I would like it restored and the redirect removed

You deleted/ redirected my Wikipedia page. Why did you do that. This is Alexander DeVoe I would like my page restored 2603:8001:7C3F:B632:64F7:7140:35F0:964E (talk) 11:18, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Thank You

Hello Onel5969, I hope you doing great ? I see you review articles I created on the wikipedia platform. Just want to say thank you for your remark, I do appreciate and hoping to create more good articles in the future.--Gabriel601 (talk) 04:53, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

Loraine James

Hello again!

Could you assess this article and give me some feedback whenever you have the time? I thought it would be a better idea for me to focalize a bit when creating articles so as to learn the ins and outs a bit more efficiently. This week, I'm considering creating articles for a number of notable musicians slated to perform at this year's Coachella.

Loraine James is notable, that's for sure, and I like to think I did a pretty good job with the article. But I'm certain there's room for improvement and I have a few lingering questions.

1. What do you think of the "External Links" section, particularly for entertainer biographies? Should it be placed before or after the "References" section?
   1. The placement of sections in an article is best gone over at Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Layout, but to answer your specific question, after.
2. Would you have sectioned the article differently?
   1. This is very subjective. Personally, I wouldn't have the Biography header, would have just broken the article into 3 sections. But the way you did it is fine.
3. Should I write more about the albums? I try to but it usually ends up sounding a bit subjective, or the tone just isn't very "encyclopedic". Still, I feel as if there is room for expansion.
   1. Again, subjective, but most editors would agree that single sentence paragraphs are problematic. I would condense them into a single paragraph, or two short ones (one for the 2010s and one for the 2020s). For the 1st album and the 2 EPs, I would expand, especially since they don't have their own articles. The 2nd album, which has its own article is fine.
4. How should I proceed with categories? I feel like I often miss the important/pertinent ones while adding a few that are somewhat broad. For example, should I add the "Electronic music articles" category to Jame's article, a biography?
   1. Categories are not my strong suit, I tend to hit the major ones, and let editors who scour WP about categories flesh them out. But if you know of a cat, than by all means add it.
5. Anything else I can improve?
   1. Looks good to me as it is, other than the single sentence structure. One thing though, you mention she has an aka, whenever you do that, and bold it in the lead, create a redirect. In this case I did it for you.

Thanks again for your time! If you'd rather I ping you on my own talk page next time, please let me know. Mooonswimmer 17:16, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

Hope this helps. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:26, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

Arunmozhi

Thank you

The page 'Arunmozhi' was created by me as a music fan. Since Wikipedia remains an important source of information, I wanted to document the contributions of Arunmozhi to music in Wikipedia. There is absolutely no conflict of interest. As a new editor of Wikipedia, I couldnt connect this page with one page, which is already there in his name in Tamil language, which is very brief and short of information. Most of his songs are internally sources which were earlier found in his both names. Through this page, I organized them well and properly sourced.! I have also collected few more reliable sources, that I will add. Thank you so much.! Thirukannan (talk) 05:19, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

Hi. Sorry, but there is a clear indication that you have some relationship with the article's subject. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:00, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

Hi I accepted it as it was written as a fan of the subject. I regret for showing this value in editing, which is clearly in conflict with the neutrality policy. Except that there is no other conflict of interest. I am trying to learn the important basic policies of Wikipedia that govern the editors roles and behaviour. Thank you for indicating this. I have cited few more sources and revised it from a neutral point of view.Thirukannan (talk) 12:40, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Manbang Yi

You moved the article on Korean composer Manbang Yi to "drafts". Please note that: 1) it is much longer and has much more information than articles marked as "stubs" which nevertheless have been approved to function on en.wikipedia; 2) I have done extensive research to complete the sections on Yi's compositions, written works and performances of his works and included all this in the entry 3) due to a language barrier it is practically impossible for me to quote other sources 4) there is very very little on Yi in English, so the need to create an entry on him is even bigger. The only thing I can do (cf. 3) is actually shorten the biography so that it can be approved as a stub. I would be grateful if you tell me which information to ommit and how much is enough for it to be accepted as a stub. thank you Ivonna Nowicka (talk) 18:04, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

Hi. It has nothing to do with lack of notability or sourcing, neither of which I looked at. It all comes down to the fact that there are clear indications you have some connection to the article's subject. Would you care to explain what that connection is? Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:03, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

Non-notable awards

A user Lillyput4455 is adding the nominations and awards of IPPA awards in articles such as Aisi Hai Tanhai and Sammi (TV series) without any reference, they are not notable awards and also there is no nay article linked to that awards, thus not satisfy the wiki criteria for awards. Please, guide the user about it. Qwef1234 (talk) 12:24, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

NFL Scoring Leaders - One Source

Hello,

I saw that you added a tag to the page List of National Football League annual scoring leaders. Creating articles is new for me, so I wanted to ask someone, are two sources normally considered good enough when it comes to references for stats?

Original source: https://www.pro-football-reference.com/leaders/scoring_year_by_year.htm

Additional source: https://www.footballdb.com/leaders/yearly-scoring-points

Any feedback is appreciated, as I'm still learning. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:00, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

Hi Hey man im josh - the number doesn't matter, but the quality does. But usually at least 2 quality sources are enough. You want to show that you are not synthesizing the stats, but are simply reporting them. And list articles are better if instead of simply providing the list, which many editors do, you also provide context. For instance, your list would be great if you explained why you have 3 tables (e.g. prior to the merger of the AFL and NFL...). But again, if you do, provide a source for what you right, so that it's not original research. Also, as a hint, when you leave a message, there are 3 real important things: first, be civil, which you were; second, sign your comment, which you did; and third, leave a link to the page you want to discuss, which you also did. So nice job. Keep up the good work, and don't be afraid to ask questions. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:38, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

Ksenija Knežević's wiki page

Hi! can you tell me why you always move Ksenija's page to te Hurricane's. Her page have all that needs to be there? Slovena4ther (talk) 15:02, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

Hi. First, I'm not always moving the page. I did it once. And that was because there is simply not enough in-depth coverage about her, outside the band, to show that she meets notability by herself. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:39, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

But she is definitely deserves her own page and she is notability a lot. Also think that this is not the reason to move her page to Hurricane's. She is definetly one of the most popular singers from Serbia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Slovena4ther (talk • contribs) 20:55, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Guthrie, Arizona for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Guthrie, Arizona is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guthrie, Arizona (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Mangoe (talk) 23:12, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

Pioneer Brewing Co - moved to draft

I have absolutely no idea why you made the Pioneer Brewing article a "draft" - maybe some sort of play on words given that they produce mainly packaged beers?

What would you have me do?

• List the awards they have received over the past few years? Boring I reckon.
• List the types of beers they produce - given that they seem to ring the changes in styles fairly regularly the article would soon be out of date.

When I created the article some time ago, I deliberately left it bare bones because there is not a lot of third party references around at the moment it being a family-run rural based start up and being in Australia is not PR conscious (or full of BS) like a lot of US businesses.

I don't know why some editors do this sort of thing to articles created in good faith. It's no wonder that the numbers of active editors is dropping away. Most people don't have the energy to deal with this sort of crap.

If you want an article to pick on look closer to home - the article on Flying Bison Brewing Company has lots of issues.

Silent Billy (talk) 02:35, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Because it doesn't have nearly enough in-depth sources to show it passes WP:GNG or WP:NCORP. Since I think it could be notable, I moved it to draft so you could work on it. And btw, then going to AfD and casting a !vote in retaliation is a pretty juvenile response. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:22, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

It wasn't retaliation. It's a flippin' locality at best. A short para in the local county article would be sufficient. Silent Billy (talk) 01:37, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Sorry, when you haven't participated in AfD for years, then suddenly show up at a discussion right after you post on my talk page, whining about your article, which is just below the AfD discussion notice. Very few would not see the transparency of your above lie. Stay off my talk page. You are not worth anyone's time. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:43, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

CAST-15 notability tag

I think I see your point about the question of notability of CAST-15. I will try to address the concerns as far as I can infer them. I will need some time (weeks) though as I have to manage other duties.

Well, technically, you, personally, gave no suggestion or explanation for the tag, but the following seems to state things sufficiently.

Please help to demonstrate the notability of the topic by citing reliable secondary sources that are independent of the topic and provide significant coverage of it beyond a mere trivial mention.

Most of the citations at the time were references within the RTCA publication sphere. RTCA is not FAA, while the CASTs are FAA publications. So, the citations were in that sense, secondary to a degree; they were non-FAA documents referencing FAA documents that were crucially important in the development of the non-FAA documents. Particularly, the CASTs were effectively the reasons those documents came to be.

These CASTs are at once historic and useful; yes, on one hand they were technically obsoleted by the new releases of other documents, but on the other hand they have significant information in them that was not included in the new document, but is very helpful in understanding them, and secondary sources about the new documents also refer to the CASTs. I have found in them citations for words of advice that FAA-appointed auditors have given me over the decades.

The 2004 FAA Job Aid refers to a number of CASTs, directing reviewers to them for additional information and guidance. I am trying to find the current system of FAA Software Reviews as I presume there has been some shake up.

I was able to add some citations that are neither FAA orders or RTCA publications. Hopefully, these help.

IveGoneAway (talk) 16:20, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Hi. No, RTCA are primary sources. And I understand your contention that they help to understanding the newer regs. Perhaps you could add this information into a historical section on the article about the newer regs? Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:38, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Never the less, I think I provided secondary sources (Rierson and Mathworks are authoritative). These direct workers to a number of CASTs, not just -15; Mathworks in particular seeing it necessary to cite CAST-15, not DO-178C, to explain the distinctions between HLR/LLR. A frustration of Rev C is how little clarity was improved; EASA are presently banging us up against CAST-15 (through the CM) in a language development.

As a whole, the CASTs would be mentioned in the history, whereas the CASTs need to be sited in specific sections of DO-178C, et al, to explain some concepts particularly novel to the guidance.

The FAA Job Aid directs the users to the CASTs where they know the DOs are incomplete or unclear. I am not saying all CAST are notable. CAST-15 may seem an orphan now, but there would be a few articles on FAA Orders that would reference it when I get to it. The CASTs record a historic effort and so appear in the established technical literature where they are cited rather than the standards.

IveGoneAway (talk) 01:15, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

You moved an article I created about Elio Villafranca

You said that it "appears" that the page was created by a paid editor or someone with COI? I am neither getting paid, nor do I have any COI. How does it appear this way? As far as the "independence" of the sources are concerned, can you please tell me which source is an issue? Most of the sources I used are sources that I saw being used in other approved pages. Please, if you are going to mark a page someone has worked on as a draft, do not do so with out explaining a bit more. I would like to follow guidelines. I think I did. If I did not do so, please elaborate how. A link to the page is this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Elio_Villafranca. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arimaniacle (talk • contribs) 20:33, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Hi. There are clear indications that you have a relationship with the article's subject. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:39, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

What kind of indications? --Arimaniacle (talk) 20:51, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Look, the info is all sourced. I do not have a COI with the subject. People of less noteworthiness have pages written on them. You are not being descript in the feedback. If you do not give me any real feedback, I can make a RfC. --Arimaniacle (talk) 21:31, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't give hints to folks to show them how to circumvent being COI/UPE. And your reaction tends to say that you're probably UPE, rather than simply COI. And "make a RFC"? About what? Simply submit your article for review through the AfC process. And follow the instructions on WP:COI or WP:UPE about how to deal with your conflict. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:35, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

I'm paid?? If someone contributes only one article, are they automatically assumed COI or UPE? Even if the subject is Grammy nominated, all of their contemporaries have articles, and they consistently perform in the city I am in? If that is the case, it would be impossible for anyone to become a regular contributor. I am absolutely not UPE... I am an underemployed piano teacher with passion for music who took time out of my life to make what I thought was my first article. In fact I was somewhat proud of it...

You don't want to give me hints? If any reference to an issue is a hint, and you can't give hints, how can anyone be made aware of issues? As far as the RfC, I was understanding the term literally. If it is just you I need to listen to, and you don't want to give "hints" I thought a "request for comment" may be a good way to get a comment from someone. That said, is there an issue with making an RFC? Is it not as innocuous as it sounds? I really am trying to abide by the guidelines. What else am I supposed to do? --Arimaniacle (talk) 21:55, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

RfCs are a way to attract more attention to a discussion about making changes to pages or procedures. You could certainly start one, but what would it be about? They usually have a very specific purpose, like "Should we change the SNG about Olympic athletes from the current one which says that anyone who participated in the Olympics should be considered notable, to limit it to only those who have won medals?". (That's a recent one). But feel free. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:08, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

I won't make the RFC if it will be of no use. I was thinking to use it in context of it's use for pages. That is how I thought of incorporating it to this situation. The idea was to Request for Comment if anyone else thinks I am UPE or COI. To me, the fact that you said I'm likely UPE tells me that you really are a wrong in your assumptions. I have resubmitted the draft for review. Are you saying that there is nothing else for me to do? - Thanks--Arimaniacle (talk) 22:18, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Nadja Petrovic

Hello. I was notified of the lack of independent sources for the article Nadja Petrovic, but I have referenced three sources outside her own website. is this not considered enough? I know that two of them are in Macedonian, but that's where the information is. is there a rule that they most be in English? Regards. B. Jankuloski (talk) 00:26, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Hi B. Jankuloski. Of the 3, 2 are primary, since they are related to the artist (because they are the places putting on her shows). That leaves only the single remaining one. I could not find anything additional in-depth about her. You'd need at least 2 more to show she passes GNG. Hope this helps.

I have added the required sources which I hope will satisfy GNG. Could you please have a look again and, if all is well, advise me if it's okay? I'd appreciate if you let me know if you have removed the deletion template, or if there is something else I need to do. Thank you! --B. Jankuloski (talk) 05:54, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

Nice job Bjankuloski06. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:13, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

CKFF-FM Radio

Hi there, I saw that you tagged the CKFF-FM Wikipedia article with notability. I found a newsletter from June 2020 saying that the radio station signed on the air in April 2020. There's also a link to the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) of when the new radio station in Kipawa, Quebec, Canada was approved in 2018 to operate at 104.1 FM. Hope this helps! 45.78.101.125 (talk) 02:13, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

What you need is 3 or more in-depth pieces from sources which are independent and reliable. Newsletters would not be reliable. And simple listings are not in-depth. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:41, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

February 2022 ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at WP:ANI regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Problems including repeated XfD discussion interference. Thank you.

( The thread is about interference with your XfD !vote but also concerns other allegations about you. ) Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 10:35, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Djm-leighpark (talk) 10:35, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Dudes (David Mead album)

Hello, Onel5969. Wikipedia says that you reviewed the page "Dudes (David Mead album)," but now it looks like it's vanished from Wikipedia. Did you delete it? If so, could you please explain why?

As was said in the edit summary, it did not meet WP:NALBUM. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:21, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

David Edward Williams

My only intention is to enhance Wikipedia. I do this by adding content and citations to articles that display a warning. I also edit articles to bring them up-to-date, for example, Olympic results. This gives me real buzz! As I go through this process I come across interesting and notable people and organisations who do not have a Wikipedia page. I then do extensive research and publish an article following Wikipedia strict guidelines. I do not know David Williams (I wish I did as he appears to be an extraordinary character!) nor am I paid. Therefore there is no WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. The article has 18 reliable secondary and independent sources. Please move the page back to mainspace so that readers can view the accomplishments of a notable person who I think is a genius.FuBiuC (talk) 21:51, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Sorry, but there are clear indications that you have some type of relationship with the article's subject. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:25, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

David Edward Williams is one of several gay married people I am researching for a series of blogs and publications on notable members of the LGBTQ community. That's my only relationship with him.FuBiuC (talk) 22:17, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Rinkball vs Rink bandy

The Rink bandy article was recently separated into two separate articles: one for Rink bandy and the other for Rinkball. They are separate organized sports. Several other pages have since been relinked to the new article page for rinkball. Is there any way to revert the last edit? So that the two pages remain separate? CheckersBoard (talk) 10:26, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

Rinkball is not rink bandy

Incorrect, rinkball is not rink bandy. They have separate rules and separate governing bodies and equipment. Please help revert back to where they were separated. The International Rinkball Federation is a separate body from the Federation of International Bandy. They are not the same sporting bodies. CheckersBoard (talk) 10:52, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

Hi. I reverted back to the target article due to the fact that their is not a single reference from an independent reliable source which states that they are different sports. In addition, there were large swaths of the article which were unreferenced. Since you've returned the article to mainspace, I've removed all the unsourced material. It still does not pass WP:GNG, however, since it still does not have a single in-depth reference from an independent reliable source. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:18, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

Fecal immunochemical test

It's probably a thing that warrants at least a few words outside the 'blood in stools' article. You're right that it needs decent citing, so that's been added now. Chumpih ^t 20:46, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

Annelies Strba

Of course you're American so it's no surprise you don't know this. The diacritic mark in her surname Štrba is an essential part. In my country, for example, Štrba and Strba would be considered different surnames. Stop with this Anglocentrism and move the page properly. Shumkichi (talk) 01:12, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

If you wish help, be civil, else, stay the hell off my page. It would help if you understood WP policies and guidelines, but I guess that's asking too much. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 03:12, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Draft:Yacoub_Al-Atrash

hello hello

Hope that you are doing very well...

can you check the article now? I believe it should be ready now.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Yacoub_Al-Atrash Saher AlSous (talk) 08:35, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Yanga Chief

Hello Onel5969. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Yanga Chief, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: In my opinion, the 2022 article is sufficiently different enough to the one deleted via Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yanga Chief in 2019 to avoid outright WP:G4 deletion. That said, the 2022 article would appear to be sourced from references that would not be considered reliable, and second WP:AFD might result in a similar outcome. Thank you. Shirt58 (talk) 09:18, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for the explanation Shirt58, since I can't see the deleted version, I was unsure, so I figured I'd have someone check it. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:12, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Review the draft

Hello hope you are doing well. I had created an article named Arham Abbasi which was deleted previous day and the reason was G4. And the admin User:Justlettersandnumbers, who deleted the page suggested me that the article is better then the previous one and he/she told me to expand and submit the existing draft (Draft:Arham Abbasi) which has been created already by an another edit. I have expanded the draft and now I have selected the draft for review. So I will be thankful if you check and review the draft. Thank you in advance. Trakinwiki (talk) 05:05, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Hi. The article needs to pass either WP:NACTOR or WP:GNG, hopefully both. At this point, there's nothing in the article to show that it passes either. Please read those guidelines and they'll help you understand. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:50, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Draft:Shubhra_Mohanty

Hello, trust you are doing fine. I am a bit confused why this article was moved to draft ... your rather short statement that "(the article) is not suitable as written to remain published" is not very helpful in understanding the reasons. The article is well sourced with extremely reliable and respected sources. It has been live and continuously being improved between 14th December and today.

