Jump to content

BioRxiv: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
GreenC bot (talk | contribs)
Move 2 urls. Wayback Medic 2.5
Some reorganizing, posting peer reviews
Line 19: Line 19:
}}
}}
{{lowercase title}}
{{lowercase title}}
'''bioRxiv''' (pronounced "bio-archive"<ref name=About>{{cite web |title=Advancing the sharing of research results for the life sciences |url=https://www.biorxiv.org/about-biorxiv |publisher=bioRxiv |access-date=2018-12-12}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Sever |first1=Richard |last2=Roeder |first2=Ted |last3=Hindle |first3=Samantha |last4=Sussman |first4=Linda |last5=Black |first5=Kevin-John |last6=Argentine |first6=Janet |last7=Manos |first7=Wayne |last8=Inglis |first8=John R. |date=November 6, 2019 |journal=bioRxiv |access-date=April 23, 2022 |title=bioRxiv: the preprint server for biology |url=https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/833400v1 |language=en |pages=833400 |doi=10.1101/833400 |s2cid=209580681}}</ref>) is an [[open access]] [[preprint]] [[disciplinary repository|repository]] for the [[biological sciences]] co-founded by [[John R. Inglis|John Inglis]] and [[Richard Sever]] in November 2013.<ref name=Nature1>{{cite journal |last1=Callaway |first1=Ewen |title=Preprints come to life |journal=[[Nature (journal)|Nature]] |date=12 November 2013 |volume=503 |issue=7475 |page=180 |doi=10.1038/503180a |pmid=24226869 |doi-access=free|bibcode=2013Natur.503..180C }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |author=Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory |title=bioRxiv preprints can now be submitted directly to leading research journals |url=https://phys.org/news/2016-01-biorxiv-preprints-submitted-journals.html |website=[[PhysOrg]] |access-date=2018-03-17}}</ref> It is hosted by the [[Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory]] (CSHL).<ref>{{cite web |title=About bioRxiv |url=http://biorxiv.org/about-biorxiv |work=bioRxiv |publisher=[[Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory]] |access-date=2016-09-07}}</ref> As preprints, papers hosted on bioRxiv are not [[peer-review]]ed, but undergo basic screening and checked against plagiarism. Readers may offer comments on the preprint. It was inspired by and intends to complement the [[arXiv]] repository, which mostly focuses on [[mathematics]], [[physics]] and connected disciplines, launched in 1991 by [[Paul Ginsparg]] (who also serves on the bioRxiv advisory board). It received support from both the CSHL and the [[Lourie Foundation]].<ref name=ASAPbio>{{cite web |last1=Inglis |first1=John R. |last2=Sever |first2=Richard |date=12 February 2016 |title=bioRxiv: a progress report |url=http://asapbio.org/biorxiv |work=[[ASAPbio]]|access-date=2016-09-11}}</ref> Additional funding from the [[Chan Zuckerberg Initiative]] was confirmed in April 2017.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Callaway |first=Ewen |title=BioRxiv preprint server gets cash boost from Chan Zuckerberg Initiative |journal=Nature |volume=545 |issue=7652 |pages=18 |language=en |doi=10.1038/nature.2017.21894|pmid=28470210 |bibcode=2017Natur.545...18C |year=2017 |doi-access=free }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Kaiser |first1=Jocelyn |title=BioRxiv preprint server gets funding from Chan Zuckerberg Initiative |journal=Science |date=26 April 2017 |doi=10.1126/science.aal1117}}</ref>
'''bioRxiv''' (pronounced "bio-archive"<ref name=About>{{cite web |title=Advancing the sharing of research results for the life sciences |url=https://www.biorxiv.org/about-biorxiv |publisher=bioRxiv |access-date=2018-12-12}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Sever |first1=Richard |last2=Roeder |first2=Ted |last3=Hindle |first3=Samantha |last4=Sussman |first4=Linda |last5=Black |first5=Kevin-John |last6=Argentine |first6=Janet |last7=Manos |first7=Wayne |last8=Inglis |first8=John R. |date=November 6, 2019 |journal=bioRxiv |access-date=April 23, 2022 |title=bioRxiv: the preprint server for biology |url=https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/833400v1 |language=en |pages=833400 |doi=10.1101/833400 |s2cid=209580681}}</ref>) is an [[open access]] [[preprint]] [[disciplinary repository|repository]] for the [[biological sciences]] co-founded by [[John R. Inglis|John Inglis]] and [[Richard Sever]] in November 2013.<ref name=Nature1>{{cite journal |last1=Callaway |first1=Ewen |title=Preprints come to life |journal=[[Nature (journal)|Nature]] |date=12 November 2013 |volume=503 |issue=7475 |page=180 |doi=10.1038/503180a |pmid=24226869 |doi-access=free|bibcode=2013Natur.503..180C }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |author=Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory |title=bioRxiv preprints can now be submitted directly to leading research journals |url=https://phys.org/news/2016-01-biorxiv-preprints-submitted-journals.html |website=[[PhysOrg]] |access-date=2018-03-17}}</ref> It is hosted by the [[Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory]] (CSHL).<ref>{{cite web |title=About bioRxiv |url=http://biorxiv.org/about-biorxiv |work=bioRxiv |publisher=[[Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory]] |access-date=2016-09-07}}</ref> As preprints, papers hosted on bioRxiv are not [[peer-review]]ed, but undergo basic screening and checked against plagiarism. Readers may offer comments on the preprint.

