Talk:Changesite-(Y): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 13:03, 29 September 2022

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Spaceflight Stub‑class Low‑importance

	Spaceflight portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Geology Stub‑class Mid‑importance

	Geology portal Talk:Changesite-(Y) is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Rocks and minerals Stub‑class High‑importance

	Earth sciences portal Changesite-(Y) is part of WikiProject Rocks and minerals, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use rocks and minerals resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Rocks and mineralsWikipedia:WikiProject Rocks and mineralsTemplate:WikiProject Rocks and mineralsRocks and minerals articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

China Stub‑class Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Can't verify if Changesite-(Y) was approved by the IMA

Changesite-(Y) does not appear on the latest September list of Approved Mineral Names released by the International Mineralogical Association's Commission on New Minerals, Nomenclature and Classification (IMA-CNMNC):

http://cnmnc.main.jp/

It's also not in the most recent CNMNC newsletter, where the names of new approved minerals are published:

https://ejm.copernicus.org/

So I am not able to verify that Changesite-(Y) was indeed approved by IMA-CNMNC.

Maybe I missed something, perhaps a peer review article showing it is indeed a new and valid mineral species was published in an obscure Chinese language journal or there's an article in press and China has jumped the gun in announcing its approval?

-Diamonddavej (talk) 03:19, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Formula dubious

I'm tempted to blank the formula that's been presented in the lede. 1/ It does not appear in any of the Chinese or English language announcements regarding the mineral, or in any publication of any kind that I can find. 2/ It's not a properly formatted formula. I'm not expecting to see ion charges within a stable mineral compound formula. 3/ It appears stoichiometrically dubious. Yttrium is almost always trivalent, and I'm not expecting it to replace sodium.

Anyone got any hints about where it came from?

Ordinary Person (talk) 13:38, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The following webpage is the original news release, there is no formula given. The unit cell structure of Changesite-(Y) is shown (software used is Vesta), might be possible to guess what elements are present. The SEM image shows Changesite-(Y) occurs as tiny inclusions within olivine, along with feldspar, cristobalite and baddeleyite. --Diamonddavej (talk) 16:06, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The chemical formula was added to this article on 15 September 2022 by User:Almeo. Perhaps this editor can give a source reference citation? GeoWriter (talk) 21:19, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This source in Chinese (referenced from the CN Wikipedia version of this article) gives the formula: sohu.com. There is also a Reddit page (not that I think it is a serious source, but oh well...) mentioning the formula. By the way the formula in CN Wikipedia was predating my edit. Almeo (talk) 13:02, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 13:02, 29 September 2022 edit Almeo (talk \| contribs) 101 edits No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 13:03, 29 September 2022 edit undo Almeo (talk \| contribs) 101 edits →Formula dubious Next edit →
Line 38:		Line 38:
	::The chemical formula was added to this article on 15 September 2022 by [[User:Almeo]]. Perhaps this editor can give a source reference citation? [[User:GeoWriter\|GeoWriter]] ([[User talk:GeoWriter\|talk]]) 21:19, 27 September 2022 (UTC)		::The chemical formula was added to this article on 15 September 2022 by [[User:Almeo]]. Perhaps this editor can give a source reference citation? [[User:GeoWriter\|GeoWriter]] ([[User talk:GeoWriter\|talk]]) 21:19, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

	:::This source in Chinese (referenced from the CN Wikipedia version of this article) gives the formula: [https://www.sohu.com/a/583616527_162758/?pvid=000115_3w_a sohu.com]. There is also a [https://www.reddit.com/r/space/comments/x9rnr5/changesitey_new_mineral_on_moon_discovered/ Reddit page] (not that I think it is a serious source, but oh well...) mentioning the formula. [[User:Almeo\|Almeo]] ([[User talk:Almeo\|talk]]) 13:02, 29 September 2022 (UTC)		:::This source in Chinese (referenced from the CN Wikipedia version of this article) gives the formula: [https://www.sohu.com/a/583616527_162758/?pvid=000115_3w_a sohu.com]. There is also a [https://www.reddit.com/r/space/comments/x9rnr5/changesitey_new_mineral_on_moon_discovered/ Reddit page] (not that I think it is a serious source, but oh well...) mentioning the formula. By the way the formula in CN Wikipedia was predating my edit. [[User:Almeo\|Almeo]] ([[User talk:Almeo\|talk]]) 13:02, 29 September 2022 (UTC)