IMHO, other articles with the same or less merit than this article are passed by WP to be "suitable to remain published", I can cite several dozen examples including Annelies_Strba

Can you please check the article and let me know why this should not remain published? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Shubhra_Mohanty User_talk:Wadlin13 (talk)Wadlin13 (talk) 08:26, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

First, I didn't leave a rather short statement, but a full paragraph explaining why it was draftified, second, I did leave a short edit summary, although not what you state above, which very explicitly said the reason for the move. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:51, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Greetings! I have reviewed the article again, added some more respectable references. I have strong reasons to believe that the article does meet the WP:GNG guidelines. Can you please publish this now? Or, can you please let me know, why this should not remain published? (talk)Wadlin13 — Preceding undated comment added 07:07, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Yagya Bhasin

Kindly review this article. Thank You Decentuser (talk) 09:50, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Eddy's World

I wish you could have consulted with me before deleting this page. I was not aware that there were copyvios. I thought the problem with the previous delete was lack of notability. I worked very hard to address that issue and now I find that the page is being again deleted but for a different reason. I searched and found one sentence that seems to be copied from HERE. Perhaps there are other copyvios I did not find. But could I at least have a chance to fix the problem before it is summarily deleted.Toploftical (talk) 15:20, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Hi. I didn't delete the page, I redirected it. After that, the offending copyvio was Revdel'd by an admin. Copyvios are an issue that you really can't "work on", per WP policy they have to be removed as quickly as possible. I don't have access to the original post, since it has been removed, but you might ask the admin who did the revdel. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:40, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Tiffany Moon

Hi! I noticed that a page I made was deleted. (I think)

Talk:Tiffany Moon

I see you have good experience on here. Can you please tell me what the issue is or offer advice? You decide what articles are good on Wikipedia? You just wrote (no notability outside show). People have to be on multiple TV shows or...

I thought an interview in People was good enough. What about this one? Tiffany Hendra

Just trying to figure this out. How do you decide? Thank you

Table at dorsia (talk) 18:02, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Reality show participants have to show notability outside of the show. If all of the press revolves around their participation in a show, then consensus has been to simply redirect them to the show. If they've developed notability outside a show, then there will be press coverage. A good example of this are are contestants on The Voice. If after the show, even though they finished 5th, they get a record contract and put out some albums, they'll be notable, otherwise they'll simply get redirected. And interviews are considered primary sources, and as such do not count towards notability. I hope this helps. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:43, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Thanks. That is pretty clear. That makes sense as to why the Tiffany Hendra page is ok. Sounds good to me. Thank you for helping me. Table at dorsia (talk) 19:50, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Maris Vijay moved into Draft Thrice

Hi Onel5969, I just got the notification that you reviewed the article Maris Vijay but Praxidicae moved in into draft third time. Though i am not agree on his/her sole decision. Please look into it. StyleArt (talk) 18:57, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Gotico Angioiano

Look https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Draft:Gotico_Angioiano&diff=1072103519&oldid=1072090302 https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Draft:Gotico_Angioiano&diff=1072110734&oldid=1072110332

Best regards, --Ulamm (talk) 00:40, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

And in the next case, begin a discussion with the author, please, before you withdraw an article from the public.--Ulamm (talk) 00:45, 16 February 2022 (UTC) + --Ulamm (talk) 01:26, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Queensland Wood Reference Collection was

deleted, then restored and detagged. Per special:permalink/1072129380#Queensland Wood Reference Collection copyvio deletion Apparently, the whole source site is cc-by-4.0. Thanks --Deepfriedokra (talk) 03:41, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

That is weird, I saw the copyright notice at the bottom of the source, which is why I tagged it. Thanks for letting me know. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:28, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

ATHENA

Hello please do not revert back the changes I made. These are in good faith and not vandalism. You can see why I made them in the comments in Talk:A Totally Hermetic Electron-Nucleus Apparatus. Note also the COI statement that I made in May 2021, and corresponding warning statement in the draft version of Draft:A Totally Hermetic Electron-Nucleus Apparatus. Draft article was approved with those in place. If you are worried about that, note that the page that you reverted to was written by me. Migue.arratia — Preceding undated comment added 06:28, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Sorry, you should ask that changes be made on the article's talk page, not make them yourself. Yes, you wrote the original article, but then it was reviewed by an independent editor. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:30, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Hello OK. I will ask to make changes in the Talk page. Can you please address this as the editor who approved this? see: Talk:A Totally Hermetic Electron-Nucleus Apparatus. I think that you using the UPE tag on my recent, small edits (which were removing a small paragraph that I wrote but now realize is contentious) is totally unfair, apart from being false, given the COI statements and tags I used.

User:Migue.arratia  — Preceding undated comment added 17:25, 16 February 2022 (UTC) 

Final approval

Hello dear friend, thank you for your very high experience in preventing my transfer. I really have trouble transmitting. I really made the article with a lot of difficulty and discussion. I cleared the bad and bad sources. But I have a problem with the final registration and I need an experienced one for the final registration. Thank you for helping me gain more experience from you.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Zahra_Meygoli --Nazanin1376 (talk) 10:59, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Sorry, there are quite a few experienced reviewers who have looked at your article now, all of which have come to the same conclusion, you do not have enough in-depth coverage from reliable sources to meet notability criteria. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:09, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

ok thanks for help me --Nazanin1376 (talk) 09:20, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

Neal Kwatra edits

Hi Onel5969, thank you for explaining everything around the Neal Kwatra article. It was very clarifying and I know how to make the appropriate changes.

Best, kkfinn1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kkfinn1 (talk • contribs) 13:33, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

WP:AFC Helper News

Hello! I wanted to drop a quick note for all of our AFC participants; nothing huge and fancy like a newsletter, but a few points of interest.

• AFCH will now show live previews of the comment to be left on a decline.
• The template {{db-afc-move}} has been created - this template is similar to {{db-move}} when there is a redirect in the way of an acceptance, but specifically tells the patrolling admin to let you (the draft reviewer) take care of the actual move.

Short and sweet, but there's always more to discuss at WT:AFC. Stop on by, maybe review a draft on the way? Whether you're one of our top reviewers, or haven't reviewed in a while, I want to thank you for helping out in the past and in the future. Cheers, Primefac, via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:00, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Kayako

I'm not sure if you and 2001:4455:364:A800:69ED:98AE:B3B4:FB90 are the same or different users, but it's confusing to me that Kayako Saeki has been summarily redirected twice. Kayako and Sadako Yamamura are the two biggest J-horror icons and are essentially Japan's Freddy and Jason. Redirecting those pages is at least going to require a deletion discussion.

The main reason given on the Kayako talk page for why it (and several other Ju-On / Ringu articles) were redirected is that they are currently poorly-written and sourced, and require rewrites. However, that line of reasoning has no barring on WP:GNG and fails deletion criteria.

A few of the other templated/redirected articles were also questionable, such as the original Ringu novel, the Ringu novel series (although I could easily see a merger with The Ring (franchise)), the original sequel to The Ring (Spiral), the original protagonist, and the Korean remake. Those are substantial enough topics to warrant a discussion imo. Darkknight2149 18:04, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Actually, articles without sources (which 2 of them are) can be redirected at any point in time, and should not be reverted, as per WP policy (see WP:BURDEN), until reliable sourcing is provided. The third article also does not have enough in-depth sourcing from independent sourcing to show it meets GNG either.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:12, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

WP:BURDEN refers to the addition of uncited claims within an article, it's not an excuse to blank one. The articles are also backed by the primary sources discussed in the article, which isn't enough to sustain them, but also doesn't fall under the scope of WP:BURDEN. Redirects can be contested by anyone, per WP:BRD and the deletion process. It isn't something you can decide to do unilaterally without discussion, especially if there is doubt in the primary reasons it was redirected. Darkknight2149 21:17, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

If the entire article is uncited... do the math. BRD is guideline. BURDEN is policy. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:15, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Restoring The Great Canadian Baking Show (season 5)

Hello, I noticed that you changed the The Great Canadian Baking Show (season 5) into a redirect for the reason that WP: Verify is required.

I would like to restore the page, the issue appears to be that it needs to be proven that season 5 of The Great Canadian Baking Show actually occurred/exists? And the citation on the page from the primary source, CBC, which aired the series, was insufficient? I've added as many verifiable citations as possible to prove that it actually aired and the season was not made up. If there continues to be issues, could this be discussed on Talk: The Great Canadian Baking Show (season 5)? Thank you - EikaKou (talk) 03:36, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Hi. Yes, now that you've added the sources to pass VERIFY, I've marked it as reviewed. Nice to meet an editor who understands policy. Keep up the good work. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:58, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

Devlet III to draftspace

Could it be that you are unfamiliar with the literature? Central Asian history is constructed from scattered sources in obscure languages that have not been thoroughly studied. This article is about the same quality as most biographies of Central Asian rulers. Given the poor sources I see no way to improve it. Am I missing something? Benjamin Trovato (talk) 05:05, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Hi. First, when you leave a message regarding a particular article, please leave a link to that article. Second, not sure what literature you are speaking about. If you're talking about the single, unreliable source you link to, than you are correct, I am unfamiliar with it. Other than the fact that it's an unreliable source. Second, the source does not mention, but I believe the equivalent is Devlet Giray Black. Regardless, the over-riding concepts are WP:RS and WP:VERIFY. Most articles require at least 2-3 sources, but they must be reliable. The fact that other articles about Central Asian rulers are in a crappy state, is called an WP:OSE argument. Hope this helps. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:04, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

I was referring to the entire scholarly literature on the history of inner Asia. Sources to improve the article either do not exist or in some obscure location that I have not found. Benjamin Trovato (talk) 01:45, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

I do not understand this. The purpose of draftspace is to make improvements. The article is a summary of the best scholarship that I could find and I do not see any way that it could be improved. Do you know any sources that could be used to improve the article? Benjamin Trovato (talk) 05:39, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

If there is only a single unreliable source, than it is not an encyclopedic topic. Articles on WP have to pass WP:VERIFY and WP:GNG, neither of which this article does. If you are having difficulty finding sources, you might pose a question at the appropriate project talkpage, asking for help. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:50, 26 February 2022 (UTC).

I have read at least 10,000 pages of Asian history. If better sources exist I think I would have found them.Benjamin Trovato (talk) 04:39, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

Are you unfamiliar with inner Asian history, or am I? First, there is no binary distinction between reliable and unreliable. There are degrees of reliability and the sources for inner Asia are much less reliable than those for modern Europe. We must use the sources we have. The idea is to summarize the best sources available and make improvements as new information is found. I see no reason to suppress what little information we have when better information is not available. Wikipedia articles are placed in mainspace so that people can improve them when improvements are possible.Benjamin Trovato (talk) 03:17, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

No, you are unfamiliar with WP policies, guidelines and procedures. And seem unwilling to learn. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:06, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

Strange notificiation

Hello. I received a notification message that says only The page Brittney Rodriguez has been reviewed. It points to the page Brittney Rodriguez that I created, but there doesn't appear to be any recent edits, and none by you, on that page. Can you explain what the message was it about? The deletion nomination discussion page for it doesn't have any edits by you, either. I don't even see anything associated with that page on your "User contributions" page, but a link to your profile is below the message in my alert. If it was reviewed, what was the results of the review? If you did nothing, why was I notified about it? THanks much. Kire1975 (talk) 10:47, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

New articles go through a review process. When an unreviewed article is sent to AfD, a reviewer will usually mark it as reviewed, since the outcome of the AfD will determine whether the article is kept or deleted. Hope this explains it. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:10, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Not really. Is there a policy page that explains this? Kire1975 (talk) 13:27, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Explains what? That new articles are reviewed? Take a look at WP:NPP. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:32, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Explains the questions that I asked. I'll take a look. Thank you. Kire1975 (talk) 13:36, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	You have done a lot for the Wikipedia Community, Congrats on the hard work! Phillypaboy123 (talk) 00:49, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

Stop changing public housing estates to redirects

Dear Onel5969,

I noticed that you converted some of the public housing estates in Hong Kong to redirects. Please change back to their own articles.

Thank you.

Aravindhan Ravikumar (talk) 12:00, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

Sorry, they simply don't meet WP:GNG guidelines. Two recent AfD's support redirecting to the lists, and I've just begun a 3rd, which will most likely end up with the same result. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:01, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

Materna

Please stop redirecting an article as you did with Materna. The article is a stub with a potential of being expanded. Also, stop accusing editors of being socks when they are not. Thank you.--97.116.117.56 (talk) 17:42, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

Quack quack. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:43, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Onel, this is hardly civil behaviour. I would urge you to not be disruptive, this is clearly a notable topic–as indicated by the 17 reviews listed at Rotten Tomatoes. Sean Stephens (talk) 01:39, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Calling a probable sock a probable sock is disruptive? I urge you not to post on my talk page again, and not shunt discussions into notability which had nothing to do with notability. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:29, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Especially when it is a sock. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:31, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Sure, I'll respect that request. But I'm sure you you'd know to be cautious with sock allegations; until proven, it's just conjecture. Even "probable socks" are entitled to the assumption of good faith until an investigation proves them as one, which I'd encourage you to open. Sean Stephens (talk) 22:19, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

The SPI is closed. And socks deserve no courtesy. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:40, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Request for protecting article Lagzi Lake

Hello @Onel5969: Please protect the article Lagzi Lake from editing. someone are trying to missuse it. I don't know how to protect it myself. please protect this article. Thank you, Khabat4545 (talk) 07:00, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

(talk page stalker)Onel is not an admin. Try WP:RFPP Happy Editing--IAmChaos 07:06, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

@IAmChaos: can you do it please? I want to have this article protected.. Thank you, Khabat4545 (talk) 07:10, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

@IAmChaos: I send my request to the link you gave me.. Thank you very much Khabat4545 (talk) 07:14, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Blanking-and-redirecting articles after being reverted

Hi Onel5969. I made a request to you at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Hong Kong#Mass housing estates articles blanking/ redirecting to self-revert the edits where you blank-and-redirected a second time.

Wikipedia:Deletion policy#Redirection says:

A page can be blanked and redirected if there is a suitable page to redirect to, and if the resulting redirect is not inappropriate. If the change is disputed via a reversion, an attempt should be made to reach a consensus before blank-and-redirecting again. Suitable venues for doing so include the article's talk page and Wikipedia:Articles for Deletion.

In "Mass housing estates articles blanking/ redirecting", you blank-and-redirected the articles a second time which is a violation of the deletion policy. When your redirects are reverted, please discuss on the article's talk page or at AfD instead of blanking-and-redirecting again. Thank you, Cunard (talk) 09:36, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Hi Onel5969. At Anthro New England, you blanked-and-redirected after a redirect was reverted. This is after I posted my message to you above saying that blanking-and-redirecting again is in violation of Wikipedia:Deletion policy#Redirection. Please stop doing this as Wikipedia:Deletion policy#Redirection does not make an exception for articles that do not meet Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline. Cunard (talk) 10:59, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Actually it's not a violation. Cheers. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:58, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Why is it not a violation of the deletion policy? Wikipedia:Deletion policy#Redirection says, "If the change is disputed via a reversion, an attempt should be made to reach a consensus before blank-and-redirecting again." Did you attempt to reach a consensus before blanking-and-redirecting again? Cunard (talk) 22:52, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Draft: Seethalakshmi Prakash

Thank you for moving it to Draft space - but the article WAS in the Draft space, I had not moved it to the main space. There is no COI , UPE issues - I am a US Citizen living in USA for past 45 years. Sankarnair2 (talk) 19:50, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Darkknight2149 02:10, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Yogesh Ingale

Hello sir, This is both the people of his group. An account has been activet after 5 years to give support.Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yogesh Ingale User name (InfiNeuro), (Zgz.or) Cinzia007 (talk) 08:48, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Sir I told you last time, If my estimate is correct then these people will support in the article of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prashant M Walde

User name - Priyatungi, InfiNeuro, Zgz.or, Aaajit22700, Azaishah2000, Urbanlife1984

Cinzia007 (talk) 04:49, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

Disruptive editor

Hello. A user who seems to be disruptive following edits on Pashtun name (reverted back by you), Ytpks896, has also been removing content from Afghan name. These edits were made 18 days ago but has gone unnoticed until I discovered it just now. Another user, Hv3f5, reverted Ytpks896's content removal on Afghan name but the latter reverted it again with a reason given as unexplained. This editor is being disruptive by constantly making these reversions, all without valid reasons, and I suspect they're trying to "hide" it with the comment of "unexplained". I will now revert this person's edit again but further action is needed against the editor, as well as to patrol/protect the article in question. --WR 23:55, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Don't do vandalism on Rajen Sharma page

Edamyb (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Be advised that Edamyb reported you at WP:ANI regarding your edits to Rajen Sharma. —C.Fred (talk) 03:48, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Thanks C.Fred - it's already been archived, so not sure what it was about. Hopefully I didn't get blocked. . Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:07, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Result was Edamyb blocked as a sockpuppet. David notMD (talk) 14:09, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

More AfDs needed?

