Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Zhomron: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Declining checkuser, comment (using spihelper.js) |
ce |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== |
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== |
||
*CU {{Decline-IP}} |
*CU {{Decline-IP}} The case will have to be decided based on behaviour. Thanks, [[User:Spicy|Spicy]] ([[User talk:Spicy|talk]]) 14:48, 29 September 2022 (UTC) |
||
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
||
Revision as of 14:49, 29 September 2022
Zhomron
Zhomron (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed
For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Zhomron/Archive.
29 September 2022
– An SPI clerk has declined a request for CheckUser, and the case is now awaiting a behavioural investigation.
Suspected sockpuppets
Same topic area; motive exists to evade WP:3RR on Temple in Jerusalem dispute; condescending tone in edit summaries and talk pages; 7-article overlap after 18 edits by IP. Elizium23 (talk) 04:31, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- I can't help but notice an affinity with User:GPinkerton so perhaps this bears a CheckUser after all. Elizium23 (talk) 04:52, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
Comments by other users
- Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- CU
Check declined – Checkusers will not link accounts to IPs, per the privacy policy. The case will have to be decided based on behaviour. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 14:48, 29 September 2022 (UTC)