User talk:King of Arrogance2001: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
moves |
Reply |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:I'm sorry then, i shall revert my changes and refrain from further actions. [[User:King of Arrogance2001|King of Arrogance2001]] ([[User talk:King of Arrogance2001#top|talk]]) 17:50, 30 September 2022 (UTC) |
:I'm sorry then, i shall revert my changes and refrain from further actions. [[User:King of Arrogance2001|King of Arrogance2001]] ([[User talk:King of Arrogance2001#top|talk]]) 17:50, 30 September 2022 (UTC) |
||
::Also, in case you swing into action on this again in January, there is no such thing as ''Count of Denmark''. Best wishes, --[[User:SergeWoodzing|SergeWoodzing]] ([[User talk:SergeWoodzing|talk]]) 15:09, 1 October 2022 (UTC) |
::Also, in case you swing into action on this again in January, there is no such thing as ''Count of Denmark''. Best wishes, --[[User:SergeWoodzing|SergeWoodzing]] ([[User talk:SergeWoodzing|talk]]) 15:09, 1 October 2022 (UTC) |
||
:::Yes, i'm quite sorry about that, but i accually have few questions now that we are on the subject? How shall we title the four royals, once they lose there Princely statues? And will they still be considered as part of the Danish Royal family? [[User:King of Arrogance2001|King of Arrogance2001]] ([[User talk:King of Arrogance2001#top|talk]]) 15:22, 1 October 2022 (UTC) |
|||
==October 2022== |
==October 2022== |
||
Moving articles (changing their names) should never - never - be done without discussion on the talk pages of those articles, unless a change is obviously uncontroversial and would be of no interest for anyone to discuss. We do not move articles based solely on our personal opinions, without giving other Wikpedians a chance to discuss the moves '''first'''. A main guideline for article names is that a name should be very well known in reliable sources. --[[User:SergeWoodzing|SergeWoodzing]] ([[User talk:SergeWoodzing|talk]]) 15:17, 1 October 2022 (UTC) |
Moving articles (changing their names) should never - never - be done without discussion on the talk pages of those articles, unless a change is obviously uncontroversial and would be of no interest for anyone to discuss. We do not move articles based solely on our personal opinions, without giving other Wikpedians a chance to discuss the moves '''first'''. A main guideline for article names is that a name should be very well known in reliable sources. --[[User:SergeWoodzing|SergeWoodzing]] ([[User talk:SergeWoodzing|talk]]) 15:17, 1 October 2022 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 15:22, 1 October 2022
Danish titles
Hi. The decision to strip Joachim's children of their titles takes effect in 2023. Your edits are premature. Surtsicna (talk) 17:48, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
- I'm sorry then, i shall revert my changes and refrain from further actions. King of Arrogance2001 (talk) 17:50, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
- Also, in case you swing into action on this again in January, there is no such thing as Count of Denmark. Best wishes, --SergeWoodzing (talk) 15:09, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, i'm quite sorry about that, but i accually have few questions now that we are on the subject? How shall we title the four royals, once they lose there Princely statues? And will they still be considered as part of the Danish Royal family? King of Arrogance2001 (talk) 15:22, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
- Also, in case you swing into action on this again in January, there is no such thing as Count of Denmark. Best wishes, --SergeWoodzing (talk) 15:09, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
October 2022
Moving articles (changing their names) should never - never - be done without discussion on the talk pages of those articles, unless a change is obviously uncontroversial and would be of no interest for anyone to discuss. We do not move articles based solely on our personal opinions, without giving other Wikpedians a chance to discuss the moves first. A main guideline for article names is that a name should be very well known in reliable sources. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 15:17, 1 October 2022 (UTC)