If you look at User:Wikipedian India, it appears that this editor intends to create an article for every person in the India Army who was killed in action and posthumously received a medal. All show same pattern, down to photo of wife receiving the medal. I am going to see if I can get the attention of an Admin, perhaps to (strongly) advise to stop this effort. David notMD (talk) 14:17, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Ah. Appears that Administrators (including you?) have deleted some of the articles that Wikipedian India created. Note that in January, Wikipedian India expressed desire to change name to Soldierpedia, adding: "Soldierpedia is a non-profit organization, creates, edits, and manages individual Wikipedia pages for the national warriors." David notMD (talk) 14:27, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

I've noticed that as well David notMD, but was unaware of the soldierpedia issue. Appears to have changed their username now. BTW, I'm not an admin. And feel free to comment on the AfD's regarding this individual's articles. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:49, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

Excessive copyvio revdel (cv-revdel)

Please see https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Boiling_Point_%282021_film%29&type=revision&diff=1065673242&oldid=1063320014

A whole chunk of revisions that were not in breach of copyright have been removed from public view, so we can no longer see who added what or why, particlarly in the 'Reception' section.

Please only blank out the specific revisions that contained copyright-infringing changes.

Jakeqz (talk) 00:40, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

Sorry Jakeqz - That's not the way revdel works. Since the copyrighted material appears in EVERY VERSION of the article from when it was first inserted, the revdel must contain all the edits from when it was inserted, through when it was deleted. I myself didn't know this until about 2 years ago. I had been doing it the way you suggested, but was told that was incorrect, which is when I learned the reason. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:44, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

Hmm. I'm used to version control software like `git` where it would be possible for super-admins to 'rewrite history' in such a way that the non-copyvio edits can still be seen individially in all their glory. I wanted to try to 'thank' someone for a well-sourced review quote that seems to accurately describe the film (which I am yet to watch). But now it is impossible to determine who added that quotation. IMO this is something that needs to be fixed, but it is probably and arguably never going to be top of the agenda. Jakeqz (talk) 02:03, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

(talk page stalker)Yeah, probably not, changing versions of history? The reason we have it that way is to be able to attribute who added what to any page, as part of our creative commons license. Happy Editing--IAmChaos 04:00, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

Inline citations for math articles

About the need for inline citations. Math articles often do not provide inline citations because the materials can be checked using a pure logic. I know that in Wikipedia, all the materials need to be sourced. But the materials do appear in the books cited in the references (just that sometimes online citations are not provided). For the mac lane article, I have at least added an inline citation. I hope this clears the issue. -- Taku (talk) 12:19, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

Stop tagging notability on every Hong Kong housing estate article and stop nominating for deletion.

Dear Onel5969,

I noticed that you put notability tag on some of Hong Kong housing estate articles and thus nominating them for deletion. Will you stop doing this next time?

Thank you.

Aravindhan Ravikumar (talk) 13:24, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

No, because they do not demonstrate that they pass notability standards. Stop creating articles about non-notable subjects. Thank you. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:32, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

Your incorrect redirect and unconstructive reversion of Vileda

If an article needs more WP:VERIFY and WP:PRIMARY, the solution is not to redirect it to the wrong place.

It is wrong to redirect a parent brand, Vileda to what is effectively a sub-brand, O-Cedar. If there is to be any redirection, it is to be in the opposite direction. If you wish to improve Wikipedia, then reverse the redirect, or find sources for Vileda rather than incorrectly redirecting it. --Cornellier (talk) 14:15, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

Sorry, it's a valid redirect - and redirecting an article which does not establish either WP:GNG or WP:CORPDEPTH is a valid move. If you wish to create an article on Vileda, please feel free to do so, and provide enough sourcing so that it passes those two criteria. The O-Cedar article is equally as dreadful, but if they are indeed the same company, than the O-Cedar article should be expanded. And if there was a name change, than the existing article should be moved. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:03, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

Draft career statistics

Why you moved Kaia Kanepi, Monica Niculescu and Yanina Wickmayer career statistics pages to draft? What is wrong with them? The same things are with almost 90% of player's career statistics pages? JamesAndersoon (talk) 15:52, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

Stay away from my articles

Gnisu (talk) 05:49, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

@Gnisu: WP:OWN is a page you might like to look at. Happy Editing--IAmChaos 06:15, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

Deletion review for Saints Row: Undercover

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Saints Row: Undercover. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Jumpytoo Talk 07:18, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

About Peranakan cuisine - G5 in one of the templates? Or categories?

Hi Onel5969,

This article currently (UTC 12:28 AM) displays with a WP:G5 tag.

This article may meet Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion as a page created by a banned or blocked user (Awanama – SPI confirmed suspected) in violation of the user's ban or block, with no substantial edits by others. See CSD G5.

My initial speedy decline response would have been "This article was created on 27 January 2006 by Makewa. Unless I am missing something, that user has never been tagged as a Awanama sockpuppet."

It would appear to me that the G5 applies to one or perhaps more of the templates and/or categories attached to the page.

• {{Cuisine of Indonesia}}
• {{Cuisine of Malaysia}}
• {{Cuisine of China}}

I'm Teh CIR about technical stuff like this. Could you possibly look into this and specifically identify the templates and/or categories that need G5-ing?

Pete AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 10:52, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

Hi Shirt58 - okay, this is a bit bizarre, it looks like the CSD tag was never actually added by anyone, but was somehow added automatically during this edit, when Awanama, who is indeed a puppeteer, added the {{Cuisine of Malaysia}} template. Looking forward, that automatic add occurred when the G5 template was added to the template by an ip editor. Apparently when the underlying template got tagged for G5, it auto populated any articles it was on. However, imho, as much as I hate sockpuppetry, the template does not appear to be a valid G5 candidate, as Awanama created it on 7 October 2020, and was not blocked until December of that year. I took the incentive and removed the G5 notice from the template, because I wanted to see if that removed it from the article, and it did. That appeared to be the only template which was tagged. I actually did not see a {{Cuisine of China}} on the article.

Curious as to why you brought this to my attention? Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:45, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Essex House (publisher)

For your information all the data are NOT extracted from the source which I quoted (ParisOlimpiaPress) and to which you wrongly attribute the catalogue; the source is https://openlibrary.org/publishers/Essex_House from which I painfully extracted all data including the publishing year. If you have the opinion that the bibliography of an important and significant editorial activity cannot exist in Wikipedia simply because ParisOlimpiaPress published and copies the vaue and imprecise information present in https://sf-encyclopedia.com/entry/essex_house pleas at least act in a such a way that that it become impossible to have a requirement to "Creating Essex House (publisher)"LordFalk (talk) 22:03, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

Actually, the prose was a copyright violation. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:05, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

I agree on that. What I propose is to recover the bibliography with a minimal textLordFalk (talk) 16:15, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

I reformulated Essex House (publisher); please confirm me that this formulation has no copyright violation. Thanks.LordFalk (talk) 02:16, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Yup, no copyvio LordFalk, but you're going to need more in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to meet WP:GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:34, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Redirects

Hi, hope all is well, there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums about undue redirecting and Ive understood from policy changes that redirects should not be editwarred if they are contested but taken to AfD.In this case for example here the article looks relatively well referenced including rs such as AllMusic and Music Might and a book source. regards Atlantic306 (talk) 00:33, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Máté Kanász-Nagy

Dear Onel5969,

I do not fully understand why did you move him into draftspace, so how does the article lack some "independent sources"? Please provide me more information about that, because in this form it is not acceptable for me. Thank you. With best wishes, --Smoothcheeks (talk) 14:29, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Because most of the article is unsourced. He's most likely notable, but WP requires that WP:VERIFY be satisfied. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:31, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Conica AG

Hi Onel 5969, regarding your tags on Conica AG: I have checked all sources again of which a high number is in German language (I am German). One of those is e.g. SRF, the public and main Swiss (German speaking) broadcaster, that serves twice as source and can be considered independent with no doubt. Others are reliable international or regional professional media in the fields of athletics in general and running in particular. Nevertheless, it was and is a current topic during and after the Olympic Games in Tokyo, where some athletes had problems with the surfaces of the running tracks used there. I am confident that this article can be expanded and would consider it more of an already well developed stub that needs only a bit more flesh on the bones. This is the way. I’ll take care. There is more to come! Respicefinem (talk) 00:30, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Hi Respicefinem, the SRF is a good source. I haven't checked all of them, but the 8 or so I looked at all seemed to be primary or press release type material. That's why I tagged it, rather than prodding or AfD'ing it. I'll let another reviewer take a deeper dive into it. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:14, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Hello Onel5969! Have you had another reviewer look at the article in the meantime? @Alexandermcnabb: AfDPROD'ed it, but I think this could be solved in a different way. Instead of deleting the article, I would rather suggest marking it WP:STUB or WP:CITENEED for the time being. I still have some sources to add. Thanks Respicefinem (talk) 09:28, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

Jessica Darrow

They pass per NMUSIC, no? Charted single? Is it not verified? Drmies (talk) 02:31, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Drmies - Very valid point. And one I frankly overlooked, as I was looking at it as a Disney song, not necessarily a song by the artist. But you are right about that. However, that said, I was looking at it as per GNG, which I don't think she makes the bar. I see as the note below that it's now been taken to AfD (and while I agree with the nom's assessment, I won't be participating in, since it's canvassing -- although I would have if I hadn't been canvassed), so we'll see what the community thinks. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:19, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Thanks--but please do weigh in there: you have a wealth of experience. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 15:21, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Jessica Darrow AfD

Since you have previously been involved with the Jessica Darrow article/redirect, I wanted to let you know that I have nominated it for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessica Darrow. Aerin17 (t • c) 06:00, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Andras Miyagi

Hello. I am requesting your help since I had some user nominating the article of Andras Miyagi for deletion. Can you please have a look over it when you have time? I am asking for your help since you have reviewed so many articles of professional wrestlers I have made before. And now I need some help in the discussion of deletion. Take a look at what they wrote in there as well please. If they are right about the fact that the refs that I chose are not relevant for the article please just let me know in my talk page. Best regards. User:JeyReydar97 (talk) 10:46, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Hi JeyReydar97 - I can't participate in the AfD discussion, since what you did is called canvassing, but I agree with the assessments of those who are participating in the discussion. You'll need several in-depth pieces about her, not merely snippets. Allow it to be dratified and look for more sourcing. And don't let this discourage you. Hope this helps.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:22, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Please read

You have recently been on my page and made some proposals, including deletion of one of my article. Can I ask you to refrain from your actions respectively. Articles submitted met the criteria for inclusion on wiki. They were written very comparatively with other articles which have been accepted. You should know that subjects from some African countries are not readily collaboratively thorough as compared to western subjects which gets thoroughly covered in the media. It is in this vain that I have taken it upto myself to document as much subjects as possible of African originality. Thank you for your support. Freshymail (Talk page ) the knowledge-defender 21:30, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

You should learn WP policies, guidelines and procedures. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:07, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

On the article Varanasi City Police Commissionerate

What do you mean by not enough information?? If there was not enough information then why don't you added any information? What was the need of redirecting the page? Shane Editor (talk) 14:47, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

Because I don't care about the topic. You need to find in-depth coverage from independent reliable secondary sources. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:49, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

"Canoeing at the 2017 European Youth Summer Olympic Festival" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Canoeing at the 2017 European Youth Summer Olympic Festival and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 2#Canoeing at the 2017 European Youth Summer Olympic Festival until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. CLalgo (talk) 13:48, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Draft:Palatine Lodge No. 97

Hi Thank you for your prompt review and feedback on my article Draft:Palatine Lodge No. 97. Can you please provide me with examples of where there is a need for citations from reliable, independent sources. Thanks again and regards --Stev201961 (talk) 21:04, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Hi Stev201961 - it's most likely notable, but you need to make sure everything is cited and footnoted. I moved it into draft so that you could work on it. The history section is almost totally uncited as is the master section, meeting places and ritual are totally uncited. In addition, in your list of notable members, if there is no link to an article, you need a citation (and quite frankly, if there is no article, they should be removed from the list), and if there is a link, but the WP doesn't mention they were a member (e.g. William Reid Clanny), then that should have a ref. Hope this helps, and thanks for reaching out. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:17, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Contested speedy deletion

Hi, I'm letting you know that I've contested the deletion of TimescaleDB, a software project that meets the inclusion criteria set at WP:NSOFT. Please feel free to start an AfD, however I would urge you to follow WP:BEFORE before doing that. riffic (talk) 22:49, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Moving my articles to draftspace

I see that, yet again, you have moved a perfectly reasonable article, which includes independent references, into draftspace. This is the third time you have removed an article I have created from Wikipedia. If you have an issue with articles that i write please can you help me to improve them rather than unilaterally removing them from Wikipedia? Rillington (talk) 12:42, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Moving it to mainspace, rather than asking to have it deleted, is attempting to help you improve them. First, when you leave a message for an editor, it's polite to link to the item under discussion. Second, half the brief article is unsourced. I could have removed the unsourced material, but rather than gut the article, I moved it to draft to allow you the time to supply citations and footnotes. Third, currently there is not enough in-depth coverage about the station to show that it passes WP:GNG. Fourth, always happy to help, but it would be better if you approached it civilly. I hope this helps. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:51, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for your swift response. Please accept my apologies if you think I have been rude but you have to appreciate that when the same person draftifies three articles on two separate occasions, one isn't going to be too happy about it. And the reason I didn't mention the articles by name was due to my overall point about draftifying my articles. I have made further additions and improvements to Draft:West Wolds Radio and added additional information so there is no reason why this should not be on the main site. Rillington (talk) 13:06, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Redirects

Looking at two you made here and here. They were absolutely stubs with little information so I understand the redirects. However, both are bestsellers. I have read the second and currently reading the first. The first may be harder to source but the second has plenty of sources to show WP:NBOOK. Wanted your thoughts before moving it back and expanding. Will look closer at the first later on. --CNMall41 (talk) 16:21, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Hi CNMall41 - as long as you source the best-selling status (and that depends on what you mean "best-seller", NYT? Amazon? - they are the hallmark), then they would pass NBOOK. Those two newspaper sources would also be good enough to satisfy GNG. Hope this helps. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:33, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Exactly. Thanks for the response. --CNMall41 (talk) 17:15, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

March 2022

Hi Onel5969, why was the article Uvalo converted to a redirect page? Neo the Twin (talk) 20:04, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Hi. As was said it in the edit summary, because it does not pass WP:NSONG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:39, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

Onel5969, can you please move it to draft space so that I can improve it and make it reach notability requirements. Thank you! Neo the Twin (talk) 23:21, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Moved to Draft:Uvalo 2. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:39, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

Moved my article to draft

Hello onel5969, you have moved the article I wrote to draft space - Girish Rao Hatwar. I am really perplexed on how you decided the article that I wrote is -

• Not suitable as written to remain published?
• It has 10 references, but you have decided more citations needed. May I know on what basis you decided so?
• How you decided there is a WP:COI conflict? The person is not a friend, family member, employee/employer of me. I don't have any business dealings with him. How did you arrive at this conclusion?
• How did you arrive at the conclusion that the references provided are not verifiable? All references are from authentic sources. They are all well-known journals, newspapers and websites.

Please enlighten me.--Pavanaja (talk) 15:43, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

Hi. Because there are clear indications that you have some sort of relationship to the subject. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:40, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

Sorry, I did not get any proof in your reply for your claim. Please provide valid, authentic, verifiable proof for your claim.--Pavanaja (talk) 04:35, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Sorry, no, I don't give hints to UPE/COI editors to help them evade getting found out. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:47, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Respected onel5969, I do know Girish Rao hatwar & Dr Pavanaja. They are neither blood relative's nor do have any sort of commercially connected. Girish is a very popular journalist & respected author. Please don't broad brush accusations. Wikipedia is standing on pillars of proof. In the best interests of debate & in the interest of continuing healthy atmosphere, I'm requesting you to inform why you arrived at this conclusion that Girish Rao hatwar article must remain in draft status.

It's frankly disappointing to see a senior contributor like you, doing this.

Gangaasoonu (talk) 05:31, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

Well, now that you've admitted that you know the, follow the steps at WP:COI. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:34, 7 March 2022 (UTC) - did not notice this was not same editor.