Prior to the establishment of bioRxiv, biological scientists were divided on the issue of having a dedicated preprint [[open-access repository]].<ref name=Nature1/> Many had concerns of having their research [[scoop (news)|scooped]] by competitors and losing their claim to [[discovery (observation)|discovery]]. However, several geneticists had submitted papers to the "[[quantitative biology]]" section of the arXiv repository (launched in 2003) and no longer had those concerns, as they could point to preprints to support their claims of discovery.<ref name=Nature1/><ref name=Nature2>{{cite journal |last1=Callaway |first1=Ewen |title=Geneticists eye the potential of arXiv |journal=[[Nature (journal)|Nature]] |date=31 July 2012 |volume=488 |issue=7409 |page=19 |doi=10.1038/488019a |doi-access=free |pmid=22859182|bibcode=2012Natur.488...19C }}</ref>


As a result of bioRxiv's popularity, many biology journals have updated their policies on preprints,<ref name=ASAPbio/><ref name=Science/> clarifying they do not consider preprints to be a 'prior publication' for purpose of the [[Ingelfinger rule]]. Over 20,000 [[Twitter|tweets]] were made about bioRxiv-hosted preprints in 2015.<ref name=ASAPbio/> In July 2017, the number of monthly submissions exceeded 1,000.<ref name=JohnInglisTweet>{{cite web|url=https://twitter.com/JohnRInglis/status/880996280616484864|title=A life sci #preprint milestone: @biorxivpreprint's first >1000 ms month. Thanks to authors, affiliates, and staff for making it happen|last=Inglis|first=John|date=2017-06-30|website=@JohnRInglis|access-date=2017-07-02}}</ref> As of December 31, 2019, over 68,000 papers have been accepted in total.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.biorxiv.org/search/limit_from:2010-01-01%20limit_to:2019-12-31%20numresults:10%20sort:relevance-rank%20format_result:standard|title=Search Results {{!}} bioRxiv|website=biorxiv.org|language=en|access-date=2020-01-21}}</ref>
As a result of bioRxiv's popularity, many biology journals have updated their policies on preprints,<ref name=ASAPbio/><ref name=Science/> clarifying they do not consider preprints to be a 'prior publication' for purpose of the [[Ingelfinger rule]]. Over 20,000 [[Twitter|tweets]] were made about bioRxiv-hosted preprints in 2015.<ref name=ASAPbio/> In July 2017, the number of monthly submissions exceeded 1,000.<ref name=JohnInglisTweet>{{cite web|url=https://twitter.com/JohnRInglis/status/880996280616484864|title=A life sci #preprint milestone: @biorxivpreprint's first >1000 ms month. Thanks to authors, affiliates, and staff for making it happen|last=Inglis|first=John|date=2017-06-30|website=@JohnRInglis|access-date=2017-07-02}}</ref> As of December 31, 2019, over 68,000 papers have been accepted in total.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.biorxiv.org/search/limit_from:2010-01-01%20limit_to:2019-12-31%20numresults:10%20sort:relevance-rank%20format_result:standard|title=Search Results {{!}} bioRxiv|website=biorxiv.org|language=en|access-date=2020-01-21}}</ref>
Line 28: Line 26:


MedRxiv, and its sister site, bioRxiv, have been major sources for the dissemination of [[COVID-19]] research.<ref>{{Cite news|last=Yan|first=Wudan|date=2020-04-14|title=Coronavirus Tests Science's Need for Speed Limits|language=en-US|work=The New York Times|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/14/science/coronavirus-disinformation.html|access-date=2020-05-01|issn=0362-4331}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|last=Koerth|first=Maggie|date=2021-07-08|title=How Science Moved Beyond Peer Review During The Pandemic|url=https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/how-science-moved-beyond-peer-review-during-the-pandemic/|access-date=2021-08-07|website=FiveThirtyEight|language=en-US}}</ref>
MedRxiv, and its sister site, bioRxiv, have been major sources for the dissemination of [[COVID-19]] research.<ref>{{Cite news|last=Yan|first=Wudan|date=2020-04-14|title=Coronavirus Tests Science's Need for Speed Limits|language=en-US|work=The New York Times|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/14/science/coronavirus-disinformation.html|access-date=2020-05-01|issn=0362-4331}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|last=Koerth|first=Maggie|date=2021-07-08|title=How Science Moved Beyond Peer Review During The Pandemic|url=https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/how-science-moved-beyond-peer-review-during-the-pandemic/|access-date=2021-08-07|website=FiveThirtyEight|language=en-US}}</ref>

==History==

BioRxiv was inspired by and intends to complement the [[arXiv]] repository, which mostly focuses on [[mathematics]], [[physics]] and connected disciplines, launched in 1991 by [[Paul Ginsparg]] (who also serves on the bioRxiv advisory board). It received support from both the CSHL and the [[Lourie Foundation]].<ref name=ASAPbio>{{cite web |last1=Inglis |first1=John R. |last2=Sever |first2=Richard |date=12 February 2016 |title=bioRxiv: a progress report |url=http://asapbio.org/biorxiv |work=[[ASAPbio]]|access-date=2016-09-11}}</ref> Additional funding from the [[Chan Zuckerberg Initiative]] was confirmed in April 2017.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Callaway |first=Ewen |title=BioRxiv preprint server gets cash boost from Chan Zuckerberg Initiative |journal=Nature |volume=545 |issue=7652 |pages=18 |language=en |doi=10.1038/nature.2017.21894|pmid=28470210 |bibcode=2017Natur.545...18C |year=2017 |doi-access=free }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Kaiser |first1=Jocelyn |title=BioRxiv preprint server gets funding from Chan Zuckerberg Initiative |journal=Science |date=26 April 2017 |doi=10.1126/science.aal1117}}</ref>

Prior to the establishment of bioRxiv, biological scientists were divided on the issue of having a dedicated preprint [[open-access repository]].<ref name=Nature1/> Many had concerns of having their research [[scoop (news)|scooped]] by competitors and losing their claim to [[discovery (observation)|discovery]]. However, several geneticists had submitted papers to the "[[quantitative biology]]" section of the arXiv repository (launched in 2003) and no longer had those concerns, as they could point to preprints to support their claims of discovery.<ref name=Nature1/><ref name=Nature2>{{cite journal |last1=Callaway |first1=Ewen |title=Geneticists eye the potential of arXiv |journal=[[Nature (journal)|Nature]] |date=31 July 2012 |volume=488 |issue=7409 |page=19 |doi=10.1038/488019a |doi-access=free |pmid=22859182|bibcode=2012Natur.488...19C }}</ref>


