Talk:Brandenburgers: Difference between revisions
War Crimes? |
|||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
What about the darker sides of the Brandenburgers?--[[User:134.76.10.66|134.76.10.66]] 14:16, 27 February 2007 (UTC) |
What about the darker sides of the Brandenburgers?--[[User:134.76.10.66|134.76.10.66]] 14:16, 27 February 2007 (UTC) |
||
:Operating in enemy uniforms is a war crime!, but if you mean massacres of villages, etc, find evidence and we shall gladly put it on the article [[User:Valentinejoesmith|V. Joe]] 14:46, 27 February 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:46, 27 February 2007
Military history Start‑class | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brandenburger_Regiment
text used as a basis for this article. may be a copyright prob with this. looks like it's been lifted straight from the site noted on the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brandenburgers page.
- understood... it now appears that the copyvio site cited was using a hidden mirrior of the other wiki article. So there's no copyvio problem with this page. Feco 05:19, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
How is this page different from Brandenburger_Regiment... are they the same organization? Feco 05:19, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The Brandenburg Regiment was only one manifestation of this unit. During the course of the war, it went from Company to Division. I guess. The Brandenburg Regiment was only an entity between 1941-1942. The Brandenburgers encompass this formation, but also the overall formation. (kind of like saying 'US Rangers' instead of '75th Ranger Battalion')AnsbachDragoner
- understood... can you take some time to clarify that in the two related articles? Maybe put some links between the two at the top of each. I couldn't tell that there was a difference between the two articles (at the time of my original comment). Feco
You'll want to be sure to include a link to this article on the Brandenburg (disambiguation) page. Moncrief 06:48, Apr 11, 2005 (UTC)
will do and will do. Ansbachdragoner
question regarding section "Operation Barbarossa - Ostfront"
somthing's fishy with the example about the fall of Maikop, it's reported here that it fell the 9th of august 1941 which is completely wrong (it actually happend in late 1942). The germans were nowhere near maikop in 1941. Maybe the dates are wrong? Yet since the information in the example is not correct I that it should either be corrected or removed. andreas_td 14:14. Mars 1, 2006 (UTC+2) Dates were completely wrong. This Folkersalm's raid occured in October 1942. This has been corrected.--ansbachdragoner 23:36, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
Abwehr II.
Hello, I have made some articles about Operations to Ireland that involved Bandenburgers. You can find them all listed at IRA Abwehr WW2. Fluffy999 16:50, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
Brandenburgers sounds stupid, because the noun brandenburger is also used in the pluraral form (der Brandenburger-singular)(die Brandenburger-plural), the usual name in germany is "Die Brandenburger"(comment of a german user--84.189.11.35 12:55, 5 February 2007 (UTC))
War Crimes?
What about the darker sides of the Brandenburgers?--134.76.10.66 14:16, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- Operating in enemy uniforms is a war crime!, but if you mean massacres of villages, etc, find evidence and we shall gladly put it on the article V. Joe 14:46, 27 February 2007 (UTC)