Hello onel5969, your answer I don't give hints to UPE/COI editors to help them evade getting found out is not making much reason with me. I have not hidden my identity. Details about me is available in my user page at Meta. I am a real person. I am a Wikimedian since 2004, a bureaucrat at Kannada Wikipedia and admin at Tulu Wikipedia. My global contributions can be found out here. I am not hiding anything to evade getting found out. As you can see from my userpage in Meta, I am having pretty well understanding of Wikipedia/Wikimedia and their policies. I have conducted more than 300 workshops/editathons/outreach programs on Wikipedia and trained more than 3000 persons on using Wikipedia. In such scenario, there is chance of me violating the policies. I can't figure out which sentence in my write-up made you to think that have violated COI. I am a well-known writer of science and ICT articles in Kannada. I do get invitations to be the guest and participate in many programs like book-releases, seminars, conferences, etc. I do sit with many dignitaries and stalwarts on the dias at many programs. These may make people to feel they are my friends or known to me quite well, which need not be true. Regarding the article that I wrote about Girish Rao Hatwar, he is a popular Kannada writer. His books are constantly in the weekly top ten books of Kannada. Hence notability criteria is met. Hence I request you to move the article back to main space.--Pavanaja (talk) 11:00, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

Sorry, the one exception to objecting to draftification is COI/UPE editing. COI guidelines state, "Any external relationship can trigger a conflict of interest. That someone has a conflict of interest is a description of a situation, not a judgement about that person's opinions, integrity, or good faith." Since you won't admit to how you know this individual, and it's obvious that you do, I suggest that submit it through AfC. Since you are a 'crat, you should know better. But also, since you are a 'crat I'll email you in a bit about how it's obvious.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:14, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

Actually, if you do wish to know, email me and I'll email you back with the reason. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:26, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

Moving The Dip (Band) to draft

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:The_Dip_(band) I'll work on adding more references, although as far as I can tell the references I added were all independent (except for links to band information etc). But I'm not sure why you thought there was a WP:UPE or WP:COI issue? I'm not paid by the band or have any relationship with the band, but how do I prove that? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adamba (talk • contribs) 06:25, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

I didn't question the notability or the sourcing. Frankly I did not look at either. This is an issue where it appears you have a COI/UPE conflict, which I said in the message I left on your talk page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:48, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Maybe I am not familiar enough with Wikipedia to know where to look, but all I see on my Talk page is the comment "there appears to be a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict." If there is some other place where you explain why this appears to be true, please let me know. Also you wrote "When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue..." Your comment above implies the notability is no longer an issue; what I am looking for is guidance on how to "address the UPE/COI issue" since I don't think there is any UPE/COI, and the content I can find on Wikipedia about how to address it seems to assume there *is* an issue. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adamba (talk • contribs) 16:41, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

I never said that notability was not an issue, or that sourcing was not an issue. What I said was that I did not look at those, since it was obvious you had a COI/UPE conflict. It is obvious that you have some relationship to the subject, so I would suggest following the guidance which I've pointed to you in the message on your talk page, WP:UPE or WP:COI. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:22, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Can you clarify why "it is obvious that I have some relationship to the subject", since I don't? Is it something in the content of the article or the style in which it is written?? It seems I am stuck being asked to prove a negative. Unless being a fan of a band or owning their records disqualifies you from writing about it, which seems excessive. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adamba (talk • contribs) 19:21, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Sorry, no. I don't give hints so that UPE/COI editors can attempt to get around the restrictions. But it's obvious to anyone who reviews articles.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:21, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Can you clarify what the next steps are? The guidelines are not clear. Do I add the "connected contributor" thing and somebody reviews the text? Or am I just prohibited from editing an article about this band because you claim I have a COI? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adamba (talk • contribs) 20:47, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Improving the Ontario biker War

Onel5969 hello and thank you for your message I have no problem doing that editing I do apologize I believe when I was making the article I was getting extremely tired so I might have been doing a bit too much close referencing in terms of the language could you please point out to me the sections in the article you wish for me to work on so I may focus my attention in that area? As I did write a fair bit of it from scratch and I tried to fix a fair bit of the 2002 section as well.CanadianHistorian(MMA & History) (talk) 07:31, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Hi CanadianHistorian(MMA & History) - you did a nice job after my last notice, but as I said on your talk page, still too similar. I gave you a link in that talk page message, which will bring up Earwig's copyvio report, which will show you the matches between the sources and your article. I've reviewed a few of your articles, and you do good work, I think this is only the 2nd one where I had an issue, keep up the good work. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:54, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Onel5969 hello I have made a lot of edits to the page and I compared it it is still a bit high but I do believe that is due to the amount of quoted material I have I have quite a few quotations but take a look I believe it to be acceptable if you deduct the items with literal quotation marks around them

It looks okay now. The matches are due to quotations, and common expressions. Nice job and thanks for your diligence. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:35, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

I do apologize about having a slip up in the first place appreciate your help as well. PS do you know much about uploading images to wikimedia Commons if so I do have an important questionCanadianHistorian(MMA & History) (talk) 05:58, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

Elections 2024

Hello Sir, Have been two more years left to have an election. election commission too has not made an official statement regarding the next election yet. There are no reliable sources of this articles

• Next Arunachal Pradesh Legislative Assembly election
• Next Odisha Legislative Assembly election
• Next Maharashtra Legislative Assembly election
• Next Maharashtra Legislative Assembly election
• Next Sikkim Legislative Assembly election
• Next Haryana Legislative Assembly election
• Next Bihar Legislative Assembly election
• Next Andhra Pradesh Legislative Assembly election Cinzia007 (talk) 08:14, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Zahra Joya

Hello Onel5969, it's been a while! I had been busy this past month so I didn't have much time to make any extensive edits, or create any articles. I've got quite a bit free time now, so I'm back at it ;)

I just created Zahra Joya. Here are my questions:

• Do you have any comments on how I placed the hyperlinks in this article (United States and its allies invaded Afghanistan, US and its allies withdrew their troops, fell to the Taliban, ethnic and religious minority)?
• Is citing 4-6 sources to back up certain claims a bit overkill? In this case, I did so to back up the claim that "being a female journalist in Afghanistan is difficult and dangerous". I couldn't find a pertinent page to hyperlink. I initially had 6 citations for that one phrase, but cut it down to 4.
• What do you think of using Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty as a source? Is it reliable, considering its history and funding?

Thanks again! Mooonswimmer 12:25, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Glad to see you back Mooonswimmer. As to your questions, regarding the first, the overriding guidelines are WP:EASTEREGG and MOS:EGG. Looking at those, I think the first 3 are fine, but last one, ethnic and religious minority, is a bit of a stretch. Since the fact that she's a religious minority is not mentioned in any of those three sources, I'd delete that whole first sentence, as that seems to be WP:OR, or, conversely, if you provide a source which makes that claim, that would do. Regarding your second question, usually anything over 2 cites is considered overkill (sometimes that gets stretched to 3). The guideline for this is found at WP:CITEKILL, particularly look at the 4th paragraph, which deals with this question specifically. And regarding you're 3rd question, yes I think it's a reliable source. I can't remember if it's ever been discussed at WP:RS, but Radio Free Asia was, and the discussion ended with it being considered reliable, so I would say this would fall under the same rationale. Hope this helps. Keep up the good work. And nice article btw. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:13, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Sincerest Thanks

Dear Onel5969, thank you sincerely for reviewing all of my pending article creations! I greatly appreciate it. Kindest regards, Spinster300 (talk) 16:53, 5 March 2022 (UTC).

No worries, Spinster300 - other than a few blips, nice job. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:15, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

PT Kalimantan Industrial Park Indonesia

Hello, sorry, I had no time to answer your notice about PT Kalimantan Industrial Park Indonesia then, can you please restore it to a draft page so I can rewrite it? Thanks. -- Barecode (talk) 05:57, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

Hi Barecode, you have to contact the admin who deleted the article, and ask them.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:30, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

Lost Boys (album)

You repeatedly changed into a redirect the page about this album, the question being its "notability". But while thanks to your actions this album (which chartered in the UK with peak position 11) actually doesn't have a proper Wikipedia page, two other Flying Pickets albums do: "Live at the Albany Empire" (which recorded the peak position 48 in the UK charts) and "The Original Flying Pickets: Volume 1" (which never entered in the charts). Could you explain why? Eleuterio P (talk) 10:41, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

Because there are a lot of poor articles on WP. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:02, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

Although I keep disagreeing about the notability of Lost Boys (album), must admit your answer makes sense. Eleuterio P (talk) 20:10, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

Hi Eleuterio P - I'm not commenting on the notability of the album, simply on the fact that there is nothing in the article to show it passes WP:GNG or WP:NALBUM. Quite often, I'll redirect an album article, and another editor will revert me, but add the necessary sourcing.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:43, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

Eric Miller Animation Studios

Do you think this article is appropriate? (probably not and should be taken into AfD) this article has been only made up to promote their company and it only contained self published sources. 2001:4455:364:A800:DC01:4741:52BB:EE9A (talk) 00:01, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

2022 NBA draft article

Why Did you Redirect the article for. 98.186.54.177 (talk) 15:25, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

There is some information about the draft 98.186.54.177 (talk) 15:26, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

Why didn't you answer Me. 98.186.54.177 (talk) 21:20, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

You

You, Onel5969, keep moving the article into draftspace. I do feel annoyed. Ngancheekean (talk) 15:55, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

I don't understand what I'm doing wrong. This is a real State road under development and it links to the toll authority article that is building the road yet you keep saying there is no proof. Please advise. KINGBOBOFTHENORTH (talk) 21:47, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

You have to provide sources. Not links to other articles. If you don't know how to add citations and footnotes, please see WP:CIT and WP:CITE, they will show you how to format citations, and what information needs to be included. You might want to try going through the WP:Articles for Creation process. There should be at least 2-3 sources. Hope this helps. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:46, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

I dont intend to be an idiot arguing with dont know what. You have move the article again which intended for english readers. I'm learning to use vandalism so you should watch out. Ngancheekean (talk) 15:52, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

Dont move my page. No American will ever helped again. Ngancheekean (talk) 14:39, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

I think you can explain more details of the problem. Or go to WP:Teahouse and WP:ANI. I am here just because I saw Ngancheekean said my page, and Ngancheekean‎ said no americans will ever helped again.It makes me think Ngancheekean not trying to make this place better.

American helped with vandalism.... I dont wish to be so outspoken but Asian hate has been rising in America. I dont wish to go into details since I dont live in America. For that instance, Im being dragged down. Ngancheekean (talk) 17:21, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

They already know about the past, too funny. I worked so I know.... Now im obligated to help english.... Ngancheekean (talk) 15:08, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

Onel5969 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) He is a long time wikipedia editor. He didn't improve the article and keeps moving my page. Finally, he wanted to delete it. 15:46, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

Gary Kamiya

Gary Kamiya's page has been changed and is now fit to publish. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Disintegration1989 (talk • contribs) 15:51, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

Michael Stammel

If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate for AfD. Search for additional sources, if the main concern is notability. There are plenty of articles online about Michael Stammel. I'd encourage you to help with editing this article instead of submitting for AfD if you are so interested in the subject matter. Instead of allowing the article to be updated, placing it back in draft space, you redirected to another article. After I moved the article to draft space, you submitted for AfD and your only reason is notability. Have you done an online search for Michael Stammel Rensselaer, NY? Again, I invite you to help improve this article as well as other articles on Wikipedia instead of nominating AfD after others have worked hard on producing an article with valid references.

Search for additional sources, if the main concern is notability. The minimum search expected is a normal Google search, a Google Books search, a Google News search, and a Google News archive search. If you find that adequate sources do appear to exist, the fact that they are not yet present in the article is not a proper basis for a nomination. Instead, you should consider citing the sources, using the advice in Wikipedia:Citing sources, or at minimum apply an appropriate template to the page that flags the sourcing concern.

The above are all steps that have not been taken on this article by those proposing deletion due to notoriety. This information is clearly noted in the article: Articles for deletion.

 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dellis12144 (talk • contribs) 12:24, 8 March 2022 (UTC) 

Wrong. After you reverted the redirect, and made no improvements to the article, I sent it to AfD. Once there, you invalidly moved the article to draft, which I corrected. I have no interest in this non-notable small town mayor. You must wait till the AfD runs its course, which is most likely going to result in either deletion, or redirection to the list. Yes, I did do a WP:BEFORE, and there is not anywhere near enough information out there to show they pass WP:GNG. And I see you've moved it again, in spite of being informed that that was against WP policy. Do it again, and you'll most likely be blocked from editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:31, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

You are being extremely disrespectful. You have not done your research. There are many articles about Michael Stammel as Mayor, a member of the fire department, ambulance service, serving as emergency coordinator for Amtrak, serving on the County Legislature and as their chairman. There are also many articles about his commitment to environmental threats in the community. So people spend a lot of time working on an article and you decide you don't like the content and move it to a redirect instead of contacting those who put work in to an article and letting them know you are doing a redirect if the article is not improved. I've personally spent a lot of time improving articles that deal with the community I live in. Now just because you don't agree with me you are threating me to be blocked from editing. Is this how Wikipedia really works? You alienate those who actually take the time to improve articles? You nominated an article for deletion just because you were mad that I removed the redirect and then claim there is no notability without doing your research. Maybe you need to be blocked from editing since you are not doing proper research. Dellis12144 (talk) 12:38, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

No, I'm not threatening at all, just letting you know that you're disruptive editing could lead to you getting blocked. Not to mention your incivility. Now stay off my talk page since you can't be civil, and apparently have no desire to learn WP policies or guidelines. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:53, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of World Divyang T10 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article World Divyang T10, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Divyang T10 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

Redirection of Articles without AFD

While I understand that WP:BLAR exists, I think that a good chunk of fictional articles that were WP:BOLDly redirected recently, like Jessie (Toy Story) and BoJack Horseman (character) should go to WP:AFD. This is so that sources can be found and implemented that can save these articles. WP:BLAR states that "if editors cannot agree, the content issues should be discussed at the relevant talk page, and other methods of dispute resolution should be used, such as restoring the article and nominating the article for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion". I think this situation is ideal for these articles. By the way, I am sorry if this addition breaks the formatting of your talk page. (Oinkers42) (talk) 19:04, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

When they are crap articles, and have been crap articles for years, sometimes decades. There's nothing to discuss in their current condition. Some of us think that this is an encyclopedia, not some fanboy mag. Instead of wasting other editors time with reverting redirects back to crappy articles, fix the articles. There's a concept. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:27, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

CAST-15 Review

Thank you for the CAST-15 review.

Might that mean acceptance of the topic?

It could be apparent from my focus on safety-of-flight topics that I come from an engineering discipline where the subject of an inquiry does not have authority to disposition the inquiry. However, I interpret that in the cooperative gestalt of WP, the editor that sets a tag is not expected to remove it when the issue is resolved, more to the point, when anyone thinks a tag's issue is resolved, they may remove the tag, subject to retagging ....

It just goes against my grain to remove a tag that I didn't set.

I am not done with CAST-15, (but, then there are dozens of pages I am not done with, yet) I think part of the Contents section needs improvement and elaboration on the importance of levels of stakeholders.

IveGoneAway (talk) 20:12, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

Well, my acceptance, anyway . I think it is well-sourced enough now. Nice job IveGoneAway. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:28, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

onel5969- need to connect on Sandeep Singh, you have undo my redirect request, let me know how can we connect Deepak Sahu (talk) 12:30, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

Please see discussion at Village Pump

You’re draftifying wrong. Thanks Elinruby (talk) 00:08, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

Nope... Draft:Tatar Khan (Governor), solely sourced by Banglapedia? Or Draft:Richard Aurili which had such marvelous refs as "(1801-1884)", "Explication des ouvrages de peinture, sculpture, 1903", and "12 avenue Muterse."? Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:34, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

Oh, and nice to see you voted multiple times in the discussion. Good job. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:01, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

You draftified a page, and immediately got reverted

Prince Hwaui is back in mainspace, right after you moved into draftspace despite no changes to it. Thought you'd be interested in this type of behavior. Pilaz (talk) 03:26, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

South Florida–UCF football rivalry

Hello, I saw you reverted my edit on South Florida–UCF football rivalry. I added that information to make War on I-4 shorter since it is already well over 100,000 bytes (even without the information that was moved). Other rivalries also have multiple pages for their rivalries in specific sports despite already having a page for the overall rivalry (e.g. Carolina–Duke rivalry, Duke–North Carolina lacrosse rivalry, and Victory Bell (Duke–North Carolina); or Oregon–Oregon State rivalry and Oregon–Oregon State football rivalry), so it's not like South Florida–UCF would be unique in that regard. Geolojoey (talk) 14:14, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

Please review old articles

There is a rule that prevents reviewers from reviewing articles created in last 24 hours, to allow time to build the page. Please follow it. There is a tool also for this. Venkat TL (talk) 15:18, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

you might want to try NotSoFast tool Venkat TL (talk) 15:19, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

Uh... where did you hear that? Completely false. But nice job on the articles you've created.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:21, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

I did not hear that. But the tool exists, so I am sure there would be some basis. Thank you for your appreciation and help in reviewing and assessing the articles. Venkat TL (talk) 16:21, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

Teddy Fresh

Hello, it has been 2 years since last AFD, I had even no idea they had a page before. I made this page from scratch and it is different. They have much more news and major partnerships now, such as with Elton John. I also posted a message about it in the talk page. If you do not agree, perphaps nominate it for AFD again, but do not just base reversal on prior AFD. Jupiteralien (talk) 22:23, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

The appropriate avenue for an AfD'd article is to take it through AfC. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:33, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

You seem to be a long time editor, so I respect what you have to say, but is there an actual policy about this? if so please send the link and if not, would it hurt to just review it for few minutes and tell me if you see any issues from just posting it live? again the last AFD was while back so it is not applicable anymore. They have more news now and have significant partnerships with Elton John, Looney Tunes and Spongebob. Jupiteralien (talk) 01:04, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

The rule would be Wikipedia:Consensus, which is policy. Consensus was reached at the AfD that the article did not have notability. Further consensus is that the best venue to attempt recreate an article deleted through AfD is to go through AfC. Especially when the vast majority of coverage is of the promotional variety. I hope this helps. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:01, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

Mengli II Giray moved to draftspace?