==Submission rate==
==Submission rate==

Jocelyn Kaiser of ''[[Science (journal)|Science]]'' said that in their first year, the repository had "attracted a modest but growing stream of papers", having hosted 824 preprints.<ref name=Science>{{cite web |last=Kaiser |first=Jocelyn |date=11 November 2014 |title=BioRxiv at 1 year: A promising start |url=https://www.science.org/content/article/biorxiv-1-year-promising-start |work=[[Science (journal)|Science]] |access-date=2016-09-07}}</ref> As of February 2016, the submission rate to bioRxiv had steadily increased from ≈60 to ≈200 per month.<ref name=ASAPbio/> In 2017, the number of monthly submissions rose from over 800 in March<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://twitter.com/JohnRInglis/status/836809771722366978|title=John Inglis on Twitter|work=Twitter|access-date=2017-03-01|language=en}}</ref> to more than 1000 in July<ref name=JohnInglisTweet/> with a total number of 10,722 papers submitted in 2017.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.biorxiv.org/search/limit_from:2017-01-01%20limit_to:2017-12-31%20numresults:10%20sort:relevance-rank%20format_result:standard|title=Search Results {{!}} bioRxiv|website=biorxiv.org|language=en|access-date=2018-10-22}}</ref> In the year of 2018, a total of 20,000 manuscripts were submitted, which results in a monthly average of 1600 papers.<ref name="urlSearch2018">{{cite web |url=https://www.biorxiv.org/search/limit_from:2018-01-01%20limit_to:2018-12-31%20numresults:10%20sort:relevance-rank%20format_result:standard |title=Search Results &#124; bioRxiv }}</ref>
Jocelyn Kaiser of ''[[Science (journal)|Science]]'' said that in their first year, the repository had "attracted a modest but growing stream of papers", having hosted 824 preprints.<ref name=Science>{{cite web |last=Kaiser |first=Jocelyn |date=11 November 2014 |title=BioRxiv at 1 year: A promising start |url=https://www.science.org/content/article/biorxiv-1-year-promising-start |work=[[Science (journal)|Science]] |access-date=2016-09-07}}</ref> As of February 2016, the submission rate to bioRxiv had steadily increased from ≈60 to ≈200 per month.<ref name=ASAPbio/> In 2017, the number of monthly submissions rose from over 800 in March<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://twitter.com/JohnRInglis/status/836809771722366978|title=John Inglis on Twitter|work=Twitter|access-date=2017-03-01|language=en}}</ref> to more than 1000 in July<ref name=JohnInglisTweet/> with a total number of 10,722 papers submitted in 2017.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.biorxiv.org/search/limit_from:2017-01-01%20limit_to:2017-12-31%20numresults:10%20sort:relevance-rank%20format_result:standard|title=Search Results {{!}} bioRxiv|website=biorxiv.org|language=en|access-date=2018-10-22}}</ref> In the year of 2018, a total of 20,000 manuscripts were submitted, which results in a monthly average of 1600 papers.<ref name="urlSearch2018">{{cite web |url=https://www.biorxiv.org/search/limit_from:2018-01-01%20limit_to:2018-12-31%20numresults:10%20sort:relevance-rank%20format_result:standard |title=Search Results &#124; bioRxiv }}</ref>
In the year 2019, over 31,000 manuscripts were submitted, which results in a monthly average of 2600 papers (which accelerated to just over 3000 papers per month in the last quarter of 2019).<ref name="urlSearch2019">{{cite web |url=https://www.biorxiv.org/search/limit_from:2019-01-01%20limit_to:2019-12-31%20numresults:10%20sort:relevance-rank%20format_result:standard |title=Search Results &#124; bioRxiv }}</ref>
In the year 2019, over 31,000 manuscripts were submitted, which results in a monthly average of 2600 papers (which accelerated to just over 3000 papers per month in the last quarter of 2019).<ref name="urlSearch2019">{{cite web |url=https://www.biorxiv.org/search/limit_from:2019-01-01%20limit_to:2019-12-31%20numresults:10%20sort:relevance-rank%20format_result:standard |title=Search Results &#124; bioRxiv }}</ref>


