Jump to content

Talk:Nuclear weapon: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:Nuclear weapon/Archive 5) (bot
Line 61: Line 61:
}}
}}


==Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment==
[[File:Sciences humaines.svg|40px]] This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between <span class="mw-formatted-date" title="2019-08-28">28 August 2019</span> and <span class="mw-formatted-date" title="2019-12-18">18 December 2019</span>. Further details are available [[Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/Rowan_College_at_Burlington_County/Society,_Ethics,_and_Technology_on_Campus_Section_(Fall_2019)|on the course page]]. Student editor(s): [[User:Jleavitt07|Jleavitt07]].

{{small|Above undated message substituted from [[Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment]] by [[User:PrimeBOT|PrimeBOT]] ([[User talk:PrimeBOT|talk]]) 05:28, 17 January 2022 (UTC)}}
==Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Policy Analysis==
==Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Policy Analysis==
{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/UCSD/Introduction_to_Policy_Analysis_(Spring) | assignments = [[User:Lesotelo1218|Lesotelo1218]] | start_date = 2022-03-28 | end_date = 2022-05-30 }}
{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/UCSD/Introduction_to_Policy_Analysis_(Spring) | assignments = [[User:Lesotelo1218|Lesotelo1218]] | start_date = 2022-03-28 | end_date = 2022-05-30 }}

== SI units ==

It would be good if at least some of the energies quoted were in joules. [[Special:Contributions/86.129.195.92|86.129.195.92]] ([[User talk:86.129.195.92|talk]]) 22:40, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

:Almost all energies in this article are already followed by conversions to J, GJ, TJ or PJ. [[User:Fbergo|Fbergo]] ([[User talk:Fbergo|talk]]) 00:10, 1 June 2022 (UTC)


==Wiki Education assignment: War and the Environment==
==Wiki Education assignment: War and the Environment==

Revision as of 00:06, 9 October 2022

Template:Vital article

Former featured articleNuclear weapon is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on March 13, 2004.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 19, 2004Refreshing brilliant proseKept
May 26, 2005Featured article reviewKept
April 29, 2006Featured topic candidateNot promoted
May 2, 2007Featured article reviewDemoted
July 15, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed
June 13, 2017Peer reviewReviewed
Current status: Former featured article


Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Policy Analysis

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 28 March 2022 and 30 May 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Lesotelo1218 (article contribs).

Wiki Education assignment: War and the Environment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 4 May 2022 and 6 August 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): JKendraB (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Jmack2214.

— Assignment last updated by Karanaconda (talk) 18:37, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

German

Put IT in German 195.8.226.76 (talk) 18:14, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please see de:Kernwaffe. VQuakr (talk) 18:16, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed change for clarity

Currently, the text includes,

most of these are for non-strategic (decisively war-winning) purposes

As there is ambiguity whether the parenthetical definition applies to "strategic" or "non-strategic", I would change this to state,

most of these are not for strategic (decisively war-winning) purposes

If I have misunderstood the difference between strategic and tactical, then swap out those terms. In any case, the revised sentence seems less ambiguous than the original. 194.25.174.98 (talk) 07:23, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extinction

The new section on effects of nuclear war gives far too much weight to the unlikely prospect of human extinction. Nuclear war could have a range of effects, from highly localized to widespread catastrophe. Focusing on the most implausible extreme is both biased and undermines the credibility of the section. NPguy (talk) 19:00, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's two sentences, which appear to be backed up with sources. Do you have sources for the implausibility of human extinction? John (talk) 19:07, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This was the first thing that came up: Nuclear war is unlikely to cause human extinction. NPguy (talk) 20:05, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]