Is this personal harassment or a general policy? If it is a general policy there are several hundred other articles that we will need to remove. Benjamin Trovato (talk) 22:28, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

I have no idea of what you're talking about. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:32, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

Demanding that someone do three of four days work feels like harassment to the victim. As for multiple articles: Our knowledge of inner Asian history is poor because there are few documents, they are in obscure languages and because there are few scholars working in the area. Our knowledge for Devlet and Saadet is about average for the minor rulers of Asia. It the two articles are below the acceptable level then so are most other Wikipedia articles for inner Asia. If the articles currently in Wikipedia are acceptable then so are the two articles in question, assuming we apply the same standard. My current guess is that you are only familiar with recent events documented in English, know little about Asian history, found these articles by accident and did not know that our sources for inner Asian history are poor. If my guess is wrong, please correct me. Benjamin Trovato (talk) 01:09, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

Try to speak coherently, please. And you really shouldn't guess... you embarrass yourself. Finally, since you can't seem to be civil, stay off my talk page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:11, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

The next time you find something you do not understand, please pass to someone who does. Forcing someone to do unnecessary work is not civil, among other things. Goodbye. Benjamin Trovato (talk) 19:31, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Sorry, can't help it if you're an editor who doesn't understand or is unable to understand WP policies and guidelines. And now, since you choose to be hostile, stay off my talk page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:00, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Sorry

I think you can explain more details of the problem. Or go to WP:Teahouse and WP:ANI. I am here just because I saw Ngancheekean said my page, and Ngancheekean‎ said no americans will ever helped again.It makes me think Ngancheekean not trying to make this place better. Rastinition (talk) 15:16, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

No worries... I try not to go to the drama boards. He's someone trying to help, and having difficulty understanding English WP's rules and guidelines. I give them credit for trying to edit in a foreign language, I rarely do it, except when someone from another wiki asks for help. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:24, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

Regarding Cooku with Comali (season 3) undid revision

Hello, Nice to meet u. This show is a popular show in india which brought up many people in cine industry but also this is the 3rd season respectively. Which still gave popular recognition in season 2 meanwhile now this is an ongoing game show in Star Vijay channel and in Hotstar (where as in ott platform they upload the episodes and maintain them). But still recently they had started the season 3 and it has been regularly been followed by audience but still if couldn't update it on this space it would be more disappointment to the regular fans. Also this show had been recreated in two different languages and this for this show it had given a positive rating on IMDb too. Hope this would be enough as reference to this recognition of the show and to undo the edits.

Thank you. -- TFE^{Ping 📝} 17:34, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

ANI

Someone opened an ANI thread about you here. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 17:50, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up. I've been trying to get them to the point where I don't have to take them to ANI... go figure. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:53, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for all your work!

I feel lucky you are there!Joan arden murray (talk) 19:10, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

- no worries... and you're definitely in the minority. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:54, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

Steve Kinch

How can I challenge the previous AfD decision? I put a lot of effort into this article and believe I have provided a lot more sources for why he deserves an own article campared to what was provided before and would like to overturn the decision, but I am not very familiar with the processes.(Mop66 (talk) 14:07, 12 March 2022 (UTC))

One of two ways. 1 - you can try through WP:DRV, but I doubt that would be successful since the consensus was strong, and nothing has really changed since the AfD, even though it's a few years old. The second is you could create a draft of the article and go through AfD. Nope this helps. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:22, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

fmr baguio

Please read the talk page of fmr baguio. It is really important. 120.29.78.233 (talk) 14:37, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

still not anywhere close to meet WP:GNG. 2 of the sources don't even mention the station, one is primary, and one is a simple listing Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:20, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

The two new sources mentions the station, it said "New stations are st to open in Baguio....." I know this line is simple but why this line don't pass the one you said. Sorry I am new here in wikipedia thats why. 120.29.78.233 (talk) 08:42, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

BTW, please read the whole article of the new sources 120.29.78.233 (talk) 08:47, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Review page, pre-publication

Hi Onel5969, I noticed you do a lot of work on here and have reviewed quite a few of the pages I have created in the past. Could you take a look at this one before I attempt to publish it? Not sure on the notability, plenty of references though! Link: User:LilJohnnyWimple/sandbox7

Hi [[User:|LilJohnnyWimple]] - The issue is with it is that local politicians who don't get more than local coverage usually don't get kept at AfD. If he had won a provincial or national office, then of course he'd meet WP:NPOL. It's a vey well written and structured piece, although you should look at WP:CIT on how to format footnotes. Hope this helps. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:29, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

Boomerang Spain

Hello,

         One of your recent edits on Boomerang (Spanish TV channel has been reverted because of:

• The page is under the process of restoring old informations. • The page is also on the process of being improved

Help us improve the page by contributing like adding citiations, more information, and protect the page from vandalisms. Any further more edits that related to redirecting the page will be recorded and reported. WP:EW

Regards, Samueldester1234 Samueldester1234 (talk) 04:22, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

Please be aware that re-adding uncited material is against WP policy, as per WP:BURDEN, and is considered a form of disruptive editing. See WP:DDE Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:30, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

Redirect of Criticism of philosophy

Hi. Why restore that redirect to Stephen Hawking, a page that doesn't even contain the word "philosophy"?. I don't think the old page was good content, and probably should have been deleted, but the redirect seems even worse. Even if Hawking may once have criticised some aspect of "philosophy", the idea of criticism of philosophy seems to me about like "criticism of water" or "criticism of walking". Can we just remove the redirect and let the article die a natural death or possibly get improved to something encyclopedic non-coatrack and worth keeping? SPECIFICO talk 15:02, 13 March 2022 (UTC) "

Review of Richard Forster (photographer)

Hello and thank you for the review of the above article. I corrected it according to your assessment. Could you please review it again? --PJakopin (talk) 20:42, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

Much better. Keep up the good work. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:46, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for the additional comments. The article was updated accordingly, waiting for your further review. --PJakopin (talk) 12:56, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Hello Onel5969. From March 17 you no longer review articles and this is probably why you did not reply to my above message. If you could nevertheless offer any advice on how to proceed, I would be very grateful. Kind regards --PJakopin (talk) 18:48, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

Hi PJakopin. Sorry it took so long to get back to you. It's much better, but it still has some pov issues. Phrases like, "to expand his horizons", "his first muse", and "the most natural environment for his photography", need to be re-worked. The issue is you are speaking in WP's voice, so it looks like WP is making those assertions. Changes might be something like, "Forster always called Anne-Marie his first "muse"...", but only if that can be supported by a valid source. See the difference? The first is asserting she was his muse, the second is simply making an observation about what Forster said. I hope that helps. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:33, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Hello and thank you for your additional advice. I corrected five instances of problematic assertions, including the three you mentioned. Your further comments would be most welcome. Best regards PJakopin (talk) 06:04, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Hello Onel5969. I have read the text once again and removed additional non-essential passages. Please instruct me how far to proceed. Best regards PJakopin (talk) 07:48, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Draft:Yu-Gi-Oh! Go Rush!

The series air in three weeks and there's enough sources to move it back. SpectresWrath (talk) 22:51, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

Bhasha Samman

Sir Check this article again, This article I have corrected and added source Sahitya Akademi Bhasha Samman Cinzia007 (talk) 15:13, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

List of Mixels characters

This one looks like a time sink - why not redirect it to Mixels? Atsme 💬 📧 21:06, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

The list will disrupt the article. Do not change… have you watched the TV show, Onel? Kurisumasen (talk) 21:44, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Yeah, Atsme - but I keep hoping they get it. Finally sent it to ANI as per WP:DDE. Btw, nice to *speak* with you. We cross paths all the time, and rarely interact. Thanks for all your work. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 23:13, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Deprod of Franklin D. Azar.

Deprodding of Franklin D. Azar

I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated}} tag from Franklin D. Azar, which you proposed for deletion. I think this subject meets the notability standard.. If you still think this article should be deleted, please do not add {{proposed deletion}} back to the page. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! Jeffrey Beall (talk) 22:41, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

March 2022

You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (List of Mixels characters) for a period of 72 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 12:09, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Onel5969 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

While if you simply look at this as a case of edit warring, Ritchie333’s action is warranted. However, there are exceptions to the edit-warring clause, and I feel this is one of them. Wikipedia:Edit warring#Exemptions lists at #4: "Reverting obvious vandalism—edits that any well-intentioned user would agree constitute vandalism...". Now, while all vandalism is disruptive editing, not all disruptive editing is vandalism, as per WP:DE. But it further goes on to state, "Each case should be treated independently, taking into consideration whether the actions violate Wikipedia policies and guidelines." (emphasis mine). WP:BURDEN is part of the policy, WP:VERIFY. Therefore reverting someone who is violating WP:VERIFY, is exempt from the edit warring policy. In addition, WP:Vandlism states: "The malicious removal of encyclopedic content, or the changing of such content beyond all recognition, without any regard to our core content policies of neutral point of view (which does not mean no point of view), verifiability and no original research, is a deliberate attempt to damage Wikipedia. (again, emphasis mine) Having said that, I would also like to point out, that if this block is upheld, I will of course abide by that decision, and in the future I will, as per WP:DDE to send all these issues to ANI. However, that will add several ANI cases per day, in all likelihood. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:57, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

The edits you were reverting were not obvious vandalism. 331dot (talk) 19:12, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

A goat for you!

In appreciation of your many contributions to the NPP process. I am sorry to hear that you have ended your volunteer effort.

(t · c) buidhe 19:47, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Onel5969,

You take a lot of bold actions and that will result in pushback from other editors. But after 12 years and half a million edits, I'm sure you know that! While I don't always agree with your editing choices, you are a huge contributor here and I hope you quitting NPP doesn't mean a complete departure from Wikipedia. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:06, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

CSD G5s

Hello, Onel5969,

Please do not tag pages for deletion under CSD G5 criteria until it is confirmed that the page creator is the primary contributor to the article and is a confirmed sockpuppet. In this recent case, there are other editors to some of these pages and the page creator isn't blocked or even confirmed as a sockpuppet of a banned editor so G5 doesn't apply. Thank you for using your discretion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:28, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Hi Liz. I thought Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Chatarpatar2020, which the checkuser said, "The behavioural evidence makes it clear that Cinzia007 is a sockpuppet of Chatarpatar2020", meant that they were confirmed as a sockpuppet. Apologies. Heading to bed now, if you want I'll go remove the tags in the morning. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:31, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Hi Onel - I came here after seeing Liz's post at the SPI. As the non-admin clerk (not a checkuser!) who made the comment you quoted, I agree with Liz that you shouldn't tag pages for G5 before the account is blocked. It's confusing for the admin who is reviewing the CSD tags as it's not easy for them to tell who the account is a sock of, and it's possible (though unlikely in this case) that new information might come to light before the account is blocked which changes the G5 eligibility. (It sometimes takes several days for an account to be blocked following a clerk request at SPI). Spicy (talk) 03:12, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Yeah Liz and Spicy, sorry I jumped the gun, was under a different impression, and was just trying to help out. Won't happen again. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:09, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Please, why

@Onel5969 sire, with due respect, i would like to know the reason that why did you move "Embassy of India, Zagreb" to the draft space? Do you know that i have created several articles related to that of diplomatic missions of India despite knowing their low self importance? Well, you even delete the redirect page. I didn't like that. And now that i have put "the draft" for review, it has not been done yet. I have even left a comment for that draft. It would be a grateful job for me, if you could act that way.

Utkarsh555 06:27, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

@Onel5969 I am thinking of redirect the page itself. for both the titles discussed. Utkarsh555 06:28, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

It wasn't cited well enough to pass GNG, being solely referenced with 2 primary sources. I could have restored the redirect created by another editor, but since another user had already reverted the redirect, and you had created the article, and I thought there was a chance of passing notability, I felt the best course of action was to draftify, to give you time to work on it. I no longer do review work, so, you can either wait for it to be reviewed at AfC, or you could create a redirect and ask for your draft to be deleted. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:31, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

@Onel5969 ok i find that to be good idea. Will work on it. thanks! Utkarsh555 04:26, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

Review request

Hello, I noticed u reviewed one of my recently created articles, so I was hoping you could review another new one I created–Iqbal Hossain (footballer, born 1975), since no one has reviewed it even though it has been 8 days already. Thanks. FNH004 (talk) 16:36, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Sorry, I no longer review articles. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:47, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Ultra City Smiths draft

Hi. I heard that you had Ultra City Smiths draftified due to lack of other information. I have contributed to it's draft that also included the production information that I added yesterday as it lacked the production information. I just wanted to let you know that. --Rtkat3 (talk) 14:49, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

Debbie Webster

You may want to review the situation over at Draft:Debbie Webster/Debbie Webster. I've noticed that since your revert for having no real-world notability, the content has been repeatedly recreated despite draftification. – DarkGlow • 01:14, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

Hi DarkGlow - thanks for the heads up, but I'm no longer active in reviewing articles. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:56, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Yagya Bhasin

Hello Onel5969, I raised my concern on article's talk page and tagged you. But you haven't answered kindly check it and remove notability tag and review the article. Decentuser (talk) 06:24, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

Hi. I'm no longer active in reviewing articles. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:57, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

SpaceX Starship Review

Hi. I got a notification from you that the article "SpaceX Starship has been reviewed." Thank you. I was wondering what the significance of an article being reviewed is. Does the reviewer post an analysis someplace? Does the review effect the future viability of the articl? That kind of thing.--Libertyguy (talk) 03:20, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) All it means is that the article or redirect that you created passed WP:New page patrol. Usually, there are no comments—we're swamped enough as it is. (t · c) buidhe 01:18, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

NPP school

Hi Onel5969, I was following NPP school with you as mentor at User:Onel5969/NPPSchool/Asartea. I've just now finished up most of the newest section, but I'm struggling with the barnstars and welcoming templates, since I don't normally give out barnstars and in the course of my current editing encounter relatively few well meaning newcomers. Would it be possibly to move on for now?

Additionally I saw above you have resigned from NPP; are you still interested in continuing NPPS? -- Asartea ^{Talk | Contribs} 20:14, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

Hi Asartea - I'll still absolutely help you through the NPP school. I can't get to your page tonight, but will look at it in the A.M. Bottom line is that of course we can skip over stuff, as long as we address it later. And not everything has to be perfect, just so you understand the principles and guidelines. Nice to see you back. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:54, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

Block 21/Moody Theater

Moody Theater is a significant venue for Austin, and, likewise, has significant notability given its status as studio for Austin City Limits. Per WP:Split, my intent was to be bold. While I understand my content split left Block 21 fairly bare, I made sure to leave said in a good state.

As I put in a good bit of work to bring Moody Theater up to snuff, I’d appreciate your consideration for restoration of the article split. If growing Block 21 such that it stands better on its own without Moody Theater content would satisfy your demands for both, I’ll endeavor such. Esp. given Block 21’s significance (as a complex) to Austin. jareha ^(comments) 22:01, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Hi jareha - I don't review articles any more, so another NPP patroller will have a go at it. Take care.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:16, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

About new page review

Hi Dear Sir Onel5969 are you active in Review the new article right now ? Actually i have created 2 new article (Kyun Na Aaye, Kumar Neeraj) few days ago and waiting for its review, I'm researching and ready to create 5 new article about Elected MLA's in new General Election of 2022 Uttar Pradesh Legislative Assembly election if review will be done, i will incurage to create it. Thank You & Regards Sams321 (talk) 04:46, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

Hi Sams321 - I don't review articles any more. Good luck. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:17, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Margaret Ann Ireland

Thank you! You are always such a help!Joan arden murray (talk) 23:37, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

No worries. I don't review articles any more, but yours was at CR and I had already reviewed it otherwise. Keep up the good work. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:18, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Assistance with an article

Hi. I was looking around and I saw this article. I am bringing this to your attention because something doesn't seem right about it like there are way too few sources. I do not think that this page is ready to be published. I was wondering if you could take a look and tell me if you agree with me or not. Thanks. GoWarriors151718 (talk) 00:52, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

This issue is resolved. I will leave this discussion up since I already posted this on your talk page. No need for a response. Thanks anyway. GoWarriors151718 (talk) 04:26, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

An award

	The article reviewing juggernaut
	Thanks for being an engine of work to review new articles. CT55555 (talk) 21:52, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Thanks, CT55555 - but no longer. Keep up the good work. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:33, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

New article

Hi Onel5969. I have created a new article, Pashtun National Jirga, and added references to it. One of the paragraphs in the background section was imported from a relevant article, Pashtun Tahafuz Movement. Please check if this new article is properly wikified? Thanks, Khestwol (talk) 15:11, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Hi Khestwol, the appropriate guideline is Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. It look like you've provided the correct attribution with this edit, so you're okay. Keep up the good work. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:37, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Short descriptions of musicals

Hi. Unlike films, which can be identified by the date of release, a musical's date of premiere is less important. It should be identified by the composer/book writer. Often the premiere production is a mere tryout and the real major-market premiere comes in a later year. Also, sometimes the date of publication is different from the date of the premiere, and sometimes the most famous production of the work comes years later. So, one could say something like, for Phantom of the Opera, for example, "musical by Andrew Lloyd Webber premiered in 1986". All the best, -- Ssilvers (talk) 15:18, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar

I do not believe there is an editor who has received so many barnstars, and so many of the same kind. So as it's difficult to know which one to give you you'll have to do with this generic one. One thing is for sure, your retirement from NPP (which I totally understand), and the lack of any structured coordination there has already caused NPP to fall apart at the seams. So thank you, just thank you so much for holding it together so much and for so long. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 04:29, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

Thank you, Kudpung - high praise coming from you. Shame that some admins don't think that willfully breaking WP policies, over and over again, isn't an obvious form of vandalism. I just checked the NPP queue, and all the work I helped due from Dec though March is gone in a single month. Regardless, thanks for your kind words. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:37, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

Hardly surprising. It's got as much to do also with the total lack of coordination. Nobody wants the job. It was ok for a while until Barkeep49 reached for higher office, but that's understandable - what he's doing now is equally important if not more so. It doesn't change the fact that NPP is the most important non-admin task on en.Wiki. I give up - back to retirement 😉 Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 13:22, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

Iegor Reznikoff

Dear Onel5969,

I've seen that you've moved the article Iegor Reznikoff to the Draft section. I've written the article Nicolas Schöffer in the English and Hungarian Wikipedia. The Hungarian page is more complex because I've written about Shöffer's music related research and there I mention Iegor Reznikoff. Since it does not exist in the Hungarian Wikipedia I've temporarily linked the English page until it is written in Hungarian. It was not a draft at the time but a normal article. I wanted to add this section to the English version as well and I would be happy if the Iegor Reznikoff article would exist. May I ask what was wrong with that article? Why was it moved to the Draft section? Can it be corrected? It seems that it is now a draft with many references. Thanks for your help in advance! Mirabella (talk) 20:08, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

Hi, my apologies in that I didn't correctly leave the message on your talk page when I moved it to draft. It appears that you have a connection with the subject. Please take a look WP:COI and WP:UPE to find out what steps you need to take. Take care. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:42, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

Hi Onel5969,

it must be some misunderstanding. I do not have any connection with the subject. I've never even edited the article. The thing is that I've written about an other topic where I mention Iegor Reznikoff and I would be happy if the link wouldn't be red. It would be nice if every reader of my article could look up who on earth this guy is. There are several other articles where Iegor Reznikoff is mentioned. Could you please check whether it can already been moved to the main page. It seems that in the meantime someone has already worked on it. Thank you for your help! Mirabella (talk) 15:57, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

Hi, I don't know what to do. I've tried to read the draft. These family relations are too complicated and it is not clear to me why are they relevant. Anyway his practises with human voice and his music experiments would be interesting. Mirabella (talk) 16:18, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

NPP school

I don't think I've been installing the script right. Is there something obvious that I'm doing wrong in my recent contributions? [1] Clovermoss (talk) 19:33, 15 April 2022 (UTC) I should likely link to the actual diffs instead, because recent contributions can change. [2] [3] [4]. I assumed that I was just suppossed to copy and paste the code, is there something else I should be doing to get it to work? I manually cleared my browser's cache, as well. Clovermoss (talk) 20:20, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

(talk page watcher) Your diff #1 worked when I tested it in my own common.js. Are you looking in the right spot? Here's a screenshot of where it should appear. Also, what skin are you using?