==Fields==
==Fields==

bioRxiv accepts preprints in the following disciplines
bioRxiv accepts preprints in the following disciplines
{{columns-list|colwidth=20em|
{{columns-list|colwidth=20em|
Line 65: Line 71:
}}
}}


==bioRxiv to Journals ==
==bioRxiv and journals ==

The bioRxiv to Journals (B2J) initiative allows authors to submit their manuscript directly to a journal's submission system through bioRxiv. As of May 2020, 177 journals participate in the initiative.<ref name=About/>
The bioRxiv to Journals (B2J) initiative allows authors to submit their manuscript directly to a journal's submission system through bioRxiv. As of May 2020, 177 journals participate in the initiative.<ref name=About/>

In 2019, BioRxiv started allowing posting reviews alongside preprints, in addition to allowing comments on preprints. The reviews can come from journals or from platforms such as Review Commons.<ref name="Brainard"/>


==See also==
==See also==
Line 76: Line 85:


==References==
==References==
{{Reflist}}
{{Reflist|refs=
<ref name="Brainard">{{cite journal | last=Brainard | first=Jeffrey | title=In bid to boost transparency, bioRxiv begins posting peer reviews next to preprints | journal=Science | publisher=American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) | date=2019-10-10 | issn=0036-8075 | doi=10.1126/science.aaz8160 | s2cid=211766434 }}</ref>
}}


==Further reading==
==Further reading==

Revision as of 08:47, 27 September 2022

bioRxiv
Type of site
Science
Available inEnglish
OwnerCold Spring Harbor Laboratory
URLbiorxiv.org
CommercialNo
LaunchedNovember 2013; 11 years ago (2013-11)
Current statusOnline

bioRxiv (pronounced "bio-archive"[1][2]) is an open access preprint repository for the biological sciences co-founded by John Inglis and Richard Sever in November 2013.[3][4] It is hosted by the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory (CSHL).[5] As preprints, papers hosted on bioRxiv are not peer-reviewed, but undergo basic screening and checked against plagiarism. Readers may offer comments on the preprint.

As a result of bioRxiv's popularity, many biology journals have updated their policies on preprints,[6][7] clarifying they do not consider preprints to be a 'prior publication' for purpose of the Ingelfinger rule. Over 20,000 tweets were made about bioRxiv-hosted preprints in 2015.[6] In July 2017, the number of monthly submissions exceeded 1,000.[8] As of December 31, 2019, over 68,000 papers have been accepted in total.[9]

It has been measured that two thirds of the papers posted in bioRxiv are later published in peer-reviewed journals.[10] A service called Rxivist parses the metadata of preprints from bioRxiv, and combines it with data from Twitter allowing to detect trending preprints.[11]

MedRxiv, and its sister site, bioRxiv, have been major sources for the dissemination of COVID-19 research.[12][13]

History

BioRxiv was inspired by and intends to complement the arXiv repository, which mostly focuses on mathematics, physics and connected disciplines, launched in 1991 by Paul Ginsparg (who also serves on the bioRxiv advisory board). It received support from both the CSHL and the Lourie Foundation.[6] Additional funding from the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative was confirmed in April 2017.[14][15]

Prior to the establishment of bioRxiv, biological scientists were divided on the issue of having a dedicated preprint open-access repository.[3] Many had concerns of having their research scooped by competitors and losing their claim to discovery. However, several geneticists had submitted papers to the "quantitative biology" section of the arXiv repository (launched in 2003) and no longer had those concerns, as they could point to preprints to support their claims of discovery.[3][16]

Submission rate

Jocelyn Kaiser of Science said that in their first year, the repository had "attracted a modest but growing stream of papers", having hosted 824 preprints.[7] As of February 2016, the submission rate to bioRxiv had steadily increased from ≈60 to ≈200 per month.[6] In 2017, the number of monthly submissions rose from over 800 in March[17] to more than 1000 in July[8] with a total number of 10,722 papers submitted in 2017.[18] In the year of 2018, a total of 20,000 manuscripts were submitted, which results in a monthly average of 1600 papers.[19] In the year 2019, over 31,000 manuscripts were submitted, which results in a monthly average of 2600 papers (which accelerated to just over 3000 papers per month in the last quarter of 2019).[20]

