Talk:George Michael: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 00:41, 4 October 2022

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the George Michael article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2: 12 months

George Michael was a Music good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 27, 2018	Good article nominee	Not listed

A news item involving this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on December 26, 2016.

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Biography: Musicians B‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as High-importance).

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

LGBTQ+ studies: Person B‑class

	LGBTQ portal This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by the LGBTQ+ Person task force.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Western Asia: Cyprus B‑class High‑importance

	Asia portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Western Asia, which collaborates on articles related to Western Asia. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Western AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Western AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Western AsiaWestern Asia
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Cyprus portal This article is supported by WikiProject Cyprus (assessed as High-importance).

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

London B‑class Mid‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Pop music B‑class Mid‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

R&B and Soul Music B‑class Mid‑importance

	R&B and Soul Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Template:Vital article

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 4 times. The weeks in which this happened:

There is a request, submitted by Lionsdude148, for an audio version of this article to be created. For further information, see WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia.

The rationale behind the request is: "Important".

Iraq War

Current text: "in particular the relationship between Tony Blair and George W. Bush, with their involvement in the Iraq War"

The Iraq War did not start until 2003, whereas "Shoot the Dog" was released in July 2002. This should therefore probably say something like "... and Bush, with their sabre-rattling in the direction of Iraq" (which was indeed going on in the summer of 2002), but I'm not sure how to word that. STeamTraen (talk) 17:20, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The answer to the Yog question…

The nickname Yog came from Andrew Ridgeley’s inability to pronounce George’s real name Georgious, Which when pronounced in Greek by his family members sounds like it starts with an English Y sound eg: Yorgious , which Ridgeley stated sounded like yogurt thus the nickname Yog was invented. At the height of whams fame (or just before) some of George’s best friends clubbed together to buy him a gold wedding-type ring which had the name YOG inscribed on it in bold letters. 2A02:C7D:89A6:7100:D583:30E7:7ED5:9BCB (talk) 20:55, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Birthtime of George Michael and his deathtime

George Michael was born at 6:00 AM (05:00 GMT) on Tuesday, 25 June 1963, and died at 13:42 GMT on Sunday, a Christmas Day of 2016. Birthtimes and deathtimes are important because the difference of timezones. The standard timezone of Wikipedia is GMT, not including DST. 177.138.16.179 (talk) 10:24, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We don't usually note times of birth or death. We generally just use the day for the time zone of birth? He was born and also died in England. What possible confusion could arise? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 11:13, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:TIMEZONE indicates that we date events using the timezone where it took place. In the profoundly rare situation where someone had reason to calculate the date somewhere else in the world, they can research it elsewhere; that's not what Wikipedia is here for. Jason A. Quest (talk) 19:29, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

China

The first rock group to visit China was not Wham! It was the Moody Blues in 1972. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Braggbrat (talk • contribs) 14:18, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Braggbrat. I wonder do you have a source for that, as it does not appear at The Moody Blues? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 15:18, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note that this 2012 Q&A session with Justin Hayward says this:

"Can you give us the final definitive word on what happened re: the gig to have been played in China in 1974? (there have been a few conflicting stories)

"As I remember (and there will be different memories from each of the band members), the promoters just didn’t come up with a contract or a guarantee of work visas. Both of which were essential. It wasn’t our idea to go, we were invited to play there. It was a project that we all got excited about – it just didn’t happen."

Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 09:10, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Picture

Hi fellow wikipedia enjoyers,

I'm not entirely sure of the process of this, but I see that the main picture for this article has been updated to a more recent one, instead of the ''Michael onstage during The Faith Tour in 1988'' one that was there for a long time. I much prefer the old picture as I think it shows him in his heyday, and I would vouch for that one to come back instead of this newer picture. Is there any sort of voting that goes on or official way I could express this?

Thanks a lot,

Romeowth (talk) 16:37, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. The old picture captured him in his prime. That’s how I want to remember George Michael. Kylemanzo (talk) 23:05, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 25: / Line 25: @@
 |minthreadsleft = 4
 }}
-==Edits==
-Made a bunch of edits. Did not give edit summaries for most of them--my fault. They were reverted (see https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=George_Michael&diff=1046961959&oldid=1046940303). I'd like to reinstate. Reasons for edits: Article is too long and detailed; there are some sources that aren't good; there is some repetition. [[Special:Contributions/74.67.6.88|74.67.6.88]] ([[User talk:74.67.6.88|talk]]) 00:40, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
-:No discussion, so I reinstated. [[Special:Contributions/74.67.6.88|74.67.6.88]] ([[User talk:74.67.6.88|talk]]) 21:48, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
-::You gave 45 hours? It's rather unfortunate that your changes, which have removed over 5Kbytes, are without any explanation, apart from "Article is too long and detailed; there are some sources that aren't good; there is some repetition." Doing them each one by one, with an edit summary, at least allows some discussion and partial revert, if necessary. [[User:Martinevans123|Martinevans123]] ([[User talk:Martinevans123|talk]]) 22:48, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
-:::You can’t just make “a bunch of edits” (removing over 5k worth) without any consensus. Having looked at the material in question there is a great deal of worthwhile information that is also reliably sourced, thus no justification to remove. [[User:PT Canavan|PT Canavan]] ([[User talk:PT Canavan|talk]]) 00:05, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
-::::I tend to agree. I think the text should be restored and those aspects which may be directly covered by policy guidelines addressed first. [[User:Martinevans123|Martinevans123]] ([[User talk:Martinevans123|talk]]) 10:07, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
-:::::OK. With the exception of some trivia about an unemployed van driver, I just restored all sources that were removed in my series of edits & the text that went with them. I reinstated my removal of unsourced material and my copyedits. Is everyone OK w/that? I wasn't trying to start trouble--just thought the article was way too long & unwieldy. [[Special:Contributions/74.67.6.88|74.67.6.88]] ([[User talk:74.67.6.88|talk]]) 01:22, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
 == Iraq War ==