As for the other 2 diffs, those will not work for a couple reasons. 1) The page name needs to end in .js. 2) The page name needs to be loaded into your User:Clovermoss/common.js via adding importScript() type code to your common.js. I can teach you this method if you want, but to keep it simple, diff #1 should work by itself without any need to do diff 2 or 3. Hope that helps. –Novem Linguae (talk) 21:12, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

@Novem Linguae: Thank you for trying to help me. I see the CSD log on my screen, but it just shows the CSDs that I did through Twinkle. I vaguely remember doing some manually years ago, but I'm not sure if there's any way to see a record of that because those pages were deleted. Is the script meant to show what I've done through Twinkle? I was already able to access that before. Clovermoss (talk) 22:36, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Hey there. So the code you added just adds a link to your Twinkle CSD log page. I don't think there's an easy way to check old CSDs since the revisions are likely deleted. Hope that helps. –Novem Linguae (talk) 23:10, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Sorry I"m late to respond, Clovermoss, thankfully Novem Linguae is on the ball. He's absolutely spot on his replies to you. And he's also correct that if you don't use twinkle to CSD or PROD, they don't show up on your logs. And NL, it's so nice to see the student become the teacher. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:22, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

A little smarter and wiser every day, hopefully :) –Novem Linguae (talk) 10:25, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

Monroe Grisman draft - another review

Hello Onel5969, I hope all is well. I responded to your note on my talk page, but you may have missed. Thank you for taking the time to review and provide feedback for Monroe Grisman. I cleaned it up and added more verifiable citations. I see in your other replies that you are no longer reviewing articles. Is there any chance you could please do a quick once-over and let me know how else I could improve it. I believed I have reliable citations that met the requirements, but always still learning. I would like to submit this draft for review once I clean it up enough to have the best chance of approval. Thanks again.Ddab (talk) 07:03, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Alex Thompson

Your edit comment here suggests this is UPE. If that is the case, can we speedy delete? --CNMall41 (talk) 19:28, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Hi CNMall41 - In a word, no. While discouraged, UPE editors can contribute to WP, just under stricter guidelines. While UPE can be grounds to have an editor blocked (if they continue to disregard the guidelines at WP:UPE), the fact that an article is created by a UPE is not a valid CSD criteria. They do however, have to pass through AfD to submit their articles, which is why I sent it there. If they do not own up to being a UPE, it should not be passed into mainspace. If they do admit they are a UPE, and follow the guidelines, then it can be passed to mainspace. If it meets notability and verify criteria, that is. Hope this makes sense. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:17, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Why are you delete the page of Super Dancer (Season 1), Super Dancer (Season 2), Super Dancer (Season 3) and Super Dancer (Season 4)

I have invested my lots of time create these page and added the suitable sources according to wikipedia policy some unknown ip ruined that page. But block that unknown ip you reverted the pages after I check and re-edit the page you again revert the pages. I want to why. If you have issues with some work you sould complain about unknown ip rather than delete the content. You should reverted the unknown ip edits. Rather I file a complain about you. Explain you deleted the content or re edit the pages back. Thank you Regard Vikas Sharma Vikassharmasafidon (talk) 12:50, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

No, that's not how it works. I explained in the edit summary why I removed the material, which by the way, is what I did, I did not revert you. Please familiarize yourself with WP's policies and guidelines. In this case the two most pertinent are WP:VERIFY and WP:BURDEN. As the pages stand now, neither pass GNG and should be redirected, but that's up to a new page reviewer.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:53, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

You edited the wrong dude, thousands of reality show article are available at wikipedia they doesn't provide source for score or contestants. For what sources are required i updated that sources score and guest list doesn't need refrences. So edit back that page because i don't want to undo your edit.

Dude, if you undo my edit, you'll be violating WP policies, which I gave you links to above. Doing so is disruptive editing, and will most likely get you blocked from editing. EVERYTHING needs to pass WP:VERIFY, don't know where you came up with that erroneous concept above. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:28, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

Dude, I am not that kind of person who create a war for satisfying the ego only. I understand the policy of wikipedia I think you are not understanding, article is still publish but without content and which content I have publish that was real and that content doesn't need sources because it's reality show and that contents show the score or episode details which is already mentioned. So understand the policy and rules of wikipedia and re-edit than articles or I have to complain about you to wikipedia you are miss-using your page receiver power. Thank you

Dude, you obviously don't understand WP policy. I strongly suggest you don't take this to ANI, as it will more than likely result in you being blocked in a WP:BOOMARANG. VERIFY is not optional. Period. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:38, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

Having reviewed these pages, as a near two decade editor of WP, I would strongly suggest that all four articles be merged into a single article, with removal of redundant material. A simple test is this—if in a single article, is the content sufficient to create separate sections for the Season 1, 2, 3, 4 content? There is, I believe clearly, insufficient content for an article even with four sections, and so certainly not for four separate articles. I would look for consensus for this, and my voice can be included as one supporting the (a bit complicated) merge. 2601:246:C700:558:34EC:1C9C:D792:B879 (talk) 17:33, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Where to discuss reliability of sources

Hello! I hope you're doing well.

Where exactly is the best place to discuss the reliability of a source? I was wondering if I could cite J! Archive. Mooonswimmer 21:45, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Hi Mooonswimmer - the place to discuss reliable sources is over at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Regarding your source, it's a risky connection so I would not reference it. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:30, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion examples in NPP school

When I was reading them they seemed familar to me for some reason and eventually I realized why. I've responded to these examples before when I was doing Counter-Vandalism training [5]. Do you want me to skip them, then? Clovermoss (talk) 04:47, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

Hi Clovermoss - if you feel you have a good grasp of them, then sure. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:18, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

I don't know if I nessecarily have a good grasp of them, but I feel like in theory I understand when they would apply. If you had a different set of examples that were not the exact same as ones I've answered previously and recieved input on, I'd be willing to give them a go. But if you don't think that's needed I'm okay with skipping that. Clovermoss (talk) 18:15, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

No, I don't have another set, Clovermoss, so just go ahead and skip them. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 23:14, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

Okay, I've removed them since all of those scenerios were covered already. Is there still content moving forward to work through in regards to NPP school itself? I noticed that there hasn't been anything else added yet, but I'm not sure if that's because you just haven't done so yet. Clovermoss (talk) 18:18, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Precious

Seven years!

Precious anniversary

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:15, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Adam Agee

Hello. I was wondering if I could revive the page Adam Agee. I spent a lot of time writing that page, and even though it may have a small amount of sources, I think the page gives enough information to inform the reader about the person. Cherrell410 (talk) 01:47, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

Title quandary

Hello!

I recently created an article covering the world's tallest dog. Coincidentally but not surprisingly, Zeus, the current record holder, shares his name with a previous "world's tallest tog".

On Wikipedia, Zeus #1 is Zeus (dog). Zeus #2 is Zeus (Great Dane). The thing is, both of them are Great Danes. They are also both American, and I don't have Zeus #2's year of birth. Not quite sure how to deal with the title. Any suggestions? Mooonswimmer 16:35, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

Zeus Doorlag and Zeus Davis? Folly Mox (talk) 06:41, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

Sorry, I missed this, Mooonswimmer. Your impulse regarding year would have been my way to go. Another way might be to dab one (Texas dog) and the other (Michigan dog). But you might want to ask over at Wikipedia:WikiProject Dogs.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 09:45, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

June 2022 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations | June 2022 Backlog Drive

On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? Sign up here!

You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. (t · c) buidhe 04:26, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

Kudos

		The Barnstar of Diligence
		for your diligent work that all that appears in the encyclopedia be verifiable content, so that you you not lose hope despite the seeming endless work that remains. 2601:246:C700:558:34EC:1C9C:D792:B879 (talk) 17:23, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

NPP

I'm apologise for the late message; I haven't been as active for a while. I hope you reconsider retiring from NPP, because I think you do a lot of genuine good there. The only reason you were blocked was because of your edit warring, stubborn obfuscation, and persistent obstructionism. Specifically cherry-picking (and misusing) WP:BURDEN to "win" unlimited reverts and circumvent policy in bad faith, while also canvassing, filibustering, and casting aspersions when experienced editors point you to other policies. You kept doing this even after you were told that there was no edit warring exemption for that and you were pointed to a plethora of policies that you chose to ignore (such as WP:ATD-R and WP:DISPUTE). No user can unilaterally decide to redirect an article and keep it there without consensus, and you were advised to open an WP:AFD more than once. Several attempts were made to discuss the disagreement with you on various talk pages, but you ignored all of them. The only time you replied to anything was to filibuster by repeating the same point ad nauseum (long after it had been addressed) and refusing to say anything else. Eventually, you resorted to campaigning other NPP members to help you out, which by itself was block-worthy behaviour.

You were fortunate the first time you were reported, because that was closed (prematurely) due to inactivity after getting bludgeoned by partisans and the people you canvassed from NPPR. But the following month, you boomeranged yourself anyway after continuing the same behaviour. Given that you had been doing this across multiple articles in different topic areas, and were engaged in personal attacks and canvassing, the administrator was being generous by only blocking you from the one article.

You have been editing long enough that I know you understand what you did wrong. You don't need to stop doing good work at NPP, unless that's just what you want to do. You only need to drop the WP:OWN "My way or the highway" approach and not engage in disruption like this in the future. That doesn't seem like eggshells. All of that conflict was easily avoidable if you hadn't tried to dodge the dispute resolution and deletion processes to get your way faster. Darkknight2149 03:43, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Wow, all I can say, if you haven't been active, that's probably a good thing for Wikipedia, perhaps you should reconsider becoming active. Regardless, don't post on my talk page again.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 09:56, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

+1, that was an unusually cruel and nasty post and having read the ANI links, it seems DK has been stalking Onel for some time. Blocking Onel, even temporarily, was an own-goal scored by an admin who has very little experience with the NPP process and the work required and the challenges faced. They should apologize. 78.19.228.144 (talk) 13:44, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Suggestions

Hey you should join the Wikipedia:The 50,000 Challenge since you make so many Arizona state legislator articles. Jon698 (talk) 22:13, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

Sorry, I find "challenges" to be a waste of time. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:16, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Rivian R1S

Hi. Re the Rivian R1S, you made an edit in January this year to restore a poor article to a redirect. I agree with that edit, then. [BTW, I created the original redirect in 2019.]

Another editor has recently (6 June) made the redirect into an article once again.

I stumbled onto it today, and found it has a couple of very poor sources (possibly click bait sites recycling old 2019/2020 material into 2022 material for clicks). I've made a few edits and clarified that the sources are poor.

Would ask that if you have time, you take a look and see if you think it even warrants an article, rather than a redirect. I'll try to stay involved with the convo as well, as I have definitely edited the Rivian R1T article in the past, and I believe Rivian is significantly underproducing the volume of that vehicle (can't manufacture to demand), has recently increased the price a lot, and all of that might make "production" of the R1S highly suspect. But I'd be happy to be convinced by multiple good current sources. Cheers. N2e (talk) 21:22, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

It appears to have enough sourcing in the current article to warrant its inclusion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:15, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Harry J. Karns

On 16 June 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Harry J. Karns, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the first tequila distillery in the United States was opened in 1936 in Nogales, Arizona, by Harry J. Karns, former Arizona state senator and Nogales mayor? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Harry J. Karns. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Harry J. Karns), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:03, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of M4A (disambiguation)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on M4A (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:42, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

DYK for H. B. Wilkinson

On 21 June 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article H. B. Wilkinson, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that H. B. Wilkinson lost the first special election in Arizona to Isabella Greenway, who became the first woman from Arizona to go to Congress? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/H. B. Wilkinson. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, H. B. Wilkinson), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

Another NPP school question

Hi Onel5969. Anyways, I noticed that the NPP school page says to nominate 5 successful G11s and G12s from the New Pages Feed, but only the G12s part mentions that I can count draft CSD's. I was wondering if G11s for drafts could count towards this too? So far I've found it easier to identify these issues with drafts than articles created directly in mainspace, even if I haven't had 5 of each yet. But if it's imperative that G11s are found through the New Page Patrol feed instead of the Articles for Creation one, I can do that eventually. Clovermoss (talk) 22:20, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

Hi Clovermoss - first, my apologies for not getting back to you sooner. This kind of got lost. Second, I'm a bit confused by your question. G12 deals with copyright violations, while G11 is advertising/promotion. Copyright issues trump anything else, as it is a legal thing. It's one of the reasons that when I was reviewing I always did my earwig check first. This exercise is about Copyvios. Looking at your CSD log, you're doing fine on G11s. Remember, you have to use Twinkle for it to appear on your log. If you do it manually, or use the page curation tool, it won't show up. Hope this answers your question. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:39, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

It's the way the two sections are phrased. One explicitly states to use the New Pages Patrol feed for G11s, the other section about G12s says that I can use the New Pages Patrol feed or the Articles for Creation one. My question was if I could use the Articles for Creation feed for G11s, too. Also don't apologize for taking a bit to get to me, I'm the one who's taken almost a year to get through all this. Clovermoss (talk) 14:42, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Oh, okay, Clovermoss, I see now what you're asking. In short, no. The AfC fee is for drafts, and you can't G11 a draft. In those cases you should leave a comment for the article creator telling them what the problems are, e.g. promotional, weasel words, advertising, etc. You can only G11 live articles. The only speedies I'm aware of that you can use on drafts are G12 or G13. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:47, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

I've successfully G11'd drafts? All of my G11s this month have been drafts but they were really really blatant unambigous advertising, which is kind of the point of G11. I can wait for nominating G11s through the New Pages Feed if that's important, though. Clovermoss (talk) 14:51, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Specifically Draft:KANIKA KHANNA, Draft:Why automation necessary ? and Draft:Bees Network Ltd.. Each page was deleted by a different administrator. I thought that G deletions were for pages in general? I could be wrong, though. As for how I've been nominating for deletion, the only times I've manually did that was in 2019, I think? It's hard to know for sure because I can't see that as I'm not an admin. I've been using Twinkle for this since late 2019, though. Haven't done it through page curation because I don't technically have the new page patroller right yet. Unless you're talking about the Afc reviewer tool? I'm aware that the processes are different, but I'm fairly certain page curation has to do with NPP. I was actually going to ask when I should apply for NPP... is it sometime throughout the NPP school process or after I've finished? I get that you technically don't have to do either of those things to apply for userrights, but what are your thoughts? Clovermoss (talk) 15:56, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

(talk page watcher) My experience at AFC is that they tag drafts G11 that are promo and that aren't worth fixing (the bad ones). When I first started, I tried never using G11 in draftspace, and found that others would quickly G11 and delete the ones I didn't tag. I also agree with the statement that it is hard to find G11's in mainspace, especially if one is following the "15 minute rule" advised at WP:NPP. There's often someone that will tag it G11 quicker than 15 minutes. Hope that helps. –Novem Linguae (talk) 16:55, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

I've been trying to find G11s in mainspace literally everyday for about a month and I haven't had any "luck" (if you can call identifying spam as luck). To be fair most of the time I was only checking the New Pages Feed once or twice a day. I was also doing my best to not go against the "don't rush this" advice. I'm assuming G11s in mainspace were more common before ACTRIAL was a thing? I started editing in late 2018 so I've always been used to seeing draftspace, but I find reading old policy discussions interesting sometimes. The idea of people being able to create articles directly in mainspace on like their first edit... I can see why the community was like "yeah this isn't the best idea". Especially with biographies. Geez. Clovermoss (talk) 20:16, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Clovermoss, I haven't actively reviewed in several months, but when I was, I didn't go a day without finding an article or two which was eligible for G11. Granted, I reviewed between 100-200 articles per day, so it was "easier" for me to find examples of most things. But in NPP school is training, to make sure you have grasp of the concepts, and you obviously do of G11, so I wouldn't worry about it anymore. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 09:15, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

Okay, thank you. I'll still work on the G12s. Do you think I should apply for the New Page Patroller right or that I should wait? Or you don't have an opinion on that since you're no longer reviewing? I'm somewhat aware of what happened but I don't pretend to understand because I'm not in your shoes. Clovermoss (talk) 14:31, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