Fields

bioRxiv accepts preprints in the following disciplines

bioRxiv and journals

The bioRxiv to Journals (B2J) initiative allows authors to submit their manuscript directly to a journal's submission system through bioRxiv. As of May 2020, 177 journals participate in the initiative.[1]

In 2019, BioRxiv started allowing posting reviews alongside preprints, in addition to allowing comments on preprints. The reviews can come from journals or from platforms such as Review Commons.[21]

See also

References

  1. ^ a b "Advancing the sharing of research results for the life sciences". bioRxiv. Retrieved 2018-12-12.
  2. ^ Sever, Richard; Roeder, Ted; Hindle, Samantha; Sussman, Linda; Black, Kevin-John; Argentine, Janet; Manos, Wayne; Inglis, John R. (November 6, 2019). "bioRxiv: the preprint server for biology". bioRxiv: 833400. doi:10.1101/833400. S2CID 209580681. Retrieved April 23, 2022.
  3. ^ a b c Callaway, Ewen (12 November 2013). "Preprints come to life". Nature. 503 (7475): 180. Bibcode:2013Natur.503..180C. doi:10.1038/503180a. PMID 24226869.
  4. ^ Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory. "bioRxiv preprints can now be submitted directly to leading research journals". PhysOrg. Retrieved 2018-03-17.
  5. ^ "About bioRxiv". bioRxiv. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory. Retrieved 2016-09-07.
  6. ^ a b c d Inglis, John R.; Sever, Richard (12 February 2016). "bioRxiv: a progress report". ASAPbio. Retrieved 2016-09-11.
  7. ^ a b Kaiser, Jocelyn (11 November 2014). "BioRxiv at 1 year: A promising start". Science. Retrieved 2016-09-07.
  8. ^ a b Inglis, John (2017-06-30). "A life sci #preprint milestone: @biorxivpreprint's first >1000 ms month. Thanks to authors, affiliates, and staff for making it happen". @JohnRInglis. Retrieved 2017-07-02.
  9. ^ "Search Results | bioRxiv". biorxiv.org. Retrieved 2020-01-21.
  10. ^ Abdill, Richard J (24 April 2019). "Meta-Research, Tracking the popularity and outcomes of all bioRxiv preprints". eLife. 8: e45133. doi:10.7554/eLife.45133. S2CID 129944106.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  11. ^ "Rxivist: Find interesting preprints". rxivist.org.
  12. ^ Yan, Wudan (2020-04-14). "Coronavirus Tests Science's Need for Speed Limits". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2020-05-01.
  13. ^ Koerth, Maggie (2021-07-08). "How Science Moved Beyond Peer Review During The Pandemic". FiveThirtyEight. Retrieved 2021-08-07.
  14. ^ Callaway, Ewen (2017). "BioRxiv preprint server gets cash boost from Chan Zuckerberg Initiative". Nature. 545 (7652): 18. Bibcode:2017Natur.545...18C. doi:10.1038/nature.2017.21894. PMID 28470210.
  15. ^ Kaiser, Jocelyn (26 April 2017). "BioRxiv preprint server gets funding from Chan Zuckerberg Initiative". Science. doi:10.1126/science.aal1117.
  16. ^ Callaway, Ewen (31 July 2012). "Geneticists eye the potential of arXiv". Nature. 488 (7409): 19. Bibcode:2012Natur.488...19C. doi:10.1038/488019a. PMID 22859182.
  17. ^ "John Inglis on Twitter". Twitter. Retrieved 2017-03-01.
  18. ^ "Search Results | bioRxiv". biorxiv.org. Retrieved 2018-10-22.
  19. ^ "Search Results | bioRxiv".
  20. ^ "Search Results | bioRxiv".
  21. ^ Brainard, Jeffrey (2019-10-10). "In bid to boost transparency, bioRxiv begins posting peer reviews next to preprints". Science. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). doi:10.1126/science.aaz8160. ISSN 0036-8075. S2CID 211766434.

Further reading