Jump to content

Talk:Cotswold Line: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Wolvercot Junction or Wolvercote Junction?
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{TrainsWikiProject}}
In common with many articles with the suffix '''Line''' this article seems to think that it is synonymous with '''railway'''. The term Line is one used by the railway marketing people to sell the services running over particular routes. The railway lines (NB small 'l'!) over which the present-day Cotswold Line trains run were: Oxford-Worcester, part of the ''Oxford, Worcester and Wolverhampton Railway'' (first Act of Parliament 1845); which took over the (''Worcester and Hereford Railway'', to become the ''West Midlands Railway'' in 1860). Latter amalgamated with the GWR in 1863. [[User:Peter Shearan|Peter Shearan]] 08:54, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
In common with many articles with the suffix '''Line''' this article seems to think that it is synonymous with '''railway'''. The term Line is one used by the railway marketing people to sell the services running over particular routes. The railway lines (NB small 'l'!) over which the present-day Cotswold Line trains run were: Oxford-Worcester, part of the ''Oxford, Worcester and Wolverhampton Railway'' (first Act of Parliament 1845); which took over the (''Worcester and Hereford Railway'', to become the ''West Midlands Railway'' in 1860). Latter amalgamated with the GWR in 1863. [[User:Peter Shearan|Peter Shearan]] 08:54, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
: ''Mea culpa''! The first part of my comment above still holds good, but I hadn't read lower down the article which shows exactly what I have said above. Nevertheless, I have amended very slightly the opening statement: it isn't a railway! [[User:Peter Shearan|Peter Shearan]] 09:00, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
: ''Mea culpa''! The first part of my comment above still holds good, but I hadn't read lower down the article which shows exactly what I have said above. Nevertheless, I have amended very slightly the opening statement: it isn't a railway! [[User:Peter Shearan|Peter Shearan]] 09:00, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:09, 27 February 2007

WikiProject iconTrains Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

In common with many articles with the suffix Line this article seems to think that it is synonymous with railway. The term Line is one used by the railway marketing people to sell the services running over particular routes. The railway lines (NB small 'l'!) over which the present-day Cotswold Line trains run were: Oxford-Worcester, part of the Oxford, Worcester and Wolverhampton Railway (first Act of Parliament 1845); which took over the (Worcester and Hereford Railway, to become the West Midlands Railway in 1860). Latter amalgamated with the GWR in 1863. Peter Shearan 08:54, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Mea culpa! The first part of my comment above still holds good, but I hadn't read lower down the article which shows exactly what I have said above. Nevertheless, I have amended very slightly the opening statement: it isn't a railway! Peter Shearan 09:00, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Wolvercot Junction or Wolvercote Junction

Wolvercot seems to be the traditional railway spelling and it is still in use as in the SRA Strategic Plan 2003 (pdf). --Cavrdg 2 July 2005 21:23 (UTC)