Kingdom of Oblivion

Hi One15969, on Metacritic four independent reviews are aggregated, is this not enough to say it is notable? Tekstman (talk) 14:21, 23 June 2022 (UTC) PS it is not my article, just happen to stumble on your redirect

Hi Tekstman - it depends. If the underlying reviews are from credible sources, and in-depth about the song/album, then it's most likely notable, but those full reviews should be referenced, not simply the metacritic piece. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:40, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Two of those reviews were already separately referenced, so I think there is no issue in me reviving the article then. Tekstman (talk) 06:25, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ray Ferguson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Daily Standard.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

Draft:Groosham Grange

I object to your draftification of this article. Please move it back to mainspace. ~Kvng (talk) 04:28, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

DYK nomination of W. P. Mahoney

Hello! Your submission of W. P. Mahoney at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 04:35, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Note that the only hook was struck after issues with it in prep; a new hook will need to be proposed. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:35, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

State governors' names from Brazil (Years 1892-1933)

Hello, Onel5969, this is 121.100.19.195 asking you to help expand the articles from the years 1892 to 1933 (look below to see the state governors names and the years) by adding in the state governors' names from Brazil from the articles of the years 1892 to 1933, if you can't talk to me talk to another user to help the user expand the articles from the years 1892 to 1933 by adding in the state governors' names from Brazil, please, thank you.121.100.19.195 (talk) 03:20, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

---Years in Brazil--- 1892 in Brazil 1893 in Brazil 1894 in Brazil 1895 in Brazil 1896 in Brazil 1897 in Brazil 1898 in Brazil 1899 in Brazil 1900 in Brazil 1901 in Brazil 1902 in Brazil 1903 in Brazil 1904 in Brazil 1905 in Brazil 1906 in Brazil 1907 in Brazil 1908 in Brazil 1909 in Brazil 1910 in Brazil 1911 in Brazil 1912 in Brazil 1913 in Brazil 1914 in Brazil 1915 in Brazil 1916 in Brazil 1917 in Brazil 1918 in Brazil 1919 in Brazil 1920 in Brazil 1921 in Brazil 1922 in Brazil 1923 in Brazil 1924 in Brazil 1925 in Brazil 1926 in Brazil 1927 in Brazil 1928 in Brazil 1929 in Brazil 1930 in Brazil 1931 in Brazil 1932 in Brazil 1933 in Brazil

---Governors---

• Alagoas: [[]]
• Amazonas: [[]]
• Bahia: [[]]
• Ceará: [[]]
• Goiás: [[]]
• Maranhão: [[]]
• Mato Grosso: [[]]
• Minas Gerais: [[]]
• Pará: [[]]
• Paraíba: [[]]
• Pernambuco: [[]]
• Piauí: [[]]
• Paraná: [[]]
• Rio Grande do Norte: [[]]
• Rio Grande do Sul: [[]]
• Santa Catarina: [[]]
• São Paulo: [[]]
• Sergipe: [[]]

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|121.100.19.195}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~.121.100.19.195 (talk) 03:20, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

DYK for W. P. Mahoney

On 24 July 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article W. P. Mahoney, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Arizona state senator W. P. Mahoney became an acquaintance of Wyatt Earp when he was a miner? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/W. P. Mahoney. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, W. P. Mahoney), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 00:04, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

YGM

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:22, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

Hey there Kudpung - I'm not seeing anything in my email. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 23:21, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Sorry. I meant to tell you, the article has been put back. With everything else that's going on and with the open letter from NPP to the WMF, it would probably be overkill. At least for a while. Have you signed the letter? It needs all the support it can get. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:44, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

What letter? Where can I find it? Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:55, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

(talk page watcher) Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Coordination/2022 WMF letter :) –Novem Linguae (talk) 04:08, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

Sicilian Renaissance

Back in February, you moved "Sicilian Renaissance" to Draft:Sicilian Renaissance, and rightly so. The draft is still underreferenced and shaky, but I think it has since improved to the point where it would survive an AfD and that it's beneficial even as is. I'm inclined to okay it -- very much hoping that qualified editors will quickly notice it and firm it up. What do you think? (No offence if you warmly disagree.) -- Hoary (talk) 11:58, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

Hi Hoary - It's definitely notable, just still poorly cited. I think it should still remain in draft for development, but the article's creator seems to have abandoned it, so not sure leaving it in draft will do it any good. I'm a huge believer in WP:VERIFY, and if it was moved to mainspace, I agree (and would !vote keep myself) that it would survive, but vast swaths of the article would be removed. For example the sections "Humanism in literature", "Architecture", and "Painting" are wholly unsourced. In cases like this I draftified it so that sourcing could be provided. I wouldn't object to it being moved to mainspace, but I would remove the uncited material. And just to explain my stance on VERIFY, I hate seeing WP mocked, I put a lot of work in on the project, and it is galling when people make fun of it. Unsourced/poorly sourced material only makes that mocking like shooting fish in the barrel. Anyway, that's my .02. And, btw, thanks for all you do on the project, as well as this incredibly civil question. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:22, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for your kind words, but my civility (when evident) is merely an intermittent disguise, while "The creature inside [...] is soft and repulsive in appearance, and vicious in temperament". I do agree that lack of provision of sources encourages lack of provision of sources, and in recent years I've tried to be conscientious in providing them. So I felt queasy about suggesting the promotion of this draft, promising though it was. Well, Greenman has gone and promoted it. I'm surprised that he hasn't also made any changes to it; shortly, I'll do a little of this myself. -- Hoary (talk) 22:20, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

My evaluation was that it would survive an AfD as well, so due to WP:AFCPURPOSE I approved it. There's such a backlog that I don't tend to make many changes to reviewed articles myself, just the thumbs up or down. Thanks for your improvements! Greenman (talk) 23:09, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Thanks Hoary for you input (and the chuckle . And as I said above, Greenman - my concern was never with its ability to pass AfD, as it is definitely notable, but with the paucity of sources. I also thank you Hoary, for adding the tags, but as I said in the edit summary I just left on the pages, those sections have been left uncited by months by the article's creator, who would be the best individual to provide sources, since they created the draft, so imho adding tags at this point is ... well, pointless. Therefore, I've removed the uncited material. If other editors want to come along and expand the article, with sources, cool. If not, what is there is now sourced. And Greenman, thanks for pitching in over at AfC. I did it for years, and its a thankless task. So thanks.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 23:17, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

On the thanklessness of AfC: more or less recently, I've okayed Henry F. Pulitzer, Illuminated River, Ryūichi Kaneko, David Stephenson (photographer), Susan Fletcher Crawford, Carole Robb, W. W. Morris, Sutezo Otono, Joy Labinjo, Yves Marchand and Romain Meffre, T. R. Otsuka, Alan Fletcher (artist). Most appeared to me via Wikipedia:AfC sorting/Culture/Visual arts, which is brimming with promotion. Some of what I okayed seem promotional too, but not blatantly so. I put time into each; for some, I don't know if it was really worth the effort. But on balance, I'm slightly satisfied. ¶ As for the renascence of the Renaissance article, see my appeal here; I wonder if anything will come of this. -- Hoary (talk) 03:55, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

NPP UBX

Hi. You may wish to add this to your user page: {{Wikipedia:New pages patrol/CoY userbox 2018}} Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 17:31, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:NoelFrancis.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NoelFrancis.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

NPP Awards

		Redirect Ninja Award
		For over 12,000 redirect reviews during 2021. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:11, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

		The New Page Reviewer's Osmium Award
		For over 15,000 article reviews during 2021. Thank you very much for your help at New Pages Patrol! -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:11, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

Did you see the ping?

At Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Lists#Continued discussion? It looked like consensus was against requiring blue links, so I went ahead and changed {{People from place list criteria}} — hike395 (talk) 17:02, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

Hi hike395 - yup, missed the ping. Thanks for the follow-up, have commented there.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:32, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

Asking for an opinion

Hi, can I ask your opinion for this draft, is it can pass minimum GNG or need to have more sources? also if you want to rate it from 0-10 what will you give? ZEP55 (talk) 19:05, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

NPP Awards for 2020

		The New Page Reviewer's Platinum Award
		For over 10,000 article reviews during 2020. Thank you very much for your help at New Pages Patrol! -MPGuy2824 (talk) 02:21, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

		Redirect Ninja Award
		For over 9,000 redirect reviews during 2020. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 02:21, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

Here are 2 awards to show appreciation for the NPP reviews you did back in 2020. We realize this is late, but NPP fell behind in some coordination activities. We are just getting caught up. If you don't want to receive "old" barnstars, please just ignore this and reply to let us know not to send you any more. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:54, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

A goat for you!

Thanks for the update regarding sources in other languages, much appreciated!

Sayerbay (talk) 13:31, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

Wyn Geleynse

Dear Editor: I know you retired but I don`t know who to ask for help. I wrote an article on this artist Wyn Geleynse, winner of an important Canadian prize in 2018. I noticed that I had misspelled the name of the artist in his title so moved it to the correct spelling. But I wasn`t sure I had done this right and moved it again. Now I see Wikipedia has the wrong spelling for the name. Can you fix this please? Thank you. Also please look over articles I wrote since you retired (only 4 or so) and if okay, mark them edited. There are only a few interested in Canadian art. Thank you. I`ll try not to bother you again. Joan arden murray (talk) 18:23, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

You are my hero!!! Thank you,Joan arden murray (talk) 19:26, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

Mentiras Sinceras

The record i agree may not be his best. Now, Alex himself he is, along with Alej. Sanz and Joaquin Sabina, the most known Spanish singer of all time. That's worldwide. What should we do? He only has like 6 records... I'd suggest they should have an article each. - Joaquin89uy (talk) 11:36, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for the review Ameer al safar (talk) 05:20, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

Prefectural governors' names from Japan (Years 1868-1912)

Hello, Onel5969, this is 124.158.97.1 asking you to help expand the articles from the years 1868 to 1912 (look below to see the prefectural governors names and the years) by adding in the prefectural governors' names from Japan from the articles of the years 1868 to 1912, if you can't talk to me talk to another user to help the user expand the articles from the years 1868 to 1912 by adding in the prefectural governors' names from Japan, please, thank you.124.158.97.1 (talk) 23:12, 28 August 2022 (UTC) (link below)

---Years in Japan--- 1868 in Japan 1869 in Japan 1870 in Japan 1871 in Japan 1872 in Japan 1873 in Japan 1874 in Japan 1876 in Japan 1877 in Japan 1879 in Japan 1882 in Japan 1884 in Japan 1885 in Japan 1886 in Japan 1887 in Japan 1890 in Japan 1891 in Japan 1892 in Japan 1893 in Japan 1894 in Japan 1895 in Japan 1896 in Japan 1897 in Japan 1898 in Japan 1899 in Japan 1900 in Japan 1901 in Japan 1902 in Japan 1903 in Japan 1904 in Japan 1905 in Japan 1906 in Japan 1907 in Japan 1908 in Japan 1909 in Japan 1910 in Japan 1911 in Japan 1912 in Japan

Governors

• Aichi Prefecture: [[]]
• Akita Prefecture: [[]]
• Aomori Prefecture: [[]]
• Ehime Prefecture: [[]]
• Fukui Prefecture: [[]]
• Fukushima Prefecture: [[]]
• Gifu Prefecture: [[]]
• Gunma Prefecture: [[]]
• Hiroshima Prefecture: [[]]
• Ibaraki Prefecture: [[]]
• Ishikawa Prefecture: [[]]
• Iwate Prefecture: [[]]
• Kagawa Prefecture: [[]]
• Kanagawa Prefecture: [[]]
• Kumamoto Prefecture: [[]]
• Kochi Prefecture: [[]]
• Kyoto Prefecture: [[]]
• Mie Prefecture: [[]]
• Miyagi Prefecture: [[]]
• Miyazaki Prefecture: [[]]
• Nagano Prefecture: [[]]
• Nara Prefecture: [[]]
• Niigata Prefecture: [[]]
• Oita Prefecture: [[]]
• Okayama Prefecture: [[]]
• Okinawa Prefecture: [[]]
• Osaka Prefecture: [[]]
• Saga Prefecture: [[]]
• Saitama Prefecture: [[]]
• Shiga Prefecture: [[]]
• Shiname Prefecture: [[]]
• Shizuoka Prefecture: [[]]
• Tochigi Prefecture: [[]]
• Tokushima Prefecture: [[]]
• Tokyo: [[]]
• Toyama Prefecture: [[]]
• Yamagata Prefecture: [[]]
• Yamaguchi Prefecture: [[]]

Prefectural Governors of Japan World Leaders Index

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|124.158.97.1}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~.124.158.97.1 (talk) 23:12, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

A cookie for you!

Thanks for reviewing Lhowa language for me. I added some links as you suggested. Lemajd01 (talk) 10:52, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

Universal truck sim

Why can i not put a popular play store game on Wikipedia?

Google Play should be verifiable enough probably, also why is it so hard to get an article on Wikipedia.

IF this is an encyclopedia, shouldn't there be as much info as possible? smh DragonsBreathUP2 (talk) 21:28, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

No... WP has a policy that notability, which your article did not meet. However, it might be notable, which is why I moved it to draftspace. Read WP:GNG to see what needs to be done to show it is notable. In addition, your comments on your talkpage indicate you have a COI/UPE issue, so also read WP:COI and WP:UPE and take the steps mentioned there. What it means is your article needs to go through AfC to be published. Hope this helps. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:32, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

NPP Awards for 2019

		Redirect Ninja Master Award
		For over 20,000 redirect reviews during 2019. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:16, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

		The New Page Reviewer's Osmium Award
		For over 15,000 article reviews during 2019. Thank you very much for your help at New Pages Patrol! -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:16, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Here are two awards to show appreciation for the NPP reviews you did back in 2019. We realize this is late, but NPP fell behind in some coordination activities. We are just getting caught up. If you don't want to receive "old" barnstars, please just ignore this and reply to let us know not to send you any more. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:16, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion

Hello Onel

My article Strawberrynet (cosmestics) - Wikipedia was nominated for speedy deletion and deleted for unambiguous advertising, can I improve it further then resubmit or should I stay away from creating it? Your advise will be really helpful.

Thank you EverJoking (talk) 14:33, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Hi EverJoking - I don't know about the notability of the entity, so whether or not there should be an article is a different question. But you might want to check out the following pages in WP which were created to help new contributors:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• How to structure and layout your article
• On how to properly format your citations

Hope this helps. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:15, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Promotion

Iam from ta Wiki. Sattai Duraimurugan is a very less famous Person. article in ta.wikipedia Deleted for less coverage. His fans Wrote it in too much Promotion way . Kindly Help to delete. 157.49.253.57 (talk) 12:46, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Request for Training

Hi @user:Onel5969, I have been following you for a while and you have reviewed some of my page, this is me requesting for training for NPR. I hope to hear from you B.Korlah (talk) 09:28, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

Tags

Do you have a problem with the articles I create? A small article like this that has 5 sources is more than enough. Sakiv (talk) 12:34, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

I have no idea what you are talking about. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:36, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

This article Argentina–Palestine relations and more.--Sakiv (talk) 12:40, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

Hi. I'm sure you're familiar with WP:VERIFY, the history section is very undersourced. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:43, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: World Vaisnava Association

Hello Onel5969. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of World Vaisnava Association, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Different from deleted version and hence ineligible for G4. Notability is yet to be determined. Thank you. DatGuy^Talk_Contribs 14:35, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Welcome back

Just noticed you back up at the top of the NPP reviewers list. We might stand a chance of pulling the backlog down now. The Nov 2021 backlog drive nearly knocked it out of me. Mccapra (talk) 20:54, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Hi Mccapra - long time no talk. Hope all is well with you. Don't know if I'm "back" or not. But I saw that there are about 5000 articles beyond the dastardly 90 day limit, so thought I'd take a look at some of them. We'll see how it goes. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:43, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

Board of Trustees election

Thank you for supporting the NPP initiative to improve WMF support of the Page Curation tools. Another way you can help is by voting in the Board of Trustees election. The next Board composition might be giving attention to software development. The election closes on 6 September at 23:59 UTC. View candidate statement videos and Vote Here. MB 03:57, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Paulcell Place, Arizona

The article Paulcell Place, Arizona has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of a populated place; appears to be a former ranch.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –dlthewave ☎ 05:00, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Regarding "Battle of Narnaul"

I had moved Battle of Narnaul to a separate page then simply redirecting it to the district as i wanted to expand the details about the battle, but till the time i collected the data you again redirected it stating it as duplication. I just want to discuss if we could expand the article spearately? Harman Paul (talk) 06:50, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Absolutely. There's no problem with splitting out the battle, as long as there are valid refs to back up the information. To do that, simply cut and paste the info from the city article, but when you do that, you must provide attribution in the edit summary, something like, "Info taken from Narnaul, please see that page's history for attribution". This is required as per Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Then summarize the battle on the city page, and put a link to the battle page by adding: {{Main|Battle of Narnaul}} at the top of the section on the city page. Then, if you are working on developing the page, you can put {{construction}} at the top of the page you are working on. I hope that isn't too confusing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:45, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Added links and removed orphan

Hi @Onel5969

I removed the orphan message from Saturday Night (2022 film) as I linked two articles to it. Adding more. Please check. Thank you for guiding me. Ameer al safar (talk) 11:50, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

NPP Award for 2018

		Redirect Ninja Award
		For over 20,000 redirect reviews during 2018. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 02:58, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

Here is an award to show appreciation for the NPP reviews you did back in 2018. We realize this is late, but NPP fell behind in some coordination activities. We have just caught up with giving out deserved awards. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 02:58, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Point of Rocks, Arizona

The article Point of Rocks, Arizona has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of a populated place or community to mee GEOLAND; no significant coverage to meet GNG. Not to be confused with a the place of the same name on the Salt River in Tempe.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –dlthewave ☎ 04:53, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Big Horn, Arizona

The article Big Horn, Arizona has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This appears to have been a service station and nothing more. No significant coverage to meet GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –dlthewave ☎ 04:58, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lone Mountain Ranch, Arizona

The article Lone Mountain Ranch, Arizona has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable subdivision with no significant coverage beyond real estate advertisements. Not to be confused with Lone Mountain Ranches in Montana and Patagonia which seem to have received more coverage in the local Arizona papers.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –dlthewave ☎ 05:02, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

Sur (San José de las Lajas)

Hi, I made the page Sur (San José de las Lajas) and I’m wondering if I can make a draft of it? Thank you have a nice day CubanoBoi (talk) 11:43, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

Hi CubanoBoi - absolutely. Done. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:17, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

Thank you! CubanoBoi (talk) 19:46, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Mk.gee

Hello Onel5969. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Mk.gee, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Article is considerably more fleshed out that it was last time it was listed, including a large number of new sources. Clearly passes A7 too. Take to AfD if required. . Thank you. GedUK  15:57, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Atsme. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed or created, Demon Queen, and have marked it as unreviewed. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Atsme 💬 📧 16:20, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lone Butte Ranch, Arizona

The article Lone Butte Ranch, Arizona has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is literally just a ranch with no evidence of a community. Fails GEOLAND and GNG due to lack of significant coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –dlthewave ☎ 18:39, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Granite Dells, Arizona

The article Granite Dells, Arizona has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Maps and newspaper coverage show both a geologic feature and a subdivision of the same name, neither of which are notable under GEOLAND or GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –dlthewave ☎ 18:45, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Flower Pot, Arizona

The article Flower Pot, Arizona has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is the location of the Flower Pot Ranch, not a community or otherwise notable place.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –dlthewave ☎ 04:09, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mangum Springs, Arizona

The article Mangum Springs, Arizona has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Aside from the actual spring, there's a group of buildings labelled as "Magnum Spring" or "Magnum Camp", but I'm not finding any coverage to establish notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –dlthewave ☎ 04:15, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Diamond Bell Ranch, Arizona

The article Diamond Bell Ranch, Arizona has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable subdivision; could not locate significant coverage beyond real estate notices and advertisements.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –dlthewave ☎ 04:30, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

Draft Pages

Hello, I wanted to ask if I can move a draft page to an article or its not fine? I have 2 other Draft Pages. Ahmedadeljaff (talk) 10:19, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

I would submit them through the AfC process. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:57, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination for List of Mars Ravelo's Darna (2022 TV series) episodes?

I would like to address that this page I made is NOT a plagiarised from any website (that you claimed). The page contains only the ff:

• titles of each episodes — official episode titles taken from the streaming service iWantTFC (owned by the one who distributed the show — ABS-CBN)

• Social Media hashtag — official hashtag posted every day on weekdays by JRB Creative Production (the one who produced the show).

• The date it first aired and TV ratings of each episodes. — each of the TV ratings are all sourced (from the official account of GMA Public Affairs — one of the leading news outlets in the Philippines).

If you checked the history of the times the page was edited, you can see the page is updated every day, specifically every after each of the episode is aired on TV (except for the previous episodes that were moved from its main page). This page is designed after every single Philippine television show pages that has separate pages for the list of the shows episodes. There is nothing plagiarised from my work and they are all actively updated everyday. Loibird90 (talk) 09:19, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anna_Hudson_(art_historian)

Dear 5969, Could I ask you to read one more article? Thank you in advance, as they say. Joan arden murray (talk) 12:52, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

Done. Nice job. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:40, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

Thanks!.Joan arden murray (talk) 23:48, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

Templating the regulars

Please don't apply the orphan template to articles that are less than three minutes old. Abductive (reasoning) 10:34, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

Sorry about that, Abductive. AWB doesn't show how new the article is, nor who created it, so that's a bit problematic. When I'm creating a new article, I always (well, almost always) put {{construction}} on the page, AWB does show that or {{inuse}}, so it's easy to skip over those. And thanks for all your contributions to the project.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:43, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

I see. But the construction tag doesn't really apply to the task of adding incoming links. So a stub could be completely finished (I often do them in one or two edits), but still momentarily be an orphan. Abductive (reasoning) 10:46, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

Abductive - Let me check something out in a bit. AWB queues up in creation order, apparently beginning with the newest articles. After I finish the queue this morning, I'll check to see if it will queue in reverse order, and doesn't keep adding new stuff to the queue, that way, I won't be looking at just created articles. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:56, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

Groovy. Abductive (reasoning) 10:57, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

Abductive - okay, while I can't reverse sort by time, I can put them in alpha order, that should alleviate any issues about newness for the most part. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:22, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

Bath Interferometer

It looks like you reverted my recent changes to the Bath_interferometer_(common_path) page.

My changes were to remove mention of "on axis" Bath as I was mistaken when I originally discussed that - someone pointed out that a "on axis bath" is something completely different and not found in any published literature so I wanted to remove that term. Maybe I should explain this on the talk page? Is that the issue? Or in the edit summary? I may have forgotten to mention anything in the edit summary. Is that the issue? Gr5555 (talk) 13:52, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

Not sure why you think that Gr5555, I've never edited the page, simply reviewed it. You can figure out who did the edit by looking at the page history. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:05, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

Oh! Hmm. Okay. I'm now thinking I never finished my edits and hit the publish button. It's just that I got an email from wikipedia saying the page "had been changed" by you and when I looked there were no changes for months. Even though I was pretty sure I changed it a few days ago. I'll do my edits again. Gr5555 (talk) 18:02, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

Sagua la Chica

Hi, I want to make a page about the town of Sagua la Chica but it redirects to Camajuaní, the person who made it is inactive and in wondering if I should/could make the page? Thank you!CubanoBoi (talk) 18:03, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

CubanoBoi - If you think there is enough sourcing to show that it meets notability criteria, it's perfectly fine to change the redirect into a regular page, as long as the Sagua la Chica you're creating is the same one as the one in Camajuani. If it isn't let me know and I'll turn the redirect into a dab page, and you can create a wholly new article. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:38, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

thank you!!!!! CubanoBoi (talk) 21:39, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

Sani Maikatanga

Hello, friends, and thank you for your thoughts on the subject at hand. I saw your comment, which stated that the "article contains content that is written like an advertisement." Please keep in mind that I contributed to that article solely on the basis of my knowledge of the subject and nothing else. As a result, I recommend that you make any changes you deem necessary and remove the template message. You can, however, highlight to me the areas you believe are advertising him. You should understand that everyone has their own style of writing articles, which may be perceived as advertising by some. Thank you. Safercontent (talk) 23:17, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Quinlin, Arizona

The article Quinlin, Arizona has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to be the former site of a ranch; no evidence of a populated place.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –dlthewave ☎ 02:01, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Tartron, Arizona

The article Tartron, Arizona has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Railroad siding mislabeled as a populated place.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –dlthewave ☎ 02:08, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Beardsley, Arizona

The article Beardsley, Arizona has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to be nothing more than a former rail siding and depot, no evidence of a populated place.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –dlthewave ☎ 02:21, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Raso, Arizona

The article Raso, Arizona has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable railroad stop

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –dlthewave ☎ 02:41, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Midway, Maricopa County, Arizona

The article Midway, Maricopa County, Arizona has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable railroad siding

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –dlthewave ☎ 02:45, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Growler, Arizona for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Growler, Arizona is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Growler, Arizona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

–dlthewave ☎ 03:08, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Saddle, Arizona

The article Saddle, Arizona has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable rail siding.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –dlthewave ☎ 03:10, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Smurr, Arizona

The article Smurr, Arizona has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of a populated place at this location; name appears to refer to a railroad junction/depot area

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –dlthewave ☎ 03:15, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Serape, Arizona

The article Serape, Arizona has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of a populated place; name appears to refer to a depot/junction area

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –dlthewave ☎ 03:15, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dixie, Arizona

The article Dixie, Arizona has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Rail depot mislabeled as a populated place

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –dlthewave ☎ 03:24, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Camel, Arizona

The article Camel, Arizona has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable rail siding.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –dlthewave ☎ 03:27, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Griffith, Arizona

The article Griffith, Arizona has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Railroad junction mislabeled as a populated place

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –dlthewave ☎ 03:32, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

draft:Hossein Kamalabadi

Greetings and courtesy. Please convert draft:Hossein Kamalabadi to article. Ostad10 (talk) 06:55, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

draft:Hossein Kamalabadi

Greetings and courtesy. Please convert draft to article. Ostad10 (talk) 06:55, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

Umar Gombe

Thank you for reviewing the subject page. Please note that two pages were introduced to it and I linked them to the page. Safercontent (talk) 14:04, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

draft: Bawdie

Pls my article Bawdie on Draft has been improved. Kindly review for me. Boadu Emma (talk) 22:12, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

Help re: possible merger of Freak Alley Gallery into Freak Alley

Hello Onel5969, do you think that Freak Alley Gallery that you recently reviewed should be merged into Freak Alley which has already existed for some years?

Altho I am not a new user, the procedure for doing mergers totally confuses me for some reason; I just can't seem to wrap my head around the instructions. Would you happen to know if there is a tool I can install to help with the process? I noticed that you a member of WikiProject:Merge, so thought you would be a good person to ask. Thanks in advance! Netherzone (talk) 14:22, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

Hi Netherzone - Nice catch. I'd be happy to merge, but since there is really nothing to merge (except pics, which I would not merge as per NOTGALLERY), I've simply redirected it. And I agree, some of the processes can be daunting if you don't do them regularly. Personally, I used to always have to bring up the WP page on merging anytime I did one, until I merged 100 or so articles. Even now, it's still tricky for me. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:29, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for such a quick response! I saw that you simply did a redirect, which in this case makes a lot of sense. Glad to know I'm not the only one who thinks the merger procedure is daunting! All best, Netherzone (talk) 14:31, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orest_Semchishen

Dear Onel5969^{TT me}, Could you look at this article for me? Thank you, Joan arden murray (talk) 17:24, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

Hi there... you need to flesh out the lead. At the very least it should say what the subject is. Other than that, it's fine. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:44, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Will do and thank you for advice, Joan arden murray (talk) 11:15, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

What is the draft template?

Title. I made a page called Draft:Fusté but I don’t know what the template for drafts are, thank you CubanoBoi (talk) 20:03, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

Hi. Not sure what you're asking for here. You've created it in draft, there is no "template" for drafts. Are you trying to move it into mainspace? Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:15, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

(talk page watcher) I think you're looking for {{AfC submission|t}}. Press "Submit" in order to submit it. I added it here. Hope that helps. –Novem Linguae (talk) 23:01, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Burns, Arizona

The article Burns, Arizona has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of a community here.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –dlthewave ☎ 12:52, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bledsoe, Arizona

The article Bledsoe, Arizona has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of a distinct community here.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –dlthewave ☎ 12:55, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Berry, Arizona

The article Berry, Arizona has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable railroad siding.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –dlthewave ☎ 12:57, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Lita Tresierra

Hello Onel5969. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Lita Tresierra, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: not substantially identical to the deleted version. Thank you. Salvio 19:12, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Granite Dells, Arizona for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Granite Dells, Arizona is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Granite Dells, Arizona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

–dlthewave ☎ 02:02, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bradberry, Arizona

The article Bradberry, Arizona has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of a populated place at this location.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –dlthewave ☎ 04:05, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sawmill, Gila County, Arizona

The article Sawmill, Gila County, Arizona has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of a community; appears to be a ranch with a tank/pond named Sawmill

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –dlthewave ☎ 04:14, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Hunter Creek Ranch, Arizona

The article Hunter Creek Ranch, Arizona has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable subdivision.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –dlthewave ☎ 04:40, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Cleared the issue

As you suggested recently in Ananya Raj, I have cleared the issues please take a look Ameer al safar (talk) 17:22, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Sorry, all you have there are press and promotional interviews, which don't go to notability. And only her upcoming role is potentially significant, so at best, a redirect to the film article if and when it is written would be appropriate. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:58, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Clearing Sri Ranveer Sanskrit Vidyalaya

Maybe there should have been an AfD for the 139 yr old school's article with consensus before blanking and redirecting it? User4edits (talk) 18:18, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Or maybe you could take the time to find 3 in-depth refs from independent reliable sources. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:41, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply. Yes I would have had if you had WP:PROD or WP:AFD the article or even left a message on my Talk page before blanking and redirecting. User4edits (talk) 21:35, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

The article was there for months without improvement. Exactly when did you plan on doing what you should have done in the first place? You do understand that redirection is deletion. If you want to add the necessary sourcing to show GNG, simply revert and add the citations. PROD or AFD simply wastes other editors' time. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:55, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Webb, Arizona for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Webb, Arizona is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Webb, Arizona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

–dlthewave ☎ 03:19, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Archae (disambiguation)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Archae (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 12:06, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

Review Article

Hi! My new friend, can you please review Shantikunj. There were too many issues like written like advertisement, may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines and may rely excessively on sources too closely associated with the subject. So I have fixed that issues like removed uncited sentences and added reliable sources whose point of view is neutral so can you remove that template and mark it as reviewed? Contributor008 (talk) 15:37, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Saddle, Arizona for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Saddle, Arizona is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saddle, Arizona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

–dlthewave ☎ 16:55, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Midway, Maricopa County, Arizona for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Midway, Maricopa County, Arizona is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Midway, Maricopa County, Arizona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

–dlthewave ☎ 19:33, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

Revert of Mall at the World Trade Center

Why did you revert/remove the split article of Mall at the World Trade Center ?

What is "WP:NSPLIT"?.. I can't find anything about NSPLIT. YitzhakNat (talk) 20:13, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

Sorry, typo. WP:SPLIT. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:34, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

Removal of redirects on Family Guy episode articles

May want to keep an eye on Legobro99. They took it upon themselves to begin mass-reverting the redirects for Family Guy episode articles. Cheers. DonIago (talk) 20:25, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

why? the Episodes are notable. Legobro99 (talk) 20:27, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

No, they're not. And if you think they are, then put the effort into providing the citations and references to show they are. If you continue to edit war, you may get yourself blocked. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:33, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

Yeah, some folks are just not here to build an encyclopedia. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:33, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

About Tilak Weerasooriya being moved to draftspace

Hi, apologies for some of the information that appears to have not been sufficiently referenced.

However, Prof Weerasooriya was a former Dean of the University of Ruhuna (Faculty of Medicine), and also a Deputy Vice Chancellor (Academic) - Kotelawala Defence University.

Additionally, he pioneered in Sri Lanka, the first of many, including an Andrology Clinic, Sperm Bank, and National IVF Lab. As shown by his several published research papers and links (I cited 63 links as references, including news articles and publications). One of his colleagues was Susirith Mendis, and he worked with G. P. Samarawickrama.

Also, at the Kotelawala Defence University, the other Vice Chancellors are also included on Wikipedia, examples being ,Major General Milinda Peiris RWP RSP VSV,and Major General Sumith Balasuriya, USP, ndc, IG, SLA.

Regarding WP:COI or WP:UPE, please do further illustrate as to how I have violated that, I will then fix it or clarify it.

Kindly let me know, as to how this article continues to fall short of the notability guideline, thank you.

Any prominent physician or medical academic/professional in Sri Lanka can verify Prof Weerasooriya's credentials.

Looking forward to your reply.

Cheers. (talk) 08:59, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

Hi. To handle the evident COI/UPE issue, follow the steps given at either WP:COI or WP:UPE. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:14, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mr. Fingers (disambiguation)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mr. Fingers (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:06, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Dhiren Bhagat

Hello Onel5969. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Dhiren Bhagat, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: not substantially identical to the deleted version. Thank you. Salvio 17:44, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for the reviews! X-750 List of articles that I have screwed over 00:09, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

Purangan

please review Purangan — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shashanka Hazra (talk • contribs) 02:00, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

Alex Kofi Donkor

Good day,

It is a great pleasure to meet you and I am excited to be actively part of the Wikipedia community.

To begin with, I realised my article was struck down because there were not enough information from notable sources to create a stub for the above mentioned personality.

However, I am of a contrary view as I have come across several notable sources and information on Alex Kofi Donkor. I am will be humbled if the page will be restored so that, I can continue with the work I started on the above mentioned personality.

Thank you and looking forward to your response.

Best Regards, Zekie The Geek Zekie The Geek (talk) 20:30, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

Hi. Perhaps the best thing you can do is work on the article in the draft space, then when you think it's ready, I could review it for you. If you'd like to do that, I'll move your original into draft. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:04, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Appeal to restore JL Toreliza article

Hello, I would like to appeal about the restoration of the page JL Toreliza because I believe I can improve the page to a better one. I am hoping for your consideration. Troy26Castillo (talk) 05:25, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

If you wish to develop an article, the best way to do it is in Draft space, that way you can take your time and flesh the article out. The issue with the article you created was that there were simply not enough in-depth sources about the individual musician himself. Virtually everything was about him in respect to the band. Hope this helps. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:02, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Okey, I get it. Thank you for the tip. If in case that I can find sources about the said musician. I want to let you know and ask a permission, at the same time, if I can undone the last edit you did. Troy26Castillo (talk) 11:55, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

No worries. I've put it in draftspace for you, you can find it here: Draft:JL Toreliza, so that you can develop it. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:59, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Best Ex

Hi, inquiring about why the page for Best Ex was sent to draft after being published with no notes? Please advise. I have added additional information, and numerous sources are included, including links to related acts on Wiki. 2600:4041:54F1:1400:91B5:6FCA:6A32:F2FD (talk) 16:36, 19 September 2022 (UTC)